Genetic Prediction of Individual Breast Cancer Risk Peter Devilee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Genetic Prediction of Individual Breast Cancer Risk Peter Devilee - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Genetic Prediction of Individual Breast Cancer Risk Peter Devilee Leiden University Medical Center Br63 Br45 Br46 44 10-Year risk to develop breast cancer in the Netherlands 4,00% 3,50% Absolute 3,00% risk 2,50% 2,00% 1,50% 1,00%
Br46 44 Br63 Br45
10-Year risk to develop breast cancer in the Netherlands
0,00% 0,50% 1,00% 1,50% 2,00% 2,50% 3,00% 3,50% 4,00% 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
Data: Netherlands Cancer Registry, 1999-2003
Absolute risk Age
Lifetime breast cancer risk in NL
2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1990 2000 2010 % Risk Year
Incidence* Death
* Invasive + CIS; Bron: IKNL
You?
0%
Risk stratification
100% Communicating risk:
- Relative risk
- Absolute risk
- Lifetime risk
- Cumulative risk
- 10-year risk
Br46 44 Br63 Br45
“Am I at risk?”
Breast cancer prevention
Options
Chemoprevention Prophylactic surgery Screening
Disadvantages
Side-effects Over-diagnosis Increased cost Target those most likely to benefit Identify women at greatest disease risk
Br46 44 Br63 Br45
“Am I at risk?”
Genetic Test
Genetic testing in NL
Linkage analysis
1991
BRCA1 BRCA2
1994 1995
CHEK2
2014
Gene panels (Research) PALB2
2018
Specific Cancer Syndromes: TP53, PTEN, CDH1, NF1, . . . .
1 10 0,000001 0,00001 0,0001 0,001 0,01 0,1 1
Relative Risk Allele frequency
BRCA1 BRCA2 TP53 PALB2 CHEK2 ATM CDH1 STK11 PTEN
Risk SNPs
Genetic architecture of breast cancer
1. BRCA1, BRCA2 2. Non-B1/2 genes 3. Risk SNPs
Risk management in NL
Low (RR <2) Moderate (RR: 2-3) High (RR >3) Life time risk <20% 20-30% >30% Start screening 50 yr 40 yr 35 yr Physical examination
- +
Mammography population screening <50 yr: annually >50 yr: population screening <60 yr: annually >60 yr: population screening MRI
- BRCA1/2 mutation carriers:
Uncertainties in risk level
Easton et al. 2015
Low Moderate High
PALB2 CHEK2 2x lifetime risk 4x lifetime risk
Genetic risk Population risk 95% CI
Br46 44 Br63 Br45
“Am I at risk?”
BRCA1/2 Test = Negative
Breast cancer risk prediction tools
Absolute Risk Prediction Models Gene Carrier Status Risk Prediction
Models
Risk Prediction Models of Women at High
Risk
Risk factors for breast cancer
Biology
Age Hormonal factors Breast density on mammogram
Lifestyle
Reproductive factors Alcohol / smoking / physical exercise / obesity Use of HRT, radiation exposure
Family history
Familial relative risk (FRR)
FRR for breast cancer is ~2-fold
Number of Affected First Degree Relatives Relative Risk (99% CI) 1.00
(0.97 – 1.03)
1 1.80
(1.70 – 1.91)
2
2.93
(2.37 – 3.63)
≥3
3.90
(2.03 – 7.49)
Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2001)
~12% of all patients and 7% of controls
FRR explained by “genetics”
(25 years of genetic research)
Unexplained: 41%*
BRCA1 BRCA2 CHEK2 ATM PALB2 TP53 PTEN LKB1 27 pre-iCOGS SNPs (9%) ~80 new SNPs
- n iCOGS (5%)
~65 new SNPs Oncoarray (4%) Estimated
- n chip (18%)
* For overall breast cancer in Europeans (Lower for ER-negative disease, early onset disease, and breast cancer in non-Europeans)
The multifactorial model
Number of individuals
Fletcher & Houlston (2010)
Risk level
Avg Risk
All breast cancer SNPs
77 SNPs – max 154 risk alleles
(N = 33,381) (N = 33,673)
Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036
Two-way SNP interactions
Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036
A polygenic risk score (PRS)
5% of women 5% of women
Under a polygenic multiplicative model
For women in the highest 1% of the PRS, the estimated OR compared with women in the middle quintile was 3.36 (95%CI: 2.95-3.83, p= 7.5x10-74)
Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 Absolute risk Age (years)
All Breast Cancers
>99% 95-99% 90-95% 80-90% 60-80% 40-60% 20-40% 10-20% 5-10% 1-5% <1%
Risk of developing breast cancer
80% of women
All Breast Cancers – Absolute lifetime risk
Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036
PRS and family history
Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036
Br46 44 Br63 Br45
“Am I at risk?”
BRCA1/2 Test = Negative
SNPs
PRS
Gene Panel Testing
ATM
Panel testing: which genes are relevant?
