Exponentially Suppressed Cosmological Constant with Gauge Enhanced - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

โ–ถ
exponentially suppressed cosmological constant with
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Exponentially Suppressed Cosmological Constant with Gauge Enhanced - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Exponentially Suppressed Cosmological Constant with Gauge Enhanced Symmetry in Heterotic Interpolating Models Sota Nakajima (Osaka City University) with Hiroshi Itoyama (OCU, NITEP) Based on arXiv: 1905.10745 @ YITP, 8/2, 2019 Int ntroduc


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Exponentially Suppressed Cosmological Constant with Gauge Enhanced Symmetry in Heterotic Interpolating Models

Sota Nakajima (Osaka City University) with Hiroshi Itoyama (OCU, NITEP)

@ YITP, 8/2, 2019

Based on arXiv: 1905.10745

slide-2
SLIDE 2

When a top-down approach from string theory is considered, there are two choices depending on where SUSY breaking scale is ;

1.SUSY is broken at low energy in supersymmetric EFT ; 2.SUSY is already broken at high energy like string/Planck scale. In this talk, the second one is focused on, and non-supersymmetric string models are considered. In particular, the ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• model is a unique tachyon-free non-supersymmetric string model in ten-dimensions.

[Dixon, Hervey, (1986)]

Int ntroduc uction

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Int ntroduc uction

Considering non-supersymmetric string models, however, we face with the problem of vacuum instability arising from nonzero dilaton tadpoles;

๐‘Š(๐œš) โˆ ฮ›

๐‘Š ๐œš : dilaton tadpole ฮ›: cosmological constant (vacuum energy)

๐œš

โˆ

At 1-loop level, The desired model is a non-supersymmetric one whose cosmolosical constant is vanishing or as small as possible. Interpolating models have the possibility of such properties.

[Itoyama, Taylor, (1987)]

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Ou Outlin ine

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Heterotic Strings
  • 3. 9D Interpolating models
  • 4. 9D Interpolating models with Wilson line
  • 5. Summary
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Heterotic Strings
  • 3. 9D Interpolating models
  • 4. 9D Interpolating models with Wilson line
  • 5. Summary

Ou Outlin ine

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ide dea a of

  • f Het

eter erot

  • tic

ic S Strin ings

Left mover: 26d bosonic string out of which internal 16d realize rank 16 current algebra Adopting the lightcone coordinates, the worldsheet contents are Right mover: 10d superstring

L R

10=(8+2)d 16d

  • n torus

10=(8+2)d Heterotic strings are hybrid closed strings of bosonic string in 26D and superstrings in 10D.

[Gross, Hervey, Martinec, Rohm, (1985)]

slide-7
SLIDE 7

The he o

  • ne

ne-loo

  • op

p pa partit itio ion n fu func

  • nc. &

& St Stat ate e Co Coun untin ing

๏ฌ The one-loop partition function is the trace over string Fock space: ๏ฌ ๐‘Ž ๐œ counts #(states) at each mass level as coeff. in ๐‘Ÿ เดค ๐‘Ÿ expansion.

๐’ƒ๐’๐’ denotes #(bosons) minus #(fermions) at mass levels (๐’, ๐’)

In the string model with spacetime SUSY, ๐‘๐‘›๐‘œ = 0 for all (๐‘›, ๐‘œ) because of fermion-boson degeneracy. for supersymmetric string models. ๏ฌ In order for the string model to be consistent, ๐‘Ž(๐œ) has to be invariant under modular transformation:

slide-8
SLIDE 8

๏ฌ ๐‘Ž(๐œ) is written in terms of ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ 2๐‘œ characters ๐‘ƒ2๐‘œ, ๐‘Š

2๐‘œ, ๐‘‡2๐‘œ, ๐ท2๐‘œ and the

Dedekind eta function ๐œƒ(๐œ), e.g,

Cha Charac acter ers

๐‘‡๐‘ƒ 32 hetero: ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ 16 ร— ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) hetero: ๐น8 ร— ๐น8 hetero: , , the Jacobiโ€™s abstruse identity:

slide-9
SLIDE 9

SU SUSY SY br brea eaki king ng by by Co Comp mpac actif ific icat atio ion

๏ฌ Compactification on a circle ๏ฌ Compactification on a twisted circle ๐‘Œ9

2๐œŒ๐‘† The translation operator for ๐‘Œ9 satifies

identify

identify with ๐Ÿ‘๐† rot.

