experience with rf at high beam current at pep ii
play

Experience with Rf at high beam Current at PEP-II H.-Ulrich (Uli) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Experience with Rf at high beam Current at PEP-II H.-Ulrich (Uli) Wienands Accelerator Physicist and Deputy Assoc. Project Manager for Zone F Systems Argonne National Laboratory ex Run Coordinator & Deputy Accelerator Division Head, PEP-II


  1. Experience with Rf at high beam Current at PEP-II H.-Ulrich (Uli) Wienands Accelerator Physicist and Deputy Assoc. Project Manager for Zone F Systems Argonne National Laboratory ex Run Coordinator & Deputy Accelerator Division Head, PEP-II EIC Accelerator Workshop Oct 8-11, 2019

  2. PEP-II Rf System Design slot I I --.-^A ^^ WKZlw waveguiae 2.2 MVA HV power I 12 kV 3 phase AC - SUPPlY Circulator 476 MHz A Low-level RF Windo from SLAC master oscillator A Figure 2. HER RF station ba A circulator is used to protect the klystron output window Table 2: Cavitv design pi U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 meters 2 and allow for stable klystron operation. It also provides a PARAMETER matched source for the cavities, which improves beam RF frequency (MHz) 476 stability. The power is divided by Magic-Tees and the cavities Shunt Impedance Rs (Mfi) a 3.5 are placed an odd number of quarter wavelengths apart. This Max. gap voltage (MV) 1.02 combines emitted power from the cavities into a 1.2 MW load Accelerating gradient (Mv/m) at the fourth port of the Magic-Tee. The arrangement shields 4.6 Wall loss/cavity (kw) the circulator from the large emitted power spikes from each 150 cavity, which can reach as much as four times the maximum Coupling factor without beam (p) 3.6 drive power of 500 kW per cavity when the beam is suddenly Unloaded Q of cavityb -30000 lost. a Rs =V2/2P b with ports, at 40°C 3. SYSTEM LAYOUT An overall system layout was established using the above cavity parameters and a 1.2 MW power source similar to those available in industry. The high energy ring is operated with 6 klystron stations and 24 cavities, each four cavities driven by one klystron (see Fig. 2). Similarly the low energy ring has 5 klystron stations driving 10 cavities, two cavities per klystron. With this system layout both rings can operate with full beam current and slightly increased bunch-length (1.15 cm instead of 1 cm) with one station idle in each ring. This requirement is driven by PEP-II being designated a “factory” with an up-time of more than 75% and the possibility of a station being in a maintenance mode despite a rugged design philosophy.- Table 3: Station pan :ters 1’ / 1 I . . J PARAMETER HER LER 3.m~ . Quadqoles 8.761 . Number of klystrons 6 5 Figure 3. Cross-section of waveguide layout with 4 cavities Number of cavities 24 10 in tunnel Gap Voltage (MV) 0.77 0.59 Accelerating gradient (MV/m) 3.4 2.6 The design of the waveguide network is guided by the Wall loss/cavity (kw) 85 50 following requirements: Coupling factor without beam (p) 3.6 3.6 1) Minimize electrical length. Klystron power with beam (MW) 1.03 .82 2) Dissipate potentially large reflected power in the Magic- Reflected power w. beam/sta. (kW: 12 83 Tee loads to protect the circulator. Beam power/cavity (kW) 160 3) Phasing of RF fields in the cavities correctly for 302 Total power/window (kW) acceleration of the respective 245 beams. 393 Cavity detuning with beam (kHz) 4) Match the signal delay to each cavity to beam arrival -73 -206 time in each cavity within M.5 wavelengths for fast feedback. 1883

  3. PEP-II Rf Parameters Parameter Symbol Unit HER LER Beam energy E GeV 9 3.1 Beam current 
 I A 2 3.2 (max achieved) harmonic number h -- 1792 1792 ion-clearing gap % of bunches 5 ≈ > 1 5 ≈ > 1 Rf Voltage Vrf MV 16 6 Rf Frequency frf MHz 476 476 Total # cavities in ring 28 8 # cavities/klystron 4 & 2 2 cavity coupling factor ß 3.6 3.6 U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 3

  4. Rf Station  § Digitally controlled analog LLRF system – comb filter is digital § Baseband processing in the analog chain § Rf voltage regulated using HV (no mod-anode) § Piston tuners run by stepper motors. § Input for phase control by LFB system (low-frequency kicker)   :  . U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 4

  5. Why are fast & Comb-filter feedbacks needed? § Cavity detuning for match to klystron: ω r I 0 - R ω D = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ≈ V c Q and and – for PEP-II HER R/Q ≈ 120 Ω , V c ≈ 700 kV, I 0 =2 A: w D /( 2 π ) > 160 kHz (negative), > 136 kHz. – Robinson unstable once revolution frequency is crossed. – (not crossing the rev. harmonic is no guarantee for stability, though!) § Make V c larger and/or R/Q smaller to avoid this? – impractical for r/t cavities, to much power dissipation (KEKB ARES comes close, though) – s/c cavities in principle can do this. § Use rf feedback to suppress impedances. U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 5

  6. Feedback Parameters § Gain for direct loop is limited by group delay ( ≈ 17 dB in PEP-II case) § small group delay is difficult td = 0 td = 500 ns – PEP-II klystrons spec’d for 150 ns (c/f 600 ns, APS klystrons (352 MHz, 1.1 MW)) – direct loop electronics ≤ 100 ns – rf and cable runs U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 6

  7. Comb Filter § Comb filter loop to make up the rest – the trick is to get the correct phase at each synchrotron harmonic, phase flip in between – in practice, we used a double comb peaked at n s sidebands (avoid amplifying rev. harmonics) – can get another 20 … 30 dB f rev U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 7

  8. Combined effect     U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 8

  9. “Woofer” § Direct & comb filter were not sufficient for low-lying, negative modes at higher beam currents ( ≥ 1 A or so) § Use a direct link from the LFB system into the rf system, adjusting the rf phase – ≈ 1 MHz bandwidth (up to maybe mode ±6) § in principle can reduce effect of rf noise (mode 0) as well – in practice, better to fix at the source (klystron), maybe using ripple compensation. U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 9

  10. Gap transients § Never(!) enough klystron power to compensate transients from gaps in beam – pre-compensate rf reference so LLRF would not try to compensate; adjusting to beam conditions. – operationally, we could increase beam current by reducing gap length (5% ≈ > 1%). – slightly larger detuning than optimal gives the transient 1 st -order behavior. § Schemes like guard bunches to compensate gaps cause beam-beam issues in colliders. Measured HER and LER Beam Current and Phase 12 − Jun − 2000 14:07:24 20 – either too much beam-beam LER beam current − mA/sample – or (if non-colliding) too little 15 HER – short lifetime, high background 10 5 total HER current = 701.6 mA (red) total LER current = 1119.8 mA (blue) 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 time − us U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 10

  11. Parked Cavities § Occasionally one is forced to run with some stations off. – tune rf cavities in pairs to ± 2.5 revolution harmonics to minimize impedance – pairwise detuning cancels the imaginary(?) part of the (uncontrolled) impedance. 20 HER (1 stn parked) mean HER phase = 13.0 degrees 15 phase − degrees mean LER phase = 10.7 degrees 10 LER 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 time − us U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 11

  12. Practical Experience § The strong feedback loops are very sensitive to transients. – due to high loop gain, transients tend to cause relatively quick changes of rf voltage -> reflected power -> station trip § Ramping a station up initially very slow – Turn rf on with no feedback & moderate rf voltage – ramp up loop gains (very slowly to avoid trips) – raise gap voltage slowly to control transients. – It turned out much faster to run the stations up with loops set at no-beam settings. § ac ripple a significant limit on performance – gain of klystron varies -> loop gain varies -> cannot operate too close to the limit – needs to be taken care of at the LLRF level – solid-state rf power amplifiers do not have this issue. U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 12

  13. Dynamics of Analog Circuitry § Any noise or transient can cause klystron saturation: game over! Measured Klystron Saturation Curve HR85 16 − Jun − 2000 500 good wp gain inversion! § Amplitude limiter helps 450 – but the gain still drops 65 kV 400 20 Wop 350 output power − kW 300 60 kV 20 Wop 250 200 55 kV 15 Wop 150 100 50 0 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 drive power − W U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 13 Fig. 7. Measured klystron saturation curve showing sug-

  14. Trips from Transients § Irregularities in the cavity probe signals initially a significant source of rf trips. – drop in probe signal not due to arc, causes large increase in klystron power to compensate – this leads to reflected power in other cavities -> trip. – reduced by masking short drop-outs. U. Wienands, EIC Collab Meeting - Oct 9-11, 2019 14

  15. HER 12-6 Aborts Probe signal masked in LLRF • Masked cavity A probe in the LLRF system on 7/22 to ignore such a fast change in signal. 7.8 us • Station has not aborted on such a fault since. • Signal is dropping out somewhere in the probe signal path and recovers within 10 µ s – cavity probe, cable or coupler in LLRF rack. Peter McIntosh, PEP-II MAC Review, December 13-15 2004

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend