Final Draft SamTrans Service Plan Presentation Public Workshop - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

final draft samtrans service plan
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Final Draft SamTrans Service Plan Presentation Public Workshop - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Final Draft SamTrans Service Plan Presentation Public Workshop City Hall, Brisbane March 20, 2013 Presentation Outline Plan Purpose Recap Draft Plan released August 2012, public outreach fall 2012 Summary of comments


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Final Draft SamTrans Service Plan Presentation

Public Workshop City Hall, Brisbane March 20, 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • Plan Purpose – Recap
  • Draft Plan released August 2012, public
  • utreach fall 2012
  • Summary of comments
  • Proposed Revisions – March 2013
  • Next Steps

Presentation Outline

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

More of what works

  • Improve service where our customers need it

Less of what doesn’t work

  • Discontinue routes or segments that aren’t

working

Try new things

  • Try innovative ways of delivering transportation

services

Plan Purpose

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Plan Approach

SSP Framework

  • Guiding Principles
  • Customers
  • Service
  • Service Markets
  • Financial Stability
  • Coordinated Planning

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Crafting the Draft Plan

  • Balance various elements of our guiding

principles

  • Focus the plan to improve efficiency,

effectiveness, and ridership for the system as a whole

  • Understand the tradeoffs needed to move

SamTrans into the future

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 390 391 397 120 292 122 121 296 130 250 260 110 295 140 281 133 274 112 132 271 123 251 294 280 262 118 270 141 359 297 KX 14 83 17 53 85 36 54 46 16 73 24 58 35 55 72 38 43

Weekday Boardings

El Camino Local Express Community

Weekday Ridership (2011)

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Route Performance (2011)

Legend El Camino Real Local Express Community 7

391 390 120 292 KX

Financial Effectiveness Productivity

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Draft Plan Resources

8

Annual In-service Hours Existing Draft Plan Aug 2012 Percent Differential Weekday 335,505 311,208

  • 7.24%

Saturday 36,052 34,445

  • 4.5%

Sunday 32,287 33,174 2.7% Total 403,843 378,826

  • 6.2%
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Engaging the Community

  • Involved the community in locally-focused

conversations

  • Utilized community organization partnerships to

create additional awareness

  • Engaged all levels of the community in the process:
  • SamTrans riders
  • Public
  • Operators
  • Stakeholders
  • City Councils

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Public Feedback

Outreach in fall 2012 yielded more than 1,200 comments:

  • 9 public meetings
  • E-mail and U.S. mail
  • Multiple operator outreach sessions
  • Online survey
  • 16 City Council meetings
  • Dedicated project phone line
  • 3 tabling events

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Major Comment Themes

  • Route-specific
  • Keep route the same
  • Change the route in a different way
  • Expand route and increase frequency
  • Concern about how changes to route will impact

specific populations

  • General
  • Amenities
  • Customer service
  • Outreach

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Route Comments

12

50 100 150 200 250 300 14 16 17 24 46 85 110 112 118 120 121 122 123 130 131 132 133 140 141 250 251 260 262 270 271 274 275 280 281 292 294 295 296 297 359 390 391 397 ECR KX Other Comments

Comment Count

Route number Total comments

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Final Draft Proposals

13

Route Proposed change August 2012 Revised change March 2013

110 no change added morning schedule 118 discontinue restore peak hour service 121 discontinue mid-day service restore mid-day service 251 route change: no service to Beach Park restore service to Beach Park 270 route change: no service east of 101, no Saturday service maintain service east of 101 and provide service to new county jail 275 new route Saturday trips to Canada College 280 discontinue no changes without East Palo Alto shuttle coordination 281 increased frequency no changes without East Palo Alto shuttle coordination 292 Discontinue off-peak & weekend service to SF restore route

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Multi-City Route Proposals – revised from Draft Plan

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Route 292 - revised

15

August 2012 Draft: discontinue off- peak/weekend service; reduce service to SF March 2013 Revision: Off-peak/weekend service to SF restored

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Multi-City Route Proposals – same as Draft Plan

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Route KX

17

Recommendation:

  • Discontinue off-peak

service to SF, discontinue service south of Redwood City

  • Low ridership and multiple

alternative services are available including Muni, Caltrain, and improved ECR service

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Route ECR

18

Recommendation:

  • New consolidated route

(former 390/391) along El Camino Real from Daly City to Palo Alto

  • Discontinue service to San

Francisco due to low performance

  • Alternatives include BART,

Caltrain, Muni

  • Service will have fifteen

minute frequencies seven days a week

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Route 397

19

No change proposed

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

North County Route Proposals – revised from Draft Plan

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Route 121 - revised

21

August 2012 Draft: Discontinue mid- day service March 2013 Revision: Restore mid-day service

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

North County Route Proposals – same as Draft Plan

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Route 120

23

Recommendation:

  • Improve weekend

service span

  • Operate more

frequent Sunday service

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Route 122

24

Recommendation:

  • Realign route for less

circuitous trip through Westborough area

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Route 123

25

Recommendation:

  • Candidate for discontinuation

due to low ridership/ duplicative service

  • Route 123 service overlaps

with Routes 121 and 122

  • Route 121 also provides

service between Serramonte and Skyline College

  • Route 122 realigned to serve

Callan Blvd

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Route 130

26

Recommendation:

  • Split into two routes:

northern segment will end at Colma BART

  • Improve weekday

frequency

  • Extend service span on the

weekend

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Route 131

27

Recommendation:

  • New route which follows

former Route 130 in South San Francisco and then extends to Serramonte

  • Improve weekday

frequency

  • Extend service span on

the weekend

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Route 132

28

Recommendation:

  • Operate select trips on

school days only

  • Duplicates service

provided by Routes 131, ECR, community shuttles

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Route 133

29

Recommendation:

  • Discontinue portion of route

between Serramonte and Tanforan due to low ridership/duplicative service

  • Other service options

provided by ECR and Route 131

  • Improve frequency to 30

minutes all day (weekday and Saturday)

  • Introduce 60 minute service
  • n Sunday
slide-30
SLIDE 30

Route 140

30

Recommendation:

  • Straighten route

along Sneath Lane between Cherry Ave and San Bruno BART and along Longview Drive.

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Route 141

31

Recommendation:

  • Realign route via San

Bruno Ave rather than Jenevein Ave to serve Shelter Creek riders

  • Run only select trips on

segments along San Mateo Ave and 3rd Ave

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Route 24

32

No change proposed

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Route 35 & 36 – not revised

33

No change proposed

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Route 38 – not revised

34

No change proposed

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Route 43 – not revised

35

No change proposed

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Route 46 – not revised

36

No change proposed

slide-37
SLIDE 37

SSP Project Schedule

37

March April May

Final Draft Released Public Outreach/Comments Call for Public Hearing Adopt Plan Public Hearing Revise Plan

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Let’s Hear from You!

  • Email: ssp@samtrans.com
  • Phone: 650-508-6338

Download final draft plan at: www.samtrans.com/ssp

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Questions

39