Geologic Risk Assessment And Prospect Evaluation RoseAssoc.com - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

geologic risk assessment
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Geologic Risk Assessment And Prospect Evaluation RoseAssoc.com - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Exploration Geologic Risk Assessment And Prospect Evaluation RoseAssoc.com Nahum Schneidermann (Chevron retired) Bob Otis (Rose & Associates) In san i - ty Webster: Extreme folly or unreasonableness Albert Einstein:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Exploration Geologic Risk Assessment And Prospect Evaluation

Nahum Schneidermann (Chevron retired) Bob Otis (Rose & Associates)

RoseAssoc.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2

In – san – i - ty

Webster: “Extreme folly or unreasonableness” Albert Einstein: “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result."

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Risk Analysis:

An integrated project assessment (resources, chance, economics) under conditions of uncertainty. Utilized for subsequent Decision Analysis.

Risk Management:

The art and science of identifying, analyzing and responding to risk factors throughout the life of a project.

Risk Analysis:

An integrated project assessment (resources, chance, economics) under conditions of uncertainty. Utilized for subsequent Decision Analysis.

Risk Management:

The art and science of identifying, analyzing and responding to risk factors throughout the life of a project.

Uncertainty: Range of possible

  • utcomes

Chance: Likelihood of occurrence Risk: Threat of loss Uncertainty: Range of possible

  • utcomes

Chance: Likelihood of occurrence Risk: Threat of loss

Definitions

 

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Expected Value

The basic equation for project evaluation

EV = Pc (PVc) + Pf (PVf)

Expected Value is the sum of the probability-weighted outcomes

c = commercial success outcomes f = geologic and commercial failure outcomes

slide-5
SLIDE 5

This part of the Basic Equation is expressed as a cash-flow schedule incorporating net revenue interest (NRI), production decline, time-value of money, and anticipated inflation.

Pc

TOTAL EUR WELLHEAD PRICE NET FINDING, DEVELOPING, & OPERATING COSTS NET TAXES X

+

+

NRI *

  • (1- Pc)

NET AFTER - TAX FAILURE COST

=

PROJECT EXPECTED NET PRESENT VALUE @ X%

Basic Equation for Project Evaluation

*NRI = Net Revenue Interest = (1 – Royalty)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

This part of the Basic Equation is expressed as a cash-flow schedule incorporating net revenue interest (NRI), production decline, time-value of money, and anticipated inflation.

Pc

TOTAL EUR

WELLHEAD PRICE NET FINDING, DEVELOPING, & OPERATING COSTS NET TAXES X

+

+

NRI *

  • (1- Pc)

NET AFTER - TAX FAILURE COST

=

PROJECT EXPECTED NET PRESENT VALUE @ X%

Basic Equation for Project Evaluation

*NRI = Net Revenue Interest = (1 – Royalty)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Exploration Evaluation Process

Geologic Chance Assessment Probabilistic EUR Estimation Prospect or Play Evaluation Engineering, Economics, Com./Econ. Truncation Drill? Post Drill Assessments, Performance Tracking Recommended Technology Spending Recommend Process Improvements Recommend Process Improvements Recommend Process Improvements After Otis & Schneidermann, 1997

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • 1. Discuss uncertainty in E&P, its magnitude and

effects, and the application of statistics to characterize uncertainty

  • 2. Discuss fundamentals of estimating prospect

resources (EUR) and assessment of chance of success, that lead to accurate calculation of value and better exploration decisions

  • 3. Convey the importance of assessing geotechnical

performance, by comparing forecasts of estimated ultimate recovery, critical chance factors, and profitability with actual outcomes

  • 4. Learn, network and have fun

Objectives

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • 1. Discuss uncertainty in E&P, its magnitude and

effects, and the application of statistics to characterize uncertainty

  • 2. Discuss fundamentals of estimating prospect

resources (EUR) and assessment of chance of success, that lead to accurate calculation of value and better exploration decisions

  • 3. Convey the importance of assessing geotechnical

performance, by comparing forecasts of estimated ultimate recovery, critical chance factors, and profitability with actual outcomes

  • 4. Learn, network and have fun

Objectives Statistics and Uncertainty

slide-10
SLIDE 10

One of two or more things which can occur, aka, possible outcomes What does occur Subjective confidence about the likelihood of an uncertain future event, given repeated trials An orderly portrayal of related data samples selected from a population Event: Outcome: Probability: Distribution:

Definitions

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Sample and Population Descriptive Terms

  • Measures of central tendency

– Mode – the most frequent event – Median – half events are above; half are below – Mean – average of all values in the distribution

  • Measures of uncertainty

– Variance – the average of squares about the mean – Standard deviation – square root of variance – P10/P90 – ratio of the P10 to the P90

slide-12
SLIDE 12
  • Definitions: % >= (‘GE’) or % <= (‘LE’)
  • Industry standard: % >= (‘GE’)

– Explorers think in terms of large discoveries – Consistent with SEC / SPE / WPC / AAPG guidelines – Commercial threshold truncations easier to apply – Less confusing for decision makers

In a Greater Than convention:

  • P10 is the larger number
  • P90 is the smaller number

Plotting Conventions

slide-13
SLIDE 13

What Are P10 and P90?

  • In the GE convention

– P10 is the value on the distribution for which there is a 10% probability that a random selection from that distribution will be greater than or equal to that value – this is a large number – P90 is the value on the distribution for which there is a 90% probability that a random selection from that distribution will be greater than or equal to that value – this is a small number

  • In the LE convention

– P10 is the value on the distribution for which there is a 10% probability that a random selection from that distribution will be less than or equal to that value – this is a small number – P90 is the value on the distribution for which there is a 90% probability that a random selection from that distribution will be less than or equal to that value – this is a large number

  • These definitions apply to any Pvalue
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Distributions

14

Sums tend to have distributions that are normal-like Products tend to have distributions that are lognormal-like

Estimates of EUR (Resources) are products: Area x Avg Net Pay x Recovery Yield

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Data from Abbotts, 1991

Resource Field Size Distribution North Sea Brent Play

Estimates of EUR are products: (Area x Net Pay x Recovery Yield)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Derived from Cossey & Associates, Inc. Deepwater Database

Productive Area Distribution GOM DW

Estimates of Area are products: (Length x Width)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Derived from Cossey & Associates, Inc. Deepwater Database

Avg Net Pay Distribution Brazil DW

Estimates of Net Pay are products: (Thickness x N/G)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

After Capen, 1984

April Rainfall (Inches) Dallas, 1931-1969

Most natural processes are products: Why rainfall?

Rainfall (inches)

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • 1. Discuss uncertainty in E&P, its magnitude and

effects, and the application of statistics to characterize uncertainty

  • 2. Discuss fundamentals of estimating prospect

resources (EUR) and assessment of chance of success, that lead to accurate calculation of value and better exploration decisions

  • 3. Convey the importance of assessing geotechnical

performance, by comparing forecasts of estimated ultimate recovery, critical chance factors, and profitability with actual outcomes

  • 4. Learn, network and have fun

Objectives Estimation of Resource and Chance

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Critical Success Factors

  • Develop and maintain a rigorous, probabilistic

process that delivers predictable resources - Deliver what you promise

  • Focus on high quality technical evaluations of

prospects and plays - Strong focus on fundamentals

  • Improve assessment of prospect chance,

volumes and risk through calibration with actual results to allow better portfolio decisions – Active performance tracking

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Prospect or Play Evaluation

  • Do we have a Source of hydrocarbons? What

kind – oil or gas?

  • Can we Migrate the hydrocarbons from the

source to the trap with the right Timing? When and how much?

  • Do we have a Reservoir to store the

hydrocarbons? What are its characteristics?

  • Is the a Closure to trap the hydrocarbons in the

reservoir? How big is it?

  • Is there a seal that will Contain the hydrocarbons

to the present day? How efficient is it?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Five Independent Chance Factors Multiplied Together Yields Pg

  • Do we have a Source of hydrocarbons? What

kind – oil or gas?

  • Can we Migrate the hydrocarbons from the

source to the trap with the right Timing? When and how much?

  • Do we have a Reservoir to store the

hydrocarbons? What are its characteristics?

  • Is the a Closure to trap the hydrocarbons in the

reservoir? How big is it?

  • Is there a seal that will Contain the hydrocarbons

to the present day? How efficient is it?

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Five Independent Chance Factors Multiplied Together Yields Pg

Source Timing & Migration Reservoir Closure Contain- ment

Source presence Source quality Generation history Migration pathways Migration shadows Preservation Reservoir presence Reservoir continuity Porosity Permeability Diagenesis Data quality Data control Structural complexity Velocity variations Depth variations Seal lithology & continuity # of seals necessary Fault gouge Pore pressure

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Van Krevelen Diagrams - Oil or Gas?

  • Indicates kerogen type

which impacts whether source rock is oil prone (Type I), gas prone (Type III) or both (Type II)

  • What is Fm 4?

24

Type II Fm 1 Fm 2 Fm 3 Fm 4

Plot hydrogen and oxygen indices obtained from pyrolysis

Oxygen Index (mg CO2/g org. carbon) Hydrogen Index (mg hydroc. compounds/g org. carbon)

Type I Type III

slide-25
SLIDE 25

From Roberts, et al, 2005

Petroleum-System Events Charts

Source Reservoir

slide-26
SLIDE 26

From Magoon & Dow, 1994

Petroleum-System Events Charts

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Data from Abbotts, 1991

Maps, Cross Sections, Well Logs Armada Field, North Sea

Summary Log => <= Structure Map Cross Section =>

slide-28
SLIDE 28

From Geomage advertisement, The Leading Edge, 2013

Seismic Data Quality

What is the chance of structural closure, faulting, good velocity control?

slide-29
SLIDE 29

0.0 – 0.2

(1/10)

0.8 – 1.0

(9/10)

0.2 – 0.4

(1/3)

0.4 – 0.6

(1/2)

0.6 – 0.8

(2/3)

0.3 – 0.45

(2/5)

0.45 – 0.55

(1/2)

0.55 – 0.7

(3/5)

Bad News Good News “Coin Toss” Quality Quantity Confidence level Control

Poor Limited Good Lots Low High

Chance Factor Adequacy Matrix

DATA

Geological Probability of Success

Pg

Rose & Associates, Training Manual

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Resource Estimation

  • Do we have a Source of hydrocarbons? What

kind – oil or gas?

  • Can we Migrate the hydrocarbons from the

source to the trap with the right Timing? When and how much?

  • Do we have a Reservoir to store the

hydrocarbons? What are its characteristics?

  • Is the a Closure to trap the hydrocarbons in the

reservoir? How big is it?

  • Is there a seal that will Contain the hydrocarbons

to the present day? How efficient is it?

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Estimation of Resource

Source Timing & Migration Reservoir Closure Contain- ment

Hydrocarbon type Oil or gas or both? Fluid properties GOR Wet or dry gas? Depositional Environ. Reservoir thickness, continuity & temp. Porosity Permeability Water saturation Structural or stratigraphic trap? Productive area Spill point HC column height Depth of burial Hydrocarbon column Shale or Evaporite? Cataclasis? Capillary pressure Overpressure? Temperature

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Data from Abbotts, 1991

Maps, Cross Sections, Well Logs Armada Field, North Sea

Depositional Environment, Porosity => <= Area, Column, Trap Type Depth, Burial History, Temperature, Pressure =>

slide-33
SLIDE 33

From Taylor, et al, 2010

Porosity Depth Plots

  • Porosity normally

decreases as depth increases

  • Porosity-depth

plots illustrate the uncertainty associated with specific depth intervals

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Reality Checks

slide-35
SLIDE 35

The P99 is typically driven by economics

Reality Checks

slide-36
SLIDE 36

The P01 is typically driven by geology The P99 is typically driven by economics

Reality Checks

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Derived from Cossey & Associates, Inc. Deepwater Database

Reality Checks Drivers of Uncertainty

Downside potential is similar What drives the upside difference?

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Derived from Cossey & Associates, Inc. Deepwater Database

Reality Checks Drivers of Uncertainty

Avg Net Pay is similar in all three plays

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Derived from Cossey & Associates, Inc. Deepwater Database

  • Prod. area is a key driver

Why the separation in the Campos Basin?

Reality Checks Drivers of Uncertainty

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Focus On Fundamentals

  • 1. Obtain a thorough understanding of the

geologic, geophysical and engineering aspects

  • f the opportunity
  • 2. Using well founded statistical methods, develop

as estimate of the distribution of resource volumes – focus on reality checks

  • 3. Once the resource distribution is documented,

assess the chance that an active hydrocarbon system can provide the range of volumes

slide-41
SLIDE 41
  • 1. Discuss uncertainty in E&P, its magnitude and

effects, and the application of statistics to characterize uncertainty

  • 2. Discuss fundamentals of estimating prospect

resources (EUR) and assessment of chance of success, that lead to accurate calculation of value and better exploration decisions

  • 3. Convey the importance of assessing geotechnical

performance, by comparing forecasts of estimated ultimate recovery, critical chance factors, and profitability with actual outcomes

  • 4. Learn, network and have fun

Objectives Estimation of Resource and Chance

slide-42
SLIDE 42
  • Simply put, the end goal of performance tracking

is to provide assurance to our stakeholders that we can deliver what we promise!

  • Our stakeholders want to be assured that, if they

invest capital and trust in our projects, we will deliver, with a high degree of confidence, the agreed performance targets What performance metrics do you use? What metrics do your stakeholders use?

The End Goal of Performance Tracking

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Sequence of Targets Drilled

Harper, 1999

25 50 75 100 125 Predicted Actual Volumes from All Discoveries Predictive Accuracy = 45%

What is this gap of cumulative under- delivery called?

Global Deepwater Targets

“As with most exploration companies, BP has tended to. . .

  • verestimate the potential discovery volumes prior to drilling --

this trend is even more pronounced for deep water prospects [where] volume estimation. . . remains significantly poorer than expected.” Francis Harper (BP) 1999

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Sequence of Targets Drilled

Harper, 1999

25 50 75 100 125 Predicted Actual Volumes from All Discoveries Predictive Accuracy = 45%

Global Deepwater Targets

BIAS

“As with most exploration companies, BP has tended to. . .

  • verestimate the potential discovery volumes prior to drilling --

this trend is even more pronounced for deep water prospects [where] volume estimation. . . remains significantly poorer than expected.” Francis Harper (BP) 1999

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Pre and Post Drill Estimates Norwegian North Sea

Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, 1997 1 10 100 1,000 10,000

Size of Discovery, MMBOE

1 10 100 1,000 10,000

Expected Size Before Licensing, MMBOE

Evidence for motivational bias ?

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Pre and Post Drill Estimates Norwegian North Sea

Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, 2008 0.1 1 10 100 1,000 0.1 1 10 100 1,000

Expected Size Before Licensing, MMm3 Size of Discovery, MMm3

Evidence for motivational bias ?

10x 0.1x

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Percentile Histograms

  • Plot a histogram of where the post drill outcome falls on the pre drill

distribution

  • If the post-drill result from each pre-drill distribution is random, over time,

the result will be a uniform distribution Otis and Schneidermann, 1997

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Diagnostics

Heavy on the downside – too

  • ptimistic

Heavy on the upside – too pessimistic Heavy on both up - and downsides – need to widen ranges Uniform distribution - acceptable Otis and Schneidermann, 1997

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Percentage of Discoveries at Forecast Percentile

Otis and Schneidermann, 1997

1989 - 90 n = 22 Chevron International

50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

P80 P60 P40 P20

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Percentage of Discoveries at Forecast Percentile – EUR Parameters

Otis and Schneidermann, 1997 1989-1990 parameter percentile histograms

slide-51
SLIDE 51

10 20 30 40 50

Percentage of Discoveries at Forecast Percentile

1993 - 94 n = 34

Otis and Schneidermann, 1997

Chevron International

50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

P80 P60 P40 P20

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Most common cause of poor estimation of EUR: Low-side (P99) estimates EUR Estimating Pitfalls

slide-53
SLIDE 53

Calibration of Pg or Pc

From McMaster, 2008

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Calibration of Pg or Pc

From McMaster, 2008

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Critical Success Factors

  • Develop and maintain a rigorous, probabilistic

process that delivers predictable resources - Deliver what you promise

  • Focus on high quality technical evaluations of

prospects and plays - Strong focus on fundamentals

  • Improve assessment of prospect chance,

volumes and risk through calibration with actual results to allow better portfolio decisions – Active performance tracking

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Experience is Inevitable, Learning is Not!

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Thank You For Your Attention

www.roseassoc.com garycitron or bobotis@roseassoc.com