Exact vs. High-Energy symmetries in String Scattering Amplitudes - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

exact vs high energy symmetries in string scattering
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Exact vs. High-Energy symmetries in String Scattering Amplitudes - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

YITP Workshop Strings and Fields, 25 July 2014 Exact vs. High-Energy symmetries in String Scattering Amplitudes Shoichi Kawamoto (National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Taiwan) Based on Nucl.Phy Phys. s.B885(2 (2014) ) 225 with


slide-1
SLIDE 1

YITP Workshop “Strings and Fields”, 25 July 2014

Exact vs. High-Energy symmetries in String Scattering Amplitudes

Shoichi Kawamoto (National Center for Theoretical Sciences, Taiwan)

Based on Nucl.Phy Phys. s.B885(2 (2014) ) 225 with Chuan-Tsung Chan and Dan Tomino

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 2

High-energy scatterings in string theory

[Gross-Mende, Gross-Manes, ...]

String theory scattering amplitudes (bosonic open 4-pt amplitudes)

Fixed-angle High-energy limit: Can be evaluated by the saddle point method : vertex operators Polynomials in momenta “Veneziano” part including

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 3

Linear relations and high-energy symmetry?

Simple relations among amplitudes

[Gross] High-energy symmetry:

  • Infinitely many linear relations
  • New identity due to enhancement of symmetry?

Helicity basis in the CM frame

Scattering plane

: linear relation [Lee, Chan, Yi, Ho, Teraguchi, Lin, Ko, Mitsuka, ...]

cf) Decoupling of “high-energy zero-norm states”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 4

Plan

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Deformation of vertex operators and relation among

amplitudes

  • 3. High-energy expansion
  • 4. Conclusion and Discussion

[Moore ('93)]

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 5

Bracket operation

: “deformer” operator : “seed” operator Example: Mutually local:

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 6

Bracket operators

  • Deformation = Specific form of the polarization tensor
  • The resultant operator level is determined by q. k
  • There are infinitely many choices to give an operator at a level

Observation:

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 7

Moore's exact identity: Sketch

Contour deformation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 8

Moore's exact identity: 4-pt amplitudes

With this becomes a relation among amplitudes

In general,

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 9

Example: from exact relation to H.E. relations

Seed: Deformer: Deformation of 3rd and 4th operators trivially vanish.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 10

Explicit forms of the exact relation

Using This holds for arbitrary

Want to translate them to asymptotic high-energy relations.

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 11

High-energy limit and set of “Ward identities”

  • Different set of vertex operators
  • Equal set of momenta
  • The same basis for polarizations (the scattering planes are tilted)

Deformation of momentum: Mass shell conditions: High-energy limit In CM frame, We may want

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 12

A convenient basis for physical amplitudes

Helicity basis w.r.t. the deformation momentum q Standard helicity basis: (for 1st state) Rearrange The physical bracket operator: Corresponding state Original basis

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 13

Asymptotic expansion of the exact relations

Fixed angle expansion: Expand the amplitudes and the coefficients:

Coefficients are functions of

Moore's relation in terms of “familiar amplitudes” : Known from the kinematics : unknowns to be determined From this expansion, we find constraints on the leading order amplitudes.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 14

Asymptotic expansion of the exact relations

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 15

Asymptotic expansion of the exact relations

For leading order part, we can find some linear relations: Rotational symmetry: Subleading relations: Known linear relation An inter-level relation In this way, we can extract lots of nontrivial relations among amplitudes.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 16

Another example considered

We have also calculated a bit more involved example:

Massive deformer and a level 3 state appears

Derive various (known) linear relations, but not all of them

Amplitudes are related to one another in a complicated manner. There are infinitely many ways to construct a given level vertex operator.

Through many other amplitudes, they would be related.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 17

Conclusion (or observation)

We have understood:

“Change of frame” coefficients from the deformation momentum q High-energy expansion of the relations from bracket deformation leads to high-energy relations systematically.

(q indeed connects asymptotic amplitudes)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 18

High-energy symmetry in String Theory? Hint?

: Leading energy part with respect to the scattering plane Reduction of degrees of freedom? [Gross-Manes] DDF operators in closed string theory Kac-Moody algebra [West-Gaberdiel] Some algebra from Bracket deformation? So far, not promising. Special choice of q: Referring to other states Troidal compactification [West][Moore]

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 19

Future directions...

Multi-point amplitudes and higher genus

We want to understand ...

Another limit, such as Regge limit Deformation of vertex operators and world-sheet symmetries

….

What is the (high-energy) stringy symmetry?

[NCTU group]

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Shoichi Kawamoto (NCTS) 20

Thank you for your attention!