Fishing for a Legal Solution: An Analytical Framework Clear - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

fishing for a legal solution an analytical framework
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Fishing for a Legal Solution: An Analytical Framework Clear - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Fishing for a Legal Solution: An Analytical Framework Clear Objectives Needed for an Effective Legal Solution Overall Goal: Minimize gear loss while maximizing recovery. Directed Objectives: 1. Prevention --Behavior


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Fishing for a Legal Solution: An Analytical Framework

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Clear Objectives Needed for an Effective Legal Solution

  • Overall Goal:

“Minimize gear loss while maximizing recovery.”

  • Directed Objectives:

1. Prevention

  • -Behavior modification
  • -Economic Incentives for

gear disposal

  • -Manufacturing processes

2. Enforcement and Compliance

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Clear Objectives

  • -What is being

enforced, penalties 3. Coordination, cooperation, and info exchange 4. Outreach/Education 5. Research 6. Remediation (e.g., reporting after loss to possible affected States, clean up) 7. Funding

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Analytical Framework

Instrument to resolve problem? (General

principles v. specific provisions)

  • -UNCLOS (e.g., Arts

192, 194, 197, 200)

  • -MARPOL Annex V and

Implementing Guidelines

  • -London Convention
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Analytical Framework

  • “Soft” v. “Hard” Law

– Examples of “soft” law include UNGA Resolutions, MARPOL Guidelines and examples of “hard” law include treaties such as UNCLOS, MARPOL, LC – Benefits/Drawbacks (e.g., enforcement, ease of obtaining agreement, resources

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Analytical Framework

Are these instruments effective?

– UNCLOS general principles – MARPOL: disposal into sea of all synthetic ropes and fishing nets prohibited; however, accidental loss exempted from prohibition if reasonable precautions

  • taken. Drawback: garbage

recording, management plan applicable only to vessels of 400 gt and above

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Analytical Framework

  • -LC: intentional dumping, does

not include wastes incidental to normal operations

  • -MARPOL Guidelines:
  • -defines fishing gear (1.7.11)
  • -Exchange of info re marine

debris among gov’ts (2.2.4)

  • -Encourage fishing vessel
  • perators and gov’ts to research

derelict fishing gear, develop technologies and adopt regs necessary to prevent gear loss, and maximize recovery (3.5)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Analytical Framework

  • -Ex. of suggested minimization

techniques: info exchange b/n fishermen and other ship traffic, gear identification systems, documentation of gear loss, research and technology dev. on gear identification; use of biodegradable materials (3.5 et seq)

  • -Fishermen/seafarers encouraged

to retain derelict gear onboard for disposal on land (4.3.5.1)

  • -Notification to appropriate

coastal State of location of derelict gear (4.5.4)

  • -Gov’ts encouraged to study

provision of reception facilities (6.3.2.2)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Analytical Framework

If the problem is not resolved should another instrument be developed

  • r amendments made to

an existing instrument?

– Difficulties: must be made priority w/n national gov’ts and internat’l institutions, substantial resources needed for creation of a legally binding instrument as well as to ensure compliance once adopted, and inertia must be

  • vercome
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Analytical Framework

Is there an internat’l institution to address this issue?

  • RFMOs
  • FAO, UNEP, IMO
  • -Do any take ownership
  • f issue, are they actively

addressing it, and do they coordinate?

  • -Feasibility of taking

action within an

  • rganization and how to

go about it (e.g., rules of procedure, getting issue of the agenda)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Conclusion

  • Careful consideration

must be given to whether regulatory action needed. If so, the objectives for such action must be clear and decisions made regarding at what level action should be taken: nat’l, bilateral, reg’l, global

  • Priorities should be set

with regard to the action to be taken, regulatory and

  • therwise, in the short,

medium, and long term

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Conclusion

Considerations:

  • 1. Identify a focused group
  • f people to take
  • wnership of the issue

and responsibility for action 2. Develop a step by step game plan and strategy and decide on action to be taken, which could include:

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Conclusion

A. Short Term Action: Info Dissemination (e.g.,

target public and consumers, interested and affected parties, and appropriate institutions

B. Medium Term Action: Development of a UNGA Resolution, Code

  • f Practice, and/or

Action Plan C. Long Term Action: Amendment of MARPOL or development of new instrument

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Conclusion