Future Resilient Transport Networks Prof Chris Baker Birmingham - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

future resilient transport networks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Future Resilient Transport Networks Prof Chris Baker Birmingham - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Future Resilient Transport Networks Prof Chris Baker Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education Transport Systems Catapult ( with thanks to Dr Andrew Quinn) Change is normal EU roadmap Future of Transport 2050 Modal shift


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Future Resilient Transport Networks

Prof Chris Baker Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education Transport Systems Catapult (with thanks to Dr Andrew Quinn)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Change is normal

  • EU roadmap Future of Transport 2050
  • Modal shift – “business as usual” not an option
  • Over past 50 years in UK
  • 800% increase in road traffic
  • 1:1 → 8:1 road : rail tonne kilometers of freight moved
  • Changing climate
  • Warmer wetter winters
  • Hotter drier summers
  • More extremes
  • Changing social environment
  • Travel more and for different reasons
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Contents

  • FUTURENET and MOWE-IT
  • Two projects with very different methodologies
  • Other road based resilience project at UOB
  • Other rail based resilience projects at UOB
  • Conclusions
slide-4
SLIDE 4

FUTURENET

  • EPSRC funded project – Universities of Birmingham,

Nottingham and Loughborough, TRL, BGS, HR

  • Tools to help define the shape of the transport network that

will be most resilient

  • Resilience calculation methodologies for
  • Complete routes
  • Specific infrastructure
  • Identification of issues to be addressed
  • Where are the critical points of failure?
slide-5
SLIDE 5

MOWE-IT

  • EU funded project led by VTT in Finland
  • To mitigate natural disasters and extreme weather phenomena
  • n transport system performance
  • For transport operators, authorities and users
  • To identify existing best practices
  • To develop recommendations for mode-sectors and cross-

modal, short and long-term

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Two approaches

FUTURENET

  • Modelling based
  • Future focus
  • ‘Resilience’ quantification
  • Detailed, data driven

www.arcc-futurenet.org MOWE-IT

  • Case-study based
  • Historical focus
  • Impacts and recovery
  • Broad recommendations

www.mowe-it.eu

slide-7
SLIDE 7

FUTURENET

  • Three viewpoints
  • Policy makers
  • Infrastructure manager
  • Traveller
  • Quantitative and qualitative approaches
  • Numerical values of “resilience”
  • Consideration of different futures
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Plausible Futures

  • Although we don’t know the destination we know the factors

that could change:

  • Social, Economic, Environment
  • These need to be included in any analysis
  • Not one future but many possible futures
  • What is resilience?
  • Multiple perspectives required
  • Users, infrastructure operators, service providers
slide-9
SLIDE 9

FUTURENET– model integration

  • Integration of
  • Social scenario studies
  • Travel behaviour studies
  • Meteorological / climate studies
  • Transport modelling
  • Weather effects on infrastructure and vehicles
slide-10
SLIDE 10

The approach

  • Levels of calculation
  • Calculation of resilience of complete routes (London-Glasgow chosen as

example)

  • Detailed calculations of local effects of different weather events (landslip,

flooding etc)

  • Ideal calculation would begin with local modelling and

aggregate results for complete route

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Calculating Resilience

FUTURENET modelling

Modal choices Numbers of users Types of users Attitudes to disruption Infrastructure condition Climate change Weather Generator Not one but many iterations Statistics of network behaviour Delays and Recovery

slide-12
SLIDE 12

FUTURENET

  • Definition of resilience
  • Resilience is the ability to provide and maintain an acceptable level of service

in the face of challenges to normal operation

  • Acceptable service level different for different sectors
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Calculating resilience

1000 journeys today 1000 journeys in 2050

Delay % Journeys Delay % Journeys Change in resilience Measured as changing number of journeys considered to have ‘failed’

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 30
  • 20
  • 10

10 20 30 40 50 60 baseline 2050s 2080s Percentage change

medium emissions high emissions medium emissions high emissions

Summer Winter

Percentage change of rain-related journey failures relative to baseline for 2050s and 2080s (central estimates)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

FUTURENET corridor analyses

  • Scaleable
  • Route
  • Section
  • Weather v Resilience
  • Quantified
  • Visualisations
  • Fly-through
  • Data can be interrogated
  • Requires high quality data

Motorway Rail Line A Road Low Resilience High Resilience

N

slide-16
SLIDE 16

FUTURENET Outputs

  • Resilience calculation methodologies for
  • Complete routes
  • Specific infrastructure
  • Identification of issues to be addressed
  • Spatial coherence of weather predictions
  • Requirement for high quality asset data
slide-17
SLIDE 17

MOWE-IT (rail) case studies

  • Weather types
  • Flooding / heavy rain
  • Wind
  • Snow / winter conditions
  • Analysis
  • Meteorological situation
  • Impact on rail infrastructure and operations
  • Event management
  • Repairs
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

John Dora Consulting Limited www.johndoraconsulting.eu

Flooding/heavy rain

Saxony 2002 UK June 2012 UK 2007 Alpine flooding 2005 (Switzerland, Austria, Germany)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

John Dora Consulting Limited www.johndoraconsulting.eu

Wind/storm

Hurricane Sandy 2012 Storms Lothar and Martin 1999 (France, Switzerland, Germany) Storm Kyrill 2006 (UK,

Netherlands, Belgium, France, Germany, Poland, Austria, Czech republic, Denmark, Switzerland, Slovenia)

Storm Gudrun, Sweden 2005

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

John Dora Consulting Limited www.johndoraconsulting.eu

Snow/winter

Channel Tunnel 2009 Sweden, heavy snow 2009/2010 Stockholm 2001-2002 Southern Finland, extreme winter 2009- 2010

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Weather-specific

  • Long-term preparation
  • Before
  • During
  • After

Generalised

  • Applicable in most cases
  • Long term-preparation, event

management, recovery

Guidelines and Recommendations

  • Areas: weather forecasts,

vehicles, infrastructure, equipment, operations, information, cooperation, staff

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Other road based projects

  • PhD - An investigation of the impact of climate change on road maintenance
  • PhD - A risk based methodology to assess road drainage maintenance

requirements in the light of climate change

  • PhD - The Resilience of the Jamaican Road Network to the effects of extreme

weather events

  • DIFID - Promoting Sustainable Rural Access and Developing a Risk Based

Vulnerability Assessment for Rural Communities in the Changing Climate of Sub Saharan Africa

  • PhD - Road Pavement Deterioration Modelling Affected by Climate Change –

HDM-4

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Road Pavement Deterioration Modelling Affected by Climate Change – HDM-4

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Other rail based projects

  • LivingRAIL
  • Barriers (technical and policy) to modal shift to rail
  • Such modal shift must consider disruption
  • RSSB – TRaCCA
  • Developing knowledge throughout the rail industry
  • Metrics and Systems thinking in disruption analysis
  • RSSB - Wind Alarm systems
  • Using new NR weather data to improve preparedness, response

and recovery to extreme events

  • REWARD
  • NR risk mapping based on disruption and weather data
  • Novel ways of presenting information and decision support
slide-25
SLIDE 25

The REWARD project June 28th 2012

slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28
slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Conclusions

  • ‘Risk’/’Resilience’ needs to be in context
  • risk of what? to who?
  • History can be used – broadly
  • Detailed models can be used – high quality data required
  • Transport is a complex system
  • System approach is required
  • Broad recommendations are easy(!)
  • Detail requires significant investment
  • Systems near capacity are not resilient