G-inflation: models and perturbations MASAHIDE YAMAGUCHI (Tokyo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

g inflation models and perturbations
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

G-inflation: models and perturbations MASAHIDE YAMAGUCHI (Tokyo - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

G-inflation: models and perturbations MASAHIDE YAMAGUCHI (Tokyo Institute of Technology) 06/08/11 @takehara arXiv:1008.0603, PRL 105, 231302 (2010), T.Kobayashi, MY, J.Yokoyama arXiv:1012.4238, PRD 83, 083515 (2011),


slide-1
SLIDE 1

G-inflation: models and perturbations

MASAHIDE YAMAGUCHI

(Tokyo Institute of Technology) 06/08/11 @takehara

理論物理学の展望 arXiv:1008.0603, PRL 105, 231302 (2010), T.Kobayashi, MY, J.Yokoyama arXiv:1012.4238, PRD 83, 083515 (2011), K. Kamada, T. Kobayashi, MY, J. Yokoyama arXiv:1103.1740, PRD in press, T. Kobayashi, MY, J. Yokoyama arXiv:1105.5723, T. Kobayashi, MY, J. Yokoyama

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Contents

 Introduction What is G ? What is G-inflation ?  Powerspectrum of primordial perturbations Tensor perturbations Density perturbations  Summary

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Lagrangian

Why does the Lagrangian generally depend on only a position q and its velocity dot{q} ?

The Euler-Lagrange equation gives an equation of motion up to the second time derivative if the Lagrangian is given by L = L(q,dot{q},t).

Newton recognized that an acceleration, which is given by the second time derivative of a position, is related to the Force : What happens if the Lagrangian depends on higher derivative terms ?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Ostrogradski’s theorem

Assume that L = L(q, dot{q},ddot{q}) and depends on ddot{q} :

(Non-degeneracy)

Canonical variables :

Non-degeneracy ⇔ there is a function a=a(Q1,Q2,P2) such that These canonical variables really satisfy the canonical EOM : Hamiltonian: P1 depends linearly on H so that no system of this form can be stable !!

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Loophole of Ostrogradski’s theorem

We can break the non-degeneracy condition, which states depends on ddot{q} :

This equation is really up to the second order. No Ostrogradski’s instability !!

e.g. (This Lagrangian is degenerate.)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

G = Galileon field

Field equations have Galilean shift symmetry in flat space :

Nicolis et al. 2009 Deffayet et al. 2009

Lagrangian has higher order derivatives, but EOM are second order.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Galileon cosmology

What happens when Galileon field is present ?

 It can behave like dark energy.  It can drive inflation and was named G-inflation by us.

Chow & Khoury 2009, Silva & Koyama 2009, Kobayashi et al. 2010, De Felice, Mukohyama, Tsujikawa 2010, Many others …

Field equations cannot have Galilean shift symmetry in curved space : The extension to curved space is necessary. is not invariant under Extend it the most generally as long as the equations

  • f motions are up to second order.
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Covariantization of Galileon field

Deffayet et al. 2009, 2011

This (& the Gauss-Bonnet term) is the most general non-canonical and non- minimally coupled single-field model which yields second-order equations. NB : ● G4 = MG2 / 2 yields the Einstein-Hilbert action

  • G4 = f(φ) yields a non-minimal coupling of the form f(φ)R
  • The new Higgs inflation with comes from G5 ∝φ

after integration by parts.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Equations of motion

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Gravitational EOM under the Friedmann background

Under the homogeneous and isotropic background:

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Scalar field EOM under the Friedmann background

Under the homogeneous and isotropic background:

NB : Pφ vanishes if all of K & Gi depend only on X.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Exact de Sitter inflation

We would like to look for the exact de Sitter solution :

Assume that the model has a shift symmetry :

J = 0 is an attractor solution.

If these equations have a non-trivial solution with H≠0 & dot{φ}≠0, exact de Sitter inflation can be realized.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Exact de Sitter inflation II

For the exact de Sitter solution : This model has a shift symmetry : e.g. x (0 < x < 1) is a constant satisfying For μ< MG, Note, however, that shift symmetry must be broken to terminate inflation.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Powerspectrum of primordial fluctuations

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Primordial tensor perturbations

Perturbed metric : Expand the action up to the second order to evaluate the powerspectrum of tensor perturbations.

does not contain hij up to the second order.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Quadratic action for tensor perturbations

No ghost instabilities ⇔ No gradient instabilities ⇔

For G4X≠0 or G5φ≠0 or G5X≠0, the sound velocity squared cT2 can deviate from unity.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Quadratic action for tensor perturbations II

New variables :

Sound horizon crossing ⇔

Superhorizon solutions :

Decaying mode

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Assuming

Slow-roll (slow varying) parameters

EOM in momentum space :

Khoury & Piazza 2009, Noller & Magueijo 2011.

yT runs from -∞ to 0 as the Universe expands. The decaying mode really decays.

We impose

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Powerspectrum of tensor perturbations

Mode functions : Commutation relations :

Note that the blue spectrum nT > 0 can be easily obtained as long as 4ε+ 3fT - gT < 0.

polarization tensor

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Primordial density fluctuations

Perturbed metric : Unitary gauge :

 Expand the action up to the second order  Eliminate αand βby use of the constraint equations  Obtain the quadratic action for R

Prescription:

Note that this gauge does not coincide with the comoving gauge because , different from the k-inflation model.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Expansion of the action up to the second order and constraint equation

Hamiltonian constraint : Momentum constraint :

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Quadratic action for scalar perturbations

No ghost instabilities ⇔ No gradient instabilities ⇔

NB : In case of k-inflation with G3 = G5 = 0 and G4 = MG2 / 2, FS = MG2ε= - MG2 dot{H} / H2, which means that dot{H} > 0 is prohibitted by the stability condition.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Quadratic action for scalar perturbations II

New variables :

Sound horizon crossing ⇔

Superhorizon solutions :

Decaying mode

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Assuming

Slow-roll (slow varying) parameters

EOM in momentum space :

Khoury & Piazza 2009, Noller & Magueijo 2011.

yS runs from -∞ to 0 as the Universe expands. The decaying mode really decays.

We impose

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Powerspectrum of scalar perturbations

Mode functions : Commutation relations :

Note that almost scale invariance requires 2ε+ 3sS + gS << 1, while each slow-roll parameter can be large.

Tensor-to-scalar ratio :

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Gauss-Bonnet term

 Background gravitational equations :  Background field equations :  Tensor and scalar perturbations : Our formulae apply for the Gauss-Bonnet case by the above replacements.

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Summary

 We have proposed a new inflation model named G-inflation, which is driven by a Galileon field.  G-inflation predicts new consistency relations between r and nT.  Kinetically driven G-inflation can predict large tensor-to-scalar ratio and large non-Gaussianity. Scalar fluctuations are generated even in exact de Sitter background.