Final Draft SamTrans Service Plan Presentation Public Workshop - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Final Draft SamTrans Service Plan Presentation Public Workshop - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Final Draft SamTrans Service Plan Presentation Public Workshop City Hall, Brisbane March 20, 2013 Presentation Outline Plan Purpose Recap Draft Plan released August 2012, public outreach fall 2012 Summary of comments
- Plan Purpose – Recap
- Draft Plan released August 2012, public
- utreach fall 2012
- Summary of comments
- Proposed Revisions – March 2013
- Next Steps
Presentation Outline
2
More of what works
- Improve service where our customers need it
Less of what doesn’t work
- Discontinue routes or segments that aren’t
working
Try new things
- Try innovative ways of delivering transportation
services
Plan Purpose
3
Plan Approach
SSP Framework
- Guiding Principles
- Customers
- Service
- Service Markets
- Financial Stability
- Coordinated Planning
4
Crafting the Draft Plan
- Balance various elements of our guiding
principles
- Focus the plan to improve efficiency,
effectiveness, and ridership for the system as a whole
- Understand the tradeoffs needed to move
SamTrans into the future
5
1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 390 391 397 120 292 122 121 296 130 250 260 110 295 140 281 133 274 112 132 271 123 251 294 280 262 118 270 141 359 297 KX 14 83 17 53 85 36 54 46 16 73 24 58 35 55 72 38 43
Weekday Boardings
El Camino Local Express Community
Weekday Ridership (2011)
6
Route Performance (2011)
Legend El Camino Real Local Express Community 7
391 390 120 292 KX
Financial Effectiveness Productivity
Draft Plan Resources
8
Annual In-service Hours Existing Draft Plan Aug 2012 Percent Differential Weekday 335,505 311,208
- 7.24%
Saturday 36,052 34,445
- 4.5%
Sunday 32,287 33,174 2.7% Total 403,843 378,826
- 6.2%
Engaging the Community
- Involved the community in locally-focused
conversations
- Utilized community organization partnerships to
create additional awareness
- Engaged all levels of the community in the process:
- SamTrans riders
- Public
- Operators
- Stakeholders
- City Councils
9
Public Feedback
Outreach in fall 2012 yielded more than 1,200 comments:
- 9 public meetings
- E-mail and U.S. mail
- Multiple operator outreach sessions
- Online survey
- 16 City Council meetings
- Dedicated project phone line
- 3 tabling events
10
Major Comment Themes
- Route-specific
- Keep route the same
- Change the route in a different way
- Expand route and increase frequency
- Concern about how changes to route will impact
specific populations
- General
- Amenities
- Customer service
- Outreach
11
Route Comments
12
50 100 150 200 250 300 14 16 17 24 46 85 110 112 118 120 121 122 123 130 131 132 133 140 141 250 251 260 262 270 271 274 275 280 281 292 294 295 296 297 359 390 391 397 ECR KX Other Comments
Comment Count
Route number Total comments
Final Draft Proposals
13
Route Proposed change August 2012 Revised change March 2013
110 no change added morning schedule 118 discontinue restore peak hour service 121 discontinue mid-day service restore mid-day service 251 route change: no service to Beach Park restore service to Beach Park 270 route change: no service east of 101, no Saturday service maintain service east of 101 and provide service to new county jail 275 new route Saturday trips to Canada College 280 discontinue no changes without East Palo Alto shuttle coordination 281 increased frequency no changes without East Palo Alto shuttle coordination 292 Discontinue off-peak & weekend service to SF restore route
14
Multi-City Route Proposals – revised from Draft Plan
Route 292 - revised
15
August 2012 Draft: discontinue off- peak/weekend service; reduce service to SF March 2013 Revision: Off-peak/weekend service to SF restored
16
Multi-City Route Proposals – same as Draft Plan
Route KX
17
Recommendation:
- Discontinue off-peak
service to SF, discontinue service south of Redwood City
- Low ridership and multiple
alternative services are available including Muni, Caltrain, and improved ECR service
Route ECR
18
Recommendation:
- New consolidated route
(former 390/391) along El Camino Real from Daly City to Palo Alto
- Discontinue service to San
Francisco due to low performance
- Alternatives include BART,
Caltrain, Muni
- Service will have fifteen
minute frequencies seven days a week
Route 397
19
No change proposed
20
North County Route Proposals – revised from Draft Plan
Route 121 - revised
21
August 2012 Draft: Discontinue mid- day service March 2013 Revision: Restore mid-day service
22
North County Route Proposals – same as Draft Plan
Route 120
23
Recommendation:
- Improve weekend
service span
- Operate more
frequent Sunday service
Route 122
24
Recommendation:
- Realign route for less
circuitous trip through Westborough area
Route 123
25
Recommendation:
- Candidate for discontinuation
due to low ridership/ duplicative service
- Route 123 service overlaps
with Routes 121 and 122
- Route 121 also provides
service between Serramonte and Skyline College
- Route 122 realigned to serve
Callan Blvd
Route 130
26
Recommendation:
- Split into two routes:
northern segment will end at Colma BART
- Improve weekday
frequency
- Extend service span on the
weekend
Route 131
27
Recommendation:
- New route which follows
former Route 130 in South San Francisco and then extends to Serramonte
- Improve weekday
frequency
- Extend service span on
the weekend
Route 132
28
Recommendation:
- Operate select trips on
school days only
- Duplicates service
provided by Routes 131, ECR, community shuttles
Route 133
29
Recommendation:
- Discontinue portion of route
between Serramonte and Tanforan due to low ridership/duplicative service
- Other service options
provided by ECR and Route 131
- Improve frequency to 30
minutes all day (weekday and Saturday)
- Introduce 60 minute service
- n Sunday
Route 140
30
Recommendation:
- Straighten route
along Sneath Lane between Cherry Ave and San Bruno BART and along Longview Drive.
Route 141
31
Recommendation:
- Realign route via San
Bruno Ave rather than Jenevein Ave to serve Shelter Creek riders
- Run only select trips on
segments along San Mateo Ave and 3rd Ave
Route 24
32
No change proposed
Route 35 & 36 – not revised
33
No change proposed
Route 38 – not revised
34
No change proposed
Route 43 – not revised
35
No change proposed
Route 46 – not revised
36
No change proposed
SSP Project Schedule
37
March April May
Final Draft Released Public Outreach/Comments Call for Public Hearing Adopt Plan Public Hearing Revise Plan
Let’s Hear from You!
- Email: ssp@samtrans.com
- Phone: 650-508-6338
Download final draft plan at: www.samtrans.com/ssp
38
Questions
39