Exploring Gluonic Matter with Electron-Ion Collisions
J.H. Lee Brookhaven National Laboratory
1 QM2012, Washington D.C.
Outline
- Gluon, Saturation
- Electron-Ion Collider
- Signals of saturation/Selected key
measurements in eA
Exploring Gluonic Matter with Electron-Ion Collisions Outline - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Exploring Gluonic Matter with Electron-Ion Collisions Outline Gluon, Saturation Electron-Ion Collider Signals of saturation/Selected key measurements in eA J.H. Lee Brookhaven National Laboratory QM2012, Washington D.C. 1
J.H. Lee Brookhaven National Laboratory
1 QM2012, Washington D.C.
Outline
measurements in eA
HERA F
2
1 2 3 4 5 1 10 10
210
310
410
5F
2 em
10
(x) Q
2
(GeV
2
)
ZEUS NLO QCD fit H1 PDF 2000 fit H1 94-00 H1 (prel.) 99/00 ZEUS 96/97 BCDMS E665 NMC x=6.32 10-5 x=0.000102 x=0.000161 x=0.000253 x=0.0004 x=0.0005 x=0.000632 x=0.0008 x=0.0013 x=0.0021 x=0.0032 x=0.005 x=0.008 x=0.013 x=0.021 x=0.032 x=0.05 x=0.08 x=0.13 x=0.18 x=0.25 x=0. 4 x=0.65
d2σep→eX dxdQ2 = 4πα2
e.m.
xQ4 ⇤ 1 − y + y2 2 ⇥ F2(x, Q2) − y2 2 FL(x, Q2) ⌅
2
structure
Simple quark-parton model Bjorken scaling breaks
evolution is not well established
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
10
10
10
10 1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 HERAPDF1.7 (prel.)
model uncert. parametrization uncert. HERAPDF1.6 (prel.)
x xf
2= 10 GeV
2Q
vxu
vxd 0.05) × xS ( 0.05) × xg (
HERAPDF Structure Function Working Group June 2011
HERA I+II inclusive, jets, charm PDF Fit
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
gluon fusion between self-interacting gluons, arises naturally through non-linear BK/JIMWLK evolution
saturation regime is fundamentally important for understanding of gluonic dynamics - strong interaction
3
10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 1 10 0.1
Λ2
QCDQ2 (GeV2)
200
120 4
A x
Proton Calcium Gold
P a r t
G a s Color Glass Condensate Confinement Regime
EIC Coverage
(Qs
A)2 ≈ cQ0 2 A
x # $ % & ' (
1/3
(~x300) effective small-x reach - deeply into saturation regime
coverage with great leverage for measuring gluon distribution FL (√sA=~20-100 GeV)
HERA) : rare and precision probe for gluonic properties: heavy flavor, exclusive measurements, ...
contribution to spin degree of freedom of nucleon
4
1 10 10-3 103 10-2 102 10-1 1 10-4
x Q2 (GeV2)
0.1
Measurements with A ≥ 56 (Fe):
eA/μA DIS (E-139, E-665, EMC, NMC) νA DIS (CCFR, CDHSW, CHORUS, NuTeV) DY (E772, E866)
Q
2 s , q uarkA u , me d ian b C a, me d ian b p, m e d ia n b
EIC √s=90 GeV EIC √s=45 GeV
distribution of gluons in nuclei in wide kinematic range including saturation regime through:
(F2,FL, F2D, FLD): eA→eX, eA→eX+gap
distributions: eA→eA{π,K,Φ,D,J/Ψ...}X
5
k p X k' q
k k' p' p q
gap
Mx
X A gap
}
e e
Selected Key Measurement I: Integrated gluon distribution: non-linear QCD in FL
6
twist (non-linear) effects at low Q2 / small-x - correction to leading-twist DGLAP
F A
L (x, Q2) ∝ x GA(x, Q2)
(FL - FL
leading twist )/FL(FL - FL
leading twist )/FLAu (A=197) proton
1 2 3
log
1(x) log10(Q2) log
1(x) log10(Q2)
1 2 3
Bartels, ¡Golec-‑Biernat, ¡Motyka, ¡PRD ¡ ¡81 ¡(2010)
Integrated gluon distribution at EIC: F2 and FL
7
A¹⁄³ A¹⁄³
rcBK EPS09 (CTEQ) Q2 = 2.7 GeV2, x = 10-3 Q2 = 2.7 GeV2, x = 10-3 rcBK EPS09 (CTEQ)
errors to scale
Cu Au Beam Energies A ∫Ldt 5 on 50 GeV 2 fb-1 5 on 75 GeV 4 fb-1 5 on 100 GeV 4 fb-1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2
R2 = F2
A/(A F2 p)
RL = FL
A/(A FL p) Beam Energies A ∫Ldt 5 on 50 GeV 2 fb-1 5 on 75 GeV 4 fb-1 5 on 100 GeV 4 fb-1
σr(x, Q2) = F A
2 (x, Q2) − y2
Y + F A
L (x, Q2)
Q2=sxy
Selected Key Measurement II: Di-hadron correlation: Measurements at RHIC
at ΔΦ=π) in CGC frame work ( J. Albacete and C. Marquet, PRL 105 (2010))
without saturation at “moderate” x (Kang, Vitev, Xing PRD85 (2012))
8
20
STAR Preliminary
Uncorrected Coincidence Probability (rad-1)
p+p → π0 π0 + X, √s = 200 GeV d+Au → π0 π0 + X, √s = 200 GeV d+Au → π0 π0 + X, √s = 200 GeV STAR Preliminary STAR Preliminary d+Au peripheral d+Au central p+p
pT,L > 2 GeV/c, 1 GeV/c < pT,S < pT,L 〈ηL〉=3.2, 〈ηS〉=3.2 pT,L > 2 GeV/c, 1 GeV/c < pT,S < pT,L 〈ηL〉=3.2, 〈ηS〉=3.2 pT,L > 2 GeV/c, 1 GeV/c < pT,S < pT,L 〈ηL〉=3.1, 〈ηS〉=3.2
Δφ Δφ Δφ
CGC+offset
σ 0.41 ± 0.01 0.68 ± 0.01
PeaksΔφ π σ 0.46 ± 0.02 0.99 ± 0.06
PeaksΔφ π σ 0.44 ± 0.02 1.63 ± 0.29
PeaksΔφ π
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 0.02 0.15 0.01 0.05 0.03 0.025 0.02 0.015 0.01 0.005 0.016 0.014 0.012 0.01 0.008 0.006 0.004 0.002
p q
x y
p q
x y
correlation measurement
compared with non-saturation model: Pythia+nPDF+DPMJETIII
9
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 eAu eAu - sat eAu - nosat eCa pT
trigger < 2 GeV/c 1 < pT assoc < pT trigger |η|<4ep
Q2 = 1 GeV2
Δϕ Δϕ C(Δϕ) CeAu(Δϕ)
2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 EIC stage-II ∫ Ldt = 10 fb-1/A
sampling
Bowen, Dominguez, Yuan 2011/2012
Di-hadron correlation vs x at EIC: Nuclear modification JeAu
10
log10(xg) JeAu
1 eAu - sat eAu - nosat
Q2 = 1 GeV2 pT
trigger > 2 GeV/c
1 < pT
assoc < pT trigger
|η|<4
EIC stage-II ∫ Ldt = 10 fb-1/A 10-3 10-2 1 10-1
peripheral central
xA
frag
JdAu
RHIC dAu, √s = 200 GeV
forward-forward mid-forward
Data:Phenix
Selected Key measurement III: Gluon spatial distribution and correlations in exclusive diffractive Vector Meson production
coherent and incoherent diffractive interaction: Sensitive to saturation (s,b,A)
gap gap A A A A’ p n e e e e
coherent incoherent
11
Exclusive diffractive vector meson production: J/Ψ and Φ
12
|t | (GeV2) |t | (GeV2)
0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18
)
2/dt (nb/GeV
e’ + Au’ + J/ψ) → (e + Auσ d )
2/dt (nb/GeV
e’ + Au’ + φ) → (e + Auσ d
J/ψ φ
∫Ldt = 10 fb-1 1 < Q2 < 10 GeV2 x < 0.01 |η(edecay)| < 4 p(edecay) > 1 GeV/c δt/t = 5% ∫Ldt = 10 fb-1 1 < Q2 < 10 GeV2 x < 0.01 |η(Kdecay)| < 4 p(Kdecay) > 1 GeV/c δt/t = 5%104 103 102 10 1 10-1 10-2 105 104 103 102 10 1 10-1 10-2
coherent - no saturation incoherent - no saturation coherent - saturation (bSat) incoherent - saturation (bSat) coherent - no saturation incoherent - no saturation coherent - saturation (bSat) incoherent - saturation (bSat)Φ J/Ψ
Exclusive Diffractive Vector Meson at EIC
function
13
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 coherent events only ∫Ldt = 10 fb-1 x < 0.01 Experimental Cuts: |η(edecay)| < 4 p(edecay) > 1 GeV/c coherent events only ∫Ldt = 10 fb-1 x < 0.01 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(1/A4/3) σ(eAu)/σ(ep) Q2 (GeV2)
no saturation saturation (bSat) no saturation saturation (bSat)
e e e p(Au) → e’ p’(Au’) J/ψ
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
(1/A4/3) σ(eAu)/σ(ep) Q2 (GeV2)
2.2 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
e p/Au → e’ p’/Au’ φ K K
Experimental Cuts: |η(Kdecay)| < 4 p(Kdecay) > 1 GeV/c
Coherent Diffraction (γ*+IP ) in Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC
diffractive ρ production in Au +Au at √sNN=200 GeV
Ultra-peripheral AuAu Collision
14
]
2
0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 ]
2
/dydt [mb/GeV σ d
10
10
10 1 10
2
10
STAR Preliminary Sartre (coherent)
Selected Key measurement IV: semi-inclusive DIS at large-x
the medium
mechanism
15 h
q q q
l lf
p q
γ∗
z
Multiplicity Ratio
30 < Q2 < 40 GeV2 140 < ν < 150 GeV 0.01 < y < 0.85 x > 0.1 ∫Ldt = 10 fb-1 Pb ν = 35 GeV Q2 = 10 GeV2 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 1.40 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20z Multiplicity Ratio
D0 mesons pions D0 (10% less energy loss) 8 < Q2 < 12 GeV2 32.5 < ν < 37.5 GeV 0.01 < y < 0.85 x > 0.1 ∫Ldt = 10 fb-1Attenuation of hadrons in nuclei
16 ν = virtual photon energy in nucleon rest frame zh = Eh/ν
RM(multiplicity ratio)
D0 π
Hermes EIC EIC Hermes
The new proposed versatile and high-luminosity electron-Ion collider (EIC) is to study one of the outstanding fundamental questions in QCD:
matter - saturation regime by systematically studying the unprecedentedly accessed kinematic regime with the probes sensitive to saturation
correlations
disentangle initial and final state effects in RHIC and LHC heavy-ion results
17
18
ρ~xG(x,Q2)/πR2
σ~ αs/Q2
Q2 < Qs2(x)
saturation regime: Need √s=1-2 TeV in ep
19
20