GREEN BUILDINGS for developing countries from code to voluntary - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GREEN BUILDINGS

for developing countries from code to voluntary systems www.edgebuildings.com

World Bank Group – Climate

_______

EDGE is an innovation of IFC, a member of the World Bank Group.

IFC’s EDGE Offers a Programmatic Solution

3

Government regulations Supporting new financial products EDGE certification system Investing in buildings & technologies

A four-pronged approach to incentivize market adoption of green building practices

EDG DGE of

• ffers a dynamic effort to
• tr

transform th the e market by drawin ing tog

• gether government, devel

elopers, banks, professionals, and occ

• ccupants.

Developers use EDGE to differentiate Banks target GB market with new products Owners recognize operating benefits Governments offer incentives and enable alignment of EE code

4

• Built

ilt envi vironment: buildings structures excluding infrastructure (roads, power plants, water sanitation, etc.)

• Ri

Risks: : Natural hazards risks (seismic, weather-related, etc.) and chronic risks (fires, structural collapse)

• Firs

First lin line of

• f pro

rotective defense ag again inst nat atural l haz azards: In cities, we spend 95% of

• ur lives inside or around buildings

A new program for the built environment

Addis Ababa, 2016

Chronic Building Failure Acute Disaster or Concentrated Risk

The benefits of effective building regulation

PUBLIC HEALTH RESOURCE EFFICIENCY PROPERTY VALUE & MUNICIPAL FINANCE ACCESSIBILITY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

Chronic Building Failure Acute Disaster or Concentrated Risk

The benefits of effective building regulation

PUBLIC HEALTH RESOURCE EFFICIENCY PROPERTY VALUE & MUNICIPAL FINANCE ACCESSIBILITY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES

The necessary support environment

8

ADDRESSING THE LARGE PERFORMANCE ‘GAP’ IN EMERGING MARKETS? _______ CODES:

• SIMPLE
• ACTIONABLE
• BUSINESS-FOCUSED
• INSPECTABLE

9

IFC’s GB Code Experience

• 1. Indonesia

Green Building Code

National Jakarta Bandung* Makassar* Surabaya*

• 2. Vietnam

Energy Efficiency Code

• 5. Philippines

National Mandaluyong

• 4. Colombia
• 6. Peru* & Costa Rica*
• 3. Bangladesh*

Green Building Code * In development/ waiting approval About

10 Million m2 of

new building space has complied with these codes

• 7. Mongolia, Cambodia & Myanmar

In early planning stage

10

Phases in GB Code Development

• 2. Code Development
• 3. Code Enforcement
• 4. What Next?
• 1. Before the Code

What kind of research & preparations is needed before starting code development? How can the codes more impactful, simple and contextual? How can high compliance be ensured, without burdening enforcement staff and developers? How can we learn from the process and results to improve the current and future developments?

11

• 1. Before the Code

1.1. Criteria for Country Selection

Other Factors:

• High construction growth
• Government interest and

policy alignment

• Lack of existing regulation

Some countries with “low cost but high carbon grid” were still selected because energy is heavily subsidized there and the “real cost of energy” is fairly high

12

• 1. Before the Code

1.2. Long Term Roadmap

Current State

Phased Plan

Vision for Future

What initiatives/ enabling regulations/ related policies are already in place? What are the gaps between current state and desired vision? Who else is championing this in the country? Based on government’s targets on

• sustainability
• energy/ resource sustainability
• climate change

Timeline with specific intermediate targets. Also identifying teams/ champions

Net Zero Energy? Net Carbon? Renewable energy? Reduced groundwater use? CO2 emission targets?