  • n the 7-8 plane

๐‘Œ9

2๐œŒ๐‘†

๐‘Œ7 ๐‘Œ8

The translation operator for ๐‘Œ9 satifies This comp. affects bosonic and fermionic states in the same way. SUSY is NOT broken. This comp. affects bosonic and fermionic states in the different way. It induces the mass splitting between bosonic and fermionic states.

SUSY is broken

[Rohm, (1984)]

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Ou Outlin ine

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Heterotic Strings
  • 3. 9D Interpolating models
  • 4. 9D Interpolating models with WL
  • 5. Summary
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Interp rpolat ation betwe ween SU SUSY SY an and non-SU SUSY Y mo models

Model ๐‘ต๐Ÿ Model ๐‘ต๐Ÿ‘

  • Comp. on a

twisted circle T-dual

Interpolating model

Radius ๐‘†

โˆž

10 dim. 9 dim. SUSY breaking SUSY non-SUSY non-SUSY

In the large ๐‘† (small ๐‘) region, the cosmological constant is

[Itoyama, Taylor, (1987)]

If ๐’๐‘ฎ = ๐’๐‘ช, the cosmological constant is exponentially suppressed.

: # of massless fermions, bosons

An interpolating model is a lower dimensional string model relating two different higher dimensional string models continuously.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Interp rpolat ation betwe ween ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•)

๏ฌ The one-loop partition function where the sum is taken over

  • ๐‘† โ†’ โˆž: contribution from the zero

winding # only

  • ๐‘† โ†’ 0: contribution from the zero

momentum only

slide-13
SLIDE 13

๏ฌ The limiting case: ๐‘บ โ†’ โˆž

the one-loop partition function of SUSY ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(32) heterotic model, which is vanishing

SUSY is restored in ๐‘บ โ†’ โˆž (๐’ƒ โ†’ ๐Ÿ)

Interp rpolat ation betwe ween ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

๏ฌ The limiting case: ๐‘บ โ†’ ๐Ÿ

the one-loop partition function of ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) ร— ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) heterotic model realizes SUSY ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(32) model in ๐‘† โ†’ โˆž ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) ร— ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) model in ๐‘† โ†’ 0

Interp rpolat ation betwe ween ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•)

๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘) ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) Radius ๐‘†

โˆž

SUSY non-SUSY

non-SUSY

9D Int. model

slide-15
SLIDE 15

๏ฌ Massless spectrum at generic R, massless states come from n=w=0 part

Massless bosons Massless fermions

  • 9-dim. graviton, anti-symmetric tensor, dilaton:
  • Fermions
  • Gauge bosons in adj rep of ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฏ,๐‘ช

๐Ÿ‘ (๐Ÿ)

๐‘•9๐œˆ, ๐ถ9๐œˆ

Interp rpolat ation betwe ween ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•)

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Heterotic Strings
  • 3. 9D Interpolating models
  • 4. 9D Interpolating models with Wilson line
  • 5. Summary

Ou Outlin ine

slide-17
SLIDE 17
  • The ๐‘’-dimensional compactifications are classified by the transformation

whose DOF agree with that of ๐ท

๐ต๐‘.

Bo Boost st on mo mome mentum um lat attice

๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16+๐‘’,๐‘’) ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ 16+๐‘’ ร—๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(๐‘’),

  • Considering ๐‘’-dimensional compactification, the boost in the momentum

lattice corresponds to putting massless constant backgrounds, that is, adding the following term to the worldsheet action ๐ท๐‘๐‘: metric and antisymmetric tensor, ๐ท๐ฝ๐‘: ๐‘‰(1)16 gauge fields (WL)

[Narain, Sarmadi, Witten, (1986)] ๐‘ = 10 โˆ’ ๐‘’, โ‹ฏ , 9 ๐ต = ๐‘, ๐ฝ = 10 โˆ’ ๐‘’, โ‹ฏ , 26

  • In this work, we will consider one-dimensional compactification and put a single

WL background ๐ต = ๐ท๐ฝ=1,๐‘=9 for simplicity.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Bo Boost st on mo mome mentum um lat attice

boost and rotation

The effective change in the 1-loop partition function is

๐‘š๐‘€ is the left-moving momentum of ๐‘Œ๐‘€

๐ฝ=1

After turning on WL, the momenta of ๐‘Œ๐‘€

๐ฝ=1, ๐‘Œ๐‘€ ๐‘=9 and ๐‘Œ๐‘† ๐‘=9 are changed as

introduction

  • f WL
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Th The fu fundam amental al re region of f mo modul uli sp spac ace

Do all the points in moduli space correspond to different models? It is convenient to introduce a modular parameter ว ๐œ as NO! Momentum lattice ฮ›(๐›ฟ,๐œ€)

(๐›ฝ,๐›พ) is invariant under the shift

The fundamental region of moduli space is ว ๐œ1 ว ๐œ2

โˆ’ 2 2

slide-20
SLIDE 20

๏ฌ The one-loop partition function

  • ๐‘† โ†’ โˆž:
  • ๐‘† โ†’ 0:

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

slide-21
SLIDE 21

๏ฌ The one-loop partition function

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

๏ฌ The limiting cases

For any WL ๐ต, realizes SUSY ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ 32 model in ๐‘† โ†’ โˆž ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) ร— ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) model in ๐‘† โ†’ 0

  • ๐‘† โ†’ โˆž: the 1st and 2nd lines survive
  • ๐‘† โ†’ 0: the 1st and 3rd lines survive

๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘) ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) Radius ๐‘†

โˆž

SUSY non-SUSY

non-SUSY

+ WL ๐‘ฉ 9D Int. model

slide-22
SLIDE 22

๏ฌ Massless spectrum

Massless bosons Massless fermions

  • 9-dim. graviton, anti-symmetric tensor, dilaton:
  • Gauge bosons in adj rep of ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“) ร— ๐‘ฝ(๐Ÿ) ร— ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฏ,๐‘ช

๐Ÿ‘ (๐Ÿ)

  • 8

at generic R, massless states come from n=w=0 part

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

slide-23
SLIDE 23

๏ฌ Massless spectrum

  • two
  • two

new massless states๏ผš

๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ ร— ๐‘ฝ(๐Ÿ) ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•)

condition โ‘ 

a few conditions under which the additional massless states appear

โˆƒ

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

slide-24
SLIDE 24

๏ฌ Massless spectrum

  • two
  • two

new massless states๏ผš

๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ ร— ๐‘ฝ(๐Ÿ) ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“)

condition โ‘ก

a few conditions under which the additional massless states appear

โˆƒ

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Actually, there are only four inequivalent orbits in the fundamental region: We have found the two conditions under which the additional massless states appear:

๏ฌ Summary of the conditions

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ’๐Ÿ‘ an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

condition โ‘  condition โ‘ก Condition

๐’1 = ๐Ÿ and ๐Ÿ‘ (or โˆ’๐Ÿ‘) ๐’๐Ÿ‘ = โˆ’๐Ÿ and ๐Ÿ

Gauge gp

๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ—) ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“) ๐’๐‘ฎ > ๐’๐‘ช ๐’๐‘ฎ = ๐’๐‘ช

slide-26
SLIDE 26

๏ฌ The one-loop partition function

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

  • ๐‘† โ†’ โˆž:
  • ๐‘† โ†’ 0:
slide-27
SLIDE 27

๏ฌ The one-loop partition function

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

๏ฌ The limiting cases

For any WL ๐ต, realizes SUSY ๐น8 ร— ๐น8 model in ๐‘† โ†’ โˆž ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) ร— ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) model in ๐‘† โ†’ 0

  • ๐‘† โ†’ โˆž: the 1st and 2nd lines survive
  • ๐‘† โ†’ 0: the 1st and 3rd lines survive

๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) Radius ๐‘†

โˆž

SUSY non-SUSY

non-SUSY

+ WL ๐‘ฉ 9D Int. model

slide-28
SLIDE 28

๏ฌ Massless spectrum at generic R, massless states come from n=w=0 part

Massless bosons Massless fermions

  • 9-dim. graviton, anti-symmetric tensor, dilaton:
  • Gauge bosons in adj rep of ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“) ร— ๐‘ฝ(๐Ÿ) ร— ๐‘ฝ๐‘ฏ,๐‘ช

๐Ÿ‘ (๐Ÿ)

