GCRF Due Diligence A Case Study Jennifer Stergiou July 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

gcrf due diligence a case study
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

GCRF Due Diligence A Case Study Jennifer Stergiou July 2017 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ARMA Good Practice Exchange GCRF Due Diligence A Case Study Jennifer Stergiou July 2017 Before GCRF Historically risk assessment only undertaken where there was a perceived need 2014 The one that got away Internal audit


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ARMA Good Practice Exchange GCRF Due Diligence – A Case Study

Jennifer Stergiou July 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Before GCRF……

  • Historically risk assessment only undertaken where there

was a perceived need

  • 2014 – The one that got away
  • Internal audit recommended strengthening risk review

process

  • New risk review process mandated by financial regulations

from Aug 2015:

➢ Risk review for all applications and awards ➢ Light touch process for low risk funders – the “declaration” ➢ Risk scoring & red flag issues (automatic escalation) ➢ Escalation / Approval levels for different types of risks

  • Mitigating actions
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Risk types:

  • Financial
  • Operational
  • Location
  • Governance
  • Reputation

Red flag issues:

  • Credit check issues
  • Previous operational issues
  • High risk countries
  • Conflict of interest
  • Risk to the University’s

reputation, as identified by the PI

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Credit checks

  • Date of incorporation
  • Date accounts last filed (tool calculates whether

late/overdue)

  • Working capital positive or negative
  • Are accounts audited and if yes is audit opinion

qualified?

  • Recommended credit limit (tool compares to

contract value or value to the specific partner)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

High risk countries:

  • High risk of corruption
  • Lack of robust & transparent accounting practices
  • Economic sanctions
  • Money laundering concerns
  • Financing of terrorist activity
  • Export control risk
slide-6
SLIDE 6

GCRF

  • Risk review dashboard process as normal, PLUS
  • The Leeds Due Diligence Questionnaire
  • Standard text for RCUK Assurance questionnaires

setting out UOL approach

  • Contracting process
  • Pre and post award finance guidance in

development

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Leeds questionnaire

  • 1. Legal status of the organisation
  • 2. Corporate governance of the organisation
  • 3. Financial controls
  • 4. Income
  • 5. Research grant management
  • 6. Costs
  • 7. Travel and subsistence
  • 8. Accountings systems
  • 9. Audit
  • 10. Sub contracts, partner organisation, consortium and collaborative

agreements

  • 11. Conflict of interest
  • 12. Declaration and authorisation to retain/share responses
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Then what? What if responses to questionnaire are not provided before the research starts? What if responses to the questionnaire are not satisfactory?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Pre and post award finance guidance

Receipts? Verifying costs The cost of conducting due diligence Partner authorisation

  • f costs

What kind of evidence is acceptable? Who are we paying? Advance payments