Extra or essential? Public programs in archives Sigrid McCausland - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

extra or essential public programs in archives
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Extra or essential? Public programs in archives Sigrid McCausland - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Extra or essential? Public programs in archives Sigrid McCausland School of Information Studies Research Seminar 30 April 2014 Overview the relationship between archives and their publics archival institutions not traditionally user-


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Extra or essential? Public programs in archives

Sigrid McCausland School of Information Studies Research Seminar 30 April 2014

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Overview

  • the relationship between archives and their

publics

  • archival institutions not traditionally user-

centred

  • internal tensions between records-focused

and user/public oriented responsibilities

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Which methodology fits?

  • Historiography

‘Historical studies of archival science,

recordkeeping and archival practice, archival institutions, the profession, development of national or regional archival traditions, key figures in the profession.’

(McKemmish & Gilliland, Research Methods, p. 96)

  • Ethnography

Ethnography & ethnology which includes ‘In- depth studies of archival practices such as reference services’

(McKemmish & Gilliland, Research Methods, p. 97)

  • Or something else?
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

…that fine institution, the National

  • Archives. Not as well-known or

frequently visited as the National Library, the Archives is the principal repository of government papers and turned out to be a friendly and user- friendly place, full of fascinating displays, and, yes, secrets.

Source: Adams, P. (2014). In Burgmann, M. (Ed). Dirty secrets: Our ASIO

  • files. p.175.
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Australian Archives 1981

Institutional Priorities: High – Disposal Medium - ? Low – Reference No – Exhibitions ________________ ‘an unobtrusive central service agency’

Source: Golder, H. (1994). Documenting a nation…p.41.

slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10
slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Public programs are tools that support and enhance other archival functions, including research, reference, preservation, and

  • collecting. They can be highly educational, both

for planners and participants; they can foster a greater appreciation for history and historical records; and they help ensure firm and continuing support for archival endeavours.

Source: Pederson, A. & Casterline, G. (1982), Archives and Manuscripts: Public Programs,p.8

slide-15
SLIDE 15

In writing and talking about programs for the public, archivists often use the term outreach. At the National Archives we prefer the term public

  • programs. This is not only because it is the term

used by other national cultural institutions but also because it focuses explicitly on the public.

Source: Hyslop, G. (2002). For many audiences…p.49

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Advocacy as a political- and policy-focused activity to convince a targeted audience to act is distinguished from archival public programming that is centered around

  • utreach, publicity, exhibitions, and reference

services.

Elves, D. (2012). Advocating electronic records… http://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/bitstream/1993/14234/1/Elves_Daniel.pdf

slide-17
SLIDE 17
slide-18
SLIDE 18
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

It is no exaggeration … that most archival concepts of public service have been developed in isolation, divorced from acquisition/appraisal and arrangement/description.

Source: Cook, T. (1990-91). Viewing the world upside down, p.126

slide-21
SLIDE 21

And yet, who can blame those who work in the reference and public programming areas of archives for feeling alienated from the professional mainstream, and thus developing their

  • wn theoretical approach based on

users rather than materials?

Source: Cook, T. (1990-91). Viewing the world upside down, p.126

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Although the multiplicity of archives' roles in public affairs is one of the most striking recent developments in the archival world, it remains a minor feature of public

  • programming. It does not play the central

role it could in pursuing what is arguably the top priority for archivists - changing public attitudes towards archives.

Source: Nesmith, T. (2010) . Archivists and public affairs…p.169

slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24

…'new public programming' would have two interrelated dimensions: greater commitment to the history of records and archives and more active pursuit of a wider role for archives in public affairs. The two come together as archivists employ their knowledge of records and archiving to help identify and contextualize records for public affairs purposes.

Source: Nesmith, T. (2010). Archivists and public affairs…p.171.

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Websites to browse

  • www.naa.gov.au
  • www.nara.gov
  • www.archives.govt.nz
  • www.nationalarchives.gov.uk
slide-29
SLIDE 29

Conclusion

  • Where to now?
  • Your thoughts…

thanks for attending!