Gerhard Dorfer A Digital Description of the Fundamental Group of - - PDF document

gerhard dorfer a digital description of the fundamental
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Gerhard Dorfer A Digital Description of the Fundamental Group of - - PDF document

Gerhard Dorfer A Digital Description of the Fundamental Group of Fractals I (joint work with S. Akiyama, J. Thuswaldner and R. Winkler) Project: Metric and Topological Aspects of Number Theoretical Problems Principal Investigator: Reinhard


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Gerhard Dorfer A Digital Description of the Fundamental Group of Fractals I (joint work with S. Akiyama,

  • J. Thuswaldner and R. Winkler)

Project: Metric and Topological Aspects of Number Theoretical Problems Principal Investigator: Reinhard Winkler Analytic Combinatorics and Probabilistic Number Theory National Research Network of the Austrian Science Foundation FWF

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Some references

[1] J. Cannon and G. Conner. The combinatorial struc- ture of the Hawaiian earring group. Topology Ap-

  • pl. 106 (2000), 225–271

[2] J. Cannon and G. Conner. The big fundamen- tal group, big Hawaiian earrings, and the big free

  • groups. Topology Appl. 106 (2000), 273–291

[3] J. Cannon and G. Conner. On the fundamental group of one dimensional spases. Preprint [4] G. Conner and K. Eda. Fundamental groups ha- ving the whole information of spaces. Topology

  • Appl. 146/147 (2005), 317–328

[5] K. Eda and K. Kawamura. The fundamental groups

  • f one dimensional spaces. Topology Appl. 87

(1998), 163–172 [6] J. Luo and J. Thuswaldner. On the fundamental group of self affine plane tiles. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), to appear

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Digital representation of the Sierpi´ nski gasket △ by sequences with digits {0, 1, 2} dyadic points: belong to 2 subtriangles in △n, the smallest such n is the order of the dyadic point dyadic points P = (0), (1), (2) have 2 repre- sentations as sequences in {0, 1, 2}N e.g. P = (0, 1, 2, 2, . . .) = (0, 2, 1, 1, . . .) =: (0, 1|2) dyadic points correspond to sequences which are eventually constant Dn: dyadic points of order ≤ n generic points have a unique representation

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Symbolic representation of loops in △ ω : [0, 1] → △, ω(0) = ω(1) = (0) fixed approximation level n: {ω−1(P)|P ∈ Dn} is a finite family of disjoint closed set ⊆ [0, 1] → separated family of sets ω → σn(ω): contains the (finite!) sequence of dyadic points of order ≤ n that ω “passes” σn(ω) is a finite word over the alphabet Dn

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Frame for (σn(ω))n∈N Sn: the set of all “admissible” words ωn

  • ver the alphabet Dn, i.e.
  • 1. ωn starts and ends with (0)
  • 2. consecutive letters in ωn are neighboring

dyadic points in △n (Sn, ·): semigroup where · is concatenation of words and one intermediate (0) is cancelled γn : Sn → Sn−1: γn deletes all points of order n and cancels out repetitions of points γn is a semigroup homomorphism ↓ lim

← − Sn inverse limit of semigroups Sn

  • Proposition. Let ω : [0, 1] → △ be a loop in

△. Then (σn(ω))n∈N ∈ lim

← − Sn.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Reduction process reflecting homotopy reduced words in Sn: do not contain subwords

  • f the form PQP, or PQR, where P, Q, R be-

long to the same subtriangle of △n Gn: the set of all reduced words over the alphabet Dn Redn : Sn → Gn: reduces subwords

  • PQP → P,

and PQR → PR (P, Q, R in the same subtriangle) until word is reduced

  • Redn well defined
  • Redn(ωn) canonical representative of the

homotopy class of the elementary path cor-

  • resp. to ωn in △n
slide-7
SLIDE 7

multiplication ∗ in Gn: ωn ∗ ¯ ωn := Redn(ωn · ¯ ωn)

  • Proposition. (Gn, ∗) is isomorphic to the fun-

damental group of △n. δn :

  • Gn

→ Gn−1 is a group ωn → Redn−1(γn(ωn)) homomorphism ↓ lim

← − Gn inverse limit of groups

  • Proposition. The ˇ

Cech homotopy group of △ is isomorphic to lim

← − Gn.

the following diagram commutes: Sn

γn

− → Sn−1 ↓ Redn

Redn−1 ↓

Gn

δn

− → Gn−1

slide-8
SLIDE 8

S(△)

σ

− → lim

← − Sn

[ . ] Red ↓

π(△)

ϕ

− → lim

← − Gn (S(△), ·): groupoid of loops in △ with concatenation · [ω] homotopy class of ω σ(ω) := (σn(ω))n∈N Red((ωn)n∈N) := (Redn(ωn))n∈N ϕ([ω]) := (Redn(σn(ω)))n∈N

  • ϕ is injective (Eda/Kawamura 1998), i.e.

π(△) is a subgroup of lim

← − Gn

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • ϕ is not surjective:

Example 1. ω1 = (0) ω2 = C0C1C−1 ω3 = C0C1C−1

0 C2

ω4 = C0C1C−1

0 C2C0C3C−1

. . . (ωn)n∈N ∈ lim

← − Gn, but (ωn)n∈N /

∈ range(ϕ): a loop ω in △ with ϕ([ω]) = (ωn)n∈N has to pass the cycle C0 infinitely often

  • range(ϕ)= range(ϕ ◦ [ . ]) = range(Red ◦ σ)
slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • σ is not surjective:

Example 2. ω1 = (0)(0|1)(0) ω2 = (0)(0, 0|1)(0|1)(1, 0|1)(0|1)(0, 0|1)(0) ω3 = (0)(0, 0, 0|1)(0, 0|1) . . . (1, 1, 0|1) . . . (0) . . .

  • graph associated to (ωn)n∈N ∈ lim

← − Sn:

– every branch corresponds to a dyadic point – there is total order on the branches – this order is dense – every Dedekind cut in the set of branches converges to a point in the Sierpi´ nski gasket

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Range and kernel of σ

  • Theorem. (ωn)n∈N ∈ lim

← − Sn is in the range of

σ if and only if every irrational Dedekind cut in the set of branches of the graph associated to (ωn)n∈N converges to a generic point in △.

  • Theorem. For ω and ¯

ω in S(△) we have σ(ω) = σ(¯ ω) if and only if ω and ¯ ω have a common re-parametrization, i.e. there exist α, β : [0, 1] → [0, 1] monotonously increasing and surjective such that ω ◦ α = ¯ ω ◦ β.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Main Theorem. An element (ωn)n≥0 of lim

← − Gn

is in ϕ(π(△)) if and only if for all k ≥ 0 the sequence (γnk(ωn))n≥k stabilizes, where γnk = γk+1 ◦ . . . ◦ γn.