Friction Fun! Toy Team Members: Emma Drum, Emma Schooley, Vern - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

friction fun toy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Friction Fun! Toy Team Members: Emma Drum, Emma Schooley, Vern - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Friction Fun! Toy Team Members: Emma Drum, Emma Schooley, Vern Patel, and Raj Patel Team Name: The Amu s ing 4 Team Number: B218-3 Class: EF-152 Spring 2018 Date: April 3rd, 2018 Customer Product Requirements Selection Target Audience:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Friction Fun! Toy

Team Members: Emma Drum, Emma Schooley, Vern Patel, and Raj Patel Team Name: The Amusing 4 Team Number: B218-3 Class: EF-152 Spring 2018 Date: April 3rd, 2018

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Customer Requirements

  • Target Audience: 1st, 2nd,

and 3rd grade elementary students.

  • Wanted to focus on a

younger age group of students

Product Selection

  • Had to two main ideas first:

○ Airplane Toy ○ Friction Toy

  • Decided to go with the

Friction Toy ○ Has a simpler design ○ Wanted to create further interest in STEM

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Conceptual Design

  • We basically created a

Free Body Diagram problem in real life

  • Initially, we were going to

use an Arduino and a motor to pull the block

  • Adding the pulley makes

it easier to pull the block

  • Added pegs to change

the angle of the incline

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Actual Design

  • In the end, we did not use an

Arduino and a motor to pull the block

  • A more simplistic approach:

We decided to use different weights to pull the block up the incline

  • The pegs and the pulley

remain the same

  • Only used 4 materials on the

block, instead of 6

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Marketing Video

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Customer Feedback and Results

  • When we were still using the Arduino,

we received feedback that we maybe could move the age range up to 4th and 5th grade elementary students. ○ In the end, we did not use an Arduino, so we kept the age range the same.

  • Could market it towards teachers

instead of students when we had to Arduino. ○ Using the Arduino may be too complicated for students

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Cost and Time Estimates

  • Design and Prototyping Costs:

$89.89 without tax, $98.89 with tax

  • Design Time: 21.5 hours
  • Material Cost for 1000 Units:

$25,543.39 without tax, $28,097.73 with tax

  • Retail Price for One Unit: $46.99

without tax, $51.69 with tax

  • Yearly Profit (after production,
  • verhead, advertising, and

delivery): $102,953.99

Design Cost Project Panel- Home Depot 28.48 Everbilt Pulley- Home Depot 2.36 Paint- Walmart 1.97 Brushes- Walmart 1.97 Hinges- Home Depot 5.56 Everbilt Twine- Home Depot 2.97 Screws- Home Depot 4.24 Titebond Wood Glue- HD 5.47 Sandpaper- Walmart 1.47 Aluminum Foil- Walmart 2.77 Wood Block- Amazon 9.99 Weights Set- Amazon 14.36 Non-Stick Mat- Walmart 4.49 Hook Screw- Target 3.79 Total Cost 89.89 Retail Price for 1 Unit Overhead 139200 Production 306520.68 Advertising 12983.33 Delivery 2222 Total Cost 460926.01 Total Cost and Profit (20%) 553111.212 Retail Price for 1 Unit 46.092601 Retail Price for 1 Unit Rounded 46.99 Total Profit before Costs Removed 563880 Total Profit before Costs Removed 102953.99

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Conclusion

  • We wanted to teach the STEM concept of friction

○ Simple and Easy to understand for 1st, 2nd, and 3rd graders

  • We wanted students to have fun while learning

STEM concepts

  • We wanted to create an innovative way to teach

how different materials cause more friction than

  • thers.
  • Did not use trial and error.

○ Gave equations and values for them to solve to find how many weights they need to pull the cube

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Questions?