Geometry-Induced Superdiffusion in Driven Crowded Systems Carlos - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

geometry induced superdiffusion in driven crowded systems
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Geometry-Induced Superdiffusion in Driven Crowded Systems Carlos - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Geometry-Induced Superdiffusion in Driven Crowded Systems Carlos Meja-Monasterio Technical University of Madrid Galileo Galilei Institute, Arcetri Florence May 2014 Active micro-rheology Active manipulation of small probe particles by


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Geometry-Induced Superdiffusion in Driven Crowded Systems

Carlos Mejía-Monasterio

Technical University of Madrid

Galileo Galilei Institute, Arcetri Florence May 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Active micro-rheology

Active manipulation of small probe particles by external forces, using magnetic fields, electric fields, or micro-mechanical forces. Optical tweezers Magnetic manipulation Atomic force microscopy

J Pesic, et al, PRE (2012) 86, 031403

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Nonequilibrium inhomogeneity

As the force increases ... a traffic jammed region in front of the intruder a wake region behind the it

C M-M, G Oshanin Soft Matter (2011), 7 993

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Nonequilibrium inhomogeneity

As the force increases ... a traffic jammed region in front of the intruder a wake region behind the it

C M-M, G Oshanin Soft Matter (2011), 7 993

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Nonequilibrium inhomogeneity

10 10

1

10

2

10

  • 4

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

−x

In the wake

∼ x−3/2 5 10 15 10

  • 4

10

  • 3

10

  • 2

10

  • 1

10

2

x

In front

  • bserved in colloidal suspensions, monolayers
  • f vibrated grains and in glass systems.

The medium remembers the passage of the intruder on large temporal and spatial scales

C M-M, G Oshanin Soft Matter (2011), 7 993

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Simple Exclusion Process

The model

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Simple Exclusion Process

The model

◮ We consider a square lattice of Lx × Ly sites, of unit spacing, with P.B.C and populated with hard-core particles. ◮ Each site can be either empty or

  • ccupied by at most one particle.

◮ The system evolves in discrete time n and particles move randomly. ◮ One particle, the intruder, is subject to a constant force F

  • Bath particles move in either direction with equal jump

probability 1/4.

  • The intruder moves in direction eν with probability

pν = Z −1e

β 2 F·eν ,

where Z = 2(1 + cosh (βσF/2)) and β is the inverse temperature.

Simple Exclusion Process

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Force-velocity relation

2 4 6 8

F

0.1 0.2 0.3

|V|

βF = 0.5 βF = 10

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Force-velocity relation

Stokesian regime V = F ξ , with friction coefficient ξ = ξmf + ξcoop where

ξmf = 4τ βσ2(1 − ρ) and ξcoop = 4τ βσ2(1 − ρ) (π − 2)ρ 1 + (1 − ρ)

O B´ enichou, et al, PRL (2000) 84, 511; PRB (2001) 63, 235413 C M-M, G Oshanin, Soft Matter (2011) 7, 993

2 4 6 8

F

0.1 0.2 0.3

|V|

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The problem

What is the probability distribution function of the intruder’s displacement at time n?

We are interested in the limit of very dense lattices or very strong pulling forces.

P(Rn)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The limit of high density 2D

  • Limit of small vacancy density ρ0 = M/(Lx × Ly) 1
  • Idea: trapping of the intruder by diffusive vacancies.

O B´ enichou, G Oshanin, PRE (2001) 64. 020103 MJAM Brummelhuis, HJ Hilhorst, Physica A (1989) 156, 575

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The limit of high density 2D

many vacancies problem as many single vacancy problems. propagator of the intruder in the presence of a single vacancy is given in terms of First-Passage Time distributions of the vacancy to the site ocupied by the intruder. results in the long time limit

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Intruder’s displacement

Let Z j n denote the position of the j-th vacancy at time n,

j = 1, 2, . . . , M.

