g gmva a a and s sma o a obser ervations o of m m 8 87
play

G GMVA a A and S SMA O A Obser ervations o of M M 8 87 And S - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

G GMVA a A and S SMA O A Obser ervations o of M M 8 87 And S An Status R Rep eport o of t the G e GLT P Projec ject Asada, K., Nakamura, M., Pu, H.-Y., et al. (ASIAA)) ~ 10 r s Academia Sinica, Institute of Astronomy and


  1. G GMVA a A and S SMA O A Obser ervations o of M M 8 87 And S An Status R Rep eport o of t the G e GLT P Projec ject Asada, K., Nakamura, M., Pu, H.-Y., et al. (ASIAA)) ~ 10 r s

  2. Academia Sinica, Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics - Research Manpower: 42 research faculty 43 engineers 57 postdocs/contracted persons + students and administrative stuffs - Research Topics: Extragalactic/Star Formation/ Interstellar Medium/Dust/Cosmology/ Planetary Sciences/radio and op<cal instrumenta<ons - Research Projects: SMA/TAOS I, II/ Computa<onal astronomy/ AMiBA/CFHT/SUBARU/ALMA/GLT, JCMT/VLBI

  3. Outline of this talk - Introduction of M 87 and GLT - Mass Accretion rate of M 8 87 with SMA observations Kuo, C.Y., Asada, K. et al. 2014, ApJL, 783, 33 Asada, K., Rao, R., et al. in prep. - Collimation of M 8 87 jet with VLBI observations Asada, K. & Nakamura, M. 2012, ApJ, 745, 28 Nakamura, M. and Asada, K. 2013, ApJ, 775, 118 Asada, K., Nakamura, M., and Pu, H.-Y. to be submitted Asada, K. et al. in prep. - Acceleration of M 8 87 jet with VLBI observations Nakamura, M. and Asada, K. 2013, ApJ, 775, 118 Asada, K. et al. 2014, ApJL, 781, 2

  4. Introduction

  5. Importance of M 87 □ M 87 (Virgo A*) - 2 nd brightest galaxy in Virgo cluster - Large BH mass BH mass: 6 (3) × 10 9 M � Gebhardt and Thomas 09, 11 (e.g. Ford+94, Harms+ 94, Walsh 2013) - One of the nearest AGN Distance: 16.7 Mpc Jordan et al. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1002 - 2 nd largest apparent size of r s (radius of non-rotating BH) 1 mas = 0.074pc (= 125 r s )

  6. radio Optical X 1 st Discovered relativistic jet □ M 87 (Virgo A*) Resolution: - arcmin (~ 10 7 r s ) to sub-mas (~ 10 r s ) Frequency: - Radio – optical – X-ray – γ -ray

  7. Low-Luminosity AGN - With Chandra Observa<on Di MaVeo et al. 2003, ApJ, 582,133 - L X ~ 7 × 10 40 erg s -1 It’s sub-eddington, and Probably has a Radiatvely Inefficient Accre<on Flow (RIAF)

  8. X- and γ - ray flare Abramowski+ 2012 core core Chandra core Chandra HST-1 VLBA core VLA core VLA HST-1

  9. X- and γ - ray flare Abramowski+ 2012 HST-1 -1 Chandra core Chandra HST-1 Giroleb+ 2012, A&A, 538, L10 Hada+ 2014, ApJ, 788, 165 VLBA core VLA core VLA HST-1

  10. Location of the Central Engine Central engine is located at (41±12) µas (6±2 Rs) eastward of the 43-GHz radio core. Hada+ 2011, Nature, 477, 185

  11. Importance of M 87 □ M 87 (Virgo A*) - 1 st discovered relativistic jet Cur<s 1918, Publica<ons of Lick Observatory 13, 31 - Low-Luminosity AGN Typical AGN with radia<vely inefficient accre<on flow (RIAF) - High Energy activities Up to TeV gamma-ray Miss-aligned Blaser? - 2 nd largest apparent size of r s (radius of non-rotating BH) It contains all contents of AGN !! Best Source to understand AGN !!

  12. Goal of the Greenland Telescope Project PdBI IRAM 30 m LMT From “INTERSTELLAR” Primary objec<ve: Image a shadow of black hole of M 87 with sub-millimeter VLBI observa<on includes Greenland Telescope , SMA/JCMT and phased ALMA at 230, 345 GHz and higher frequency.

  13. Logistics of Greenland Our radiometer at the site - Peak of the Greenland ice cap (3,200 m) at 72°35'46.4"N 38°25'19.1”W - Sponsored by the NSF, operated by CH2M Hill Polar Services (CPS) - Camp population: 5 (winter) up to 50 (summer) - Air National Guard provides LC-130 aircraft, twin otter aircraft or traverse. - Network: Satellite link - We have accessed the Summit Station since 2011 for the site testing.

  14. Logistics of Greenland Our radiometer at the site - Peak of the Greenland ice cap (3,200 m) at 72°35'46.4"N 38°25'19.1”W - Sponsored by the NSF, operated by CH2M Hill Polar Services (CPS) - Camp population: 5 (winter) up to 50 (summer) - Air National Guard provides LC-130 aircraft, twin otter aircraft or traverse. - Network: Satellite link - We have accessed the Summit Station since 2011 for the site testing.

  15. Logistics of Greenland Our radiometer at the site - Peak of the Greenland ice cap (3,200 m) at 72°35'46.4"N 38°25'19.1”W - Sponsored by the NSF, operated by CH2M Hill Polar Services (CPS) - Camp population: 5 (winter) up to 50 (summer) - Air National Guard provides LC-130 aircraft, twin otter aircraft or traverse. - Network: Satellite link - We have accessed the Summit Station since 2011 for the site testing.

  16. Logistics of Greenland Our radiometer at the site - Peak of the Greenland ice cap (3,200 m) at 72°35'46.4"N 38°25'19.1”W - Sponsored by the NSF, operated by CH2M Hill Polar Services (CPS) - Camp population: 5 (winter) up to 50 (summer) - Air National Guard provides LC-130 aircraft, twin otter aircraft or traverse. - Network: Satellite link - We have accessed the Summit Station since 2011 for the site testing.

  17. Plan for 2016 and beyond • Antenna shipping to Thule (2016). • Antenna re-assemble and test at Thule, including VLBI test (2016-2019). • Single-dish & VLBI first light at Thule (2017-2018). • Transport antenna across ice sheet (2019). • First light at the Summit Station (2019/20).

  18. Accretion flow onto SMBH of M 87

  19. M 87 and its Accretion Flows - Low-Luminosity AGNs are subclass of AGN. (L < 10 -3 L edd ) - LLAGNs (Ho et al. 1997) are considered to accommodate RIAF - M 87 is categorized as LLAGN. LLAGN No Big Blue Bump (Ho et al. 2009)

  20. Accretion flow of LLAGNs Three types of RIAFs: ADAF ADIOS CDAF ( Ichimaru 1977; ( Blandford & Begelman ( Igumenshchev & Narayan & Yi 1995 ) 1999 ) Abramowicz 1999 ) Structure ~ (r/r B ) 0 ~ (r/r B ) 0-1 ~ (r/r B ) 1 M r B : Bondi radius (~ 10 4-6 r s ) - Substan<al decrease of the mass accre<on rate can be expected for ADIOS and CDAF !! Mass Accre<on Rate is fundamental parameter to consider energy balance between L acc and L rad or L jet .

  21. Probing Accretion Flow with SED fitting Yuan et al. 2003 (e.g., Narayan et al. 1995; Manmoto et al. 1997) - Very succeeded method for Sgr A* M ~ 4 × 10 -8 M � yr -1 SED can be contaminated/dominated by jet….

  22. Probing Accretion Flow with Faraday Rotation Agol 2000, Quataert & Gruzinov 2000, Bower et al. 2003, Observer Marrone et al. 2006, Macquart et al. 2006 With RIAF model: Magnetized Plasma n ( r ) ∼ ( r (RIAF) ~ 10 7-9 K ) − β = 1 / 2 (ADAF) r s β = 3 / 2 (CDAF) T ( r ) ∼ ( r BH ) − 1 = 1 / 2 − 3 / 2 (ADIOS) r s Polarized emission (innermost AF or Jet) ~ 10 12 K Marrone et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, 308

  23. SMA Polarimetry towards Sgr A* Marrone et al. 2006, ApJ, 640, 308 RM observa<on with SMA towards Sgr A* - RM = (5.6 ± 0.7) × 10 5 rad m -2 M = 2 × 10 -7 - 2 × 10 -9 M � yr -1

  24. In the case of M 87 - Apply the same scheme to M 87 Back light would be innermost jet, not AF - With Chandra Observa<on - r B ~ 230 pc (3 × 10 5 r s ) - P B ~ 7 × 10 45 erg s -1 - M B ~ 0.12 M � yr -1 Di MaVeo et al. 2003, ApJ, 582,133

  25. RM fitting towards M 87 1.5 × 10 5 rad m -2 2014, Jan. 09 12 mon. 2013, Jan. 27 -2.1 × 10 5 rad m -2 EVPA [degree] 1.5 mon. -1.9 × 10 5 rad m -2 2014, Feb. 28 -3.2 × 10 5 rad m -2 3 mon. 2014, May 13 λ 2 [mm 2 ] Preliminary

  26. Mean RM and Mass accretion rate Assuming no time variation, <RM> = (-1.8 ± 0.3) × 10 5 rad m -2 !! First “soli lid d detection” n” of RM !! Our “ALMA b band nd 3 3” and “SMA at 230 and 345 GHz” observations were conducted in 2015!! M = (3.6 ± 1.1) × 10 -4 M � yr -1 (at 21 r s ) M = (2.9 ± 0.9) × 10 -3 M B (at 21 r s )

  27. RM fitting towards M 87 BAF / ADAF 1 3D MHD sim. GADAF Pang et al. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 1228 10 -1 Jet power 2D HD sim. ADIOS Yuan et al. 2012, ApJ, 761, 130 10 -2 M B c 2 M B F M/ ˙ P j / η ˙ A This work!! 10 -3 D ˙ C 10 -4 M = (2.9 ± 0.9) × 10 -3 M B (at 21 r s ) Substan<al decrease of the mass accre<on rate. 10 -5 Probably very strong constraint on RIAF !! 10 -6 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 10 5 1 R/R s

  28. Comparison with Jet Power Accre<ng Power :P acc (= Mc 2 ) ~ 2 × 10 43 erg s -1 Li+ 2009, ApJ, 699, 513 Even if 10 % of P acc used for jet, it’s slightly smaller than L jet Another possibili<es to support jet power: Jet would be supported by “BH spin” !!

  29. Collimation of M 87 jet

  30. (c) VLBA image at 15 GHz (b) EVN image at 1.6 GHz (a) MERLIN image at 1.6 GHz Revisit structure of M 87 jet Asada & Nakamura 2012, ApJ, 745, 28 Bondi radius VLBA at 43 GHz VLBA at 15 GHz EVN at 1.6 GHz MERLIN at 1.6 GHz MERLIN at 1.6 GHz Conical Parabolic ISCO EVN at 1.6 GHz - Jet can described with two power-law lines Parabolic stream with z = r 1.7 ( - 10 5 r s ) Conical stream with z = r 1 (10 5 r s – ) VLBA at 15 GHz - Transition at ~ 10 5 r s !!

  31. Revisit structure of M 87 jet Nakamura and KA 2013, ApJ, 775, 118 Bondi radius VLBA at 43 GHz VLBA at 15 GHz EVN at 1.6 GHz MERLIN at 1.6 GHz VLBA core at 43 GHz VLBA core at 86 GHz Conical VLBA 86 GHz ISCO Parabolic - VLBI core = innermost jet with τ = 1 surface at observing freq.

  32. Revisit structure of M 87 jet Nakamura and KA 2013, ApJ, 775, 118 Doeleman et al. 2012 Science, 338, 355 Bondi radius VLBA at 43 GHz VLBA at 15 GHz EVN at 1.6 GHz MERLIN at 1.6 GHz VLBA core at 43 GHz VLBA core at 86 GHz VLBI core at 230 GHz Conical ISCO Parabolic Size ~ 40 µas - VLBI core = innermost jet with τ = 1 surface at observing freq. - Same power-law index for 6 order !!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend