¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ FRESHMAN INITIATIVES: MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE MILLENNIAL GENERATION ¡
¡
- Dr. Patrick Turner
Georgia State University Instructor – Freshman Learning Community February 9, 2015
FRESHMAN INITIATIVES: MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE MILLENNIAL - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
FRESHMAN INITIATIVES: MEETING THE NEEDS OF THE MILLENNIAL GENERATION Dr. Patrick Turner Georgia State University Instructor Freshman Learning Community February 9, 2015 THE CONVERSATION Vague Question Answer
¡
Georgia State University Instructor – Freshman Learning Community February 9, 2015
Vague Answer Deflection Blame Excuses Question
¡
¡
Born 1982-2002 Over 100 million
Largest generation Technologically Savvy
Ø Learning style (s) Ø Expectations (unrealistic)
§ professional and academic abilities § faculty and administrators
Ø Consumers
¡ Challenge traditional programs, services, and instructional strategies offered by many colleges.
¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡(Elam, ¡Stratton, ¡& ¡Gibson, ¡2007; ¡Lowery, ¡2004) ¡
¡ ¡ ¡
18 1898 20 2014 4
¡
“Most will survive the first-year at college and go on to graduate, but all to many drop out before the freshman year is over”
Marina, B., & McGuire, M. (2008)
¡
institution for their sophomore year in 2012-2013 was 58.2%
National Student Clearinghouse Research Center 2014
76.6 .6 58.5 .5 49.6 .6 78.7 .7 0.0 .0 10.0 .0 20.0 .0 30.0 .0 40.0 .0 50.0 .0 60.0 .0 70.0 .0 80.0 .0 90.0 .0 4-Year P Publi lic 2-Year P Publi lic 4-Year F For-P
4-Year P Private
Fall 2012 Cohort- Full-Time
Retention Rate
¡ ¡
¡
¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡
¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡(The ¡National ¡Student ¡Clearinghouse ¡Research ¡Center ¡2014) ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡
First- ¡year ¡Retention ¡and ¡Persistence ¡
(Four-‑Year ¡Public ¡Institution) ¡
Full-‑Time ¡Freshman ¡Students ¡
¡
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Fall 2009 Fall 2010 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 69.2 69.4 68.5 68.2 78.96 77.47 76.6 76.6 87.74 86.98 85.93 85.49 National Rate 4-Year Public Institution Persistence
First -Y
Ex Experience ce
Soci cial F Freshmen Act ctivities
Development ¡of ¡
Effective ¡Study ¡ Strategies ¡
Instruct ctor-S
Relationship Aca cademic- c- Ad Advis visement t Suppo Support rt
FRESHMEN SOPHOMORES NON-RETURNING FRESHMEN
TOTAL Social Freshmen Activities
70% 60% 70% 67%
great for the freshmen experience and building friendships” (FM3)
time” (NRM3)
Development of Effective Study Strategies
80% 80% 40% 67%
NRF5
knowledge.” SM6
Instructor-Student Relationship
50% 70% 50% 57%
here to do their job and leave. They should act like they care.” SF3
Academic Advisement- Support
80% 30% 50% 53%
like point them in a certain direction.” SM6
¡ ¡ ¡
Ø Social environment Ø Academic environment
§ Peers § Instructors § College administrators
Ø Experiential learning
Ø Poor personal study skills Ø Limited academic advisement-support Ø Instructor-student relationship
v Provide a balanced social and academic experience v Integrate freshmen workshops into classroom exercises v Promote the instructor-student relationship v Provide aggressive and intrusive student advisement v Involve student organizations v Provide in-house training for academic advisors and faculty
Ø Colleges and universities must view the first-year as a combination of
independent yet interdependent components. The four major themes functioned as critical factors that influenced the social and academic
freshmen transition. A combined and orchestrated interaction of all the themes framed the overall experience.
Ø Millennial freshman students required ongoing academic guidance,
feedback, and interaction which helped promote a seamless transition into both the academic and social environment.
Ø First-year programs, courses, and/or initiatives should be strategically
integrated or threaded into the overall experience.
¡
Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham, England: Open University Press. Burshong, S. (2009). Freshman retention drops, except at 2-year colleges. Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(21), A17. College Board. (2011). Pay for college. Retrieved from http://www.collegeboard.com/student/pay/add-it-up/4494.html Elam, C., Stratton, T., & Gibson, D. D. (2007). Welcoming a new generation to college: The millennial students. Journal of College Admission, 195, 20-25. Hayashi, Y., Nakayama, T., Slingsby, B., Sugimori, H., Takahashi, M., & Yamazaki, H. (2009). Characteristics of qualitative studies in influential journals of general medicine: A critical
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books. Jafee, D. (2007). Peer cohorts and the unintended consequences of freshman learning
Monaco, M., & Martin, M. (2007). The millennial student: A new generation of learners. Athletic Training Education Journal, 2, 42-46.
¡
National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2015). First-Year Persistence and Retention Rates by Starting Enrollment n: 2009-2012. http://nscresearchcenter.org/snapshotreport-persistenceretention14/ Rickes, P. C. (2009). Make way for millennials! How today's students are shaping higher education space, Planning for Higher Education, 37 (2), 7-17. The National Center for Higher Education Management Systems. (2012). Retention Rates – First-Time College Freshmen Returning Their Second Year. Retrieved from http:// www.higheredinfo.org/dbrowser/?year=2010&level=nation&mode=map&state=0&submeasure=224 Tinto, V. (2009). Taking student retention seriously: Rethinking the first year of college. Retrieved from http://faculty.soe.syr.edu/vtinto/Files/Taking%20Student%20Retention%20Seriously.pdf Williams, D. F. (2011). The impact of career workshops on freshman college students at-risk for dropout: An action research study. College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 13(1), 37-62.
¡
peturner@gsu.edu ¡ 404-‑413-‑7217 ¡ ¡