First passage fluctuation relations ruled by cycles affinities F. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

first passage fluctuation relations ruled by cycles
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

First passage fluctuation relations ruled by cycles affinities F. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

First passage fluctuation relations ruled by cycles affinities F. Cornu joint work with M. Bauer Laboratoire de Physique Thorique, Orsay Institut de Physique Thorique, CEA Saclay J. Stat. Phys. (2014) 155 703 STOCHASTIC


slide-1
SLIDE 1

First passage fluctuation relations ruled by cycles affinities

  • F. Cornu⋆

joint work with M. Bauer⋆⋆

⋆ Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, Orsay ⋆⋆ Institut de Physique Théorique, CEA Saclay

  • J. Stat. Phys. (2014) 155 703
slide-2
SLIDE 2

STOCHASTIC PROCESSES OF INTEREST Semi-Markovian property

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Semi-Markovian processes Firenze, 2014/05/30 2 / 30

slide-3
SLIDE 3

1.1 Example of processes of interest : a bacterial ratchet motor

Di Leonardo & al. PNAS, 107 9541 (2010)

  • Experiment : asymmetric gear (diameter : 48 µm, thickness 10 µm)

in active bath of self-propelling bacteriae. αt: angle of black spot position at time t αt t = 1 revolution per minute

  • Physical mechanism

white "head" : self-propulsion direction

  • perpendicular wall reaction

reorients bacteria motion

  • either bacteria slides to corner

− → gets stuck − → torque

  • r bacteria slides away from corner

− → no torque

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Semi-Markovian processes Firenze, 2014/05/30 3 / 30

slide-4
SLIDE 4

1.2 Modelization by a finite state semi-Markovian process

  • Finite number of configurations Cm :

discretized values of angle α of black spot position : Cm ≡ αm = m2π/M

  • Semi-Markovian process (or generalized renewal sequence) :

History :

  • (C0, τ 0), (C, τ 0 + τ), (C′, τ0 + τ + τ ′), . . .
  • After a waiting time τ distributed with probability PC(τ),

system jumps from C to C′ with probability (C′|P|C) (P stochastic matrix with quantum mechanics convention for sense of evolution)

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Semi-Markovian processes Firenze, 2014/05/30 4 / 30

slide-5
SLIDE 5

1.2 Modelization by a finite state semi-Markovian process

  • Finite number of configurations Cm :

discretized values of angle α of black spot position : Cm ≡ αm = m2π/M

  • Semi-Markovian process (or generalized renewal sequence) :

History :

  • (C0, τ 0), (C, τ 0 + τ), (C′, τ0 + τ + τ ′), . . .
  • After a waiting time τ distributed with probability PC(τ),

system jumps from C to C′ with probability (C′|P|C) (P stochastic matrix with quantum mechanics convention for sense of evolution)

  • Graph representation :

vertex • :

  • configuration C

weight for waiting time at C :

  • P0

C(τ) if C initial configuration of history

  • PC(τ) otherwise

bond —– : probability (C′|P|C) to jump from C to C′ when a jump is known to occur and probability (C|P|C′) of reverse jump

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Semi-Markovian processes Firenze, 2014/05/30 4 / 30

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1.3 Questions

1) Probability that the cycle be performed at least once in positive (negative) sense in a infinite time interval ? 2) Fluctuation relation for first passage time at winding number +1 or -1 ? winding number = number of revolutions in the positive sense minus number of revolutions in the opposite sense Answers use affinity concept

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Semi-Markovian processes Firenze, 2014/05/30 5 / 30

slide-7
SLIDE 7

AFFINITY and ENTROPY PRODUCTION RATE Known results for Markovian processes

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 6 / 30

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2.1 Specific case : Markovian processes

  • Markov property : specific form for probability of waiting time τ in

configuration C : exponential PC(τ) = r(C)e−r(C)τ r(C) escape rate from C = inverse mean waiting time at C

  • From a Markov chain to a Markov process :

(C′|P|C) probability to jump from C to C′ knowing that system jumps out of C − →(C′|W|C)dt probability to jump from C to C′ during dt

  • Master equation for evolution of probability P(C; t) of configuration C at t

dP(C; t) dt =

  • C′=C

[(C|W|C′)P(C′; t) − (C′|W|C)P(C; t)]

  • Microreversibility hypothesis : (C′|W|C) = 0

⇔ (C|W|C′) = 0

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 7 / 30

slide-9
SLIDE 9

2.2 Shannon-Gibbs entropy evolution and irreversibility

  • Dimensionless Shannon-Gibbs entropy (kB = 1)

S

SG [P(t)] ≡ −

  • C

P(C; t) ln P(C; t) dS SG dt =

  • C,C′

(C′|W|C)P(C; t) ln P(C; t) P(C′; t)

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 8 / 30

slide-10
SLIDE 10

2.2 Shannon-Gibbs entropy evolution and irreversibility

  • Dimensionless Shannon-Gibbs entropy (kB = 1)

S

SG [P(t)] ≡ −

  • C

P(C; t) ln P(C; t) dS SG dt =

  • C,C′

(C′|W|C)P(C; t) ln P(C; t) P(C′; t)

  • Analogy with phenomenological thermodynamics of irreversible processes

[Schnakenberg 1976] dS SG dt = dexchS SG dt + dirrS SG dt dexchS SG dt ≡ −

  • C,C′

(C′|W|C)P(C; t)ln (C′|W|C) (C|W|C′) with no definite sign dirrS SG dt ≡ 1 2

  • C,C′

[(C′|W|C)P(C; t) − (C|W|C′)P(C′; t)] ln (C′|W|C)P(C; t) (C|W|C′)P(C′; t) ≥ 0 dirrS SG dt : irreversible entropy production rate

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 8 / 30

slide-11
SLIDE 11

2.3 Comparison with kinetic theory : affinity of a chemical reaction (a)

  • In a vessel with walls at inverse temperature β and exerting pressure P,
  • ne introduces species A and B prepared separately at (β, P)

reversible reaction : A ⇋ B

  • Phenomenological thermodynamics of irreversible processes

dirrSph dt

entropy production rate

= β(µA − µB)

  • affinity AA⇋B

× dnA⇋B

B

dt

reaction extent rate JA⇋B

µi chemical potential (i = A, B, ni : molecule concentration for species i)

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 9 / 30

slide-12
SLIDE 12

2.3 Comparison with kinetic theory : affinity of a chemical reaction (a)

  • In a vessel with walls at inverse temperature β and exerting pressure P,
  • ne introduces species A and B prepared separately at (β, P)

reversible reaction : A ⇋ B

  • Phenomenological thermodynamics of irreversible processes

dirrSph dt

entropy production rate

= β(µA − µB)

  • affinity AA⇋B

× dnA⇋B

B

dt

reaction extent rate JA⇋B

µi chemical potential (i = A, B, ni : molecule concentration for species i)

  • Kinetic theory : dnA⇋B

B

dt = kB←AnA − kA←BnB with kj←i : kinetic constants

  • Thermodynamics of ideal solutions : ni ∝ eβµi and µeq

A = µeq B →

β(µA − µB) = ln kB←AnA kA←BnB

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 9 / 30

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2.3 Comparison with kinetic theory : affinity of a chemical reaction (b)

  • Correspondance:

concentration ni(t) − → P(C; t) configuration probability kinetic constant kj←i − → (C′|W|C) transition rate − → Rewriting dirrS SG dt = 1 2

  • C,C′

JC⇋C′AC⇋C′ bond current JC⇋C′ ≡ (C′|W|C)P(C; t) − (C|W|C′)P(C′; t) bond affinity AC⇋C′ ≡ ln (C′|W|C)P(C; t) (C|W|C′)P(C′; t)

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 10 / 30

slide-14
SLIDE 14

2.4 Affinity for a master equation corresponding to a graph made of a single cycle

  • Representation of a master equation by a graph

Graph G : vertex • : configuration C bond —– : transtion rates (C′|W|C) and (C|W|C′)

  • Case where graph G is a cycle C of M vertices.

Fixed orientation along C with CM+1 ≡ C1 cycle affinity AC ≡

M

  • m=1

ACm⇋Cm+1 with ACm⇋Cm+1 ≡ ln

(Cm+1|W|Cm)P(Cm;t) (Cm|W|Cm+1)P(Cm+1;t)

AC = ln

M

  • m=1

(Cm+1|W|Cm) (Cm|W|Cm+1) independent from P(C, t)

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 11 / 30

slide-15
SLIDE 15

2.4 Affinity for a master equation corresponding to a graph made of a single cycle

  • Representation of a master equation by a graph

Graph G : vertex • : configuration C bond —– : transtion rates (C′|W|C) and (C|W|C′)

  • Case where graph G is a cycle C of M vertices.

Fixed orientation along C with CM+1 ≡ C1 cycle affinity AC ≡

M

  • m=1

ACm⇋Cm+1 with ACm⇋Cm+1 ≡ ln

(Cm+1|W|Cm)P(Cm;t) (Cm|W|Cm+1)P(Cm+1;t)

AC = ln

M

  • m=1

(Cm+1|W|Cm) (Cm|W|Cm+1) independent from P(C, t)

  • Property of stationary state Pst(C)

Cycle current : JC[Pst] ≡ JC1⇋C2[Pst] = JC2⇋C3[Pst] = · · · Entropy production rate: dirrS SG dt

  • Pst

= JC[Pst] AC

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 11 / 30

slide-16
SLIDE 16

2.5 Affinity class in graph theory

  • Exchange processes in configuration jumps ↔ antisymmetric matrices
  • S for the exchange entropy variation
  • A for the affinity variation

(C′|S|C) ≡ ln (C′|W|C) (C|W|C′) and (C′|A[P]|C) ≡ ln (C′|W|C)P(C; t) (C|W|C′)P(C′; t) ≡ AC⇋C′

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 12 / 30

slide-17
SLIDE 17

2.5 Affinity class in graph theory

  • Exchange processes in configuration jumps ↔ antisymmetric matrices
  • S for the exchange entropy variation
  • A for the affinity variation

(C′|S|C) ≡ ln (C′|W|C) (C|W|C′) and (C′|A[P]|C) ≡ ln (C′|W|C)P(C; t) (C|W|C′)P(C′; t) ≡ AC⇋C′

  • For any P(C; t)

(C′|A[P]|C) − (C′|S|C) = − ln P(C′) + ln P(C) − → For any P(C; t), A[P] in cohomology class of S : set of antisymmetric Q such that "integration" along any cycle subgraph C gives the same result as for S ∀C

M

  • m=1

(Cm+1|Q|Cm) =

M

  • m=1

(Cm+1|S|Cm) =

M

  • m=1

ln (Cm+1|W|Cm) (Cm|W|Cm+1) ≡ AC − → cohomology class of S called "affinity class"

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity Firenze, 2014/05/30 12 / 30

slide-18
SLIDE 18

AFFINITY CLASS INVARIANCE under probabilistic constructions

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 13 / 30

slide-19
SLIDE 19

3.1 From a Markov process to a Markov chain

  • Hypothesis : G connected :

→ no absorption configuration : r(C) =

C′=C(C′|W|C) = 0 for all C

(C′|W|C)dt probability to jump from C to C′ during dt − → (C′|P|C) probability to jump from C to C′ knowing that system jumps out of C for C′ = C (C′|P|C) = (C′|W|C) r(C)

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 14 / 30

slide-20
SLIDE 20

3.1 From a Markov process to a Markov chain

  • Hypothesis : G connected :

