Generator Interconnection Procedures Stephen Rutty Manager, Grid - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

generator interconnection procedures
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Generator Interconnection Procedures Stephen Rutty Manager, Grid - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Decision on Improvements to the Generator Interconnection Procedures Stephen Rutty Manager, Grid Assets Board of Governors Meeting General Session September 9, 2010 The ISO oversees the interconnection of generators to the transmission grid.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Decision on Improvements to the Generator Interconnection Procedures

Stephen Rutty Manager, Grid Assets Board of Governors Meeting General Session September 9, 2010

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Slide 2

  • ISO is required to ensure safe and reliable generator

interconnections.

  • Currently two processes:
  • Small generator interconnection procedures (SGIP) 20 MW and

less

  • 119 active SGIP projects – 2,223.85 MW
  • Large generator interconnection procedures (LGIP) greater than

20 MW

  • 179 active LGIP projects – 44,724.4 MW

The ISO oversees the interconnection of generators to the transmission grid.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The ISO experienced a recent surge in interconnection requests for small generators (20 MW or less).

  • The state’s renewable portfolio

standard goals will continue to drive dramatic increases

  • Same problems experienced with

the former serial LGIP process

  • Serial one at a time study process
  • verwhelmed and backlogged
  • Impacts of small and large projects

must be considered together

Slide 3

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 2007 2008 2009 2010 YTD

Number of Projects Year

Annual ISO SGIP Interconnection Requests

Projects per Year

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The ISO led a collaborative stakeholder process to explore issues and develop solutions.

  • Three in-person stakeholder meetings
  • Four in-person and fifteen teleconference volunteer

working group meetings

  • Three rounds of stakeholder written comments

Slide 4

Issues Gathering Solution Development Solution Refinement

February March April May June July August September

Final proposal balances diverse stakeholder interests

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The primary issues identified through the process are addressed in the proposal.

  • Provides cost and timing certainty to interconnection

customers;

  • Accommodates any number of requests in a scalable

study process;

  • Considers interdependencies of small and large

generator interconnection requests;

  • Provides options for qualified projects to be studied

quickly; and

  • Provides small generators enhanced opportunities for

deliverability assessment.

Slide 5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The proposal combines SGIP and LGIP into a unified generator interconnection procedure (GIP).

Slide 6

  • Annual cluster study track
  • Provides a shorter timeline than current LGIP and similar to SGIP
  • Approximately 420 calendar days
  • Network upgrades shared proportionately with cost certainty
  • Alternative independent study process track
  • Qualifying projects may apply any time of year
  • Approximately 240 calendar days
  • Project responsible for network upgrades
  • Modified fast track
  • Increased size from current 2MW to 5MW
  • Relaxed screening criteria
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Key proposal elements:

Element Current Procedures Proposed Combined GIP SGIP LGIP

Study Process Serial Cluster Cluster Deliverability Assessment

 

Study Deposit Per individual study estimates Tiered ($100K or $250K) Volumetric ($50K plus $1K per MW capped at $250K) Financial Security Postings At start of construction After each study phase After each study phase

Alternatives to Cluster Study

Independent Study Process Track

Fast Track

 

Slide 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Stakeholders support major aspects of proposal but concerns remain.

Issue ISO Response

Study timelines still too long Proposal will allow a project to be studied more quickly than current serial process. Cost allocation Project upgrade costs are shared proportionately and equitably within a cluster and are capped. Independent study eligibility criteria Proposal strikes the right balance without undermining the benefits of the cluster approach. Data availability ISO committed to make information more

  • available. No tariff change required to

implement. Wholesale Distribution Access Tariff (WDAT) impacts PTO’s have committed to hold a stakeholder process for the WDAT.

Slide 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Management recommends approval of the proposed generator interconnection procedures.

Slide 9

  • The proposed reforms provide:
  • A more effective and streamlined interconnection process for

both small and large generation

  • Greater certainty on cost and schedule
  • Enhanced opportunities for small generators to have full

deliverability

  • Proposal will enable more timely processing of

interconnection requests to meet the state’s renewable portfolio standard goals.