Fair Value Accounting for GMxB Riders Shaio-Tien Pan SOA Antitrust - - PDF document

fair value accounting for gmxb riders shaio tien pan
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Fair Value Accounting for GMxB Riders Shaio-Tien Pan SOA Antitrust - - PDF document

Equity-Based Insurance Guarantees Conference Nov. 5-6, 2018 Chicago, IL Fair Value Accounting for GMxB Riders Shaio-Tien Pan SOA Antitrust Compliance Guidelines SOA Presentation Disclaimer Sponsored by Fair Value Accounting for GMxB Riders


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Equity-Based Insurance Guarantees Conference

  • Nov. 5-6, 2018

Chicago, IL

Fair Value Accounting for GMxB Riders Shaio-Tien Pan

SOA Antitrust Compliance Guidelines SOA Presentation Disclaimer

Sponsored by

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Fair Value Accounting for GMxB Riders

SHAIO-TIEN PAN

Actuarial Director, PwC

2018 EBIG Conference (Session 3B) 5 November 2018 (1530 – 1700 hours)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

2

GAAP LTDI – History & background

  • The existing U.S. GAAP multi-model accounting

approach for insurance contracts evolved over the decades, often in response to new product features.

  • FASB began proactively working with the IASB in 2008
  • n an exposure draft of fundamental changes to the

accounting for insurance contracts.

  • In the summer of 2013, FASB released its proposed

comprehensive new standards for insurance.

  • In February of 2014, the FASB voted to change its course

toward making ‘targeted improvements’ for long-duration

  • contracts. GAAP LDTI begins.
  • In April of 2014, the target areas are chosen: unit of

account, liability calculations, DAC amortization, loss recognition, and revenue recognition.

  • The LDTI exposure draft was issued in 2016. It was

redeliberated in 2017-18, with significant changes made; the effective date has been announced to be 2021 for public companies. The final version was released August 15, 2018

GAAP LTDI objectives

1.Improve the timeliness of the

liability for future policy benefits with assumptions updates

2.Simplify and improve the

accounting for GMxB in variable contracts

3.Simplify DAC amortization 4.Improve the effectiveness

  • f the required disclosures
slide-4
SLIDE 4

3

FASB Long-Duration Targeted Improvements (LDTI) – History and adoption timeline

2014 2015 2016 2016 2018 2019 2020 2017 2021 2022 Beyond

February 2014 FASB decided to drop its comprehensive insurance project and focus on targeted improvements August 2014 FASB begins re-deliberations

  • n long duration

targeted improvements based on scope agreed upon in April 2014 1st half 2016 Re-deliberations completed in March 2016; FASB votes to draft a revised document for exposure September 2016 FASB exposure draft issued with comment period ending 12/15/16 March 2017 Public roundtable August, October, and November 2017 Board Meetings to discuss tentative decisions June 2018 Final deliberations August 2018 Issuance of final standard 2021 Public companies Effective January 1, 2021 2022 Private companies Effective January 1, 2022

Who does it affect? All public and private companies that report on a US GAAP basis. Further secondary impacts to any firms that have adopted a modified US GAAP basis. When does it take effect? Adoption dates are the following for calendar year-end companies:

  • Public companies –

Jan 1, 2021

  • Private companies -

Jan 1, 2022 Early adoption is acceptable What will be required? Three years comparative income statements at date of first reporting after adoption (e.g. for public companies comparative will be required from 2019).

slide-5
SLIDE 5

4

FASB Long-Duration Targeted Improvements (LDTI) – overview of changes

  • For contract features that have other-

than-nominal capital market risks

  • Fair value measurement through

income

  • Change in instrument-specific credit

risk recognized in OCI

02 04

  • New disclosure requirements including

liability roll forwards and information about significant inputs, judgements and assumptions.

Targeted Improvements for Long-Duration Contracts

  • Assumptions updates for

for non-participating traditional and limited- payment insurance contracts.

  • Discount rate will be based
  • n upper medium grade (low

credit risk) fixed-income instruments.

  • Eliminate PAD and loss

recognition testing.

03

  • DAC will be amortized on a

constant basis over the life of the contract, independent of profitability

  • No interest accretion
  • No impairment test.

01

What is changing?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

5

GAAP LTDI - Impact on Annuity GMxB’s

GMx MxB Current G GAA AAP New G GAAP VA GMDB SOP03-1

  • Payment is a result of an identifiable insurable

event Ma Market R Risk Be Benefit ( (MR MRB)

  • To be measured at Fai

air V Val alue

  • Changes in fair value flow through

P/L, except changes in instrument- specific credit risk recognized in Other Comprehensive Income

  • If a contract contains multiple MRB,

those MRBs shall be bundled together as a single compound market risk benefit

Note: FIA’s index crediting feature is not considered MRB, and will continue to be accounted for as embedded derivatives under ASC 815

VA GMAB FAS 157 VA GMIB

  • Typically SOP 03-1
  • FAS 157 if benefit is net settled
  • Typical for reinsurance
  • Some consider automatic annuitization

feature net settlement VA GMWB/GLWB

  • Typically FAS 157 for non-lifetime GMWBs
  • Diversity in practice exists for lifetime GMWBs
  • Full-FAS 157
  • Hybrid FAS 157/SOP03-1

FIA GMxB Typically SOP 03-1

slide-7
SLIDE 7

6

Transition

Transition Date: 1/1/2019 2019

Adoption in 2021 would require adjustment to the 2020 and 2019 comparative periods

Ful ull r ret etrosp spec ective e method must be used for MRB

Benefit of hindsight may be used for the full retrospective method to the extent that assumptions in prior periods are unobservable or otherwise unavailable and cannot be independently substantiated.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

7

GMxB Financial Impact Assessment

Opening Eq g Equity ty a at Tran ansit itio ion Profi fit Em t Emergence (New b w business) Ear arnin ings V Vola

  • latilit

lity Tota tal Eq Equity ty Vola

  • latilit

ility Variable Annuity Adverse Adverse Adverse Adverse FIA with GMxB Adverse Adverse Adverse Adverse

  • The expected adverse impact primarily due to Guarantees currently accounted for under SOP 03-1

(GMDBs, GMIBs, etc) will now be measured at fair value under the new definition of Market Risk Benefits (MRBs)

  • Further analysis based on company specific circumstances is recommended to assess the potential

financial impacts of the new guidance

  • Potential levers to manage these metrics: Hedging strategy
slide-9
SLIDE 9

8

FASB LDTI – Implications for insurers

LDTI will impact all aspects of an insurer’s operations - going beyond just the finance and actuarial functions including product design and distribution, capital management and hedging, strategic planning, commercial decisions and market communications

Strategic Implications

  • Earnings volatility and risk

sensitivity

  • Increased disclosures
  • Budgeting and strategic planning
  • Product decisions
  • Hedging
  • Annual incentive plans

Implementation & Transition Challenges

  • Finance, actuarial and IT resources
  • PMO and interactions to inflight projects
  • Parallel reporting during 2020
  • Board and Executive Team training
  • Management of external communications

Technical Challenges

  • DAC calculation
  • Transition
  • Fair value market

risk benefits

  • Disclosure

Business Operation Challenges

  • Capturing new and additional data

points; historical data points needed for transition

  • Actuarial valuation & reporting

infrastructure

  • New financial reporting controls

Top LDTI

items

slide-10
SLIDE 10

9

Implications on GMxB Hedging

  • Hedge Objective
  • Pre-2021: What to hedge toward between the Transition Date (2019) and the Effective Date (2021)?
  • Post-2021: Economics vs New GAAP vs Stat(also new)
  • Cost of Hedging
  • Higher notional required
  • Potential rise in implied volatility due to increased demand for option hedges
  • Hedge Strategy
  • Rho & Vega coverage
  • Gamma coverage
  • Dynamic vs Static
  • Rebalance threshold
  • Other factors
  • Wall Street analysts & investors expectations
  • Rating Agencies’ viewpoints
  • Company’s risk appetite
slide-11
SLIDE 11