geometric flows and gravitational instantons
play

Geometric flows and gravitational instantons Marios Petropoulos - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Geometric flows and gravitational instantons Marios Petropoulos CPHT Ecole Polytechnique CNRS Galileo Galilei Institute for Theoretical Physics AdS 4 /CFT 3 and the Holographic States of Matter October 2010 Highlights Motivations


  1. Geometric flows and gravitational instantons Marios Petropoulos CPHT – Ecole Polytechnique – CNRS Galileo Galilei Institute for Theoretical Physics AdS 4 /CFT 3 and the Holographic States of Matter – October 2010

  2. Highlights Motivations and summary Gravitational instantons: homogeneity and self-duality The view from the leaf: geometric flows Extensions Outlook

  3. Framework The Ricci flow describes the parametric evolution of a geometry as ∂ g ij ∂ t = − R ij ◮ Introduced by R. Hamilton in 1982 as a tool for proving Poincaré’s (1904) and Thurston’s (late 70s) 3D conjectures ◮ In non-critical string theory Ricci flow is an RG flow [Friedan, 1985] – can mimic time evolution as UV → IR t = log 1 / µ

  4. Basic features: a reminder ◮ Volume is not preserved along the flow d D x √ det gg ij ∂ g ij d D x √ det gR d V d t = 1 � ∂ t = − 1 � 2 2 Consequence: ◮ positive curvature → space contracts ◮ negative curvature → space expands ◮ Killing vectors are preserved in time: the isometry group remains unaltered – or grows in limiting situations

  5. Example ◮ At initial time: R ( 0 ) = ag ( 0 ) with a constant ij ij ◮ Subsequent evolution: linear rescaling g ij ( t ) = ( 1 − at ) g ( 0 ) ij R ij ( t ) = R ( 0 ) ij ◮ Properties ◮ a > 0 ⇒ uniform contraction → singularity at t = 1 / a ◮ a < 0 ⇒ indefinite expansion

  6. Gravitational instantons ◮ Useful for non-perturbative transitions in quantum gravity ◮ Appear in string compactifications e.g. in heterotic: C 2 / Γ → ALE spaces → Gibbons–Hawking multi-instantons as Eguchi–Hanson (blow-up of the C 2 / Z 2 A 1 singularity) ◮ Describe hyper moduli spaces e.g. in IIA: ◮ Taub–NUT ( SU ( 2 ) × U ( 1 ) , Λ = 0): tree-level ◮ Pedersen/Fubini–Study ( SU ( 2 ) × U ( 1 ) , Λ � = 0): supergravity ◮ Calderbank–Pedersen (Heisenberg × U ( 1 ) , Λ � = 0): string pert ◮ Calderbank–Pedersen ( U ( 1 ) × U ( 1 ) , Λ � = 0): string non-pert or in heterotic: Atiyah–Hitchin ( SU ( 2 ) , Λ = 0)

  7. Geometric flows arise in gravitational instantons with time foliation ◮ In 4D self-dual gravitational instantons with homogeneous Bianchi spatial sections: time evolution is a Ricci flow of the 3D homogeneous space ◮ In non-relativistic gravity with invariance explicitly broken to foliation-preserving diffeomorphisms and with detailed-balance dynamics: time evolution is a geometric flow of the 3D space (valid actually in D + 1 → D ) Geometric flows might carry information on holographic evolution in some gravitational set ups – yet to be unravelled

  8. Highlights Motivations and summary Gravitational instantons: homogeneity and self-duality The view from the leaf: geometric flows Extensions Outlook

  9. Cartan’s formalism Metric and torsionless connection one-form ω a b and curvature two-form R a b in an orthonormal frame: d s 2 = δ ab θ a θ b bcd θ c ∧ θ d ◮ Riemann tensor: R a b = d ω a b + ω a c ∧ ω c b = 1 2 R a ◮ Torsion tensor: T a = d θ a + ω a b ∧ θ b = 1 bc θ b ∧ θ c 2 T a ◮ Cartan structure equations: ω ab = − ω ba , T a = 0 ◮ Bianchi identity: d R a b + ω a c ∧ R c b − R a c ∧ ω c b = 0 ◮ Cyclic identity: d T a + ω a b ∧ T b = R a b ∧ θ b = 0

  10. Holonomy ◮ d s 2 = δ ab θ a θ b invariant under local SO ( D ) transformations θ a ′ = Λ − 1 a b θ b ◮ Connection and curvature transform ◮ ω a ′ b = Λ − 1 ac ω c d Λ d b + Λ − 1 ac d Λ c b ◮ R a ′ b = Λ − 1 ac R c d Λ d b Connection and curvature are both antisymmetric-matrix-valued two-forms ∈ D ( D − 1 ) / 2 representation of SO ( D )

  11. Self-dual/anti-self-dual decomposition in 4D Duality supported by the fully antisymmetric symbol ǫ abcd ◮ Dual connection: b = 1 ω a 2 ǫ a bc ω c d ˜ d ◮ Dual curvature: b = 1 R a ˜ 2 ǫ a bc R c d d Curvature and connection ∈ 6 (antisymmetric) of SO ( 4 ) – reducible as ( 3 , 1 ) ⊕ ( 1 , 3 ) under SU ( 2 ) sd ⊗ SU ( 2 ) asd ∼ = SO ( 4 )

  12. θ 0 , θ i � � to the action of SU ( 2 ) sd ⊗ SU ( 2 ) asd Adapting the frame ◮ Connection one-form � ω 0 i + 1 / 2 ǫ ijk ω jk � ( 3 , 1 ) Σ i = 1 / 2 � ω 0 i − 1 / 2 ǫ ijk ω jk � ( 1 , 3 ) A i = 1 / 2 ◮ Curvature two-form � R 0 i + 1 / 2 ǫ ijk R jk � ( 3 , 1 ) S i = 1 / 2 � R 0 i − 1 / 2 ǫ ijk R jk � ( 1 , 3 ) A i = 1 / 2 ◮ R a b = d ω a b + ω a c ∧ ω c b decomposes ◮ S i = d Σ i − ǫ ijk Σ j ∧ Σ k ◮ A i = d A i + ǫ ijk A j ∧ A k { Σ i , S i } vectors of SU ( 2 ) sd and singlets of SU ( 2 ) asd and vice-versa for { A i , A i }

  13. Dynamics in 4D Einstein–Hilbert action in Palatini formalisms 1 � R cd ∧ θ c ∧ θ d ˜ S EH = 16 π G M 4 d ∧ θ d = 0 ˜ ◮ Vacuum equations: R c d ∧ θ d = 0 ◮ Cyclic identity for torsionless connection: R c Curvature (anti)self-duality guarantees vacuum solution ± ˜ R a R a = ⇒ Ricci flatness b b � A i = 0 S i = 0 or

  14. The M 4 geometry Foliation and spatial homogeneity [textbook: Ryan and Shepley, 1975] ◮ Topologically M 4 = R × M 3 ◮ Bianchi 3D group G acts simply transitively on the leaves M 3 M 3 is locally G ◮ left-invariant Maurer–Cartan forms σ i : d σ i = 1 jk σ j ∧ σ k 2 c i ◮ 3 linearly independent Killing vectors tangent to M 3 : � = c i � ξ i , ξ j jk ξ k ◮ Classes A ( T 3 , Heisenberg, E 1 , 1 , E 2 , SL ( 2 , R ) , SU ( 2 ) ) & B

  15. Self-dual vacuum solutions Geometry Foliation plus spatial homogeneity → ◮ Good ansatz for the metric ( g ij s functions of t ): d s 2 = d t 2 + g ij σ i σ j = δ ab θ a θ b ◮ Minimalistic (diagonal) ansatz: d s 2 = d t 2 + ∑ γ i σ i � 2 � i (the most general in most Bianchi classes)

  16. Second-order equations: A i = d A i + ǫ ijk A j ∧ A k = 0 Solutions: anti-self-dual flat connections A i = λ ij 2 σ j λ i ℓ c ℓ jk + ǫ imn λ m [ j λ n k ] = 0 G → SU ( 2 ) homomorphisms [Bourliot, Estes, Petropoulos, Spindel, 2009] ◮ λ ij = 0 rank-0 (trivial) homomorphism: Class A, Class B ◮ λ ij � = 0 ◮ rank-1: I, II, VI h = − 1 , VII h = 0 & III, IV, V ,VI h � = − 1 , VII h � = 0 ◮ rank-3: VIII, IX

  17. Bianchi IX: G ≡ SU ( 2 ) and M 3 ≡ S 3 Convenient parameterization: Ω i = γ j γ k σ 1 � 2 + Ω 3 Ω 1 σ 2 � 2 + Ω 1 Ω 2 d s 2 = Ω 1 Ω 2 Ω 3 d T 2 + Ω 2 Ω 3 σ 3 � 2 � � � Ω 1 Ω 2 Ω 3 General self-duality equations: A i = λ ij 2 σ j λ ij = 0 Lagrange system (Euler-top) [Jacobi] Ω 1 = − Ω 2 Ω 3 , Ω 2 = − Ω 3 Ω 1 , Ω 3 = − Ω 1 Ω 2 ˙ ˙ ˙ λ ij = δ ij Darboux–Halphen system [Darboux 1878; Halphen 1881] Ω 1 = Ω 2 Ω 3 − Ω 1 � Ω 2 + Ω 3 �  ˙   Ω 2 = Ω 3 Ω 1 − Ω 2 � Ω 3 + Ω 1 � ˙ Ω 3 = Ω 1 Ω 2 − Ω 3 � Ω 1 + Ω 2 �  ˙ 

  18. Solutions with γ 1 = γ 2 → SU ( 2 ) × U ( 1 ) symmetry 1. Lagrange: Eguchi–Hanson [Eguchi, Hanson, April 1978] 2 + ( σ 2 ) 2 + 1 − a 4 2 � � ρ 4 + ρ 2 ( σ 1 ) ( σ 3 ) d ρ 2 d s 2 = ρ 4 1 − a 4 4 with a removable bolt at ρ = a 2. Darboux–Halphen: Taub–NUT [Newman, Tamburino, Unti, 1963] r 2 − m 2 � ( σ 1 ) 2 + ( σ 2 ) 2 d s 2 = r + m m σ 3 � 2 d r 2 + r − m � � 4 + r − m 4 r + m with a removable nut at r = m

  19. Note: not the most general ◮ γ 1 = γ 2 = γ 3 → SU ( 2 ) × SU ( 2 ) : solution is flat space ◮ γ 1 � = γ 2 � = γ 3 → strict- SU ( 2 ) : solutions exist but have often naked singularities ◮ Lagrange system: ∃ naked singularities [Belisnky, Gibbons, Page, Pope, June 1978] ◮ Darboux–Halphen system: solvable in terms of quasi-modular forms [Halphen, 1881] , ∃ naked singularities except for one solution with a bolt [Atiyah, Hitchin, 1985] describing the configuration space of two slowly moving BPS SU ( 2 ) Yang–Mills–Higgs monopoles [Manton, 1981]

  20. Reminder: bolts and nuts Fixed points of isometries generated by ξ - characterised by the rank of ∇ [ ν ξ µ ] - potential removable or non-removable singularities, depending on the precise behaviour of g µν - χ bolt = 2 , χ nut = 1 Around t = 0 ◮ rank 4: nut – removable if γ i ≃ t / 2 ∀ i ◮ rank 2: bolt – removable if γ 1 ≃ γ 2 ≃ finite and γ 3 ≃ nt / 2 Gravitational instantons of GR are classified according to bolts, nuts and asymptotic behaviours (Euclidean vs. Taubian) within the positive-action conjecture [Gibbons, Hawking, 1979]

  21. Highlights Motivations and summary Gravitational instantons: homogeneity and self-duality The view from the leaf: geometric flows Extensions Outlook

  22. Curvature for 3D homogeneous spaces ˜ M 3 : homogeneous 3D Bianchi IX space with metric s 2 = γ ij σ i σ j = δ ij ˜ θ i ˜ θ j d ˜ ( Γ ij inverse of γ ij ) ij = − ǫ ij ℓ n ℓ k Bianchi A classes: c k ◮ Cartan–Killing: C ij = − 1 2 ǫ ℓ im ǫ kjn n mk n n ℓ ◮ Ricci: tr ( n γ ) 2 Ric [ γ ] = C − 1 det γ γ + γ n γ n γ 2 det γ

  23. Back to 4D: self-duality equations M 4 with d s 2 = d t 2 + g ij ( t ) σ i σ j Self-duality over M 4 with g ij = γ ik K k ℓ γ ℓ j A i ≡ 1 � ω 0 i − 1 � = λ ij 2 σ j ⇔ d γ ij d t = − R ij [ γ ] − 1 2 ǫ ijk ω jk 2tr ( α i α j ) 2 θ i SU ( 2 ) Yang–Mills connection over α = α i ˜ ˜ M 3 α i = ( C ij − λ ij ) t j with tr ( t i t j ) = − 2 δ ij ◮ t -independent: d α / d t = 0 ◮ flat: F ≡ d α + [ α , α ] = 0 ( ⇔ λ i ℓ c ℓ jk + ǫ imn λ m [ j λ n k ] = 0)

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend