Event Deconstruction: example with top quarks Davison E. Soper - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

event deconstruction example with top quarks
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Event Deconstruction: example with top quarks Davison E. Soper - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Event Deconstruction: example with top quarks Davison E. Soper University of Oregon W ork with Michael Spannowsky MIAPP , Munich, August 2014 1 Introduction One can examine the fine grained structure of events in order to dig out new


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Event Deconstruction: example with top quarks

Davison E. Soper University of Oregon W

  • rk with Michael Spannowsky

MIAPP , Munich, August 2014

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Introduction

  • One can examine the fine grained structure of events

in order to dig out new physics signals.

  • Michael Spannowsky and I proposed a general method

for subjet analysis: “shower deconstruction.” (Phys. Rev.

D84 (2011) 074002)

  • An application is to find top quark jets. (Phys. Rev. D87

(2013) 054012)

  • This works well in ATLAS: ``Performance of shower

deconstruction in ATLAS,'' ATLAS-CONF-2014-003.

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • W

e have extended this to “event deconstruction,’’ looking at the relevant features of whole events.

(arXiv:1402.1189 [hep-ph])

  • Our example:

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Our example

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Event sample

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Microjets

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • We would like to separate signal an background using

What we would like

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Why?

  • Assuming that you believe your

Monte Carlo, to get the most signal cross section for a given background cross section by making a cut, your cut should be along a contour line of

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

What we do

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Event histories

initial state radiation a QCD splitting a Sudakov factor a Sudakov factor a decay a decay

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Sum over event histories

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

distributions for signal and background

) χ log(

  • 14
  • 12
  • 10
  • 8
  • 6
  • 4
  • 2

) [1/0.3] χ /dlog( σ d σ 1/ 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7

Z’ t t Dijets

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Tagging efficiency

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Comparison to HEP top tagger

Efficiency for tagging Z’ 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 1 / Prob. of accepting fake background 1 10

2

10

3

10

4

10

5

10

6

10

Full ED bkg.) t Full ED (only t Full ED (only dijet bkg.) HTT + mass cut bkg.) + mass cut t HTT (only t HTT (only dijet bkg.) + mass cut

Event deconstruction HEP top tagger and mass cut

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusions

  • Event deconstruction seems to work well.
  • For tagging single jets, shower deconstruction also

works nicely with Monte Carlo events.

  • ATLAS finds that shower deconstruction works well

for finding top quark jets in experiment.

  • The general method could be helped by

contributions from other theorists.

15