Gene Breast Ovary BRCA1 BRCA2 TP53 PTEN CDH1 STK11 PALB2 ATM CHEK2 NF1 BRIP1 RAD51C RAD51D
Yes > 2x risk? Probably Unlikely No Unknown
Douglas Easton, unpublished
Don’t just do panel testing!
0.1 1 10
CHEK2 ATM PALB2 BRCA2 BRCA1
- Approx. Centile
10% <0.1% 1%
Relative Risk
Br46 44 Br63 Br45
“Am I at risk?”
BRCA1/2 Test = Negative
SNPs
PRS
Gene Panel Testing
ATM + Other risk factors:
- Family history
- Breast density etc.
Examples
Hilbers et al., manuscript in preparation
* * * * CHEK2* 1100delC
1.24 1.62 1.02 1.50 1.68 1.55 1.62 PRS-160 Odds Ratio
Combining PRS with family history
Lakeman et al., unpublished
Counseling familial breast cancer
Current practice
Aimed at identifying or
excluding high risk
Test affected individual In “positive” families:
Carriers are given gene-
specific risks
Those testing negative are
given population risk
In “negative” families,
family history determines risk Future practice
A more holistic approach,
aimed at establishing individual risk
Anyone can be tested A wide range of risk
levels can be found
Some risk factors are
modifiable
Outstanding issues
Which genes confer risk? Allelic diversity and risk* Imprecise risk estimates How do risk factors combine?*
* Journal Club
Filling in the gaps…
Allele frequency Penetrance
0.001 0.01 0.1
Sequencing studies: Terra incognita GWA studies: Stretching limits Linkage studies: exhausted
Need to do REALLY BIG studies
BRIDGES Gene Panel Sequencing
Studies Cases Controls Population-based 23 18,513 15,503 “Other” (clinic- based, selected for FH or bilaterality) 12 12,891 8,615 TOTAL 35 31,404 24,118
Truncating variants – known genes
Pop-based Familial/other Gene Cases Controls OR OR (95%CI) P BRCA1 278 35 11.96 (7.01-20.41) 2.53 (1.37-4.67) 6.7x10-25 BRCA2 394 110 3.51 (2.68-4.61) 2.85 (1.74-4.67) 1.1x10-24 PALB2 224 29 4.39 (2.75-7.02) 17.48 (7.53-40.59) 4.9x10-20 ATM 230 83 1.92 (1.33-2.76) 2.61 (1.67-4.10) 3.3x10-9 CHEK2 706 166 2.48 (1.96-3.13) 5.16 (3.80-7.02) 3.6x10-41
- 1100delC 591
130 2.67 (2.04-3.49) 5.05 (3.66-6.98) 2.6x10-36
- other
117 36 1.94 (1.21-3.20) 4.07 (1.75-9.48) 3.0x10-6
BRIDGES consortium, preliminary data
DNA variation and breast cancer
Long-range enhancers Transcription factor binding sites
5’
Aminoacid substitutions UTR Splicing signals UTR
3’
miRNA binding sites Polyadenylation signals
- Real breast cancer genes
- Candidate breast cancer genes
- Common SNPs
Complementation and HR efficiency
0,0 0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1,0 1,2 1,4
Relative HR to WT HBRCA2
hBRCA2 WT
Mesman et al., submitted
Translating functional results into cancer risk
OR 1 OR 1.5 OR 2.0 OR 2.5 OR 3.0
0,2 0,4 0,6 0,8 1 1,2
Relative HR efficiency
Continuous Model
OR > 3
OR 8.0
Towards better risk prediction
Genetics Family history Lifestyle Hormonal factors Breast density
Risk Calculator Personal risk estimate
10-Year risk to develop breast cancer in the Netherlands
0,00% 0,50% 1,00% 1,50% 2,00% 2,50% 3,00% 3,50% 4,00% 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90
Data: Netherlands Cancer Registry, 1999-2003
Start mammographic screening
Absolute risk Age
Risk stratification
0.00 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.10 0.12 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 10 year risk Age (years)
All Breast Cancers
>99% 95-99% 90-95% 80-90% 60-80% 40-60% 20-40% 10-20% 5-10% 1-5% <1%
10-year risk all breast cancers, by SNP profile
OR = 1.00
20% of women reach threshold before age 40 20-40% of women never reach threshold
Screening threshold
Mavaddat et al (2015), JNCI 107: djv036
- Pop. Avg.
Risk
Identifying surveillance group
8% of women 17% of cases Clinical Guideline: Enhanced surveillance when lifetime risk > 17%
Acknowlegdements
LUMC
Romy Mesman, Inge
Lakeman, Rick Boonen, Harry Vrieling, Haico van Attikum, Maaike Vreeswijk, Mar Rodriguez
Clinical Genetics: Christi
van Asperen, Setareh Moghadasi, Juul Wijnen (Inter)national
Douglas Easton Jacques Simard Fergus Couch Matti Rookus (for Hebon)
Thank you for your attention…