EXCHANGE THEORY Chapter 3 Leader Member Exchange Theory 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EXCHANGE THEORY Chapter 3 Leader Member Exchange Theory 2 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE THEORY Chapter 3 Leader Member Exchange Theory 2 Initially the theory described the nature of in groups and out groups called the vertical dyad linkage theory Focuses on the ongoing relationship that leaders and
Leader Member Exchange Theory
2
Initially the theory described the nature of in
groups and out groups called the vertical dyad linkage theory
Focuses on the ongoing relationship that leaders
and members of their group experiences as they:
Negotiate and exchange mutual perceptions,
influenced, types and amount of work, loyalty and perquisites, etc.
(Graen & Uhl-Bien, 1995)
Leader Member Exchange Theory
3
Leaders perceive high-exchange relation
members as more: (in-groups)
Competent, hardworking, likable Receive more benefits, better assignments, schedules,
praise, assistance, etc.
Leaders perceive low-exchange relation
members as less: (out-groups)
Committed, competent, hardworking and loyal Receive fewer benefits, less support and opportunity
to participate
Leadership Member Exchange Theory
Theory now separates followers into high- exchange and low-exchange groups
Emphasizes that a leader should develop high- quality exchanges with all rather than just a few.
Three phases of leadership making
which develops over time:
(a) stranger phase (b) acquaintance phase (c) mature partnership phase
LMX - Leadership Making Phases
5
Phase I Stranger Phase II Acquaintance Phase III - Partnership Roles Scripted Tested Negotiated Influences One way Mixed Reciprocal Exchanges Low quality Medium quality High quality Interests Self Self and other Group Time Chart not in text
LMX Theory
Stranger
- Interactions within the leader-subordinate dyad are
generally rule bound
- Rely on contractual relationships
- Relate to each other within prescribed organizational
roles
- Experience lower quality exchanges
- Motives of subordinate directed toward self-interest
rather than good of the group
Phase 1
LMX Theory
Acquaintance
Begins with an “offer” by leader/subordinate for improved career-oriented
social exchanges
- Testing period for both, assessing whether
- the subordinate is interested in taking on new roles
- leader is willing to provide new challenges
- Shift in dyad from formalized interactions to new ways of relating
- Quality of exchanges improve along with greater trust & respect
- Less focus on self-interest, more on goals of the group
Phase 2
LMX Theory Mature Partnership
- Marked by high-quality leader-member exchanges
- Experience high degree of mutual trust, respect, and obligation toward each other
- Tested relationship and found it dependable
- High degree of reciprocity between leaders and subordinates
- May depend on each other for favors and special assistance
- Highly developed patterns of relating that produce positive
- utcomes for both themselves & the organization
Phase 3
Partnerships are transformational – moving beyond self-interest to
accomplish greater good of the team & organization
LMX Outcomes for Employees
(Harris, Wheeler & Kacmar, 2009)
Advantages of High LMX
Preferential treatment Increased job-related
communication
Ample access to supervisors increased performance-
related feedback
Disadvantages of Low LMX
limited trust and support
from supervisors
few benefits outside the
employment contract
Leader-Member Exchange Theory
10
The Benefits of Quality Exchanges
Less Employee Turnover More Positive Performance Evaluations Higher Frequency of Promotions Greater Organizational Commitment
Leadership Making develops progressively over time in three phases:
1.
The Stranger Phase
2.
The Acquaintance Phase
3.
The Mature Partnership Phase
LMX Theory Casual Chain
11
Leadership styles relate to the three phases:
Stranger, Acquaintance and Partner Considered a universal theory as the ideal style is a
high exchange relationship (Partner)
Strategies for success focus on reciprocal influence,
negotiated roles, mutual trust and the integration of individual and group needs
Performance goals are production efficiency and
follower satisfaction and development
Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Causal Chain Leadership Styles Stranger (low mutual trust) Acquaintance (moderate mutual trust) Partner (high mutual trust) Performance Goal Production efficiency. Follower satisfaction and development Criterion: % of employees in partner role) Ideal Conditions Universal Strategies for Success Reciprocal influence Fluid, negotiated roles High sense of mutual trust Integration of both individual and group needs
12
Application
For organizations and case analysis:
Identify subordinates perceived to be in the high
exchange and low exchange groups – Specifically those in:
Phase I (Stranger), Phase II (Acquaintance) and Phase III (Mature Partnership)
Application
Leader initiates the following strategies:
1.
Create a special relationship with all subordinates characterized by reciprocal influence
2.
Offer each subordinate the opportunity to take on new roles and responsibilities (negotiated roles)
3.
Nurture high quality exchanges with all subordinates
4.
Build trust and respect with all subordinates
5.
Look beyond their own work unit and create high-quality partnerships with people throughout the organization
Application
In instances of low performance consider applying some of the
strategies from attribution theory
Express a sincere desire to assist Provide feedback professionally by focusing on the behavior and
not the individual
Point out the adverse effect of the behavior Mutually identify reasons for inadequate performance Ask the person to suggest remedies, then reach agreement on action
steps
Summarize the discussion and verify agreement
Application
For performance goals measure:
Percent of employees in partnership role Production efficiency Follower satisfaction and development
Strengths
It accurately describes the leadership process
and the presence of in-groups and out-groups
The only leadership approach to consider the
dyadic relationship of leader and follower and the exchanges that determine organizational effectiveness.
It highlights communication as the vehicle through
which leaders and subordinates achieve a productive working environment
17
Strengths
18
Research supports LMX’s claims to positive
- rganizational outcomes
Innovation, empowerment, positive job climate, and
- rganizational citizenship behavior.
Weaknesses
19
Tends to be simplistic and to ignore situational variables
such as:
Unit has untalented or incompetent employees Presence of self-serving employees It fails to explain how high-quality leader-member