Facilitation Impact Awards Information session Slides used during - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Facilitation Impact Awards Information session Slides used during Zoom information session with Pepijn Nicolas on Friday 18 May 2018 Agenda 1 2 3 4 Overview of Facilitation Project overview Questions and answers Summary Impact Awards
1 Overview of Facilitation Impact Awards
2
Julia Donohue Project Leader Facilitation Impact Awards Pepijn Nicolas, youfacilitate 2017 Gold Award Stichting Onderwijsarbeidsmarktfonds MBO (SOM) Strategic Vitality Management in the MBO sector
2 Project overview 3 Questions and answers 4 Summary
3
Our mission is to grow the community of practice for all those who facilitate, establish internationally accepted professional standards, build credibility and promote the value
All eligible submissions that score 70+ points receive an award Purpose
Open to organisations of any size
legally recognised entity use and benefit from facilitation rather than firms that provide facilitation services facilitator included in
both the organisation and facilitator receive an award Silver 70+
4
Gold 80+ Platinum 90+
Organisation impact 55 points in total
Facilitation use Organisation culture Facilitator’s professional standing Facilitation quality— IAF Core Competencies
5
Context and challenges
SOM is the Vocational Education Schools fund in the Netherlands. Vitality Management a growing trend in the Netherlands – goal is to create a sustainable working culture and environment that enables employees to work professionally and reach their pension in good health. In 2014, Vitality Management was almost non-existent in the MBO sector. Only a few schools had developed initiatives, but none were of considerable scale, nor integrated in a comprehensive strategy.
Project objectives
towards Strategic Vitality Management in schools.
least 17 schools (25%) have developed and implemented Strategic Vitality Management, affecting at least 14,000 employees in the sector.
active network of professionals who contribute to Strategic Vitality Management within the sector.
Results
57 schools (88%) implemented Strategic Vitality Management, affecting 52,000 employees. A strong network of 530 professionals established itself and is being successful on HR-subjects beyond Strategic Vitality Management. A strong network of cooperating stakeholders contribute to facilitate schools implementing Strategic Vitality Management. Zero-absenteeism in the sector increased from 47% to 51%. Powerful school teams became effective in moving the schools to achieve remarkable outcomes and create their own network of fellowship of knights in their region.
Approach
Created a community-based change movement—facilitated fellowship of heroic knights:
help each other
generations help the younger get on their way
We organised:
meetings using a wide variety
DNA, to help transfer this way
6
7
Results achieved At least one facilitated process was held Submission closing date
If results are yet to be achieved, consider nominating next year
24 June
8
Explains criteria Shows scoring framework evaluators use Headings reflect criteria Instructions shown as shaded text – please do not delete instructions
Ideas generated at staff workshops generated significant savings Heavy equipment utilisation improved significantly Turnaround times were reduced Improved customer service
9
Section 3 Criterion 1 – quantified results achieved Criterion 2 – qualitative results achieved Criterion 3 – % of organisation involved or affected
generated savings of $500k
28% to 92%
in 2013 to 100 in 2014
Section 2 Project overview Include clear project objectives Include clear definition of
10
Address each sub-competency…A1, A2, A3
11
IAF members:
consistently – understand submission – score maximum points possible using scoring framework Most have a number of years experience as an evaluator
score score score Average
Submission
At least 3 evaluators independently score each submission Submission score is the average of the 3 scores If there is a wide spread in scores… ≥ 15 points independently score the submission again evaluators discuss the reasons for the scores they gave 65 71 82 score score score
12
provide specific examples rather than generic statements
Nominations close Sunday 24 June 2018 at 11pm GMT View past award projects at www.iaf-world.org/FIA