Completion and Graduation Rates Board Presentation 2/3/16 4- Year - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

completion and
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Completion and Graduation Rates Board Presentation 2/3/16 4- Year - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Completion and Graduation Rates Board Presentation 2/3/16 4- Year Cohort Graduation Rate Definition In 2008-09, the state began tracking graduation rates using the cohort graduation rate method Follows a class of students through four


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Completion and Graduation Rates

Board Presentation 2/3/16

slide-2
SLIDE 2

4- Year Cohort Graduation Rate Definition

 In 2008-09, the state began tracking

graduation rates using the cohort graduation rate method

 Follows a class of students through four years of

high school and measures the percentage that graduate on-time

 More rigorous than previous method

 Students earning GEDs or extended diplomas

are not counted as graduates.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Cohort Method

9th Grade 2011-12 (3291 students) Remained enrolled (2649 students) Final cohort 2014-15 (3222 students)

Removed from cohort by transfer

  • ut, etc…

(642 students) Added to cohort by transfer in

(573 students)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Definitions: 4 Year Completion

 Included in completer rate are students who….

 graduated or  earned a GED or  Earned an extended or adult high school diploma

 In 2014, the GED revamped to be more

rigorous and align with common core state standards

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4-Year Cohort Graduation rates over time

53% 55% 62% 63% 67% 70% 74% 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Graduation & Completion Rates

62% 63% 67% 70% 74% 73% 73% 75% 76% 77% 72% 79% 80% 82% 81%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 4 Year Graduation 4 Year Completion 5 Year Completion

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Graduation Rate: Comparison to Oregon

66 66.38 67.65 68.44 68.66 72 73.82 53 55.00 62.27 63.09 66.91 70 73.71

30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80

2008-9 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Oregon PPS

%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

4-Year Cohort Rate: Race/Ethnicity

44% 74% 55% 49% 67% 51% 88% 66% 65% 69% 77%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Amer Indian /Ala Nat Asian Black Hispanic Pacific Islander White 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

slide-9
SLIDE 9

4 Year Cohort Rates – 2014-15

n=152 n= 24 91% 84% 79% 76% 72% 71% 71% 71% 66% 65% 58% 57% 50% 45% 77% 70%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Asian Female Asian Male White Female NativeHawaiian/Pacific Islander Fmale Multi-Racial Female White Male Hispanic /Latino Female Multi-Racial Male Black/ African American Male Black/ African American Female American Indian/ Alaska Native Female Hispanic /Latino Male Native Hawaiian /Pacific Islander Male American Indian/ Alaska Native Male All Females All Males

n = 26 n = 160 n = 198 n = 250 n = 21 n = 845 n = 111 n = 38 n = 153 n = 204 n = 272 n = 12 n = 887 n = 102

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Graduation rates: other groups

2014-15 Graduation Rate 2010-11 Graduation Rate % point gain since 2010-11* Economically Disadvantaged 65% 57% +8% Limited English Proficiency (Emerging Bi-lingual) 60% 42% +18% Special Education 49% 31% +18% TAG 91% 88% +3% Females 77% 68% +9% Males 70% 57% +13%

10

* 2010-11 marked the first year of High School System Design

slide-11
SLIDE 11

4 Yr. Cohort Graduation Rates by School

2014-15 Graduation rate % point gain since 2010-11* Benson 88% +2.4% Cleveland 85% +5.6% Franklin 88% +16.7% Grant 89% +6.8% Jefferson 80% +25.7% Lincoln 93% +3.9% Madison 74% +10.5% Roosevelt 62% +8.7% Wilson 91% +12.9 Total (above) 85% +11%

11

* 2010-11 marked the first year of High School System Design

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Other Highlights

  • Black/white graduation gap closed at

Benson, Madison, and Roosevelt

  • Hispanic/white graduation gap closed

at Benson, Franklin, Grant, Lincoln, and Wilson

  • Racially historically underserved male

students increased rate by 7.3 percentage points from previous year

slide-13
SLIDE 13

65% 67% 68% 73% 74% 78% 46% 52% 52% 55% 56% 65% 40% 45% 50% 55% 60% 65% 70% 75% 80%

2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

Not Historically Underserved Race Grad Rate Historically Underserved Race Grad Rate

Grad Rates for Historically Underserved Race students vs Not Historically Underserved Race students over time

Graduation Rate Gap Closure

19 percentage point difference 13 percentage point difference

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Late Joiners

Late Joiners Graduation Rate 9th Grade Joiners Graduation Rate 2013-14 41% 77% 2014-15 47% (n = 573) 79%

  • “Late Joiners” are those students who join PPS after the

9th grade

  • These students are disproportionately students of color
  • Racially Historically Underserved Late Joiners graduated

at higher rates than White Late Joiners (49% vs. 46%)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Unassigned Students

  • 291 “unassigned” students
  • Graduated at a rate of 11%
  • Attended a CBO or special program
  • Vast majority have not attended a PPS comprehensive
  • r focus option school
  • 23% or 66 of them entered PPS in their “senior year” or

in 2014-15

  • If all had these students had graduated, PPS could

increase its graduation rate by 6%

  • More research needed to better understand who these

students are

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Who are unassigned students?

291 Students

33 graduated 75 continued

  • n

46 GED 137 dropped

  • ut
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Key Strategies

  • Focusing on keeping 9th graders on track

– Ninth Grade Counts summer program – Freshmen academies – College and Career Exploration (CCE) course that is in every high school

  • Increased access to rigor

– Examples include: Franklin High School’s Advanced Scholars program, Madison’s Senator Scholars and Jefferson’s Middle College program

  • Career technical education (CTE)

– PPS has increased its state-approved CTE programs – from 19 in 2011-12 to over 50 today.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Key Strategies

  • Reconnection Center

– Team of outreach workers connect with students who have left school and reconnect them to school – Door knocking campaign

  • Eight period schedule

– 8 period day to preserve elective offerings for students, including CTE, credit recovery, AVID, etc… – This schedule, along with improved funding, led to an increase the number of students taking an eight period schedule.

  • Credit recovery

– Credit recovery programs such as Summer Scholars where students who need just a few credits to get on track to graduate get that extra support. – Partnership with TriMet to expand free transit for Summer Scholars