Building Codes Energy Conservation Laws Appliance efficiency standards

13

• 1. Before the Code

1.2. Long Term Roadmap- example from Jakarta

CO2 Emissions

30%

Water

30%

Energy

30%

= 3.8 GWH = 3.37

• Mill. ton CO2e

= 2.400

• Bill. liter

2030 Grand Design

for entire Jakarta building stock

Reduction targets vs Business as Usual

14

Policy and Regulation

SKPD Penanggung Jawab

Pengarusutamaan BGH pada RPJMD 2017, 2020, 2025 dan 2030 Bappeda Pengembangan Pergub 38 dan Pembaharuannya DPK Pengembangan Skema Pembiayaan BGH oleh Institusi Keuangan DPK Pengembangan Skema Insentif dan Disinsentif DPK Pengembangan Standar Kompetensi Pemeriksaan BGH Eksisitng DPK

Tahun

Uraian Kegiatan

Perangkat Penerapan untuk Implementasi Pemenuhan Persyaratan BGH BPTSP Sinergi Prosedur Perizinan dan Kelaikan Fungsi BPTSP, DPK, BPLHD, DPE, Tata A Aplikasi Teknologi Informasi Pada Tahap Pemanfaatan BPTSP Percontohan BGH DPGP Pemantauan pada Percontohan BGH DPK, BPLHD, DPE, Tata Air

Implementation

2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030

Penilaian Berkala atas Implementasi BGH (Policy Assessment DPK Pelaporan Pencapaian BPTSP

Monitoring and Evaluation Stakeholder Engagement

Peningkatan Kualitas Aparat Pemda

• a. Pelatihan Aparat terkait BGH dan Pemeriksaan Bangunan

Badan Diklat

• b. Lokakrya tentang BGH

Badan Diklat Peningkatan Kualitas Penyedia Jasa

• a. Penyusunan Database IPTB Non RT secara elektronik

DPK

• b. Pelatihan dan Pelaksanaan Pembaharuan IPTB Non RT

DPK Keterlibatan Pemangku Kepentingan Lainnya dalam Pengemb. Kapasitas Biro KDH KLN, Biro Tapem

Capacity Development

Peningkatan Partispasi Publik

• a. Kampanye Publik

Diskominfomas

• b. Pengarusutamaan pada Generasi Muda

Dians Pendidikan

• c. Pelibatan Masyarakat dalam Pengawasan

DPK Pengembangan Jejaring

• a. Forum lintas pemangku kepentingan

Biro KDH KLN

• b. Keterkaitan dengan Akademisi dan Profesional

Biro KDH KLN, Biro Tapem

• c. Keterkaitan dengan Pemerintah Pusat (K/L) dan Pemerintah Daerah

Biro Tapem

Knowledge Management

Penyebarluasan Informasi BGH

• a. Website BGH Resmi DKI Jakarta

Diskominfomas

• b. Pusat informasi Penerapan Teknologi BGH

DPK Scaling UP

• a. Kolaborasi lintas program (Kampung Ilim, Kawasan Hijau, Hunian Hijau, Kota Hijau)

DPK, BPLHD

• b. Partispasi Aktif pada acara-acara regional/internasional

Biro KDH KLN

JAKARTA GRAND DESIGN- PHASING TILL 2030

15

Phases in GB Code Development

• 2. Code Development

2.1. Stakeholder engagement

Identification of Gaps and Challenges Discussion of Best Practices from Other countries Share government ambitions and targets

Awareness----

• What is the benefit of building green?
• How to design GB efficiently?
• Low consumer demand for GB

Capacity----

• Lack of enforcement capacity in

government

• Low skill level among professionals

(architects/ engineers, developers) Funding---

• Lack of funding mechanisms or

incentives

• High cost of GB (real or perceived)

16

Phases in GB Code Development

• 2. Code Development

2.2. Type of Code

PRESCRIPTIVE PERFORMANCE CAP BASED

1. Based on specific building elements 2. Defining the performance

• f each element

3. Simpler to use 4. Less room to maneuver 1. Defining the performance of entire building against specific baseline. 2. Requires higher skills at design and inspection stage 3. Higher flexibility 1. Defining the performance

• f entire building against

specific use. 2. Requires higher skills at design and inspection side 3. Higher flexibility

COMBINED

1. A combination of the methods

Preferred approach for

developing countries

Preferred approach for

developing countries

17

Phases in GB Code Development

• 2. Code Development

2.3. Data Collection & Analysis Building Survey Existing Local standards Local Weather data Calibrated computer simulation models

Typical Specifications Operational behavior Utility costs

Local utility tariffs Local construction costs

Sensitivity analysis measures

18

Phases in GB Code Development

• 2. Code Development

2.3. Data Collection & Analysis

19

Baseline Max & Min Sensitivity Analysis

Energy saving more than 1% Exclu lude de Yes

Payback less than 5 Years?

No No

Is it a easy measure to achieve?

Exclu lude de

No No No No

Yes

Technically feasible?

Yes

No No

Exclu lude de Yes

Include in the Code Typical Criteria for Selecting Code Measures

What is the cost impact? Payback assessment for offices

Green Building Measure

%Saving Cost increase Payback period Action

• Window to wall ratio

8.0% Negative Include

• Solar Shading Devices

17.3% 7.2% 25.0 Consider

• Reflectivity - Wall

0.5% 0.0% 4.8 Include

• Thermal Conductance (Wall U-Value)

0.3% 0.5% 98.6 Exclude

• Reflectivity – Roof

0.2% Negligible

• Include
• Thermal Conductance – (Roof U-value)

0.1% 0.0% 18.1 Consider

• Glazing Assembly Properties (U-value, SHGC, VLT)

7.3% 0.1% 0.9 Include

• COP of air conditioning equipment

11.4% 1% 5.4 Include

• Variable Speed Drives for cooling towers

9% 0% Include

• Heat recovery on extract air

2% Cost awaiting 26.2 Consider

• Solar collectors for Hot water

NA NA

• Exclude
• Photo electric control perimeter lighting

18% 2% 7.4 Include

• Exterior lighting controls

NA NA

• Exclude
• Low energy lighting [CFL, T5, LEDs etc]

7% 0.12% 1.0 Include

• Electronic Ballast

2% Negligible 0.0 Include

• Sub-metering benefits

3% NA NA Consider

• Water efficient fittings

40% 0.35% 6.0 Include

• Rainwater harvesting

15% Cost awaiting 26.2 Consider

• Recycling onsite Sewage T plant

67% Cost awaiting 7.4 Consider

• Water metering

NA Negligible NA Include

• Storm water attenuation and ground water recharge

NA Minimal impact NA Include

The energy saving potential of each measure has been correlated with the cost impact and therefor the simple payback.

High Impact Measures

Office Retail Hotel Hospital Apartment School Photoelectric controls [inclusion of controls to maximize

daylighting] 5% NA NA NA NA 6% Solar Shading [addition of horizontal and vertical external shading] 5% 5% 10% 9% 5% 2% Glass performance [higher solar and thermal properties] 7% 3% 9% 8% 7% 4% Efficient Chillers [higher chiller COP]

11% 8% 6% 7% 9% 12% Variable speed drives [inclusion of variable drives on pumps] 9% 3% 3% 5% 0.0% 0.0% Percentage glazing

[limiting window to wall ratio of façade] 8% 4% 9% 7% 2% 0.0% Low energy Lights [limiting the power density for lighting] 7% 8% 7% 16% 6% 5% Thermostat Mgmt [limiting the min temperature] 2% 3% 3% 7% 6% 11%

Heat Recovery

[adding heat recovery to fresh air inlet] 2% 5% 3% 8% NA NA * Note: the above values must not be aggregated as they only reflect the potential of making each individual measure. The total energy savings potential will be smaller than the sum of individual measure

What measures make immediate sense in Jakarta?

Sensitivity analysis of energy efficiency option for Jakarta shows that energy savings of more than 30-40% can be achieved from simple measures

Implementation Matrix Summary

OFFICES

• CONST. COST

5% up

ENERGY USE

25% down

RETAIL

• CONST. COST

2% up

ENERGY USE

15% down

HOTELS

• CONST. COST

3% up

ENERGY USE

30% down

HOSPITALS

• CONST. COST

3% up

ENERGY USE

30% down

APARTMENTS

• CONST. COST

2% up

ENERGY USE

15% down

SCHOOLS

• CONST. COST

3% up

ENERGY USE

15% down

With an overall cost increase of 3% energy saving of more than 20% can be achieved across all new buildings in Jakarta

23

Phases in GB Code Development

• 2. Code Development

2.4. Code Recommendations

Code Recommendations Integration with permitting process Legal process

• Very specific technical requirements
• Referring to existing standards, where appropriate
• Documentation requirements clearly mentioned

Legal language of the code may sometime need to be simplified in a separate user guide Complying of code is a prerequisite for getting construction/

• ccupancy permit

24

Phases in GB Code Development

• 3. Code Enforcement

3.1. Training

Over 2000 code officials already trained in last two years

What are green buildings? What are the technical code requirements? How to check the requirements?

25

Phases in GB Code Development

• 3. Code Enforcement

3.2. User Guides & Calculators

Technical details Examples Best practices Documentation reqmts

Calculators to simplify compliance calculations

26

Phases in GB Code Development

• 3. Code Enforcement

3.3. Pilot Projects

FPT Office in Da Nang La Thanh Hotel in Ha Noi Ehome in Ho Chi Minh city

• Special technical advice provided to pilot

project owners & design team

• Project documented for sharing

Citra Towers Kemayoran, Jakarta

27

Phases in GB Code Development

• 3. Code Enforcement

3.4. Evaluation and Compliance System

ANALOG SEMI-DIGITAL/ HYBRID

• Paper- based checklists
• Slow & tedious
• Difficult to record data
• Low tech and inexpensive
• Web compliance forms OR Downloadable Excel

based checklists

• Same checklists used by developers and evaluators
• Uploading of checklists with optional automatic

data extraction by IT system. Documents provided

• Checklists include calculators
• Documents maybe submitted digitally in CD/ USB
• Evaluation status updated manually online

CLOUD BASED

• Completely cloud based

system

• Upload of forms/ documents
• Additional guidance provided
• nline
• Evaluation status can be

checked online

Hindered by low internet speeds Current approach for some countries

 Current approach for most countries

Preferred future approach

28

Checklists mapped on to the construction permitting process

29

Jakarta GB Code Web Portal

Vietnam Code Web Portal Colombia Web Portal www.greenbuilding.jakarta.go.id

greenbuilding.distarcip.bandung.go.id

Bandung GB Website

30

Phases in GB Code Development

• 3. Code Enforcement

3.5. Incentives and Penalties

31

Phases in GB Code Development

• 3. Code Enforcement

3.6. Raising Awareness

HCMC

Raising awareness through media, training workshops for professionals & academia

32

Phases in GB Code Development

• 4. What Next?

4.1. Monitoring Jakarta GB Code requires regular utility data reporting

P E R F O R M A N C E A S S E S S M E N T

[BUILDING TEST PROJECT123] by [TEST OWNER ABC ]

Collected data will be used to develop benchmarks and flag inefficient buildings

33

Phases in GB Code Development

• 4. What Next?

4.1. Monitoring Bandung GB Portal also has a monitoring dashboard that allows mayor to keep track of all GB applications

34

• Simple to comply and evaluate
• prescriptive OR hybrid code using compliance tool
• performance code to be phased in as the market matures
• Cost effective- low payback measures
• Localized
• based on local weather, available materials and technology, and construction practices
• developed through local stakeholder involvement (professionals, developers, owners etc.)

Supplemented by:

• Awareness building among industry including

training for government staff

• Financial instruments such as green mortgages,

DSM programs

• Supported by Financial and non-financial

Incentives

• Simplified compliance & monitoring mechanisms

IFC Approach for Developing Countries

35

VOLUNTARY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM

36

EDGE IS MOVING GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION TO A MAINSTREAM PRODUCT _______ EDGE:

• SIMPLE
• AFFORDABLE
• BUSINESS-FOCUSED
• FIT FOR FUNCTION

37

WHAT GREEN IDEAS WILL WORK FOR MY PROJECT? AND HOW MUCH WILL THEY COST? _______

38

20%

THE SOLUTION IS EDGE: A SOFTWARE, A STANDARD, AND A GREEN BUILDING CERTIFICATION SYSTEM. _______

ROOF TOP SOLAR PVs COST SAVING $??? ???% COST SAVING $??? ???% WATER COOLED CHILLERS COST SAVING $??? ???% DAYLIGHTING CONTROLS COST SAVING $??? ???% WALL INSULATION COST SAVING $??? ???% EFFICENT GLASS COST SAVING $??? ???% CEILING FANS COST SAVING

$??? ???%

SOLAR HOT WATER COST SAVING $??? ???% NATURAL VENTILATION VENTILATION COST SAVING $??? ???% EXTERNAL SHADING COST SAVING

• $200K

9% LOWER WINDOW AREA EXPOSED SOFITS COST SAVING $??? ???% CAVITY WALLS COST SAVING $??? ???% SOLA COST $?? NATU VEN COST $??

What if you could know what works best, instantly?

40

41

42

Operation Construction Design

Preliminary Certificate EDGE Certificate

Use of EDGE tools for design changes Use of EDGE tools for construction changes

Register

EDGE website

BUILDINGS RECEIVE A PRELIMINARY CERTIFICATE AND A POST-CONSTRUCTION FINAL CERTIFICATE _______

43

IN MOST COUNTRIES, PROJECTS CHOOSE BETWEEN 2 GLOBAL CERTIFYING PARTNERS

Global Office +44 203 473 8758 edge@thinkstep.com

Thinkstep-SGS Consortium Green Business Certification Inc

Global Office +1 202 828 1145 edge@gbci.org

OR A LOCAL PARTNER IN ONE OF THE COUNTRIES WITH LOCAL PARTNERSHIPS _______

See https://www.edgebuildings.com/certify/ for details

44

EDGE IS A FRESH NEW WAY OF CERTIFYING BUILDINGS AND A REAL GAME CHANGER.

45

• TOOL AVAILABLE IN 125 COUNTRIES
• ACTIVE PROGRAMS IN 5 COUNTRIES
• OVER 100 BUILDINGS CERTIFIED
• 822,000 M2 OF FLOOR SPACE
• 5,000 RESIDENTIAL UNITS

46

Confederation of Real Estate Developers Associations of India

JOIN ALL THOSE WHO ARE EMBRACING EDGE IN EMERGING MARKETS

47

EDGE AS A CODE COMPLIANCE TOOL

EDGE can be used as a Hybrid – performance based code compliance tool EDGE can also incorporate minimum prescriptive requirements in its default list If codes are fully enforced in a country, EDGE base case will be same as a code compliance building

Minimum Code

48

HOW CAN EDGE HELP WITH NEW FINANCIAL PRODUCTS?

Reach out to new clients Stronger portfolio Cross sell Sustainability leadership New offer for current clients GREEN BONDS GREEN MORTGAGES GREEN DEVELOPER FINANCE

QUESTIONS? _______

• Dr. Ommid Saberi

Senior Industry Specialist-Green Buildings IFC Climate Business Department

IFC is a member of the World Bank Group

T +1 (202) 458-5260 E osaberi@ifc.org

50

IFC’S FINANCIAL AND ADVISORY TOOLS TO DELIVER GREEN BUILDINGS

IFC present along value chain: market development; support for innovation; leverage client relationships and FI platform