Genetic Prediction of Individual Breast Cancer Risk Peter Devilee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

genetic prediction of individual breast cancer risk
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Genetic Prediction of Individual Breast Cancer Risk Peter Devilee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Genetic Prediction of Individual Breast Cancer Risk Peter Devilee Leiden University Medical Center Br63 Br45 Br46 44 10-Year risk to develop breast cancer in the Netherlands 4,00% 3,50% Absolute 3,00% risk 2,50% 2,00% 1,50% 1,00%


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Genetic Prediction of Individual Breast Cancer Risk

Peter Devilee Leiden University Medical Center

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Br46 44 Br63 Br45

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10-Year risk to develop breast cancer in the Netherlands

0,00% 0,50% 1,00% 1,50% 2,00% 2,50% 3,00% 3,50% 4,00% 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90

Data: Netherlands Cancer Registry, 1999-2003

Absolute risk Age

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lifetime breast cancer risk in NL

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1990 2000 2010 % Risk Year

Incidence* Death

* Invasive + CIS; Bron: IKNL

slide-6
SLIDE 6

You?

slide-7
SLIDE 7

0%

Risk stratification

100% Communicating risk:

  • Relative risk
  • Absolute risk
  • Lifetime risk
  • Cumulative risk
  • 10-year risk
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Br46 44 Br63 Br45

“Am I at risk?”

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Breast cancer prevention

Options

 Chemoprevention  Prophylactic surgery  Screening

Disadvantages

 Side-effects  Over-diagnosis  Increased cost Target those most likely to benefit Identify women at greatest disease risk

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Br46 44 Br63 Br45

“Am I at risk?”

Genetic Test

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Genetic testing in NL

Linkage analysis

1991

BRCA1 BRCA2

1994 1995

CHEK2

2014

Gene panels (Research) PALB2

2018

Specific Cancer Syndromes: TP53, PTEN, CDH1, NF1, . . . .

slide-12
SLIDE 12

1 10 0,000001 0,00001 0,0001 0,001 0,01 0,1 1

Relative Risk Allele frequency

BRCA1 BRCA2 TP53 PALB2 CHEK2 ATM CDH1 STK11 PTEN

Risk SNPs

Genetic architecture of breast cancer

1. BRCA1, BRCA2 2. Non-B1/2 genes 3. Risk SNPs

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Risk management in NL

Low (RR <2) Moderate (RR: 2-3) High (RR >3) Life time risk <20% 20-30% >30% Start screening 50 yr 40 yr 35 yr Physical examination

  • +

Mammography population screening <50 yr: annually >50 yr: population screening <60 yr: annually >60 yr: population screening MRI

  • BRCA1/2 mutation carriers:
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Uncertainties in risk level

Easton et al. 2015

Low Moderate High

PALB2 CHEK2 2x lifetime risk 4x lifetime risk

Genetic risk Population risk 95% CI

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Br46 44 Br63 Br45

“Am I at risk?”

BRCA1/2 Test = Negative

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Breast cancer risk prediction tools

 Absolute Risk Prediction Models  Gene Carrier Status Risk Prediction

Models

 Risk Prediction Models of Women at High

Risk

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Risk factors for breast cancer

 Biology

 Age  Hormonal factors  Breast density on mammogram

 Lifestyle

 Reproductive factors  Alcohol / smoking / physical exercise / obesity  Use of HRT, radiation exposure

 Family history

 Familial relative risk (FRR)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

FRR for breast cancer is ~2-fold

Number of Affected First Degree Relatives Relative Risk (99% CI) 1.00

(0.97 – 1.03)

1 1.80

(1.70 – 1.91)

2

2.93

(2.37 – 3.63)

≥3

3.90

(2.03 – 7.49)

Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2001)

~12% of all patients and 7% of controls

slide-19
SLIDE 19

FRR explained by “genetics”

(25 years of genetic research)

Unexplained: 41%*

BRCA1 BRCA2 CHEK2 ATM PALB2 TP53 PTEN LKB1 27 pre-iCOGS SNPs (9%) ~80 new SNPs

  • n iCOGS (5%)

~65 new SNPs Oncoarray (4%) Estimated

  • n chip (18%)

* For overall breast cancer in Europeans (Lower for ER-negative disease, early onset disease, and breast cancer in non-Europeans)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The multifactorial model

Number of individuals

Fletcher & Houlston (2010)

Risk level

Avg Risk

slide-21
SLIDE 21

All breast cancer SNPs

77 SNPs – max 154 risk alleles

(N = 33,381) (N = 33,673)

Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Two-way SNP interactions

Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036

slide-23
SLIDE 23

A polygenic risk score (PRS)

5% of women 5% of women

Under a polygenic multiplicative model

For women in the highest 1% of the PRS, the estimated OR compared with women in the middle quintile was 3.36 (95%CI: 2.95-3.83, p= 7.5x10-74)

Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036

slide-24
SLIDE 24

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Absolute risk Age (years)

All Breast Cancers

>99% 95-99% 90-95% 80-90% 60-80% 40-60% 20-40% 10-20% 5-10% 1-5% <1%

Risk of developing breast cancer

80% of women

All Breast Cancers – Absolute lifetime risk

Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036

slide-25
SLIDE 25

PRS and family history

Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Br46 44 Br63 Br45

“Am I at risk?”

