Fueling Systems The Cross Over Concept Phosphagen System (ATP - - PDF document

fueling systems the cross over concept phosphagen system
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Fueling Systems The Cross Over Concept Phosphagen System (ATP - - PDF document

3/1/2019 Outline Fueling the Athlete: the role Fueling Systems Review of the Sports RD Nutrient Timing Making Weight Laura Moretti, MS, RD, CSSD, LDN Energy Availability (EA) and Relative Energy Deficiency Nicole Farnsworth, MS,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

3/1/2019 1

Fueling the Athlete: the role

  • f the Sports RD

Laura Moretti, MS, RD, CSSD, LDN Nicole Farnsworth, MS, RD, LDN

Division of Sports Medicine Boston Children’s Hospital Female Athlete Program

1

Outline

  • Fueling Systems Review
  • Nutrient Timing
  • Making Weight
  • Energy Availability (EA) and Relative Energy Deficiency

in Sport (RED-S)

  • Disordered Eating/Eating Disorders in Athletes
  • Concerning Dietary Trends in Athletes

2

Sports nutrition is the practical science of hydrating and fueling before, during, and after exercise.

THE ENERGY SYSTEMS & FUELING

  • Phosphagen System (ATP –PCr) – fast, powerful, short burst
  • 6-10 secs stored energy
  • Vertical Jump, Sprints, Olympic Lifting
  • Anaerobic Glycolysis – moderate power/moderate duration
  • 1-3 mins w/o oxygen, >60mins with oxygen
  • Moderate glycogen stores required
  • 50 m swimming, basketball, 200-400 m sprinting
  • Aerobic Glycolysis – low power/long duration
  • Heavy reliance on glycogen and FA (when low intensity)
  • Distance running, cycling, swimming

Fueling Systems The Cross Over Concept

6

  • Low to moderate intensity CHO & lipids play major role
  • Relative aerobic power (60%-65%) CHO become increasingly more important
  • Better trained athletes can stay in the aerobic/fat training zone longer
slide-2
SLIDE 2

3/1/2019 2

Carbohydrates

  • Enables athletes to exercise

longer and harder

  • Recommendation:

– 30-60g CHO/hour (120-240cal)

  • Medium to High GI

– Gels, Gatorade

Determining Protein Needs

  • Protein: 10-35%
  • Non-athlete: 0.8 g/kg
  • Strength Athlete: 1.6-2.0 g/kg
  • Endurance Athlete: 1.2-1.4 g/kg

Athletes and Fat Intake

  • 20-35% of total energy intake
  • Very low fat diets ( less than 19 % fat) not

recommended!

  • Triad, RED-S

Fat Metabolism

  • Endurance
  • >90 minutes
  • 65-75% VO2 max
  • Fat oxidation
  • High intensity exercise
  • 70-80 VO2 max
  • Carbohydrate oxidation
  • Training
  • Improves fatty acid oxidation

Building a Powerful Plate

Step 1: Slow-Digesting Carbohydrates Step 2: Fruits + Vegetables Step 3: Protein-Rich Foods

Oatmeal Cream of Wheat Whole grain (WG) Dry Cereals WG Bagels WG Sandwich Bread Rolls, and buns Brown Rice Multigrain Pasta Whole wheat Couscous Corn or whole wheat Tortillas Potatoes Sweet Potatoes Bananas Apples Oranges Grapes Grapefruit Pineapple Peaches Cherries Berries Mangos Tangerines Dried Fruit Fruit Juice Broccoli Green peppers Red peppers Green Beans Zucchini Squash Spinach Field Greens Romaine Mushrooms Carrots Cauliflower Snap Peas V-8 Juice Salmon Tuna Halibut Cod Shrimp Chicken Breast Lean Turkey Breast Eggs Milk Soy milk Yogurt Greek yogurt Low-fat cottage cheese Tenderloin Pork loin Filet Sirloin Peanut butter Almonds Pecans Peanuts Walnuts Sunflower seeds Hummus Beans Soy products (tofu)

Animal Sources

  • Add two servings
  • f calcium/vitamin

D rich foods daily

  • Add healthy fat to

each meal

The Athlete’s Plate

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3/1/2019 3

Sport CHO g/kg/d PRO g/kg/d

Baseball 3-5 1.2-1.7 Basketball >5, 7-12 during vigorous training/competition 1.4-1.7 Figure Skating 3-7 1.2-1.7 Football >5, 7-12 during vigorous training, position specific 1.4-1.7 Gymnastics 3-7 1.2-1.7 Ice Hockey >5, 8-10 during training and competition 1.4-1.7 Rowing 5-7 1.2-1.7 Soccer >5, 7-12 during vigorous training/competition 1.4-1.7 Swimming 7-12 1.2-1.7

Macronutrients by Sport Energy Needs Example Calculations

19 year old female open weight collegiate rower. Trains 2-3 hours per day and lifts twice weekly. Ht: 175 cm. Weight: 68kg. Looking to maintain weight.

68 x 6 = 408 g carbs/day = 1632 kcals (60%) 68 x 1.5 = 102 g protein/day = 408 kcals (15%) 68 x 1 = 68 g fat/day = 612 kcals (23%)

Total daily calories = 2652

How does it Compare?

Harris Benedict Equation: 1533 (RMR) x 1.725 (Activity factor)

= 2,644 kcals

2652 vs 2644 !!

15

NUTRIENT TIMING

16

Pre-Activity

  • 1 ½ hours before
  • low-fiber, and low fat
  • carbohydrate/protein
  • Will leave the stomach and intestine more quickly

17

Post-Activity

  • Consumption of 10-20 grams of protein
  • The Recovery Window
  • 4:1 ratio
  • Carbohydrate : Protein
  • Restoration of muscle and liver glycogen stores
  • 1.5g CHO/kg immediately after exercise
  • 1.5g CHO/kg 2 hours later

18

slide-4
SLIDE 4

3/1/2019 4

Pre-Post Workout Fueling

Pre-Workout Mainly Carbs Post- Workout Carb + Protein

  • Granola Bar
  • Yogurt and Fruit
  • Banana + Pretzels
  • Apple Sauce and Nuts
  • Pretzels and Nuts
  • Low Fiber Dry cereal
  • Sports Drinks
  • Energy Chews
  • Chocolate Milk
  • Banana & PB/AB
  • Fruit and Yogurt/Milk

Smoothie

  • Graham Crackers and

PB/AB

  • Yogurt with Granola
  • Turkey Sandwich (1/2 or

whole)

LET’S TALK WEIGHT…

20

Weight Management & Training

  • Take it SLOW (0.5 – 1 lb/week)
  • Rapid weight loss (>1 kg/week) = water, glycogen, muscle
  • Conservative decrease in energy intake
  • Never during winter training
  • Short period of time
  • After recovery from last session of day
  • Carbohydrate
  • Kept high; protein-sparing
  • Protein
  • Slight increase or no change

Making Race/Competition Weight (24-48h)

  • Low residue diet
  • Decreased fiber
  • Safe fluid restriction
  • Note: performance deficit at

water loss equaling 2% body weight

  • Rehydration immediately after

weigh in

  • Weigh: once a week, first thing in

AM

23

Energy Availability & the Athlete

Are RDs asking enough questions to support prevention of injury and promotion of long-term health?

“You need to find a Balance”

Calories Consumed

  • Training Calories

________________ Energy Availability

slide-5
SLIDE 5

3/1/2019 5

Nattiv A, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Oct;39(10):1867-82. De Souza MJ, et al. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(4):289.

The Female Athlete Triad

26

RED-S Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport

Health Consequences

Mountjoy M, et al. Br J Sports Med, 2014

27

Mountjoy M, et al. Br J Sports Med, 2014

RED-S Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport

Potential Performance Consequences

28

Signs/Symptoms of Low EA RED-S at BCH Sports Med

  • Survey of 1000 females presenting to sports

medicine clinic (ages 15-30, >= 4 hrs/wk of exercise)

  • Self Report of DE/ED, BEDA-Q, ESP
  • 84.5% response rate
  • Positive answers as surrogates for LOW

EA/RED-S

47.3%

29 Ackerman KE, et al. Br J Sports Med 2018

Assessing EA/RED-S

  • Predictive Equations

– Harris Benedict – Mifflin St-Jeor

  • Bone Density/Body

Composition Testing

– DXA – Bod Pod

30

slide-6
SLIDE 6

3/1/2019 6

DXA

  • Body fat % on results

can be misleading

– Includes fat on ear lobes, bottom of feet

  • ‘Spiderman’

– Low in essential body fat – Body composition shift to support bone health and menstrual function

31

Disordered Eating (DE) and Eating Disorders (EDs) in Athletes

  • Prevalence of DE/EDs is higher

among athletes than non-athletes

– Higher risk in female than male athletes – Higher risk among athletes in leanness sports

  • 46% of elite females in leanness

sports and 20% in non-leanness sports struggle with clinical eating disorder

Smolak L, et al. Int J Eat Disord, 2000. Torveit et al

Common Obstacles for Athletes

  • Not eating enough
  • Not drinking enough
  • Skipping meals
  • Missing out on recovery nutrition
  • Uninformed vegetarianism
  • An obsession with scale/body image
  • Unsafe dieting
  • Unhealthy relationship with food

Similarities between Good Athlete Traits and Anorexia Characteristics

GOOD ATHLETE PERSON WITH ANOREXIA NERVOSA

Mental Toughness Asceticism Commitment to training Excessive exercise Pursuit of excellence Perfectionism Coachability Overcompliance Unselfishness Selflessness Performance despite pain Denial of discomfort

Thompson RA and Sherman RT. Eating Disorders: J Treat and Prev, 1999.

RD’s Approach

  • All Athletes:
  • Performance goals
  • Injury prevention
  • Education on basic fueling concepts
  • Meal/Snack Timing
  • ED/DE Athlete:
  • Food exposure therapy
  • Food legalization  no “good foods” or “bad foods”
  • Pre/post/during fueling
  • Balance out calories and output  adjust as

needed

Incorporating Exercise in ED Treatment

  • Allowing an athlete to remain on

his/her athletic team and participate at any level deemed appropriate helps to maintain the athlete identity and self esteem

  • Helps athlete learn how to fuel

for sport while still in treatment

36

Sherman R, Thompson R. Professional Psychology Research and Practice, 2001. Cook B, et al. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2016 Feb 24. [Epub ahead of print]

slide-7
SLIDE 7

3/1/2019 7

CONCERNING DIETARY TRENDS IN ATHLETES

37

GLUTEN FREE: THE FACTS

38

Gluten

What it is (we all know this):

  • Protein found in wheat, barley, and rye
  • Gives dough an elastic texture

What it is not (what athletes may think it is):

  • The magic bullet for:

– Weight loss – Athletic performance – ALL GI issues

39 40

Drew Brees Novak Djokovic

Why Are Athletes Going Gluten Free?

  • Performance enhancement
  • Non celiac gluten intolerance or celiac disease
  • Decrease inflammation
  • Weight loss/body comp optimization
  • GI distress* (number one reason)
  • Because ________ athlete went GF!

41

Other GI effects

  • GI distress is reported in 30-50% of endurance

athletes

  • This can be attributed to:

– Psychological factors, splanchnic hypoperfusion, dehydration, fiber, carbohydrate type, or timing of nutrient intake

Bottom line: Eliminating gluten may not be the solution!

42 Arranz E, OmniaScience 2015

slide-8
SLIDE 8

3/1/2019 8

The Research

  • Short-term GFD had no overall effect on performance, GI

symptoms, well-being, or inflammatory markers in non- celiac endurance athletes

  • “Belief effect”  1-3% improvement in performance

regardless of any actual ergogenic effect

  • In patients with celiac or non-celiac gluten intolerance:

– Relieves GI symptoms – Improves intestinal absorption

43 Halson SL, Int J Sports Physiol Performance 2010 Dana L, Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2015

LOW CARB/HIGH FAT DIETS FOR ATHLETIC PERFORMANCE?

44

What is all the hype?

  • The body stores unlimited fat, but is limited in the

amount of carbs it is able to store

  • “Bonk proof?”
  • Increase utilization of fat for fuel and expose the body to

circulating ketones

  • Become less reliant on carbs

45 Brooks GA, J Apple Physiol 1985

High Carb vs. High Fat

  • LCHF diet associated with higher rates of whole body fat
  • xidation
  • 20% more oxygen required to liberate fat compared to

carbs

  • Improved performance in chronic high carb or periodized

high carb but not in LCHF group

  • Train low and race high?

46 Burke L, J of Physiology 2017

Summary

  • Adaptation to an LCHF diet impairs performance in elite

endurance athletes despite a significant improvement in peak aerobic capacity

  • Athletes may be utilizing fat more efficiently, but if you

are bonking then what does it matter?

  • Optimizing power/weight ratio via weight loss can

improve performance but that can be done on a balanced diet as well

47

For now, we still say…

48

slide-9
SLIDE 9

3/1/2019 9

49 50