We want to compute the probability of finding the intruder at

position rn at time n conditioned to {Zj

n}

P(rn|{Zj

n}) =

  • r1

n

· · ·

  • rM

n

δ(rn, r1

n + · · · + rM n )P(r1 n, . . . , rM n |{Zj n}) P(r1 n, . . . , rM n |{Zj n}) is the conditional probability that within the

time interval n the intruder moved to r1

n due to its interaction with

vacancy 1, to r2

n due to its interaction with vacancy 2, etc. In the lowest order in ρ0 the vacancies contributions are

independent and P(r1

n, . . . , rM n |{Zj n}) ≃ M

  • j=1

P(rn|Z j

n)

The problem reduces to M single vacancies, correct to O(ρ0).

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Intruder’s displacement

Averaging P(rn|Z j n) over the initial distribution of vacancies

P(rn) ≃

  • r1

n

· · ·

  • rM

n

δ(rn, r1

n + · · · + rM n ) M

  • j=1

P(rn|Z j

n) Defining the Fourier transformed distribution

Pn(k) =

  • rn

exp (−ik · rn) P(rn|{Z j

n})

and summing over rn one obtains that it factorizes into Pn(k) =

  • rn

exp (−ik · rn) P(rn|Z j

n)

M

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Intruder’s displacement

Taking the thermodynamic limit Lx, Ly → ∞ with ρ0 fixed we

  • btain for the characteristic function

Pn(k) ≃ exp(−ρ0Ωn(k)) Ωn(k) is implicitly defined by Ωn(k) =

n

  • l=0
  • ν

∆n−l(k|eν)

  • Z=0

F ∗

l (0|eν|Z) ,

F ∗

l (0|eν|Z) is the FPT conditional probability for a RW starting at

Z to be at 0 at time l, given that it is at site 0 + eν at time l − 1 and ∆l(k|eν) = 1 − pl(k) exp (i(k · eν)) P(Rn) ' 1 4π2

Z π

π

dk exp (i (k · Rn) ρ0 Ωn(k))

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Intruder’s displacement

Ωn(k) can be solved explicitly in terms of its generating function Ωz(k) =

  • n=0

Ωn(k) zn In the large n (and ρ0 1) limit z → 1− Ωz(k) ∼ 1 (1 − z) Φ(k) 1 − z + Φ(k)/χz with χz ∼ − π (1 − z) ln(1 − z) the leading asymptotic term of the generating function of the mean number of “new” (virgin) sites visited on the n-th step

BD Hughes, (2005) Random walks in random environments

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Intruder’s displacement

Then Ωz(k) ∼ Φ(k) (1 − z)2

  • 1 − ln(1 − z)

π Φ(k) −1 , with Φ(k) = −ia0kx + a1k2

x /2 + a2k2 y /2

a0 = sinh(βF/2) (2π − 3) cosh(βF/2) + 1 , a1 = cosh(βF/2) (2π − 3) cosh(βF/2) + 1 , a2 = 1 cosh(βF/2) + 2π − 3 .

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Intruder’s displacement

P(Rn) ' 1 4π2

Z π

π

dk exp (i (k · Rn) ρ0 Ωn(k))

In the large n (and ρ0 1)

Ωz(k) =

  • n=0

Ωn(k) zn ) ∼ 1 (1 − z) Φ(k) 1 − z + Φ(k)/χz

with χz ∼ − π (1 − z) ln(1 − z) the leading asymptotic term of the generating function of the mean number of “new” (virgin) sites visited on the n-th step

BD Hughes, (2005) Random walks in random environments

Φ(k) = −ia0kx + a1k2

x /2 + a2k2 y /2

a0 = sinh(βF/2) (2π − 3) cosh(βF/2) + 1 , a1 = cosh(βF/2) (2π − 3) cosh(βF/2) + 1 , a2 = 1 cosh(βF/2) + 2π − 3 .

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Velocity and variance

0.1 0.2 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.1 0.2 0.01 0.02 0.03

0.005 0.01 0.001 0.002 0.003

v σ2

y/n

ρ0 ρ0

v ρ0

v ∼ ρ0 sinh(βF/2) (2π − 3) cosh(βF/2) + 1 σ2

y ∼

ρ0n cosh(βF/2) + 2π − 3 The intruder moves at constant velocity along the field direction and diffuses along the transversal direction

O B´ enichou, C M-M, G Oshanin, PRE 87 020103 (2013)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Velocity and variance

0.1 0.2 0.03 0.06 0.09 0.1 0.2 0.01 0.02 0.03

0.005 0.01 0.001 0.002 0.003

v σ2

y/n

ρ0 ρ0

v ρ0

v ∼ ρ0 sinh(βF/2) (2π − 3) cosh(βF/2) + 1 =     

βρ0 4(π−1) F ,

βF 1 v∞ =

ρ0 2π−3 ,

βF 1

O B´ enichou, et al, PRL (2000) 84, 511; PRB (2001) 63, 235413 O B´ enichou, C M-M, G Oshanin, PRE 87 020103 (2013)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Weak superdiffusion

10 10

1

10

2

10

3

10

4

0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 φ(n) n

σ2

x ∼ ρ0

  • a1 + 2a2

π (γ − 1) + 2a2 π ln(n)

  • n

limn→∞ Hn+1 = ln(n) + γ + O 1

n

  • with γ ≈ 0.577

O B´ enichou, C M-M, G Oshanin, PRE 87 020103 (2013)

slide-22
SLIDE 22

In the limit ρ0 → 0

Pn(x) = (2πσ2

x)−1/2e − (x−vn)2

2σ2 x

(1 + A/n + . . .) , Pn(y) = (2πσ2

y)−1/2e − y2

2σ2 y (1 + B ln n/n + . . .) ,

10 20 30 40 50 60

x

0.05 0.1 0.15

Pn(x)

  • 10
  • 5

5 10

y

0.1 0.2

Pn(y)

v ∼ ρ0 a0 , σ2

x ∼ ρ0

  • a1 + 2a2

π (γ − 1) + 2a2 π ln(n)

  • n ,

σ2

y ∼ ρ0 a2n ,

ai ≡ ai(βF)

Anomalous fluctuations broadening

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Confined geometries

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Confined geometries

The variance of the intruder’s displacement can be represented as σ2

x ∼ ρ0a1n + ρ0a2

n χn , χn: mean # of new sites visited on the n-th step by any vacancy. In terms of Sn, the mean # of distinct lattice sites visited by any

  • f the vacancies up to time n

χn = Sn − Sn−1 Sn is a fundamental characteristic property of a lattice discrete-time RW.

O B´ enichou, P Illien, C M-M, G Oshanin (2013)

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Confined geometries

In general, for infinite systems (at least in one direction) Sn ∼ nα α is and indicator of the mixing of the lattice gas and depends on the effective dimensionality of the lattice.

◮ for larger α, a vacancy mostly moves to new sites ◮ for smaller α, a vacancy predominantly revisits already visited

sites In general α < 1 for systems in which the RW is recurrent, while α = 1 for non-recurrent RW’s.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Confined geometries

We have χn ∼ nα−1 ⇒ σ2

x ∼ ρ0a1n + ρ0a2 0n2−α ◮ For non-recurrent random walk (α = 1), the behaviour is

diffusive

◮ For recurrent random walks (α < 1)

σ2

x ∼ ρ0a2 0n2−α

The less efficient the mixing of the lattice gas is the faster the variance of the intruder’s displacement grows

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Stripes and Capillaries

symbols, ðtÞ ¼ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi 3=2 p L2=ð4a2

00tÞ2 xðtÞ]

ð Þ ¼ ffiffiffiffi p ð

2

Þ

2ð Þ

ð Þ ¼ ffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi p ð

0 Þ

symbols, ðtÞ ¼ 3 ffiffiffiffi

  • p L=ð8a2

00tÞ2 xðtÞ]

capillaries: stripes:

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Single-File dynamics

1/2 1/2

X

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Single-File dynamics

1/2 1/2

X

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

  • 2

2 4 6 8 10 Pn(X) X n = 104 n = 105 n = 106

0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 1 10 100 ˜ κeven(n), ˜ κodd(n) n

(a)

1 10 100 0.85 0.9 0.95 1 n

(b)

Skellman-type distribution

. Pn(X) '

⇢0→0 exp (κeven(n))

✓κeven(n) + κodd(n) κeven(n) κodd(n) ◆X/2 ✓q ◆

  • IX

✓q κ2

even(n) κ2

  • dd(n)

lim

⇢0→0

κn

(2j+1)

ρ0 = (p1 p−1) r 2n π 2p1p−1(p1 p−1)+o(1) (13) lim

⇢0→0

κn

(2j)

ρ0 = r 2n π + o(1) , j = 0, 1, 2, . . . .

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Is superdiffusion transient?

We need to determine the long time limit of the variance at fixed vacancy density For confined geometries (limt!1lim0!02

x lim0!0limt!12

x).

between two consecutive visits to the intruder, a given vacancy experiences an effective bias due to the motion

  • f the intruder resulting from its interaction with the rest
  • f the vacancies

O Bénichou, et al, PRL 111, 260601 (2013)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Is superdiffusion transient?

The long time behaviour is always diffusive In quasi-1D the longitudinal diffusivity is enhanced

lim

t!1

2

x

t

  • 0!0

8 > > > < > > > : B quasi-1D; 4a2

010 lnð1 0 Þ

2D lattice; 2a2

0½A þ cothðf=2Þ=ð2a0Þ0

3D lattice;

In 2D

Dk D? ∼ 1 ρ0

?

Dk D? ∼ ln(ρ1

0 )

No enhancement is observed in 3D

O Bénichou, et al, PRL 111, 260601 (2013)

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Is superdiffusion transient?

In the intermediate regime we find

2

x

8 > > > < > > > : tgð2

0tÞ

quasi-1D;

  • 2a2

0t lnðð0a0Þ2 þ 1=tÞ

2D lattice; 2a2

0½A þ cothðf=2Þ=ð2a0Þ0t

3D lattice;

O Bénichou, et al, PRL 111, 260601 (2013)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Active nonlinear microrheology

Glass-forming Yukawa fluid Winter, et al., PRL 108, 028303 (2012) Binary mixture of Lennard-Jones particles Schroer, Heuer, PRL 110, 067801 (2013)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Mean volume of the Wiener saussage

Off-lattice continuous systems

The same power-law behaviour: compact exploration non-compact exploration

r α = 1,

t α < 1

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Off-lattice systems

O Bénichou, et al, PRL 111, 260601 (2013)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Lx Ly Lz Sn

1d single-file

2d 3d

2d stripes

l l

2d slit pores

l

3d capillaries

l l

X

σ2

x

χn

∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞ ∞

∞ ∼ n1/2

πn ln(n)

π ln(n)

ρ0a2 π n ln(n)

ln1/2

l n1/2 ρ0a2 l

n3/2 l2n1/2

l2 n1/2 ρ0a2 l2 n3/2 ln ln(n) l ln(n) ρ0a2 l

n ln(n)

∞ ∼ n

New phenomena field-induced broadening of fluctuations in overcrowded environments

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Molecular overcrowding

McGuffee and Elcock, PLoS Computational Biology (2010)

In confined geometries, transport is passively subdiffusive but actively superdiffusive

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Glass and jamming transitions. Dynamical arrest and the broadening of the fluctuations. Extensions to non-Brownian dynamics. Stochastic entropy. Transitions between steady-states.

Perspectives

slide-39
SLIDE 39

LPTMC - Paris Olivier Bénichou Gleb Oshanin Raphaël Voituriez Pierre Illien MPI-IS Sttutgart Adam Law Dipanjan Chakraborty State University Moscow Anna Bodrova