Exploring the Biotic-Abiotic Interface: Implications for Nano - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

exploring the biotic abiotic interface
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Exploring the Biotic-Abiotic Interface: Implications for Nano - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Exploring the Biotic-Abiotic Interface: Implications for Nano Toxicity December 16, 2013 National Capitol Area Chapter Society of Toxicology Christopher P. Weis, Ph.D., DABT. National Institutes of Environmental health Science Objectives


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Exploring the Biotic-Abiotic Interface: Implications for Nano Toxicity

December 16, 2013 National Capitol Area Chapter Society of Toxicology Christopher P. Weis, Ph.D., DABT. National Institutes of Environmental health Science

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Objectives

  • What’s going on at the Biotic – Abiotic

interface?

  • Why is the Biotic-Abiotic interface

important?

  • What are the implications for Health

Risks and Regulations?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Basic Respiratory Anatomy

Images developed under contract to the National Institutes of Health

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Anatomy of the bronchiolar alveolus clusters

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Bronchiole Alveolar Structure

Maina & van Gils (2001) Comp. Biochem and Physiol. 130(4)781-798.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Gas exchange in the lung

The alveolar- capillary membrane is just 0.2 microns thick! Blood volume in capillary space Is about 70 mL. Blood flow through the lung is about 5L/min.

slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Water: the molecule of life

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Solid – Liquid Interface

Nel et al. (2009) Nat. Mater. 8:543

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Qiao, R. et al. (2007) Nano Lett. 7(3):614

“C60 molecule can readily “jump” into the bilayer and translocate the membrane within a few milliseconds”

slide-11
SLIDE 11

“The simulation results indicate that, although a pristine C60 molecule can readily “jump” into the bilayer and translocate the membrane within a few milliseconds, the C60(OH)20 molecule can barely penetrate the bilayer.”

Small chemical modifications Can have big Consequences

Qiao, R. et al. (2007) Nano Lett. 7(3):614

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ENM – Biomolecule Interactions

Nel et al. (2009) Nat. Mater. 8:543

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Nel et al. (2009) Nat. Mater. 8:543

Nanoparticle endocytosis at the cell membrane: The clathrin-coated vessicle

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Clathrin coated vessicles transporting materials across the cell membrane

Attribution: University of British Columbia Dept. of Zoology (Permission requested)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Objectives

  • What’s going on at the Biotic – Abiotic

interface?

  • Why is the Biotic-Abiotic interface

important?

  • What are the implications for OELs?
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Attribution: F.A. Murphy, Univ.Texas Medical Branch

Coronavirus on a Mouse epithelial cell ~40,000X mag.

Coronavirus

(~70 - 200nm)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Corona Virus on Cultured Cell Surface

Attribution: Dr. Steve Patterson

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Targeted Docetaxel Nanoparticle

Preclinical development and clinical translation of a PSMA-targeted docetaxel nanoparticle with a differentiated pharmacological profile.

Hrkach et al. (2012) Sci. Trans. Med 4:128ra39

~90 nm

Docetaxel

MW=807

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Strain-specific differential response to TOPO-PMAT Cd- Se/ZnS QDs

Oropharyngeal aspiration 10 nM solution, 8 h PE BALF Neutrophils Mouse Strains

  • Univ. Washington Nanotoxicology Center
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Ceria nanowires introduced shape-dependent toxicity

Inflammasome activation

N

pro-IL-1β IL-1β

lysosome

IL-1β NALP3 Macrophage

AR 0= 1 Ф = 7 nm AR 7>200 L = 1~2 μm 50 100 150 200 250 300 25 50 75 100 125

IL-1β activity (pg/mL)

Concentration (µg/mL)

R R 1 R 2 R 3 R 4

AR 6 AR 0-5 AR7

THP-1 cells

AR7

Lysosomal Damage

AR7 SEM TEM Frustrated endocytosis

AR: aspect ratio

IL-1β

THP-1 cells THP-1 cells

Ceria nanowires introduced shape-dependent toxicity

NIEHS-funded Center for Nanobiology and Predictive Toxicology

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Objectives

  • What’s going on at the Biotic – Abiotic

interface?

  • Why is the Biotic-Abiotic interface

important?

  • What are the implications for Risks and

Regulations?

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Attribution: CP Weis

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Nano-sized mineral fibrils from Western Montana

Attribution:

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Phagocytosis of asbestos fibers

pulmonary alveolar macrophage cell attempting to engulf and ingest several long mineral fibers incomplete ingestion

  • f bio-persistent

fibers can lead to extensive ‘selective release’ of proteolytic enzymes and ROS from the ‘frustrated’ PAMs

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Microscopic and macroscopic lung abnormalities caused by durable fibers

‘mineral bodies’ ‘ferruginous bodies’

Radiograph of Pleural plaques Anatomy of Pleural plaques

Attribution: Med. Digital Library. Univ. of Michigan

slide-26
SLIDE 26

High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT)

  • f a pleural plaque

HRCT scan of a 45 Y.O. female with secondary (take home) exposure to nano particle taconite dust in the Upper Peninsula of Michigan.

Harbut et al. (2009) Int J Occup Environ Health 15(3):269- 273.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

“Fibres shorter than 5 mm have traditionally not been counted by methods used for regulatory standards for asbestos because these methods were developed to provide a reproducible index of fibre exposure. The findings from our analysis show that cumulative exposures to all fibre size indices, including fibres <5 mm in length, were highly statistically significant predictors of lung cancer or asbestosis mortality.”

Stayner et al. (2008) Occ.

  • Env. Med 65(9):613

Size–based Risk Management: a good idea?

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Summary

  • Biophysical chemistry at the abiotic-biotic

interface is critical to understanding toxicity of engineered nanomaterials;

  • Characterization of nanomaterials

(especially effects on the A-B interface) is key;

  • Toxicity studies for nanomaterials must

include minimal physico-chemical characterization.