for describing uncertainty
play

For Describing Uncertainty, Which Set S 0 Should . . . Ellipsoids - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . Convex Set-Based . . . Which Set S 0 Should . . . For Describing Uncertainty, Which Set S 0 Should . . . Ellipsoids Are Better than Main Conclusion: . . . Ellipsoids Are . . . Generic


  1. Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . Convex Set-Based . . . Which Set S 0 Should . . . For Describing Uncertainty, Which Set S 0 Should . . . Ellipsoids Are Better than Main Conclusion: . . . Ellipsoids Are . . . Generic Polyhedra and Ellipsoids Are . . . Acknowledgments Probably Better than Boxes: Home Page A Remark Title Page ◭◭ ◮◮ Olga Kosheleva and Vladik Kreinovich ◭ ◮ University of Texas at El Paso Page 1 of 10 El Paso, TX 79968, USA Go Back olgak@utep.edu, vladik@utep.edu Full Screen Close Quit

  2. Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . 1. Need for Describing Sets of Possible Values Convex Set-Based . . . • Measurement and estimates are never 100% accurate. Which Set S 0 Should . . . Which Set S 0 Should . . . • As a result, we usually do not know the exact value of Main Conclusion: . . . a physical quantity. Ellipsoids Are . . . • We usually know the set of possible values of this quan- Ellipsoids Are . . . tity. Acknowledgments Home Page • For a single quantity, this set is usually an interval. Title Page • Representing an interval in a computer is easy: e.g., we can represent an interval by its endpoints. ◭◭ ◮◮ • For several quantities x 1 , . . . , x n : ◭ ◮ Page 2 of 10 – in addition to interval bounds on each of these quantities, Go Back – we often have additional restrictions on their com- Full Screen binations. Close Quit

  3. Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . 2. Need for Describing Sets of Possible Values Convex Set-Based . . . (cont-d) Which Set S 0 Should . . . • In addition to interval bounds on quantities x 1 , . . . , x n , Which Set S 0 Should . . . we often have restrictions on their combinations. Main Conclusion: . . . Ellipsoids Are . . . • As a result, the set of possible values of x = ( x 1 , . . . , x n ) Ellipsoids Are . . . can have different shapes. Acknowledgments • The space of all possible sets is infinite-dimensional. Home Page • This means that we need infinitely many real-valued Title Page parameters to represent a generic set. ◭◭ ◮◮ • In a computer, at any given time, we can only store ◭ ◮ finitely many parameters. Page 3 of 10 • So, we cannot represent generic sets exactly. Go Back • We need to approximate them by sets from a finite- Full Screen parametric family. Close Quit

  4. Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . 3. Convex Set-Based Representation of Sets Convex Set-Based . . . • When x i are spatial coordinates, we can use a different Which Set S 0 Should . . . m Which Set S 0 Should . . . coordinate system y i = � t ij · x j . j =1 Main Conclusion: . . . • In view of this, a reasonable way to select a finite- Ellipsoids Are . . . parametric set is: Ellipsoids Are . . . Acknowledgments – to pick a bounded symmetric convex set S 0 with Home Page non-empty interior, and – to use images TS 0 of this set S 0 under arbitrary Title Page linear transformations T . ◭◭ ◮◮ def • If we start with a Euclidean unit ball S 0 = B = ◭ ◮ � n � x 2 x : � i ≤ 1 , we get the family of ellipsoids. Page 4 of 10 i =1 Go Back • If we start with a unit cube C , we get the family of all boxes (plus the corresponding parallelepipeds. Full Screen • We can also pick a symmetric convex polyhedron P . Close Quit

  5. Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . 4. Which Set S 0 Should We Choose? Convex Set-Based . . . • Once we pick a set S 0 , we can (precisely) represent sets Which Set S 0 Should . . . S of the type TS 0 . Which Set S 0 Should . . . Main Conclusion: . . . • If we start with such a set S , we enclose it into a set Ellipsoids Are . . . TS 0 = S . Ellipsoids Are . . . • Then, we want to enclose TS 0 in a set λ · S correspond- Acknowledgments ing to the original S -based representations. Home Page • We get the same original set S = TS 0 back, with λ = 1. Title Page • For sets S which are different from TS 0 , the S 0 -based ◭◭ ◮◮ representation is only approximate. ◭ ◮ • We start with a set S . Page 5 of 10 • We enclose it in a set TS 0 ⊇ S for an appropriate T . Go Back • We then try to enclose TS 0 in a set of the type λ · S . Full Screen • Then we inevitably get λ > 1. Close Quit

  6. Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . 5. Which Set S 0 Should We Choose? ✬✩ Convex Set-Based . . . Which Set S 0 Should . . . ✫✪ Which Set S 0 Should . . . Main Conclusion: . . . Ellipsoids Are . . . • We have S ⊆ TS 0 ⊆ λ · S . Ellipsoids Are . . . • The smaller λ , the better the approximation. Acknowledgments Home Page • As a measure d ( S 0 , S ) of accuracy of approximating S by S 0 , we use the smallest λ : Title Page d ( S 0 , S ) = inf { λ : ∃ T ( S ⊆ TS 0 ⊆ λ · S ) } . ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ • This quantity is known as a Banach-Mazur distance between the convex sets S and S 0 . Page 6 of 10 • As a measure of quality Q ( S 0 ) of choosing S 0 , we select Go Back the worst-case approximation accuracy Full Screen def Q ( S 0 ) = sup d ( S 0 , S ) . Close S Quit

  7. Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . 6. Main Conclusion: Ellipsoids Are Better Than Convex Set-Based . . . Generic Polyhedra Which Set S 0 Should . . . • John’s Theorem: for the Euclidean unit ball B , Which Set S 0 Should . . . d ( B, S ) ≤ √ n for all symmetric convex sets S . Main Conclusion: . . . • Thus, we have Q ( B ) ≤ √ n (actually Q ( B ) = √ n ). Ellipsoids Are . . . Ellipsoids Are . . . • Gluskin’s Theorem for polyhedra P , P ′ : Acknowledgments ∃ c > 0 ∀ n ∃ P ∃ P ′ ( d ( P, P ′ ) ≥ c · n ) . Home Page Title Page • For this polyhedron P , we have d ( P ) ≥ c · n . ◭◭ ◮◮ • Moreover, if we take a convex hull P of 2 n points ran- domly selected from a unit Euclidean sphere, then: ◭ ◮ Q ( P ) ≥ c · n with high probability . Page 7 of 10 • For large n , c · n ≫ √ n and thus, Q ( B ) ≪ Q ( P ) . Go Back Full Screen • This shows that for large dimensions, ellipsoids are in- deed better than generic polyhedra. Close Quit

  8. Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . 7. Ellipsoids Are Probably Better Than Boxes Convex Set-Based . . . • A unit ball B and a unit cube C are unit balls Which Set S 0 Should . . . � n � 1 /p def def Which Set S 0 Should . . . | x i | p = { x : � x � p ≤ 1 } in the ℓ p -metric � x � p = � : B p Main Conclusion: . . . i =1 • B is a unit ball in the ℓ 2 -metric: B = B 2 ; Ellipsoids Are . . . • C is a unit ball in the ℓ ∞ -metric: C = B ∞ . Ellipsoids Are . . . Acknowledgments • The exact values of d ( B p , B q ) are known only when Home Page both p and q are on the same side of 2. Title Page • In this case, d ( B p , B q ) = n | 1 /p − 1 /q | . • Example: for p = 1 and q = 2, we get d ( B 1 , B 2 ) = √ n . ◭◭ ◮◮ ◭ ◮ • These values have the property that when p < q , then Page 8 of 10 d ( B p , B q ) ↑ when p ↓ or when q ↑ . Go Back • For n = 2, B 1 (rhombus) and B ∞ (square) are linearly equivalent. Full Screen • Thus, d ( B 1 , B ∞ ) = 0 < d ( B 2 , B ∞ ) (no monotonicity). Close Quit

  9. Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . 8. Ellipsoids Are Probably Better Than Boxes Convex Set-Based . . . (cont-d) Which Set S 0 Should . . . • For n = 2, we have an anomaly: B 1 = TB ∞ . Which Set S 0 Should . . . Main Conclusion: . . . • As a result, d ( B p , B q ) is not monotonic in p and q . Ellipsoids Are . . . • For n > 3, we do not have this anomaly. Ellipsoids Are . . . • Therefore, it is reasonable to conjecture that for n > 3, Acknowledgments d ( B p , B q ) is monotonic in p and q . Home Page • Under this hypothesis, d ( B ∞ , B 1 ) > d ( B 2 , B 1 ) = √ n . Title Page • Thus, Q ( B ∞ ) ≥ d ( B ∞ , B 1 ) > √ n . ◭◭ ◮◮ • Since Q ( B 2 ) = √ n , we therefore conclude that ◭ ◮ Q ( B 2 ) < Q ( B ∞ ) . Page 9 of 10 Go Back • Thus, ellipsoids are better than boxes. Full Screen • This is in line with a general result that, under certain conditions, ellipsoids are the best approximators. Close Quit

  10. 9. Acknowledgments Need for Describing . . . Need for Describing . . . Convex Set-Based . . . This work was supported in part: Which Set S 0 Should . . . Which Set S 0 Should . . . • by the National Science Foundation grants HRD-0734825 Main Conclusion: . . . and HRD-1242122 (Cyber-ShARE Center of Excellence) Ellipsoids Are . . . Ellipsoids Are . . . and DUE-0926721, Acknowledgments • by Grants 1 T36 GM078000-01 and 1R43TR000173-01 Home Page from the National Institutes of Health, and Title Page • by a grant on F-transforms from the Office of Naval ◭◭ ◮◮ Research. ◭ ◮ Page 10 of 10 Go Back Full Screen Close Quit

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend