gender based differences in abdominal aortic aneurysm aaa
play

GENDER BASED DIFFERENCES IN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM (AAA) RUPTURE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GENDER BASED DIFFERENCES IN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM (AAA) RUPTURE -Srikrishna Varun Malayala, MBBS Mentors: -Khalid J Qazi, MD, MACP -Paul M Anain, MD 1. http:/ / a o rtic ste nts.c o m/ wha t-is-a b do mina l-a o rtic -a ne urysm/ (05/


  1. GENDER BASED DIFFERENCES IN ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM (AAA) RUPTURE -Srikrishna Varun Malayala, MBBS Mentors: -Khalid J Qazi, MD, MACP -Paul M Anain, MD 1. http:/ / a o rtic ste nts.c o m/ wha t-is-a b do mina l-a o rtic -a ne urysm/ (05/ 23/ 13)

  2. Disclosures None 1. http:/ / a o rtic ste nts.c o m/ wha t-is-a b do mina l-a o rtic -a ne urysm/ (05/ 23/ 13)

  3. Cardiovascular diseases • Cardiovascular disease is the number one cause of death for both men and women in the United States 1 . • Preventive medicine is practiced by screening tests, counseling and preventive medications owing to the impact of cardiovascular diseases. U. U.S. Preventi tive Service ces Task For orce ce-March h 2009 09 A- Strongly Screening modality Grade Recommended Smoking Counseling on A Benefit>>Risk cessation Hypertension Blood pressure A B-Recommended monitoring Benefit>Risk Dyslipidemia Lipid profile A Diabetes Mellitus Fasting plasma B glucose Obesity Lifestyle B Performance modification Improvement Prevention of Aspirin B Projects ?? Cardiovascular diseases 1. http:/ / www.uspre ve ntive se rvic e sta skfo rc e .o rg / uspsto pic s.htm

  4. Introduction -My out-patient PI project: Screening for AAA in high risk patients. -Dilatation or widening of the abdominal aorta. -Definition: An abdominal aortic diameter of 3 cm or more, which is usually more than 2 standard deviations above the mean diameter 1 . -Risk factors 1 : Modifiable Non modifiable • Smoking Age • • Hypertension Male gender • • Hyperlipidemia White race • • Atherosclerosis Family history • -AAA rupture is a medical and surgical emergency. -Mortality could be up to 50% 2 . 1.Ste inb e rg I, Ste in HL . Arte ro sc le ro tic a b do mina l a o rtic a ne urysms. re po rt o f 200 c o nse c utive c a se s dia g no se d b y intra ve no us a o rto g ra phy. JAMA 1966;195:1025. 2. Bro wn L C, Po we ll JT (Se pte mb e r 1999). "Risk F a c to rs fo r Ane urysm Rupture in Pa tie nts Ke pt Unde r Ultra so und Surve illa nc e ". Anna ls o f Surg e ry 230 (3): 289–96; disc ussio n 296–7. do i:10.1097/ 00000658-199909000-00002. PMC 1420874. PMID 10493476

  5. Introduction • The strongest risk factor for the rupture of an AAA is maximal aortic diameter 4 . Normal CT scan Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture 1 2 3 Risk of rupture 4 : • i. < 4 cm = 0.5% per year ii. 4.0 – 4.9 cm = 1% per year iii. 5.0 – 5.9 cm = 11% per year iv. 6.0 – 6.9 cm = 26% per year v. 7.0 – 7.9 cm = 40% per year vi. > 8 cm = 50% year year Management 5 : • i. Open repair : conventional method of repair ii. Endovascular repair: faster recovery, reduced length of stay in ICU, reduced hospital stay 1.http:/ / www.nlm.nih.g o v/ me dline plus/ e nc y/ a rtic le / 003789.htm (05/ 23/ 2013) 2.http:/ / www.surg ic a l-tuto r.o rg .uk/ de fa ult-ho me .htm? syste m/ va sc ula r/ a a a .htm~rig ht (05/ 23/ 2013) 3.http:/ / www.ra dio lo g ya ssista nt.nl/ e n/ p4530b 48a 07db d/ a a a -rupture -1.html (05/ 24/ 13) 4. Bre wste r DC, Ge lle r SC, K a ufma n JA, Ca mb ria RP, Ge rtle r JP, L a Mura g lia GM, e t a l. I nitia l e xp e rie nc e with e nd o va sc ula r a ne urysm re p a ir: c o mp a riso n o f e a rly re sults with o utc o me o f c o nve ntio na l o p e n re p a ir. J Va sc Surg 1998;27:992-1003.

