Graduation, retention, and attrition of UC San Diegos international - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Graduation, retention, and attrition of UC San Diegos international - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Graduation, retention, and attrition of UC San Diegos international undergraduates Barry Fass-Holmes, Ph.D. Analytical Studies Coordinator, International Students & Programs Office Dulce Amor L. Dorado Associate Director, International
Today’s goals
- present findings of two analytical studies on
UC San Diego’s international students
- graduation and retention
- time to completion
- discuss implications
Summary of findings
UC San Diego’s degree-seeking international undergraduates
- retained at higher rates than might be expected
- graduating to a lesser degree than might be preferred
- time-to-completion faster than might be expected
- face obstacles beyond our University’s control
Graduation and retention
graduation—completion of students’ program
- f study
retention–annual progression through their program of study
- key indicators of student success (Kuh, Kinzie,
Buckley, Bridges, & Hayek, 2006; Therriault & Krivoshey, 2014)
- accountability indicators for public universities
(Cook & Pullaro, 2010; Gold & Albert, 2006)
Graduation and retention
“Graduation rates on college campuses have become an important national issue. In 2010 President Obama called for raising the college graduation rate … to 60% by 2020, a 20% increase in just ten years.” UCR Graduation Rate Task Force Report (January 2014)
Graduation and retention
“Jerry Brown urges UC to stress graduating students in 4 years The California governor … recently proposed giving UC and Cal State more money if they boost graduation rates 10% by 2017. May 15, 2013|By Larry Gordon, Los Angeles Times SACRAMENTO — The graduation rates of UC students came under more scrutiny Wednesday as Gov. Jerry Brown urged administrators and faculty to prod more undergraduates to earn a degree in four years, not six.”
http://articles.latimes.com/2013/may/15/local/la-me-uc-regents-20130516
Graduation and retention
Figure 1: Percentage of Four-Year College Students Who Earn a Degree Within Five Years of Entry
41.9 41.9 41.2 42.0 42.3 42.3 42.8 43.7 43.8 44.0 43.4 43.1 42.9 43.1 44.2 44.3 55.5 55.1 55.5 55.9 57.9 57.4 57.8 57.8 57.4 57.6 57.2 57.0 57.0 58.4 57.6 57.5 51.2 50.9 51.0 51.6 52.0 51.8 52.3 52.3 52.5 52.7 52.3 52.0 51.9 52.8 52.6 52.6
40 45 50 55 60
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201 1 2012 2013 2014 2015
Percent Public Institutions Private Institutions All Institutions
Figure 2: Percentage of First-Year Students at Four-Year Colleges Who Return for Second Year
72.1 71.9 71.9 72.6 73.5 72.7 74.0 73.4 70.9 72.9 73.9 73.3 72.2 72.2 72.3 73.1 75.1 74.9 74.9 74.0 75.1 75.3 74.7 73.9 72.9 73.0 72.4 72.8 71.9 71.8 74.4 75.1 74.2 74.1 74.0 73.6 74.5 74.4 74.5 73.7 72.3 73.0 72.9 73.0 72.0 71.9 73.7 74.4
70 72 74 76
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 201 1 2012 2013 2014 2015
Percent Public Institutions Private Institutions All Institutions Source: Compiled from ACT Institutional Data Files
Graduation and retention
Graduation and retention
The committee of two
Graduation and retention
Graduation and retention
International undergradutes
ISPO’s definition
- all I-94 statuses (F-1, J-1, etc)
- exclude domestics
- exclude AM, AP, AS, OT, PR, RF
Campus’ definition
- exclude domestics
International undergraduates
- Table 1. Variables previously shown to affect international undergraduates’ academic achievement in
America
Category Variable Within international undergraduates Acculturation—collectivism, culture shock, etc. Diet Educational—engagement, transfer shock, etc. English fluency—comprehension, reading, writing, etc. Familial—expectations, homesickness, parents’ education, etc. Finances Friendships/relationships Health Housing conditions Psychological—motivation, self-confidence, stress, etc. Satisfaction Study practices Within classrooms American academic integrity standards American teaching methods Instructor authority Teaching assistants Within campus Access to impacted classes Campus climate Discrimination, neo-racism, stereotyping Support programs and services Within community Culture Discrimination (neo-racism) Home stay
International undergraduates
- UC San Diego enrollment
250 500 750 1000 1250 1500 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 1419 1178 899 612 505
COHORTS’ SIZES
# INTERNATIONAL UNDERGRADUATES COHORTS
20.5% increase from FA12 31.0% increase from FA11 46.9% increase from FA10 21.2% increase from FA09
International undergraduates
- citizenship country
PERCENTAG
China Hong Kong South Korea Taiwan
- thers
20 40 60 80 100
NFRS
PERCENTAG
20 40 60 80 100
TRAN
International undergraduates
- demographics—major discipline
PERCENTAGE
Economics Engineering Science
- thers
undeclared 20 40 60 80 100
NFRS
COHORTS
20 40 60 80 100 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13
TRAN
PERCENTAGE
International undergraduates
- graduation—first-time freshmen
INTERNATIONAL (F-1, J-1) NFRS GRADUATION—FA09–FA14 COHORTS
250 500 750 1000 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 FA14 26 173 76 43 918 782 636 330 119 52
COUNTS
accepts total graduates 20 40 60 80 100 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 FA14
4.1 52.4 63.9 82.7 5.2 54.6 80.8 5.9 69.2 7.7
PERCENTAGES COHORT
% graduated by end of AY0910 % graduated by end of AY1011 % graduated by end of AY1112 % graduated by end of AY1213 % graduated by end of AY1314 % graduated by end of AY1415 Data source: Data Warehouse 11-4-15
International undergraduates
- graduation—transfers
INTERNATIONAL (F-1, J-1) TRAN GRADUATION—FA09–FA14 COHORTS
250 500 750 1000 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 FA14 3 266 292 314 269 232 443 512 376 380 293 263
COUNTS
accepts total graduated 20 40 60 80 100 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 FA14
0.7 52.0 77.7 82.6 91.8 88.2 0.2 56.1 77.4 88.1 87.8 56.6 85.7 86.7 1.1 67.9 81.7 0.8 62.4 1.1
PERCENTAGE COHORT
% graduated by end of AY0910 % graduated by end of AY1011 % graduated by end of AY1112 % graduated by end of AY1213 % graduated by end of AY1314 % graduated by end of AY1415 86.7 87.888.2 Data source: Data Warehouse 11-4-15
International undergraduates
- attrition/retention— first-time freshmen
INTERNATIONAL (F-1, J-1) NFRS ATTRITION*/RETENTION—FA09–FA14 COHORTS
* attrition=neither retained nor graduated 250 500 750 1000 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 FA14 63 148 165 81 31 8 918 782 636 330 119 52
COUNTS
accepts attrition* 20 40 60 80 100 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 FA14
93.1 81.1 73.0 48.4 27.9 11.1 90.4 75.8 73.2 35.2 20.0 86.0 72.1 66.1 56.3 84.8 71.4 79.2 89.1 78.8 94.2
PERCENTAGES COHORT
% retained in FA10 % retained in FA11 % retained in FA12 % retained in FA13 % retained in FA14 % retained in FA15 Data source: Data Warehouse 11-4-15
International undergraduates
- attrition/retention—transfers
INTERNATIONAL (F-1, J-1) TRAN ATTRITION*/RETENTION—FA09–FA14 COHORTS
* attrition=neither retained nor graduated 250 500 750 1000 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 FA14 43 92 65 55 23 30 443 512 376 380 293 263
COUNTS
accepts attrition* 20 40 60 80 100 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 FA14
90.2 62.6 22.6 16.7 4.2 3.2 87.9 56.4 29.1 31.4 3.1 84.3 60.6 21.4 8.6 84.3 59.6 22.9 89.3 60.6 87.7
PERCENTAGE COHORT
% retained in FA10 % retained in FA11 % retained in FA12 % retained in FA13 % retained in FA14 % retained in FA15 Data source: Data Warehouse 11-4-15
International undergraduates
- why not retained—first-time freshmen
20 40 60 80 100 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 FA14 5.8 10.9 15.2 14.0 9.6 6.9
PERCENTAGE COHORT
INTERNATIONAL (F-1, J-1) NFRS NOT RETAINED IN THEIR SECOND FALL QUARTER—FA09–FA14 COHORTS
63 75 89 50 13 3 100 80 60 40 20
COUNTS
20 40 60 80 100 DISQ or SD LOA military did not attend UCSD stopped attending transferred out academic dishonesty
0.7 1.3 0.9 0.8 0.7 1.7 0.1 2.2 1.2 2.3 2.2 1.2 0.2 2.2 0.8 3.1 3.3 3.0 0.6 2.1 0.9 3.0 5.2 1.5 0.8 4.2 3.4 1.7 1.9 1.9PERCENTAGE REASONS
FA09 cohort FA10 cohort FA11 cohort FA12 cohort FA13 cohort FA14 cohort Data source: Data Warehouse 11-4-15
International undergraduates
- why not retained—transfers
20 40 60 80 100 D I S Q
- r
S D L O A m i l i t a r y d i d n
- t
a t t e n d U C S D s t
- p
p e d a t t e n d i n g t r a n s f e r r e d
- u
t a c a d e m i c d i s h
- n
e s t y
0.7 0.2 0.9 3.4 1.8 1.4 1.2 0.4 0.2 2.5 4.1 1.6 0.8 1.1 0.3 4.0 4.0 3.2 2.1 0.5 1.1 5.0 2.4 2.6 0.3 0.3 0.7 2.7 2.4 1.4 1.1 0.8 1.1 4.9 1.9 1.5PERCENTAGE REASONS
FA09 cohort FA10 cohort FA11 cohort FA12 cohort FA13 cohort FA14 cohort 20 40 60 80 100 FA09 FA10 FA11 FA12 FA13 FA14 13.3 11.3 16.6 15.7 12.3 10.4
PERCENTAGE COHORT
INTERNATIONAL (F-1, J-1) TRAN NOT RETAINED IN THEIR SECOND FALL QUARTER—FA09–FA14 COHORTS
46 63 59 63 33 35 100 80 60 40 20
COUNTS
Data source: Data Warehouse 11-4-15
International undergraduates
- time-to-completion—degree awardees
2 4 6 8 10 PhD 5.4 5.3 5.2 5.1 5.5
YEARS DEGREE TYPE
2 4 6 8 10 MA MAS MBA MENG MFA MPIA MS 1.7 3.2 2.5 1.1 2.3 1.4 2.2 1.8 1.7 2.3 1.4 1.8 1.4 2.4 1.7 1.7 2.5 0.7 1.7 1.0 1.9 1.9 1.8 2.3 1.8 1.0 2.0 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.8 0.9 3.4
YEARS
2 4 6 8 10 BA BS 2.9 2.1 2.8 2.1 2.6 2.0 2.7 2.0 2.7 2.0
YEARS
Data source: Data Warehouse July-August 2015
INTERNATIONAL GRADUATES—MEAN TIME TO COMPLETION BY DEGREE
174 0.78 203 0.77 203 0.83 237 0.82 300 0.91 111 1.10 106 1.00 134 1.02 158 0.95 293 0.92
10 3.08 7 0.44 17 0.74 12 1.03 9 1.30 13 0.37 22 0.46 20 0.36 34 1.32 48 1.10 23 0.29 28 0.27 31 0.19 28 0.31 18 1.90 4 0.37 n/a 1 n/a 2 0.00 3 0.38 n/a 3 0.54 2 0.53 2 0.53 2 0.18 33 0.19 41 0.30 39 0.00 43 0.11 47 0.98 183 0.54 146 0.71 164 0.44 186 0.76 204 0.54102 1.10 98 1.04 94 1.16 135 1.30 131 1.08 AY 1011 graduates AY 1112 graduates AY 1213 graduates AY 1314 graduates AY 1415 graduates
BACHELOR’S MASTER’S DOCTORATE
✔ UC San Diego’s international undergraduates have unique obstacles to graduation and retention, including
- compulsory military service
- lack of familiarity with American teaching methods
and integrity standards
- cultural and language differences