Grandville CWP Egg Shaped Anaerobic Digester and Bio-gas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

grandville cwp egg shaped anaerobic digester and bio gas
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Grandville CWP Egg Shaped Anaerobic Digester and Bio-gas - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Grandville CWP Egg Shaped Anaerobic Digester and Bio-gas Cogeneration Presented by : Brian Hannon, P.E., Moore & Bruggink Outline Brief Project Background Why ESD ESD Startup Cogeneration System Energy Management


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Grandville CWP Egg Shaped Anaerobic Digester and Bio-gas Cogeneration

Presented by: Brian Hannon, P.E., Moore & Bruggink

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Outline

  • Brief Project Background
  • Why ESD
  • ESD Startup
  • Cogeneration System
  • Energy Management
  • Current Performance vs. Design
  • Lessons Learned
slide-3
SLIDE 3

City of Grandville Overview

Grandville

Grand Rapids US 196 131

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Customer Community Overview

  • Ottawa County
  • Georgetown
  • Hudsonville
  • Jamestown
  • Jenison
  • Blendon
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Grandville Clean Water Plant

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Grandville Clean Water Plant

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Why Egg Shaped Anaerobic Digester (ESD)?

  • Process
  • Footprint
  • Cost (life cycle)

– Cleaning – Efficiency

  • Client Comfort
  • Ability to go to Class A
slide-9
SLIDE 9

ESD Pipe Gallery

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Anaerobic Digestion

  • Relatively Simple
  • Known

Technology

  • Produces two

beneficial products w/ low energy input

slide-11
SLIDE 11

How the ESD Works:

slide-12
SLIDE 12

How the ESD Works:

slide-13
SLIDE 13

How the ESD Works:

slide-14
SLIDE 14

How the ESD Works:

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Good Seed Sludge starts the process
  • Complete Control
  • Process Allowed to Acclimatize
  • No loss of Bio-Mass
  • Steady State Operation Quickly
  • Alkalinity Builds Quickly
  • Temperature Control

Micro-Digestion Style Startup

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Complete Mixing = Better Digestion = More Biogas!

(and no periodic cleaning!)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Grandville’s Biogas Components

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Why Biogas Cleaning?

  • Biogas Impurities

– Moisture – H2S – Siloxanes

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Siloxane Damage to Boiler

Silica Layer ½” to 1” Thick Pitting of Boiler Tubes

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Siloxane Damaged Valve

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Cogeneration System

  • Dual Fuel (bio-gas and natural

gas)

  • 280 kW using Bio-gas,
  • 360 kW using Nat Gas
  • Internal exchangers to capture

heat from engine cooling jacket and exhaust

  • Efficiency of 86%
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Power

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Heat

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Integrated Energy Management System (IEMS)

  • ESD – Biogas Supply
  • ESD – Heat Demand
  • CHP – Biogas Demand
  • CHP – Heat Supply
  • CHP – Power Supply
  • System – Power Demand
  • Lab/Ops – Heat Demand
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Biogas Production

  • Biogas Quantities

– Currently producing ~120,000 cuft/day – Distribute between cogen, flare, and boiler

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Power & Heat Production

  • 70,000 CF/day Biogas to CHP

– Biogas Energy Content ~ 640 BTU/CF – Average Energy Demand ~ 175 kW

  • ~ $100,000 / year (@ $0.065/kWhr)

– Electrical Efficiency 32%

slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Power & Heat Production

  • 70,000 CF/day Biogas to CHP

– Biogas Energy Content ~ 640 BTU/CF – Average Heat Production: ~ 1.0 MMBTU/hr

  • Other than coldest periods of winter, heat

production exceeds demand

  • Load Dump Radiator eliminates excess heat

– Fuel to Heat Efficiency 54% – Overall Efficiency 86%

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Power & Heat Production

  • (+) Producing sufficient heat to satisfy

demand of ESD and Lab Ops during coldest periods

  • (-) Connected load is frequently not large

enough to use all of the biogas being produced

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Optimization

  • Optimization of ESD Gas Production

– Balancing gas production with feeding times and quantities – Maintaining cleansing velocity in line – Look at potential co-feed feedstocks – Storage

  • Optimization of Power Production

– Not using all the biogas – still flaring – Add loads

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Costs and Payback

  • Elements of Capital Costs for Payback

Analysis

– Gas Cleaning Skid – Cogen Unit – Hot Water Pumps for Cogen – IEMS system – PEX lines to Lab/Ops Total “Additional” Capital = $850,000

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Estimated Savings

  • Projected Energy Savings at Startup

Rates

– $95,000/yr

  • Projected Gas Savings at Startup Rates

– $47,000/yr

  • Projected Payback

– 6 years simple, 7.8 discounted

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Actual Savings

  • Actual Energy Savings

– Approx $98,000/year

  • Actual Gas Savings

– Approx $22,000/year – Nat Gas is ½ price Utility bills have been lowered even with expanded plant! Approximately 25% of plant power is produced with CHP generator.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Where are we at today?

  • Consistently producing between 170-200 kW

power.

  • Providing all heat necessary for digester and

Lab/Ops.

  • Balancing sludge feed rates to optimize gas

production.

  • Balancing heat draw from digester to better

match production from cogen.

  • Reviewing feasibility of another transfer switch.
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Going Forward

  • Dial in Feed Rates
  • Review and

Optimize Load Usage vs. Energy Production

– Consider additional transfer switch

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Going Forward

  • Review Heat Usage
  • vs. Production from

Cogen

– Consider removing tubes from ESD HX

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Lessons Learned

  • Micro-digestion
  • Startup support
  • Power Connection to Turbo-blowers
  • Gas holder cover on old tank
  • 3-way Valve Plug Coating Material vs. Temp
  • Excessive Moisture in Bio-gas
  • Improved primary efficiencies
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Questions?

Brian Hannon, P.E. Moore & Bruggink (616) 363-9801 bhannon@mbce.com Todd Wibright City of Grandville CWP (616) 457-0720 wibrightt@cityofgrandville.com