GLOBAL 1000: Meet|Partner|Deal State Innovation and Entrepreneurship - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

global 1000 meet partner deal
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

GLOBAL 1000: Meet|Partner|Deal State Innovation and Entrepreneurship - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GLOBAL 1000: Meet|Partner|Deal State Innovation and Entrepreneurship Initiatives Mary Jo Waits National Governors Association Director, Economic Development, Human Services, and Workforce Development ALL-Hands-On-Deck to Boost State


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Mary Jo Waits

National Governors Association Director, Economic Development, Human Services, and Workforce Development

GLOBAL 1000: Meet|Partner|Deal

State Innovation and Entrepreneurship Initiatives

slide-2
SLIDE 2

“ALL-Hands-On-Deck” to Boost State Economic Growth

  • Growth will need to accelerate sharply to undo the

damage caused by one of the worst recessions in modern times

  • America gradually losing its pre-eminent position in

innovation

  • Mature industries needing to upgrade to realize growth

potential

  • Widespread abandonment of properties occurring in

states and cities

  • Education producing too many workers who have low

skills, poor skills, or the wrong skills

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Where Does Growth Come From? Where Does Growth Come From?

Six Factors to Consider in Designing Policy and Investment Six Factors to Consider in Designing Policy and Investment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Strategic Framework for Policy Decisions and Investment

Diversity Application Interaction Expertise Innovation

Focus on the Four Components of Innovation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Strategic Framework for Policy Decisions and Investments

  • Build Expertise: strong research capabilities and world-class

talent in strategic areas.

  • Facilitate Interaction: collaboration among universities and
  • thers, strong networks, shared research facilities and compact

geographical areas.

  • Link diverse knowledge fields and industry sectors

together: multidisciplinary institutions, well-designed research facilities, and mixed-use research parks to ensure that creative “sparks fly.”

  • Push the application of technology and commercialization
  • f research: university-industry partnerships, open IP policies

and faculty tenure changes, and priority on entrepreneurship.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Building Expertjse

  • Unique Institutions that attract and support the people with the talent and

foresight to create new ideas, CA Institutes for Science and Innovation, Colorado Clean Energy Collaborator, Arizona Bioscience Roadmap

  • State-sponsored Research Funds: CA, GA,TX, NJ, NY, MI, AZ, OH, OK ,

VA, WA, MD, KS – Build upon priorities of local industries: Re-enforce existing innovation clusters as well as developing new cluster – Emphasize applied research rather than basic research (proof of relevance and market pull) – Seed research that helps solve local problems (better health outcomes, economic transformation, tariff congestion) – Align university priorities with economic development goals

  • Research Talent: Lilly Endowment’s $100 M for “intellectual capital,”

Georgia Research Alliance’s 100 Eminent Scholars, Kentucky “Bucks for Brains” $120 M in 1998, 2000 and 2005; Utah Science Technology & Research (USTAR) world-class research teams in 6 strategic areas, including nanotechnology, imaging technology, biomedical technology

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Building Expertjse

  • Workers and Skills: Goals for higher education to meet STEM job needs;

Credentials and Degrees for Veterans; Washington’s 10 Centers of Excellence, each located at a community or technical college; Apprenticeship Carolina (SC) $1M plus annual employer tax credits of $1,000 per apprentice has more than doubled the number

  • New Fields and Young Talent: ASU’s new master’s in genomics and

biotech law; State University of New York, College of Nanoscale Science and Engineering, a global first, and center of excellence in nanoelectronics; Indiana’s Polytechnic Institute Applied Bachelor Degree in 3-5 years starting in 11th grade; research funds marked for young investigators

  • High-Growth Firms: Nebraska, Tennessee, Michigan, Pennsylvania and
  • thers emphasize finding and providing services to companies with high

growth potential; Kansas PIPELINE Entrepreneurial Fellows; NE partnership with Gallup to identify/strengthen entrepreneurs’ talents and “high-growth” strategies

  • Entrepreneurial Immigrants: Midwestern cities (Chicago, St Louis, Dayton

and Detroit) efforts to jumpstart growth by attracting entrepreneurial

  • immigrants. MI visa plan to bring 50,000 immigrants with advanced or

exceptional abilities in science, business or the arts

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Facilitatjng Interactjon and Collaboratjon

  • Networks: dense localized networks of trust, reciprocity and cooperation

associated with robust innovation clusters—UCSD CONNECT “Meet the Researcher”; BIOCOM; Bay Area Science and Innovation Consortium (BASIC)

  • Mega-Partnerships: Georgia Cancer Coalition, CITRIS combines 4 CA

universities—Berkley, Davis, Merced, Santa Cruz; CU-ICAR—Clemson University and BMW, Michelin and others partner for education and research; PA Nanotechnology Institute: 12 research institutions with over 4,000 researchers and $1 B of research; Commonwealth Center for Advanced Manufacturing (CCAM) to align research and education with industry needs/global standards

  • Innovation Vouchers: spur collaboration between SMEs and universities

and others to encourage SMEs to take up regular R&D and innovation activities, CT and Iowa, Netherlands model

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Facilitatjng Interactjon and Collaboratjon

  • Shared Facilities: MA’s High Performance Computing Center—state, 5

universities and companies; ASU’s supercomputer and engineering school moves to main street Tempe; test sites such as Verizon’s Innovation Center in Waltham, MA offers space, troubleshooting, and certification tools to partner companies creating advanced 4GLTE network applications, such as Ericsson, Cisco and Samsung

  • Innovation Hubs or Districts: Atlanta’s Technology Square, San Diego

Torrey Pines, Research Triangle Park, PA’s Keystone Innovation Zone, WA’s Innovation Partnership Zones, Ohio Innovation Hubs; CA Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (QB3) San Francisco’s Mission Bay

  • New Institutions/Intermediaries: “Institutes of Collaboration” or Smart

Agents—Oregon Nanoscience and Microtechnologies Institute (ONAMI), QB3, MA’s Life Sciences Center, Science Foundation Arizona (SFAz)

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • AZ Biodesign Institute co-locates researchers from 3 fields designed for

interaction, NC State Centennial Research Park, ASU SkySong-China, Georgia Tech-Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology

  • Incentives (R&D funds, new colleges) to encourage cross-disciplinary

research and interaction--University of Akron & P&G Bioinnovation Institute, linking materials science with biomedicine to become #1 in biomaterials and

  • rthopedic research
  • Right brain and left brain— Designers and Engineers (new ASU degree)
  • Entrepreneurship across the university and particularly in S&T colleges
  • Entrepreneurial “boot camps”—New England Clean Energy Council’s Clean

Energy Fellowship Program, UCDavis

  • Charismatic, Collaborative scientists and researchers; Silo, Solo is Passé

Putng Diverse Knowledge Fields and Cultures Together

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Pushing Commercializatjon/Entrepreneurs

  • University-industry Partnerships, Industry and Peer Review —that force

an outside look (e.g., venture capitalists, out-of-state reviewers) Washington Life Sciences Discovery Fund; Science Foundation Arizona; Utah Science Technology and Research (USTAR) “small-light-fast money” for startups and researchers

  • New Model for Entrepreneurial Training: AZ, Utah etc. use Steve Blank’s

Lean-Start-Up Model; NSF’s Innovation Corps improving success with SBIR/SBTT funds; Jobs4TN Regional Accelerators competitive grants to create business accelerators in each of 9 Tennessee regions

  • Update Patent, IP, Tenure Policies—master agreements to fit open-

innovation business model, reward faculty entrepreneurs

  • Regulations and Procurement— public sector procurement for green

technologies, energy efficiencies, e.g., 22 state MOU to purchase natural gas vehicles; Michigan multi-year initiative focused on business-to-business procurement opportunities

  • Venture Financing—Oregon, Maryland, Connecticut; United States

Treasury Department’s $1.5 billion State Small Business Credit Initiative (SSBCI); MassChallenge; Arizona Innovation Challenge

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Who Coordinates Key Elements of an Innovatjon Ecosystem?

Key Elements of Innovation Ecosystems

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Leaders who proactively find and nurture connections across the boundaries and know who to connect with whom. Companies and entrepreneurs need one point of contact that will connect them with all the diverse resources they need. Speed and Flexibility in working with industry. For this reason, non-profit organizations that operate outside of the university/government orbit may be needed, but they must excel at bringing together the resources of several universities. Industry Focus that allows innovation to be strategically targeted at sectors that are promising to the state or region. However, there is also a balancing act between being sector- focused and bringing together research and companies from different disciplines and industries. Space That Crosses traditional academic boundaries so that innovation results from different disciplines working together. Shared research facilities push researchers, entrepreneurs and industries beyond their specializations and allow for discoveries at the boundaries of disciplines.

These Organizatjons Require

Experiments are Bubbling Up in States— with common characteristjcs

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Oregon: Intermediaries to Bootstrap Innovatjon Ecosystems

“ON ONAMI ha AMI has em emerg erged a as a a micr icrocos

  • cosm of a
  • f a com

compl plete in innovation

  • n

stra rateg egy f y for a

  • r a s

sin ingle t le techn echnolog

  • logy a

y area rea.” .”

  • -Shelia
  • -Shelia Ma

Martin in, P , Por

  • rtla

land St State U e Univ iver ersit ity

Oregon N Nan anoscience an and Mi d Microtechnologies In Institute

  • Fostering R&D capacity among Oregon’s four research

universities, the Pacific Northwest Laboratory, and the state’s “Silicon Forest” high-technology industry cluster (250 researcher in 5 institutions)

  • Invests in a number of programs to develop expertise,

encourage interaction, and drive commercialization: match for large-scale collaborations in research, workforce development, and equipment purchases

  • “High-tech extension services”—200 companies of all sizes
  • n fee-for-services basis
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Virginia: Advanced Manufacturing Innovatjon Zone

INDUSTRY OWNED INDUSTRY OWNED AND OPERATED AND OPERATED UNIVERSITY DRIVEN UNIVERSITY DRIVEN INDUSTRY DRIVEN INDUSTRY DRIVEN INDUSTRY / COMMUNITY INDUSTRY / COMMUNITY COLLEGE DRIVEN COLLEGE DRIVEN

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Virginia Center for Advanced Manufacturing

  • Bridge the gap between

fundamental research and commercialization

– Accelerate technology into markets – Demonstrate on real problems

  • Foster collaboration among

diverse industry sectors

– Directed Research for the exclusive proprietary benefit of a member – Generic Research for the benefit

  • f all members
  • Lower R&D costs for member

companies

– Shared facilities and personnel – Shared pre-competitive research

  • Train next generation of

technology leaders

– Provide market ready experience – Connect industry with students

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Washington’s 15 Innovatjon Partnership Zones

⑮ Walla Walla

Wine and Hospitality, Water Management, Alternative Energy

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Walla Walla Community College in Washington state earns the rare distncton of being an insttuton of higher educaton that is reinventng the regional economy from the botuom up.

National Journal

When Ordinary Americans Accomplish What the Government Can't

June 13, 2013

The Natonal Journal names Walla Walla Community College one

  • f the top 50 innovators in the U.S. and one of four fnalists in the

Regional Economic Strategies category.

slide-19
SLIDE 19

A High Value-Added Industry

  • When processed, 300 acres of wine grapes generates

the same revenue as 20,000 acres of 100 bushel/acre wheat.

  • Wine productjon contributes $5 billion to Washington's

economy (Washington Wine Commission 2012).

  • Wine productjon in Walla Walla County contributes
  • ver $500 million to the local economy (Washington

Wine Commission 2012).

  • Tourism is antjcipated to produce more revenue than

wine productjon. A wine tourist spends approximately 2.5 tjmes as much as the average tourist at their destjnatjon.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Walla Walla Vision: Wine / Food / Art

slide-21
SLIDE 21

WWCC Center for Enology & Viticulture

Center of Innovation for the Wine Industry

2006 Governor’s Workforce and Economic Development Best Practice Award

slide-22
SLIDE 22

WWCC Enology Students

Learning While Creatjng College Cellars Wine

slide-23
SLIDE 23

ETS Laboratories is the leading independent laboratory serving the global wine industry today. ETS is unique in its ability to ofer wineries a combinatjon of routjne analytjcal services and proprietary, accredited analytjcal methods. These tools assist wineries in the consistent productjon of betuer wines. ETS is accredited to ISO Guide 17025 standards by the American Associatjon for Laboratory Accreditatjon (A2LA), and is the natjon's only independent wine laboratory so designated.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Port of Walla Walla Wine Incubators

slide-25
SLIDE 25

“Wine Expo Draws Buyers From Around World to Walla Walla”

Source: Walla Walla Union Bulletjn, May 11, 2006

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Projected IPZ Employment With and Without the Wine Cluster

_____With _____Without _ _ _ _ 2006 Projectjons

slide-27
SLIDE 27

WWCC Water & Environmental Center

Center of Innovation for Water and Environment

2010 Governor’s Workforce and Economic Development Best Practice Award & 2011 Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission Leadership Award

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Enhancing the Energy Cluster in Southeastern Washington

slide-29
SLIDE 29

California’s Instjtutes for Science and Innovatjon

Source: Regis Kelly, QB3

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Source: Regis Kelly, QB3

QB3 in San Francisco’s Mission Bay

slide-31
SLIDE 31

QB3: A Vision of Success Through Collaboratjon

Source: Regis Kelly, QB3

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Mission: Discover, Develop, Deploy to Market as quickly as possible

Source: Regis Kelly, QB3

slide-33
SLIDE 33

QB3 in San Francisco’s Mission Bay

Source: Regis Kelly, QB3 And Revitalizing Abandoned Spaces and Communities

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Reinventjng Downtown Phoenix “Eds and Meds” Anchor an Innovatjon Hub

Downtown Phoenix Seven Priority Themes

  • Knowledge Anchors
  • Downtown Living
  • Great Neighborhoods
  • Arts and Cultural Hub
  • Distinctive Shopping
  • Great Places/Great Spaces
  • The Connected Oasis

2004 Vision ASU Downtown Phoenix 20 acre mixed-use campus, 15,000 students, 4,000 student housing, $223 M investment Phoenix Biomedical Campus 28 acres land, $51 M for facility for TGEN headquarters, $7.5 M bond funds for projects

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Reinventing Downtown Phoenix

Reinventjng Downtown Phoenix