SLIDE 1 Frequency Dependence
Dan Stinebring Oberlin College 2019 November 4
SLIDE 2
(Time Variability)
SLIDE 3 Tilted 0355a
Roger Foster, GB 140 ft
SLIDE 4 Tilted 0355b
Roger Foster, GB 140 ft
SLIDE 5
Tilted 0919a
SLIDE 6
Tilted 0919b
SLIDE 7 Questions
- Can we distinguish between
- anisotropic Kolmogorov scattering
- distributed core + “crack in the
glass”?
- How is arc morphology affected by
- bserving frequency (strength of
scintillation)?
SLIDE 8
SLIDE 9
SLIDE 10
SLIDE 11
6 µs 90 µs
B1133+16
SLIDE 12 6 µs 90 µs
B1133+16
delay is frequency independent
SLIDE 13
340 MHz 825 MHz B0628–28
SLIDE 14
340 MHz 825 MHz B0818–13
SLIDE 15
340 MHz 825 MHz B1508+55
SLIDE 16
340 MHz 825 MHz B1540–06
SLIDE 17
340 MHz 825 MHz B2021+51
SLIDE 18
340 MHz 825 MHz B2045–16
SLIDE 19
340 MHz 825 MHz B2327–20
SLIDE 20
340 MHz 825 MHz B2310+42
SLIDE 21 Concluding Comments
- Can we distinguish between …
- Maybe. Needs to be done quantitatively.
- How is arc morphology affected by
- bserving frequency (strength of
scintillation?
- Very strongly. Need to look at frequency
evolution in order to understand models.
SLIDE 22
slides not shown …
SLIDE 23
Preamble to conjecture:
all (or almost all) of the Kolmogorov ray tracing simulations you’ve seen assume a single thin screen along the LOS
SLIDE 24
Conjecture:
rays scattered by a distributed Kolmogorov medium do not produce pronounced scintillation arcs
SLIDE 25
Oberlin honors thesis rays random walk in a distributed medium
SLIDE 26 The statistical connection between delay and Doppler (in this case) is a selection effect. It’s real, but it needs further quantitative exploration to see what sort of scintillation arcs it produces, if any.
Cordes, Shannon, & Stinebring 2016
SLIDE 27
B0628–28 DM = 34 pc cm-3 distance = 320 pc
SLIDE 28 B0628–28 DM = 34 pc cm-3 distance = 320 pc
distributed scattering
Conjecture
SLIDE 29 B0628–28 DM = 34 pc cm-3 distance = 320 pc
but it’s not there!