BRCA1/2 Test = Negative

SNPs

PRS

Gene Panel Testing

ATM

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Panel testing: which genes are relevant?

Gene Breast Ovary BRCA1 BRCA2 TP53 PTEN CDH1 STK11 PALB2 ATM CHEK2 NF1 BRIP1 RAD51C RAD51D

Yes > 2x risk? Probably Unlikely No Unknown

Douglas Easton, unpublished

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Don’t just do panel testing!

0.1 1 10

CHEK2 ATM PALB2 BRCA2 BRCA1

  • Approx. Centile

10% <0.1% 1%

Relative Risk

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Br46 44 Br63 Br45

“Am I at risk?”

BRCA1/2 Test = Negative

SNPs

PRS

Gene Panel Testing

ATM + Other risk factors:

  • Family history
  • Breast density etc.
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Examples

Hilbers et al., manuscript in preparation

* * * * CHEK2* 1100delC

1.24 1.62 1.02 1.50 1.68 1.55 1.62 PRS-160 Odds Ratio

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Combining PRS with family history

Lakeman et al., unpublished

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Counseling familial breast cancer

Current practice

 Aimed at identifying or

excluding high risk

 Test affected individual  In “positive” families:

 Carriers are given gene-

specific risks

 Those testing negative are

given population risk

 In “negative” families,

family history determines risk Future practice

 A more holistic approach,

aimed at establishing individual risk

 Anyone can be tested  A wide range of risk

levels can be found

 Some risk factors are

modifiable

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Outstanding issues

 Which genes confer risk?  Allelic diversity and risk*  Imprecise risk estimates  How do risk factors combine?*

* Journal Club

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Filling in the gaps…

Allele frequency Penetrance

0.001 0.01 0.1

Sequencing studies: Terra incognita GWA studies: Stretching limits Linkage studies: exhausted

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Need to do REALLY BIG studies

slide-36
SLIDE 36

BRIDGES Gene Panel Sequencing

Studies Cases Controls Population-based 23 18,513 15,503 “Other” (clinic- based, selected for FH or bilaterality) 12 12,891 8,615 TOTAL 35 31,404 24,118

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Truncating variants – known genes

Pop-based Familial/other Gene Cases Controls OR OR (95%CI) P BRCA1 278 35 11.96 (7.01-20.41) 2.53 (1.37-4.67) 6.7x10-25 BRCA2 394 110 3.51 (2.68-4.61) 2.85 (1.74-4.67) 1.1x10-24 PALB2 224 29 4.39 (2.75-7.02) 17.48 (7.53-40.59) 4.9x10-20 ATM 230 83 1.92 (1.33-2.76) 2.61 (1.67-4.10) 3.3x10-9 CHEK2 706 166 2.48 (1.96-3.13) 5.16 (3.80-7.02) 3.6x10-41

  • 1100delC 591

130 2.67 (2.04-3.49) 5.05 (3.66-6.98) 2.6x10-36

  • other

117 36 1.94 (1.21-3.20) 4.07 (1.75-9.48) 3.0x10-6

BRIDGES consortium, preliminary data

slide-38
SLIDE 38

DNA variation and breast cancer

Long-range enhancers Transcription factor binding sites

5’

Aminoacid substitutions UTR Splicing signals UTR

3’

miRNA binding sites Polyadenylation signals

  • Real breast cancer genes
  • Candidate breast cancer genes
  • Common SNPs
slide-39
SLIDE 39

Complementation and HR efficiency

0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 1,4

Relative HR to WT HBRCA2

hBRCA2 WT

Mesman et al., submitted

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Translating functional results into cancer risk

OR 1 OR 1.5 OR 2.0 OR 2.5 OR 3.0

0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2

Relative HR efficiency

Continuous Model

OR > 3

OR 8.0

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Towards better risk prediction

Genetics Family history Lifestyle Hormonal factors Breast density

Risk Calculator Personal risk estimate

slide-42
SLIDE 42

10-Year risk to develop breast cancer in the Netherlands

0,00% 0,50% 1,00% 1,50% 2,00% 2,50% 3,00% 3,50% 4,00% 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90

Data: Netherlands Cancer Registry, 1999-2003

Start mammographic screening

Absolute risk Age

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Risk stratification

0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 year risk Age (years)

All Breast Cancers

>99% 95-99% 90-95% 80-90% 60-80% 40-60% 20-40% 10-20% 5-10% 1-5% <1%

10-year risk all breast cancers, by SNP profile

OR = 1.00

20% of women reach threshold before age 40 20-40% of women never reach threshold

Screening threshold

Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036

slide-44
SLIDE 44
  • Pop. Avg.

Risk

Identifying surveillance group

8% of women 17% of cases Clinical Guideline: Enhanced surveillance when lifetime risk > 17%

slide-45
SLIDE 45
slide-46
SLIDE 46

Acknowlegdements

LUMC

 Romy Mesman, Inge

Lakeman, Rick Boonen, Harry Vrieling, Haico van Attikum, Maaike Vreeswijk, Mar Rodriguez

 Clinical Genetics: Christi

van Asperen, Setareh Moghadasi, Juul Wijnen (Inter)national

 Douglas Easton  Jacques Simard  Fergus Couch  Matti Rookus (for Hebon)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Thank you for your attention…