  • 8

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

slide-29
SLIDE 29

๏ฌ Massless spectrum

condition โ‘ 

  • two

new massless states๏ผš

๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ ร— ๐‘ฝ(๐Ÿ) ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) Furthermore, the different additional massless states appear depending on whether ๐’๐Ÿ/๐Ÿ‘ ๐ฃ๐ญ ๐Ÿ๐ฐ๐Ÿ๐จ ๐ฉ๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐ž๐ž.

a few conditions under which the additional massless states appear

โˆƒ

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

slide-30
SLIDE 30

๏ฌ Massless spectrum

  • two

new massless states๏ผš

condition โ‘ -1

  • two

In the fundamental region, this condition is เทค ๐Š๐Ÿ = ๐Ÿ, which corresponds to the no WL case.

a few conditions under which the additional massless states appear

โˆƒ

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

slide-31
SLIDE 31

๏ฌ Massless spectrum

  • two

new massless states๏ผš

condition โ‘ -2

  • two

In the fundamental region, this condition is เทค ๐Š๐Ÿ = ๐Ÿ‘ (or เทค ๐Š๐Ÿ = โˆ’ ๐Ÿ‘). ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“ ร— ๐‘ฝ(๐Ÿ) ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ—

a few conditions under which the additional massless states appear

โˆƒ

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

slide-32
SLIDE 32

๏ฌ Massless spectrum new massless states๏ผš

condition โ‘ก

a few conditions under which the additional massless states appear

โˆƒ

  • two

Gauge group is not enhanced

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

In the fundamental region, this condition is เทค ๐Š๐Ÿ = ๐Ÿ‘/๐Ÿ‘ and เทค ๐Š๐Ÿ = โˆ’ ๐Ÿ‘/๐Ÿ‘.

There is no condition such that ๐’๐‘ฎ = ๐’๐‘ช in this example.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

condition โ‘ -2 condition โ‘ -1 condition โ‘ก

Actually, there are only four inequivalent orbits in the fundamental region:

Interp rpolat atio ion betwe ween ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— an and ๐‘ป๐‘ท ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ• ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) wi with WL

Condition ๐’๐Ÿ = ๐Ÿ ๐’๐Ÿ = ๐Ÿ‘ (or โˆ’๐Ÿ‘) ๐’๐Ÿ‘ = ๐Ÿ and โˆ’๐Ÿ Gauge gp ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ญ๐Ÿ— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ•) ร— ๐‘ป๐‘ท(๐Ÿ๐Ÿ“) ร— ๐‘ฝ(๐Ÿ) ๐’๐‘ฎ > ๐’๐‘ช ๐’๐‘ฎ < ๐’๐‘ช ๐’๐‘ฎ < ๐’๐‘ช

We have found the three conditions under which the additional massless states appear:

๏ฌ Summary of the conditions

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Th The lead ading term rms s of f the he cosm smological al const stan ant

The cosmological constant is written as Up to exponentially suppressed terms, the results are ๏ฌ ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ 32 - ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) ร— ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) interpolation ๏ฌ ๐น8 ร— ๐น8 - ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) ร— ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16) interpolation These results reflect the shift symmetry ว ๐œ โ†’ ว ๐œ + 2 2 and the conditions under which the additional massless states appear.

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Heterotic Strings
  • 3. 9D Interpolating models
  • 4. 9D Interpolating models with Wilson line
  • 5. Summary

Ou Outlin ine

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Co Conclus usion

๏ฌ We have constructed 9D interpolating models with two parameters, radius ๐‘† and WL ๐ต, and studied the massless spectra. ๏ฌ We have found some conditions for (๐‘†, ๐ต) under which the additional massless states appear. ๏ฌ We have found that an example under which the cosmological const. is exponentially suppressed simultaneously with the gauge group enhancement to ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ 18 ร— ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ 14 .

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Ou Outlook

๏ฌHow are SM-like or GUT-like 4D models with ๐‘œ๐บ = ๐‘œ๐ถ constructed ? ๏ฌAre the conditions found in this work preferred ? Where are stable points in moduli space ? ๏ฌWe can generalize by putting more WL and the other backgrounds. In fact, compactifying ๐‘’-dimensions, the compactifications are classified by

๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16+๐‘’,๐‘’) ๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(16+๐‘’)ร—๐‘‡๐‘ƒ(๐‘’), whose DOF is ๐‘’(16 + ๐‘’).

Th Than ank k yo you! u!