Exploring the Magic of Algorithmic Predictions Joyce Lee Sejal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

exploring the magic of algorithmic predictions
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Exploring the Magic of Algorithmic Predictions Joyce Lee Sejal - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Exploring the Magic of Algorithmic Predictions Joyce Lee Sejal Popat Soravis Prakkamakul UC Berkeley School of Information 2019 MIMS Final Presentation Why do we think of technology as magic? "Any sufficiently advanced


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Exploring the “Magic” of Algorithmic Predictions

Joyce Lee Sejal Popat Soravis Prakkamakul

UC Berkeley School of Information 2019 MIMS Final Presentation

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why do we think of technology as magic?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

Clarke, A. (1999) [1st pub. 1962, rev. 1973, 1984, 1999]. Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry Into the Limits of the Possible. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Clarke, A. (1999) [1st pub. 1962, rev. 1973, 1984, 1999]. Profiles of the Future: An Inquiry Into the Limits of the Possible. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.

"Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."

slide-5
SLIDE 5

What underlies algorithmic “magic”?

1

Proprietary concerns

2

Technical illiteracy

Burrell, J. (2016). How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms. Big Data & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Astrology Aura Reading Mediumship Numerology Palm Reading Physiognomy Phrenology Psychometry Tarot Card Reading

But attempting to predict is nothing new…

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Objective

Can reframing algorithmic predictions with the deliberately mystical lens of divination lead people to reconsider its sense of “magic”?

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Approach

Within the traditions of reflective & speculative design, we develop an interactive installation that enables technology-mediated tarot-card readings.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Research Questions

1

Will people question how algorithmic prediction works in the context of divination?

2

Will people resist sharing personal data for the purpose

  • f “algorithmic divination”?
slide-10
SLIDE 10

System Design

slide-11
SLIDE 11
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Interaction flow

Conversational Interface Text Analysis & Visualization Personality Prediction Tarot Card Reading

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Topic Visualization Interior Lamp Black Curtains Card Dispensing Slot

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Tarot Card Printer Monitor Laptop Microphone Array

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tarot Card Printer Monitor Laptop Microphone Array

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Tarot Card Printer Monitor Laptop Microphone Array

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Tarot Card Printer Monitor Laptop Microphone Array

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Future Prediction Past Prediction Present Prediction

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Raw Speech Speech Recognition Intent Recognition Topic Analysis (Empath) Sentiment Analysis MBTI Personality Analysis (SpaCy) Future Prediction Past Prediction Present Prediction Basic Interactions: Skip, Repeat, etc.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Raw Speech Speech Recognition Intent Recognition Topic Analysis (Empath) Sentiment Analysis MBTI Personality Analysis (SpaCy) Future Prediction Past Prediction Present Prediction Basic Interactions: Skip, Repeat, etc.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Raw Speech Speech Recognition Intent Recognition Topic Analysis (Empath) Sentiment Analysis MBTI Personality Analysis (SpaCy) Future Prediction Past Prediction Present Prediction Basic Interactions: Skip, Repeat, etc.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Tarot Card Printer Monitor Laptop Microphone Array

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Tarot Card Printer Monitor Laptop Microphone Array

slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Research Approach

slide-27
SLIDE 27

10 Participants

Ages 25-40 50% female

Sample Recruited via Email Self-Guided Tarot Reading Follow-Up Interview

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Resulting Themes

1

Questioning whether or not to share personal data

2

Interrogating underlying technology

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Resulting Themes

1

Questioning whether or not to share personal data

2

Interrogating underlying technology

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Difficult questions “The questions got . . . pretty personal. ”

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Presence of a camera “I remembered that it was being recorded, like there’s a video. So I wondered, ‘Should I be giving all this information out? ”

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Speaking vs. writing “There is a sense in opening your own mouth to say things that you’re handing over more information… There’s something about talking that makes it feel different”

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Resulting Themes

1

Questioning whether or not to share personal data

2

Interrogating underlying technology

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Resulting Themes

1

Questioning whether or not to share personal data

2

Interrogating underlying technology

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Reflection vs. inception “I wasn’t sure whether I was being reflected or lead”

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37

Contesting classification… “If I see I’m kind of pigeon holed… I either reassess myself, or question what the algorithm is latching onto”

slide-38
SLIDE 38

… or being unable to exercise agency “There’s no real agency to clarify what you mean”

slide-39
SLIDE 39

General sense of opacity “Its mysterious. I mean we assume they’re working. A lot of prediction is business oriented and we don’t know what’s being

  • maximized. ”
slide-40
SLIDE 40

Research Questions, Revisited

1

Will people question how algorithmic prediction works in the context of divination?

2

Will people resist sharing personal data for the purpose

  • f “algorithmic divination”?
slide-41
SLIDE 41

Insights

1

Participants were most interested in the process of generating predictions, rather than the

  • utcomes themselves
slide-42
SLIDE 42

Insights

2

Participants felt they had very little agency to control how they were “seen” by the system; many wondered if they were being reflected or led

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Implications

1

The magical, optimistic presentation of algorithmic predictions may be doing more harm than good

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Implications

2

We see a need for transparent communication of technology’s inner workings, even if this requires purposeful ambiguity and room for interpretation

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Why do we think of technology as magic?

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Many Thanks To . . .

Our advisor, Kimiko Ryokai Our research participants Our I School professors & department staff Our friends & family (that’s you!)

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Exploring the “Magic” of Algorithmic Predictions

Joyce Lee Sejal Popat Soravis Prakkamakul

UC Berkeley School of Information 2019 MIMS Final Presentation