Grant applications: I ncreasing your success rate Marjolein Lauwen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

grant applications i ncreasing your success rate
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Grant applications: I ncreasing your success rate Marjolein Lauwen - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Grant applications: I ncreasing your success rate Marjolein Lauwen (NWO) Jorge Gascon (TUD) Kerstin Blank (RU) 15 October 2013 Nederlandse Organisatie voor W etenschappelijk Onderzoek Before w e start You received some statements


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Nederlandse Organisatie voor W etenschappelijk Onderzoek

Grant applications: I ncreasing your success rate

Marjolein Lauwen (NWO) Jorge Gascon (TUD) Kerstin Blank (RU) 15 October 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Before w e start……

  • You received some statements
  • Think about them
  • We will discuss after the presentations
slide-3
SLIDE 3

NW O-Research funding

  • NWO - Chemical Sciences
  • Grant overview
  • How do I apply successfully?
  • Discussion
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Governing Board

I nstitutes ASTRON Netherlands I nstitute for Radio Astronom y Centrum W iskunde & I nform atica ( CW I ) FOM I nstitute for Subatom ic Physics Nikhef FOM I nstitute AMOLF FOM I nstitute DI FFER ( Dutch I nstitute for Fundam ental Energy

Research)

NI OZ Royal Netherlands I nstitute for Sea Research Netherlands I nstitute for the Study of Crim e and Law Enforcem ent ( NSCR) SRON Netherlands I nstitute for Space Research Science Divisions Earth and Life Sciences ( ALW ) Chem ical Sciences ( CW ) Physical Sciences ( EW ) Hum anities ( GW ) Social Sciences ( MaGW ) Medical Sciences ( m anaged by ZonMw ) Physics ( N – m anaged by FOM Foundation) Technical Sciences ( m anaged by Technology Foundation STW ) W OTRO Science for Global Developm ent Tem porary taskforces Netherlands Genom ics I nitiative ( NGI ) National I nitiative Brain & Cognition ( NI HC)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Talent Grant Overview NW O

8 yr 15 yr Vidi Vici 1 yr Rubicon PhD 3 yr Veni

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Rubicon

  • W ho?

Talented researchers (only NL!), ‘3 out of 5 year’ constraint

  • W hen?
  • Max. 1 year after, but also before doctorate (after approval thesis)
  • W here?

Abroad (1-2 years) at a top institution

  • W hat?

Dependent on country, basis € 58,500 / year (* correction coefficient) + travel expenses + € 230/ month

  • Criteria

Quality of the applicant, the research proposal, the host institute and Knowledge utilisation

  • Next Deadlines

2013: 28 November, 14.59 hrs 2014: 2 April, 3 September, 27 November, 14.59 hrs

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Veni

  • W ho?

Young postdocs, fresh doctors

  • W hen?

0-3 years after doctorate, only two chances!

  • W hat?

€ 250.000 for 3 years CW: ~ 11 grants/ yr NWO: ~ 130 grants/ yr

  • Criteria

quality of the applicant, the research proposal, paragraph on research impact

  • Next Deadline

7 January 2014, 14: 59 hrs

Dr S. Lindhoud Veni 2013, UT - “Complex Coacervates as Novel Molecular Crowding Agents”

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Vidi

  • W ho?

Experienced postdocs, young lecturers, (very young) professors to develop their own innovative line of research

  • W hen?

3-8 years after doctorate, only 2 chances!

  • W hat?

€ 800.000 for 5 years CW: ~ 8 grants/ yr NWO: ~ 90 grants/ yr

  • Criteria

quality of the applicant, the research proposal, paragraph on research impact

  • Next deadline

October 2014

Dr Jorge Gascon Vidi 2012, TUD – “MetMOFCat: Towards Mild Methane Oxidation MOF catalysts”

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Vici

  • W ho?

“senior” researchers to build their own research group: experienced lecturers (UD/ UHD)/ (young) professors

  • W hen?

8-15 years after doctorate

  • W hat?

€ 1.500.000 for 5 years NWO: ~ 30 grants/ yr

  • Criteria

quality of the applicant, the research proposal, paragraph on research impact

  • Next deadline ( pre-proposals)

March 2014

Dr P.E. de Jongh (UU) - Vici 2012, “Stability of Supported Nanoparticles for Sustainable Catalysis”

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Know ledge utilisation

  • W hat

Technological, economic, cultural and societal impact (not academic within own field)

  • Mandatory from 2 0 1 2
  • Judgem ent guidelines in separate docum ent
  • Assessed by review ers and com m ittee
  • 2 0 % of final score by com m ittee
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Stim ulating careers of w om en

NW O CW Athena-prem ium W ho?

Female Veni-laureates from CW who obtain a permanent position (UD)

W hen?

During the Veni-project

W hat?

€ 100.000 for 3 years

NW O Aspasia-prem ium

W ho?

Female Vidi-laureates who become UHD, female Vici-laureates who become Professor, and female Vidi/ Vici applicants with very good marks

W hen?

Within 1 year after obtaining the Vidi- or Vici-grant

W hat?

€ 100.000 (or € 200.000 in case not funded)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Typical evaluation procedure Veni and Vidi (sometimes pre-screening necessary)

Procedure ( 1 )

Evaluation by referees Proposal subm ission Evaluation by com m ittee Rebuttal Decision by board I nterview Ranking Advice division

Phase 1 Phase 2

Preparation Granting ( 1 5 -2 5 % )

  • r

rejection

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Jorge Gascon

Vidi 2012, TUD – “MetMOFCat: Towards Mild Methane Oxidation MOF catalysts”

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Kerstin Blank

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Discussion

  • Have a second look at the statements
  • What do you think, now that you’ve heard the ‘experts’?
slide-16
SLIDE 16

General:

  • When your research is in chemistry or related to chemistry, you

should send your proposal to the Chemical Sciences division. Then you’re sure that your proposal is judged by experts.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Preparing and w riting your proposal:

  • You should apply for a Veni right after your PhD
  • Writing your proposal is something you have to do entirely by

yourself

  • You can always make up something to fill in the knowledge utilization

paragraph

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CV:

  • Including publications submitted to Nature in your CV makes a good

impression

  • With respect to publications, it’s quality that counts and not quantity
  • Working experience abroad is absolutely necessary to get a Veni or

Vidi

  • I don’t have to explain why it took two years to write my thesis,

that’s completely normal

  • Repeatedly mentioning important issues in your proposal, such as

decreased productivity due to maternity leave, is the only way to ensure that the committee notices it

slide-19
SLIDE 19

I nterview :

  • I’m the one who knows what my research is all about, so I don’t

have to prepare for my interview

  • You can never have enough slides in your presentation
  • The CW-committee consists entirely of chemists, so I don’t have to

explain the basics of my research

slide-20
SLIDE 20

More inform ation

W ebsites w w w .nw o.nl/ vi w w w .nw o.nl/ cw w w w .nw o.nl/ subsidiew ijzer Contact the NW O-Chem ical & Physical Sciences office: Rubicon Varsha Kapoerchan v.kapoerchan@nwo.nl Veni Kirsten Ampt k.ampt@nwo.nl Vidi Marjolein Lauwen m.lauwen@nwo.nl Vici Remko Achten r.achten@nwo.nl Athena Varsha Kapoerchan v.kapoerchan@nwo.nl

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Thank you for your attention

Questions ?

m.lauwen@nwo.nl

slide-22
SLIDE 22