  6. Screening guidelines USPSTF – Grade B recommendation (benefit>risk) • Ultrasound has 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity. • SAAAVE Act “Effective for services furnished on or after January 1, 2007, payment may • be made for a one-time ultrasound screening for AAA for beneficiaries who meet the following criteria 2 : Men aged 65-75 who ever smoked(100 cigarettes in life time) • Men and women with a family history of AAA • As a part of “Welcome to Medicare” within the first year of • enrollment AAA screening in women: Grade D (not recommended) • 1. F le ming C, Whitlo c k E P, Be il T , L e de rle F . Sc re e ning fo r a b do mina l a o rtic a ne urysm: a b e st-e vide nc e syste ma tic re vie w fo r the U.S. Pre ve ntive Se rvic e s T a sk F o rc e . Ann Inte rn Me d 2005;142:203-11. 2. http:/ / www.uspre ve ntive se rvic e sta skfo rc e .o rg / uspstf05/ a a a sc r/ a a a rs.htm 3. http:/ / www.fo ma distric t2.c o m/ wp-c o nte nt/ uplo a ds/ 2012/ 12/ SAAAVE -ACT .pdf

  7. Management guidelines Indications of elective surgery 1 : • Diameter of 5.5 cm for an ‘average’ patient. • Symptomatic AAA (irrespective of the size) • Rapid expansion-1 cm in one year (irrespective of the size) • Decision on repair must be “individualized for each patient”. • 1. Da vid C. Bre wste r,a MD, Ja c k L . Cro ne nwe tt, MD,b Jo hn W. Ha lle tt, Jr, MD,c K. Wa yne Jo hnsto n, MD,d Willia m C. Krupski, MD,e a nd Jo n S. Ma tsumura , MD,f Bo sto n, Ma ss; L e b a no n, NH; Ba ng o r, Me ; T o ro nto , Ca na da ; De nve r, Co lo ; a nd Chic a g o , Ill; Guide lie ns fo r tre a tme nt o f Ab do mina l Ao rtic Ane urysms, Jo urna l o f Va sc ula r Surg e ry, 2007

  8. Night float-PGY-2: 3 female patients with AAA in the same rotation. • Aorto-enteric fistula • 7 cm AAA with elective repair and admitted to ICU • Multiple aneurysms (aorto-iliacs) with rupture • Case report on aorto-enteric fistula “Time bomb in the belly”

  9. Introduction Epidemiological differences: Prevalence: 7.6% in males vs 1.3% in females 1,2 • Rate of rupture for any given size is higher in females 3 . • Women with AAA have a stronger familial association than men 4 . • Estrogen does have a protective effect on the AAA in women 4 . • 1. Ple ume e ke rs HJCM, Ho e s AW, va n de r Do e s E, va n Urk H, Ho fma n A, de Jo ng PT VM, Gro b b e e DE. Ane urysms o f the a b do mina l a o rta in o lde r a dults. Am J E pide mio l . 1995;142:1291–1299. 2. 2c o tt RAP, Bridg e wa te r S, Ashto n HA. Ra ndo mise d c linic a l tria l o f sc re e ning fo r a b do mina l a o rtic a ne urysm in wo me n. Br J Surg . 2002;89: 283–285. K a tz DJ, Sta nle y JC, Ze le no c k GB. Ge nde r diffe re nc e s in a b do mina l a o rtic a ne urysm pre va le nc e , tre a tme nt, a nd o utc o me . J Vasc Surg . 1997; 25:561–568. 3. 4. Ma nso n JE, Hsia J, Jo hnso n K C, Ro sso uw JE, Assa f AR, L a sse r NL , T re visa n M, Bla c k HR, He c kb e rt SR, De tra no R, Stric kla nd OL , Wo ng ND, Cro use JR, Ste in E, Cushma n M, fo r the Wo me n’ s He a lth Initia tive Inve stig a to rs. Estro g e n plus pro g e stin a nd the risk o f c o ro na ry he a rt dise a se . N E ng l J Me d . 2003;349:523–534.

  10. Biological differences: At any given age, males have larger abdominal aortic diameters than women 1,2 . • Suitability for EVAR is different: The angulation of iliacs, size of femoral • arteries and tortuosity of aortas are different in females 3 . 1. L e de rle F A, Jo hnso n GR, Wilso n SE , Go rdo n IL , Chute E P, L itto o y F N, Krupski WN, Bra ndyk D, Ba ro ne GW, Gra ha m L M, Hye RJ, Re inke DB, Ane urysm De te c tio n a nd Ma na g e me nt Inve stig a to rs. Re la tio nship o f a g e , g e nde r, ra c e , a nd b o dy size to infra re na l a o rtic dia me te r. J Vasc S urg . 1997;26:595– 601. 2. Sing h K, Bo na a KH, Ja c o b se n BK, Bjo rk L , So ldb e rg S. Pre va le nc e o f a nd risk fa c to rs fo r a b do mina l a o rtic a ne urysms in a po pula tio n-b a se d study. Am J E pide mio l . 2001;154:236 –244. 3. So ne sso n B, Ha nse n F , Sta le H, L a nne T . Co mplia nc e a nd dia me te r in the huma n a b do mina l a o rta : the influe nc e o f se x a nd a g e . E ur J Vasc S urg . 1993;7:690 – 697.

  11. UK Small Aneurysm trial: • Multicentre, randomised controlled trial conducted across 93 UK hospitals 83% males ADAM study (Aneurysm Detection and Management): • 73451 veterans aged 50 to 79 99% males N-67,800 All of them=men T he Unite d K ing do m Sma ll Ane urysm T ria l Pa rtic ipa nts. L o ng -te rm o utc o me s o f imme dia te re pa ir c o mpa re d with surve illa nc e o f sma ll a b do mina l a o rtic a ne urysms. N E ng l J Me d. 2002;346:1445–1452. 1. L e de rle F , Wiso n S, Jo hnso n G, Re inke D, L ito o y F , Ac he r C, Ba lla rd D, Me ssina L , Go rdo n I, Chute E , K rupski W, Bra dyk D. Imme dia te re pa ir c o mpa re d with surve illa nc e o f sma ll a b do mina l a o rtic a ne urysms. 2. N E ng l J Me d . 2002;346:1437–1444.

  12. Gender based differences in cardiovascular diseases • Traditionally, all the cardiovascular diseases were considered as “men’s diseases.” • Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the number one killer of women 1 . • Mortality is more than all forms of cancers combined (breast , cervical and lung cancer) 2 . “Women continue to be under-represented in research on heart disease. 3 . • Still women continue to receive similar treatments to men on the basis of trials that include • mainly male participants 3 . 1. http :/ / www.wo rld -he a rt-fe d e ra tio n.o rg / p re ss/ fa c t-she e ts/ wo me n-a nd -c a rd io va sc ula r-d ise a se / 2. Ame ric a n He a rt Asso c ia tio n. 1997 He a rt a nd Stro ke F a c ts: Sta tistic a l Up d a te . Da lla s, T e x: Ame ric a n He a rt Asso c ia tio n; 1996. 3. Mikha il GW. Co ro na ry he a rt d ise a se in wo me n is und e rd ia g no se d , und e r- tre a te d , a nd und e r-re se a rc he d . BMJ . 2005;331:467–468.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend