Euro How Big a Difference: Finland and Sweden in Search of Macro - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

euro how big a difference
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Euro How Big a Difference: Finland and Sweden in Search of Macro - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Euro How Big a Difference: Finland and Sweden in Search of Macro Stability * AIECE WG in Structural Change Berlin May 3, 2013 Paavo Suni ETLA * Based on paper by Paavo Suni and Vesa Vihril, ETLA to be presented in Euroframe


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

Euro – How Big a Difference:

Finland and Sweden in Search of Macro Stability *

AIECE WG in Structural Change Berlin May 3, 2013 Paavo Suni ETLA

* Based on paper by Paavo Suni and Vesa Vihriälä, ETLA to be presented in Euroframe Conferences in Warsaw in May 24 2013

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

Price and exchange rate stability before and after the start of EMU

1985/1-1998/4 1999/1-2012/4 Sweden Finland Sweden Finland Inflation (National concept) Mean 4.3 3.2 1.5 1.8 Stdev 3.2 2.1 1.2 1.3 Private consumption deflator Mean 4.9 3.4 1.5 2.0 Change in per cent) Stdev 3.3 2.0 0.7 1.3 Effective exchange rate, level Stdev 6.6 6.3 4.3 4.8

slide-7
SLIDE 7

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

Background

 The euro crisis & pros and cons of the of membership in the EMU Different choices of Finland and Sweden

  • Economies are very much alike
  • Crisis of the 1990s

Sweden has on average developed better

  • Monetary stability improved more
  • Growth faster than Finland, 2.6 % vs. 2.1 %
slide-8
SLIDE 8

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

A counter factual simulation for Sweden in ”EMU”

NiGEM

  • A counter factual
  • Adopting the EA monetary policy for Sweden.
  • EA steering rates and short-term interest rates.
  • Fixing the SEK in euros, about 9.5 kroner per euro.
  • Backward-looking expectations (and fw-looking)
  • The changing interest rates and exchange rates

drive the changes

slide-9
SLIDE 9

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

slide-10
SLIDE 10

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

slide-11
SLIDE 11

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

slide-12
SLIDE 12

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 1999/1 2001/1 2003/1 2005/1 2007/1 2009/1 2011/1 Index, 1999/1=100

Gross Domestic Product in Finland and Sweden, 1999/1-2012/3

Finland 'Sweden in EMU' Sweden

slide-13
SLIDE 13

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

  • 4
  • 3
  • 2
  • 1

1 2 3 1999/1 2001/1 2003/1 2005/1 2007/1 2009/1 2011/1 % of baseline

Sweden in EMU",

GDP with backward and and forward-looking expectations

Fw-looking BW-looking

slide-14
SLIDE 14

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

Some findings

Swedish average growth not much affected, but variation was different. Fw-looking expectations had smoothen the development

  • The krona interest and exchange rates mitigated

the impact of the global shock in 2009 and spurred growth in 2010-11, but the growth smoothened since.

Finnish GDP growth affected by non- monetary factors resulting low growth since mid-2010

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ELINKEINOELÄMÄN TUTKIMUSLAITOS, ETLA THE RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF THE FINNISH ECONOMY

Conclusions

A membership of Sweden in EMU seems not to affect (average) growth as expected, but  to rise instability as one could not expect.

  • Sweden performed initially better than simulated

Sweden after 2009; exchange rates & Krone, but the growth gap has since closed.

  • The lower growth of Finland after 2009 due to

non-monetary reasons. ”Nokia & forest industry”

The feared speculation against krone has not taken place, but it can’t be taken as granted?