Evidence-based Research Network A call to action for more - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

evidence based research network a call to action for more
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Evidence-based Research Network A call to action for more - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Evidence-based Research Network A call to action for more (efficient) systematic reviews Hans Lund on behalf of the EBRNetwork BACKGROUND The scientific ideal "If I have seen farther it


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Evidence-based Research Network ¡ ¡ A call to action for more (efficient) systematic reviews

Hans ¡Lund ¡ ¡

  • n ¡behalf ¡of ¡the ¡

EBRNetwork ¡

¡

slide-2
SLIDE 2

BACKGROUND

"If I have seen farther it is by standing on the shoulders of giants"

Letter to Robert Hooke,

  • 15. February 1676.

The scientific ideal

1643 - 1727

slide-3
SLIDE 3

BACKGROUND

“If, as is sometimes supposed, science consisted in nothing but the laborious accumulation of facts, it it wo would uld so soon co come me t to a a sta stand ndstill still, , cr crushed, a as i it we were, u under its its

  • w
  • wn we

weig ight ht…… …… The work which deserves, but I am afraid does not always receive, the most credit is that in which discovery and explanation go hand in hand, in which not only are new facts presented, but their relation to old

  • nes is pointed out.”

Lo Lord Rayl yleigh a at t the 54th meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science held in Montreal in 1884.

(Thanks to I. Chalmers, LV Hedges, H Cooper, 2002)

The scientific ideal

slide-4
SLIDE 4

"The Helsinki Declaration states that biomedical research involving people should be based on a thorough knowledge

  • f the scientific literature. That is, it is

unethical to expose human subjects unnecessarily to the risks of research. Ideally, the introduction should include a reference to a systematic review of previous similar trials or a note of the absence of such trials."

The scientific ideal

Altman et al 2001

slide-5
SLIDE 5

The assumption

One would think: No paper has ever been published without references to earlier published scientific

  • results. What's the problem?
slide-6
SLIDE 6

The assumption

Norwegian Accreditations Committee, in 2014 (nokut.no)

“Strictly speaking it seems hard to imagine any research not evidence-based. At least it seems impossible to imagine that articles published in journals with a high impact factor do not relates to earlier research"

slide-7
SLIDE 7

After 1 1994: More than 2500 received unnecessary placebo!

The evidence

Trials testing aprotinin in cardiac surgery. ¡

Fergusson et al. 2005

slide-8
SLIDE 8

? ¡

The evidence

Fergusson et al. 2005

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A Systematic Examination of the Citation of Prior Research in Reports of Randomized, Controlled Trials ¡

The evidence

Robinson ¡et ¡al. ¡2011 ¡

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Robinson 2011

Robinson ¡2011, ¡Clarke, ¡Chalmers, ¡1997, ¡ 2001, ¡2005, ¡2009 ¡

The evidence

Papers ¡from ¡the ¡ highest ¡impact ¡ medicine ¡journals ¡

slide-11
SLIDE 11

The evidence

Other studies indicates the same picture, for ex:

slide-12
SLIDE 12

To address this problem a group of researchers have initiated an international network, the ‘Evidence-Based Research Network’ (EBRNetwork).

The solution

http://ebrnetwork.org/

slide-13
SLIDE 13

At the ‘Bergen meeting’ (December 2014) part- ners agreed the aim of the EBRNetwork is to reduce ce w waste in r research b by p y promo moting:

  • No

No n new s studies w without p prior s sys ystema matic c revi view o

  • f e

existing e evi vidence ce

  • Effici

cient p product ction, u updating a and dissemi mination o

  • f s

sys ystema matic r c revi views

The solution

slide-14
SLIDE 14

The EBRNetwork now issues a call for interested individuals and organizations to join the EBRNetwork and work together in developing a cons nsens nsus us statement nt to address this challenge to the very heart and values of research.

The solution

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank you for your attention!

imgkid.com ¡