→ no absorption configuration : r(C) =

C′=C(C′|W|C) = 0 for all C

(C′|W|C)dt probability to jump from C to C′ during dt − → (C′|P|C) probability to jump from C to C′ knowing that system jumps out of C for C′ = C (C′|P|C) = (C′|W|C) r(C)

  • Comparison of cycle affinities

cycle affinity for process W AC[W] ≡ ln

M

  • m=1

(Cm+1|W|Cm) (Cm|W|Cm+1) cycle affinity for chain P AC[P] ≡ ln

M

  • m=1

(Cm+1|P|Cm) (Cm|P|Cm+1) AC[W] = AC[P] Invariance under description change from Markov process to Markov chain

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 14 / 30

slide-21
SLIDE 21

3.2 From a Markov process to processes defined on a subgraph (a)

  • Generic connected graph G. Consider red subgraph H (a cycle here)
  • Initial process with
  • transition rate (C′|W|C)

waiting time probability PC(τ) Markov property PC(τ) = r(C)e−r(C)τ

  • Derived process only between configurations of H

with

  • transition rate (C′|

W|C) waiting time probability PC(τ)

  • Examples of derived processes such that, if H is a cycle C, then AC[

W] = AC[W]

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 15 / 30

slide-22
SLIDE 22

3.2 From a Markov process to processes defined on a subgraph (b)

  • 1) restriction to a subgraph H :

Markov process for different histories where system jumps only along red bonds with same transition rates

  • (C′|Wrest|C) = (C′|W|C) −

→ different escape rate r rest(C) =

C′∈H(C′|W|C)

  • If H is a cycle C

AC[Wrest] = AC[W]

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 16 / 30

slide-23
SLIDE 23

3.2 From a Markov process to processes defined on a subgraph (b)

  • 1) restriction to a subgraph H :

Markov process for different histories where system jumps only along red bonds with same transition rates

  • (C′|Wrest|C) = (C′|W|C) −

→ different escape rate r rest(C) =

C′∈H(C′|W|C)

  • If H is a cycle C

AC[Wrest] = AC[W]

  • 2) Conditionning

Only histories where system jumps along red bonds are retained

→ Markov process with (C′|Wcond|C) = g(C′)(C′|W|C) [g(C)]−1

  • If H is a cycle C

AC[Wcond] = AC[W]

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 16 / 30

slide-24
SLIDE 24

3.2 Processes defined on a subgraph (c)

  • 3) Drag and drop

A box is bound to move on the subgraph. All histories are considered but only the following events are retained : a walker meets the box on a red site and then jumps through a red bond while carrying the box along The box moves according to a semi-Markovian process with

  • probability to jump from C to C′ : (C′|Pdd|C) = (C′|Prest|C)
  • waiting time probability

PC(τ) not exponential

  • If H is a cycle C

AC[Pdd] = AC[P]

  • Example :

⋆ graph G : positions of a complex inside a cell ⋆ subgraph H : heteropolymer ⋆ box : a ligand bound to move along the heteropolymer when carried by the complex

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 17 / 30

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Drag and Drop

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Drag and Drop

!

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Affinity class invariance Firenze, 2014/05/30 18 / 30

slide-45
SLIDE 45

AFFINITY AND FLUCTUATION RELATIONS at fixed time Exchange Markovian processes Known results

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Known results : Fluctuation relations Firenze, 2014/05/30 19 / 30

slide-46
SLIDE 46

4.1 Exchange processes : cumulative currents

  • Exchange observable Q : (antisymmetric) (C′|Q|C) = −(C|Q|C′)
  • Process Ct −

→ Exchange cumulative process X Q

t ≡

  • s∈]0,t]

(Cs|Q|Cs−)

  • Example : ( microreversibility hyp.: (C′|W|C) = 0

⇔ (C|W|C′) = 0) Stochastic exchange entropy variation along a history : Lebowitz-Spohn action functional (1999) : X S

t =

  • s∈]0,t]

(Cs|S|Cs−) For a history from C0 to CN in time interval [0, t] X S

t = ln

(CN|W|CN−1)(CN−1|W|CN−2) · · · (C1|W|C0) (C0|W|C1) · · · (CN−2|W|CN−1) · · · (CN−1|W|CN)

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Known results : Fluctuation relations Firenze, 2014/05/30 20 / 30

slide-47
SLIDE 47

4.2 Fluctuation relation for X S at fixed time

  • Extra hypothesis : graph G connected ⇒ unique stationary Pst(C)
  • Large deviation function fX S(J ) for cumulative current Jt ≡ X S

t /t

lim

t→+∞

1 t ln P X S

t

t ∈ [J , J + dJ ]

  • = fX S(J )
  • Fluctuation relation obeyed by fX S(J ) [Lebowitz and Spohn (1999)]

fX S(J ) − fX S(−J ) = J Other “sloppy” formulation P

  • X S

t = tJ

  • P
  • X S

t = −tJ

t→+∞ etJ

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Known results : Fluctuation relations Firenze, 2014/05/30 21 / 30

slide-48
SLIDE 48

4.3 Case of a graph made of a single cycle : fluctuation relation for the cycle current at fixed time

  • X NM

t

:number of passages through the bond (CM, C1) of cycle C during [0, t] in the positive sense minus the number of passages in the negative sense with NM defined by

  • (CM|NM|C1) = +1
  • (C1|NM|CM) = −1
  • (C′|NM|C) = 0 if {C, C′} = {1, M}
  • Fluctuation relation for the cycle current at fixed time

special case of more general results in Gaspard & Andrieux (2007) P

  • X NM

t

= tV

  • P
  • X NM

t

= −tV

t→+∞ e t VAC

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities Known results : Fluctuation relations Firenze, 2014/05/30 22 / 30

slide-49
SLIDE 49

FLUCTUATION RELATIONS FOR FIRST PASSAGE TIMES AT INTEGER WINDING NUMBERS Semi-Markovian processes

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities FR for first passage times Firenze, 2014/05/30 23 / 30

slide-50
SLIDE 50

5.1 Cycle graph and winding number

  • Only jumps between successive configurations
  • n the cycle

with probability knowing that a jump occurs : (Cm±1|P|Cm)

  • Probability for waiting time τ at site m :

Pm(τ)

  • Wt : winding number around the cycle C during [0, t] : number of

clockwise jumps minus number of anticlockwise jumps divided by M Wt = X Nw

t

with ∀m = 1 = · · · = M (Cm+1|Nw|Cm) = + 1 M and (Cm|Nw|Cm+1) = − 1 M

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities FR for first passage times Firenze, 2014/05/30 24 / 30

slide-51
SLIDE 51

5.2 Probability for winding number ±1 to be reached

  • Cycle affinity in the clockwise sense

AC ≡ ln

M

  • m=1

(Cm+1|P|Cm) (Cm−1|P|Cm)

  • Method : generating function. Probabilistic arguments and strong Markov

property → recursive relations P (∃t ∈ [0, +∞[ such that Wt = −1) P (∃t ∈ [0, +∞[ such that Wt = +1) = e−AC More precisely, if AC > 0

  • winding number +1 is reached with probability 1
  • winding number −1 is never reached with finite probability 1 − e−AC

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities FR for first passage times Firenze, 2014/05/30 25 / 30

slide-52
SLIDE 52

5.3 Fluctuation relation for first passage time at winding number 1

  • T± : first passage time at winding number ±1

Method : Laplace transform e−λT+ ≡

  • t∈[0,∞[

e−λtP (T+ ∈ [t, t + dt[) Result : e−λT+ e−λT− = eAC → Radon-Nikodym derivative P (T+ ∈ [t, t + dt[) P (T− ∈ [t, t + dt[) = eAC The ratio is independent from the various distributions of waiting times PCm(τ) along the cycle

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities FR for first passage times Firenze, 2014/05/30 26 / 30

slide-53
SLIDE 53

5.3 Fluctuation relation for first passage time at winding number 1

  • T± : first passage time at winding number ±1

Method : Laplace transform e−λT+ ≡

  • t∈[0,∞[

e−λtP (T+ ∈ [t, t + dt[) Result : e−λT+ e−λT− = eAC → Radon-Nikodym derivative P (T+ ∈ [t, t + dt[) P (T− ∈ [t, t + dt[) = eAC The ratio is independent from the various distributions of waiting times PCm(τ) along the cycle

  • Comparison with dual relation for a history corresponding to winding number

+1 (without restriction of first passage) P

  • historywith W =+1
  • P
  • time-reversed historywith W =−1

= eX S[historywith W =+1] = eAC

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities FR for first passage times Firenze, 2014/05/30 26 / 30

slide-54
SLIDE 54

5.4 Fluctuation relation for large winding numbers (a)

T±w first passage time at winding number ±w with w integer

  • If the first waiting time plays no role,

semi-Markov (or renewal) property → e−λT−w = e−λT−w e−λTw e−λT−w = ew AC Remarks : 1) valid for any finite winding number w 2) valid for any cycle in a more general graph of transitions as long as the procedure to define the process of the cycle preserves the affinity class

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities FR for first passage times Firenze, 2014/05/30 27 / 30

slide-55
SLIDE 55

5.4 Fluctuation relation for large winding numbers (b)

  • If the first passage time plays a special role (case of drag-and-drop construction)

law of large numbers → e−λT−w 1/w ∼

|w|→+∞ e−λT−

lim

w→±∞

  • e−λT+w

1/w [e−λT−w ]1/w = eAC

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities FR for first passage times Firenze, 2014/05/30 28 / 30

slide-56
SLIDE 56

5.4 Fluctuation relation for large winding numbers (b)

  • If the first passage time plays a special role (case of drag-and-drop construction)

law of large numbers → e−λT−w 1/w ∼

|w|→+∞ e−λT−

lim

w→±∞

  • e−λT+w

1/w [e−λT−w ]1/w = eAC

  • Comparison with fluctuation relations at fixed time

Wt : winding number : number of clockwise jumps minus number of anticlockwise jumps divided by M ∼

|Wt|→+∞

X NM

t

: number of passages through the bond (CM, C1) of cycle C during [0, t] in the positive sense minus the number of passages in the negative sense P (Wt = tV) P (Wt = −tV) ≍

t→+∞ e t VAC

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities FR for first passage times Firenze, 2014/05/30 28 / 30

slide-57
SLIDE 57

5.5 Mean first passage time at winding number 1

  • T+w is a sum of w independent random variables with mean T+

strong law of large numbers → lim

w→+∞

T+w w = T+ with probability 1 lim

t→+∞

Wt t = 1 T + with probability 1 In the long time limit fluctuations are suppressed and cycle is performed at velocity 1/T + T + = M

m=1

M

k=1 1≤i<k p+ m+i

  • τm+k

k<j≤M p− m+j

  • M

m=1 p+ m − M m=1 p− m

  • with p+

m ≡ (Cm+1|P|Cm), p− m ≡ (Cm−1|P|Cm), τm mean waiting time in Cm.

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities FR for first passage times Firenze, 2014/05/30 29 / 30

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Conclusion

  • Robustness of cycle affinities when edges are discarded by conditioning or drag

and drop → properties for a single cycle are also valid for a cycle embedded in a more generic pattern of transitions

  • In out-of-equilibrium state a current associated to winding number flows

through cycle Fluctuation relations for first-passage time at winding number ±w are ruled by cycle affinity Bauer & Cornu, J. Stat. Phys. (2014) 155 703

Bauer & Cornu : First passage FR & cycle affinities FR for first passage times Firenze, 2014/05/30 30 / 30