gi tumor board
play

GI Tumor Board 70yo F without significant PMH presents w/3 months of - PDF document

3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Casebased Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Casebased Approach Case #1 GI Tumor Board 70yo F without significant PMH presents w/3 months of diarrhea and


  1. 3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Case #1 GI Tumor Board • 70yo F without significant PMH presents w/3 months of diarrhea and Edward Kim George Poultsides RLQ abdominal pain Naseem Esteghamat Kenzo Hirose • CT: cecal mass with mesenteric adenopathy, no distant disease May Cho Alan Venook • Colonoscopy: partially obstructing tumor in cecum biopsy positive for Arta Monjazeb Margaret Tempero adenocarcinoma George Fisher Andrew Ko • Undergoes right hemicolectomy. Daniel Chang Thomas Semrad • Surgical path: 8.5cm low grade adenocarcinoma pT3/pN2a 6/53 LN Sisi Haraldsdottir positive, negative margins, MSI‐high. 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach IDEA Case #1 Question #1 What is the next step in management? 1. Test expanded RAS and BRAF 2. Treat with adjuvant FOLFOX for 3 months 3. Treat with adjuvant FOLFOX for 6 months 4. Treat with adjuvant CAPOX for 3 months 5. Treat with adjuvant CAPOX for 6 months 1

  2. 3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Low risk High risk 3m vs 6m 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach FOLFOX CAPOX Low risk High risk FOLFOX CAPOX 2

  3. 3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Case #1 Question #2 In this patient with stage III colon cancer, would BRAF status change your approach to adjuvant therapy? IDEA Clinical Consensus: Risk-based approach to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer 1. Yes 2. No 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Case #1 continued Case #1 Question #3 What is the next step in management? • Patient completed 6 months of adjuvant FOLFOX with discontinuation of 1. Surgical resection of liver metastasis oxaliplatin after cycle 9 due to sensory 2. Liver directed therapy (eg SIRT, RFA, SBRT) neuropathy 3. FOLFIRI • CT scan 2 months after completion of 4. PD‐1 inhibitor adjuvant FOLFOX reveals a 1.8cm liver lesion which on retrospect review may have been faintly present on pre‐ operative imaging • Molecular profiling reveals RAS wt, BRAF wt, MSI‐high 3

  4. 3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Case #1 Take Home Points • In patients with T1‐T3,N1 disease, consider 3 months of adjuvant therapy. Pre‐planned subgroup analysis showed non‐inferiority of 3 vs 6 months of adjuvant therapy. • For patients with T4 or N2 disease, discuss risks and benefits of 3 vs 6 months of adjuvant therapy. Non‐inferiority was not met in this subgroup • 3 months confers significantly less neurotoxicity • Consider toxicity profiles when deciding between CAPOX AND FOLFOX 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Case #2 Case #2 Question #1 What is the next step in management? A 62yo M w/no significant PMH presents with 3 month history of epigastric pain 1. Start FOLFIRINOX with associated anorexia. 2. Start gemcitabine/nab‐paclitaxel ‐ CT reveals hypodense mass 3. Radiation oncology consultation in pancreatic head with 4. Surgical oncology consultation >180 0 encasement of the superior mesenteric artery ‐ EUS‐FNA confirms pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 4

  5. 3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Case #2 Clinical Course Case #2 Question #2 What is the next step in management? • Patient receives 6 months of gemcitabine/nab‐paclitaxel • CT scans after 2 and 4 months of treatment showed stable disease 1. Surgical resection 2. Chemoradiation • Patient developed grade 3 sensory neuropathy and nab‐paclitaxel is 3. SBRT discontinued during cycle 6 4. Continue chemotherapy with gemcitabine alone • CT scan after 6 th month still showed stable disease and no evidence of 5. Continue chemotherapy but change regimen distant disease 6. Treatment break 5

  6. 3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach LAP07 LAP07 • Assess OS with chemotherapy vs chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer with progression‐free disease after gemcitabine based therapy • Evaluate effect of Erlotinib on OS in locally advanced pancreatic cancer • Gemcitabine vs Gemcitabine + Erlotinib Hammel, P et al. “2016. JAMA. 315(17); 1844‐1853. 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Case #2 Clinical Course Case #2 Question #3 What is the next step in management? • Patient elected to take a break from chemotherapy • Subsequent imaging about 4 months later shows metastatic 1. FOLFIRNOX progression to the liver and peritoneum 2. FOLFIRI 3. FOLFOX • He continues to have symptomatic sensory neuropathy 4. 5FU/nanoliposomal‐irinotecan 6

  7. 3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach NAPOLI‐1 NAPOLI‐1 ‐ OS 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Case #3 Case #2 Take Home Points • There is no standard of care best option for locally advanced pancreatic • 63yo woman presents with fatigue and adenocarcinoma jaundice • • Both frontline regimens of FOLFIRINOX and Gem/nab‐paclitaxel are reasonable options CT scan reveals biliary dilation and mass based on extrapolation from randomized trial data in the metastatic setting distally • ERCP confirms a CBD stricture and • Chemoradiotherapy has not been proven to improve OS compared to chemotherapy brushings are positive for adenocarcinoma alone in locally advanced pancreatic cancer following gemcitabine based therapy • ECOG PS 0 • Nanoliposomal Irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil extends survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who previously received gemcitabine‐based chemotherapy – compared to fluorouracil. 7

  8. 3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Case #3 followup Case #3 Question #2 What is the next step in management? • Patient undergoes whipple resection • 1. Chemotherapy – gemcitabine and cisplatin Pathology confirms a 2.5cm moderately differentiated extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma 2. Chemoradiation with capecitabine • 1/18 Lymph nodes are positive 3. Surgery • Negative margins 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach BILCAP Case #3 Question #2 What is the next step in management? 1. Chemotherapy – capecitabine 2. Chemotherapy – gemcitabine and cisplatin 3. Chemotherapy with gemcitabine/capecitabine ‐> chemoradiation with capecitabine 4. Chemoradiation with capecitabine 8

  9. 3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach BILCAP Future directions • ACTICCA‐1 – adjuvant therapy for resected cholangio or GB cancer original design = gem/cis vs placebo ‐> based on BILCAP ‐> gem/cis vs capecitabine Primary endpoint ‐ DFS 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach Case #3 Take Home Points Case #4 • 62 yo woman presents with upper GI bleeding • Capecitabine improves median overall survival compared to • EGD reveals a large ulcerative gastric mass positive for surveillance in patients with biliary tract cancer following adenocarcinoma macroscopic complete resection • EUS reveals T3N1 disease • Unclear whether multi‐drug regimens and incorporation of • Diagnostic laparoscopic evaluation with cytology of peritoneal chemoradiation add benefit in the adjuvant setting washings is negative 9

  10. 3/8/2018 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach MAGIC Trial – Perioperative Chemotherapy Case #4 Question #1 What is the next step in management? 1. Surgery 2. ECF 3. EOX 4. FOLFOX 5. FLOT 6. chemoradiation 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach 18 th Multidisciplinary Management of Cancers: A Case‐based Approach MAGIC ‐> FLOT FLOT TFLO OLFT LFTO FLTO TFOL OLTF LFOT FTLO TLOF OTLF LTOF FTOL TLFO OTFL LTFO FOLT TOLF OFLT LOTF FOTL TOFL OFTL LOFT 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend