fluctuations in growth processes
play

Fluctuations in Growth Processes Angad Yuvraj and Dominic Yates - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fluctuations in Growth Processes Angad Yuvraj and Dominic Yates Supervised by Alex Adamou, Ole Peters and Rosalba Garca Milln 1 Introduction Classical view holds that fluctuations are irrelevant to growth of a system. Recent


  1. Fluctuations in Growth Processes Angad Yuvraj and Dominic Yates Supervised by Alex Adamou, Ole Peters and Rosalba García Millán 1

  2. Introduction • Classical view holds that fluctuations are irrelevant to growth of a system. • Recent advancements demonstrate that fluctuations do play a role when considering the growth rate of the system. • It has been shown that individuals achieve boost in growth rate by completely pooling and equally splitting their resources. • We extend this concept to consider more practical forms of sharing than this type of “cooperation”. • We consider the effects of two types of resource sharing on growth rate, and the impact of fluctuations. 2

  3. Geometric Brownian Motion • 3

  4. Geometric Brownian Motion • 4

  5. 5

  6. Cooperation • 6

  7. 7

  8. Cooperation • 8

  9. 9

  10. Our Model • The motivation behind our model came after studying a paper by Jain and Krishna on the evolution of a complex system. • The system comprised of elements that catalysed the growth of other elements. • We noted that this represented a system in which individuals were cooperating, except that there was no cost to the catalysis. • This meant that the system didn’t display the same conservation present in the previous cooperation model, in which individuals pooled and split resources. • Their guiding equation helped us to generalise the cooperation model. 10

  11. Our Model • We consider a population of N individuals which interact through the giving and taking of resources, not necessarily in a symmetric manner. • We visualise this concept through graphs where each node represented an individual and directed edges represented the flow of resources. • We do not allow a node to have a directed edge to itself, and each node may have at most one directed edge towards each other node. • We allow edges to have different weights, corresponding to different rates of resource sharing. 11

  12. The Weighted Adjacency Matrix • v 0.5 v v 1 v 1.1 v v 12

  13. Our Model • 13

  14. Receiving Giving Term Term Our Model • 14

  15. Our Model • 15

  16. Our Model • 16

  17. The Deterministic Case • 17

  18. Questions • What happens when individuals only engage in partial sharing? • What rate of sharing does it take to achieve maximum growth rate? • To what extent does growth rate depend on the way resources are distributed? • Does any of the above depend on how noisy the system is? 18

  19. Complete Graph on N nodes • 19

  20. Complete Graph on N nodes • Fully Connected Graph for N = 5 20

  21. N-Cycle • N-Cycle for N = 5 21

  22. The Complete Graph for N = 2 • 22

  23. 23

  24. Normalised Growth, G • 24

  25. Normalised Growth, G • 25

  26. Normalised Growth, G • 26

  27. 27

  28. 28

  29. 29

  30. Interpretation of Results for N = 2 • 30

  31. 31

  32. Questions • What happens when individuals only engage in partial sharing? • What rate of sharing does it take to achieve a higher growth rate? • To what extent does growth rate depend on the way resources are distributed? • Does any of the above depend on how noisy the system is? 32

  33. Finiteness of Time Length T • 33

  34. 34

  35. Questions • What happens when individuals only engage in partial sharing? • What rate of sharing does it take to achieve maximum growth rate? • To what extent does growth rate depend on the way resources are distributed? • Does any of the above depend on how noisy the system is? 35

  36. Fully Connected Graph for Different N • 36

  37. 37

  38. 38

  39. Fully Connected Graph for Different N • 39

  40. Form One Form Two • 40

  41. Form One Form Two • 41

  42. 42

  43. 43

  44. Similar Behaviour in Our Model • 44

  45. 45

  46. 46

  47. Questions • What happens when individuals only engage in partial sharing? • What rate of sharing does it take to achieve maximum growth rate? • To what extent does growth rate depend on the way resources are distributed? • Does any of the above depend on how noisy the system is? 47

  48. N-Cycle • 48

  49. 49

  50. • 50

  51. 51

  52. Questions • What happens when individuals only engage in partial sharing? • What rate of sharing does it take to achieve maximum growth rate? • To what extent does growth rate depend on the way resources are distributed? • Does any of the above depend on how noisy the system is? 52

  53. 53

  54. 54

  55. 55

  56. Conclusion • In the absence of fluctuations, there is no incentive to cooperate. • Even a little sharing goes a long way. • The manner of distribution does have an impact on the growth rate. 56

  57. Thank you for listening. • References: 1. “The Evolutionary Advantage of Cooperation”, O. Peters and A. Adamou http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.03414 “The Emergence and Growth of Complex Networks in Adaptive 2. Systems”, S. Jain and S. Krishna Computer Phys. Comm. 121-122 (1999) 116-121. 3. “Far from equilibrium: Wealth reallocation in the United States”, Y. Berman, O. Peters and A. Adamou http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.05631 “Note on mean-field wealth models and the Random Energy Model”, 4. Jean-Phillipe Bouchard (not published) 57

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend