Ethics for Behavioral Health Providers Working in Schools and Health Care Settings
Avi Kriechman, M.D. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of New Mexico
Ethics for Behavioral Health Providers W orking in S chools and H - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Ethics for Behavioral Health Providers W orking in S chools and H ealth C are S ettings Avi Kriechman, M.D. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of New Mexico Learning Objectives 1. List and define fundamental ethical
Avi Kriechman, M.D. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences University of New Mexico
Responsibility of provider to encourage young person, when appropriate, to make their own decisions and to act on their own values including: 1) Help young person understand how their decisions and values may or may not be received within the context of the society in which they live, and how they may impinge on the rights of others. 2) Evaluate young person's ability to make sound and rational decisions. Persons not capable of making competent choices, such as children, and some individuals with mental challenges, should not be allowed to act on decisions that could harm themselves or others.
Does not mean treating all individuals the same, but "treating equals equally and unequal's unequally but in proportion to their relevant differences”. If an individual is to be treated differently, the provider needs to be able to
treating this individual differently.
Loyalty, faithfulness, and honoring commitments. students/patients must be able to trust the provider and have faith in the therapeutic relationship if growth is to occur. Therefore, the provider must take care not to threaten the therapeutic relationship nor to leave obligations unfulfilled.
Providers: Treat students/patients with dignity and respect as unique individuals. Encourage the maximum development of every individual. Respect students/patients’ values, beliefs and cultural background and do not impose the provider’s personal values on students/patients or their families. Are knowledgeable of laws, regulations and policies relating to students/patients and strive to protect and inform students/patients regarding their rights. Promote the welfare of individual students/patients and collaborate with them to develop a plan for success. Consider the involvement of support networks valued by the individual students/patients. Understand that professional distance with students/patients is appropriate, and any sexual or romantic relationship with students/patients is prohibited regardless of a patient’s age. Consider the potential for harm before entering into a relationship with former students/patients or one of their family members.
self/others.
assessment measures. Use assessment measures only within scope of practice, competency and training.
electronic medical records) and social media.
support and other group programs.
Purpose of Supervision: Responsibility of both the supervisor and supervisee to ensure that supervision meets all requirements consistent with the stated purpose (experience to meet licensure requirements, establishing new competencies, meet terms of a licensing board disciplinary order, etc.). of the supervised experience. Term of Supervision: will be from (month/day/year) to (month/day/ year). Type of Supervision: 1:1 supervision vs. group supervision (e.g. may involve additional supervisees of the same discipline or a treatment team) Payment for supervisor + malpractice insurance to cover the supervisee’s professional services rendered under supervision
professional values.
Consider the patient’s chronological and developmental levels. Consider the setting (contextual features). Identify and consider the values and conflict of values of key persons.
justice, and fidelity. Decide which principles apply to the specific situation and determine which principle takes priority for you in this case.
the most current professional thinking in reaching a decision.
may see other issues, provide a perspective you have not considered, identify aspects of the dilemma you are not viewing objectively.
provide help with the dilemma.
Stadler (1986) suggests applying three simple tests to the selected course of action to ensure that it is appropriate.
families, colleagues, the general public? Would you be OK if your behavior was reported in the press (the “publicity test”)?
provider in the same situation? After implementing your course of action, it is good practice to follow up
and consequences.