Estradiol-resistant mutants Cre-EBD78 itself Genes involved in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

estradiol resistant mutants
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Estradiol-resistant mutants Cre-EBD78 itself Genes involved in - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Estradiol-resistant mutants Cre-EBD78 itself Genes involved in localization of the EBD Multidrug resistance Logarithmically growing haploid cells produced resistant mutations at a rate of 1.4*10 -6 per cell division In Diploids


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Estradiol-resistant mutants

  • Cre-EBD78 itself
  • Genes involved in localization of the EBD
  • Multidrug resistance
  • Logarithmically growing haploid cells

produced resistant mutations at a rate of 1.4*10-6 per cell division

  • In Diploids, 1.4*10-8 mutations per cell

division.

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

In a rapidly growing culture of yeast, ages of individual cells will distribute geometrically, with : 1/2 of the population virgins, 1/4 one-division old mothers, 1/8 two-division-old mothers, 1/16 original mother

  • M. Kaeberlein et al. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

In search of ageing regulating genes in Baker's yeast

Thesis presentation October 2011 Shaylee Bar

4

  • Dr. Haim Cohens’ lab.
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • For many years, ageing research was not

popular among molecular biologists

  • ageing was believed to be a passive,

entropic process of deterioration that

  • ccurred in a haphazard way.
  • We know now, however, that the ageing

process, like many other biological processes, is subject to regulation by classical signaling pathways and transcription factors.

What is ageing ?

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

What is ageing ?

molecular cellular

  • rgan damage

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Why do we age?

Kirkwood et al. Nature 2000

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • The Mutation Accumulation Theory

Suggested by Medawar

Why do we age? Ageing theories

Kirkwood et al. Nature 2000

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9
  • The Theory

Suggested by Williams

Why do we age? Ageing theories

Antagonistic Pleiotropy

Kirkwood et al. Nature 2000

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10
  • The Disposable Soma Theory

Suggested by Kirkwood and Holliday

Why do we age? Ageing theories

Kirkwood et al. Nature 2000

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Ageing & Environment

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Ageing & Environment – DR

(Dietary Restriction)

  • Dr. Clive McCay

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Fontana et al. Science 2010

Ageing & DR

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Ageing & DR

Kenyon et al. Nature 2010

14

Forkheads Forkheads Forkheads Forkheads

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Sir2 - protein deacetylase

Sirtuins & Ageing

15

  • M. Kaeberlein et al. Genes Dev. 1999

sir2Δ

sir2Δ+ SIR2 OE SIR2 OE

WT Guarente L Genes Dev.2000

  • M. Kaeberlein et al. Cell Dev. Biol.2008
slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • S. Broughton et al. Biochem.2009

16

Insulin/IGF-1 signaling

Kenyon et al. Nature 2010

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Meet the Forkheads

  • FOX proteins (Forkhead box proteins) first discovered more than 10

years ago in Drosophila and are characterized by a shared 100 amino acid DNA-binding motif, termed “forkhead” domain

  • The forkhead transcription factors have been shown to play diverse

roles in development, metabolism, immunology, cancer, and cell-cycle control

  • Forkhead gene number: 39 in Homo

20 in Drosophila 15 in Caenorhabditis 4 in Saccharomyces

Carlsson et al. Developmental Biology 2002

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Forkheads in yeast

  • S.cerevisiae has 4 Forkhead proteins:
  • 1. FHL1 - Pre-rRNA processing
  • 2. HCM1 -
  • 3. FKH1 -
  • 4. FKH2 -
  • Role in mediating Replicative Life Span in

yeasts: Unknown

G2-M transition S phase transition

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Ageing yeasts

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Research goals

Checking whether S.cerevisiae‟s forkhead proteins have a role in mediating RLS.

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Results

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

RLS for forkheads‟ KO strains –

  • ld protocol

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

RLS for fkh1 KO - updated protocol

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

RLS for fkh2 KO - updated protocol

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

RLS for hcm1 KO - updated protocol

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

RLS for all 3 KO

hcm1Δ fkh2Δ fkh1Δ WT Strain 17 24 26 28 Median lifespan

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

RLS of forkhead KO strains

  • ld vs. updated

Old protocol Updated protocol

UPDATED protocol OLD protocol

hcm1Δ fkh2Δ fkh1Δ WT hcm1Δ fkh2Δ fkh1Δ WT strain

17 24 26 28 15.5 26.5 26 20.5

Median

9%

  • 6%

0% 37%

Change 27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Viability test

28

  • 28%
slide-29
SLIDE 29

OLD vs. UPDATED - RLS protocol

1cm 4cm

graveyard

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Synthesis of O/E strains of the

proteins below :

  • FKH1 OE
  • FKH2 OE
  • HCM1 OE
  • FHL1 OE

30

RLS for forkheads‟ O/E strains

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Asc1

HCM1

Pac1

pGEM-T Vector

Restriction with Asc1+Pac1 Restriction with Not1

HCM1 hisG URA3 hisG

HO-R HO-L Transformation To Yeast To the HO locus

M4366

BY4741=MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0

31

Experimental procedure

slide-32
SLIDE 32

FKH1 Over-expression

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

FKH2 Over-expression

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

HCM1 Over-expression

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35
  • 3700bp
  • No luck with cloning

FHL1 Over-expression

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

RLS for FKH1 over-expression

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

RLS for FKH2 over-expression

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

RLS for HCM1 over-expression

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39

RLS for all 3 O/E

HCM1 OE FKH2 OE FKH1 OE WT Strain 27 25 29 30 Median lifespan

39

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Discussion

  • Why didn‟t fkh1Δ, fkh2 Δ & hcm1 Δ have the

same lifespan increase like WT in the updated protocol?

  • Hcm1Δ viability test + 35% decreased in life

span

40

tetO7-HCM1 = stress resistance

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Sum-up

  • Unlike their roles in developed organisms (flies,

nematodes, mice), the yeast forkheads transcription factors do not effects yeasts replicative life span

  • 2X expression (mRNA level) is enough to induce

potential benefits ?

  • 2X in mRNA level doesn‟t always means 2X

protein levels?

  • What about Fhl1?
  • End of part 1

Questions?

BUT

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

RLS measuring by “MEP” assay The Mother Enrichment Program

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Measuring RLS

  • The current „„gold standard‟‟ for

isolating aged mother cells is by micromanipulation

  • 40 yeasts + 3 strains on each plate + Every 90 min.

= 3-4 strains in 3 weeks

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

And then came Gottschling..

  • Using a faster method to analyze RLS of tens
  • f strains without using the micromanipulation

method.

  • Novel genetic method that creates selection

against daughter cell replication, while allowing mother cells to achieve a normal RLS.

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

A Cre-lox mediated selection against daughter cells

  • MEP strain was created using the following way:
  • 1. Loxing of UBC9 and CDC20:

Both are required for the degradation of mitotic cyclins and other targets vital to cell cycle progression

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46
  • 2. Expression of the Cre recombinase

restricted by a daughter-specific promoter derived from SCW11

Daughter specific promoter: controlled by Ace2 TF, which is asymmetrically distributed to daughter cell nuclei prior to cytokinesis. Conditional ability: Cre is fused to an EBD domain (estradiol- binding domain). EBD sequesters the fusion protein in the cytoplasm until estradiol is introduced .

A Cre-lox mediated selection against daughter cells

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47
  • PSCW11-cre-EBD78 expression is restricted to daughter cells.
  • In the absence of estradiol the fusion protein is sequestered in the cytoplasm.
  • Upon ligand binding, the fusion protein is translocated into the nucleus where it

can act on loxP target sites.

  • 3. Illustration of the expected localization of Cre-EBD78

(shading) in response to estradiol.

A Cre-lox mediated selection against daughter cells

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Research goals

Perform a genetic screen for genes that effect RLS by using the MEP assay

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

MEP strain 30 O/N 30 for 3 hr recovering cells/ml

3

10 x 2 ml 25

Estradiol

0 hrs 5 hrs 10 hrs 30 hrs 120 hrs

..…

MEP assay - protocol

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50% of cells are daughters, thus immediately arrested Normal RLS aging behavior

Daughters constituted approximately half of the initial inoculum. These daughter cells are immediately arrested by estradiol, leaving

  • nly a cohort of mother cells in the viable population.

MEP assay - protocol

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Results (2)

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Assay Calibration – Estradiol effects

Diploid , Haploid and Control strains grown for 16 hours in YPD with or without estradiol to verify the effect of estradiol on life span

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

CR & MEP

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

CR & MEP- take 2

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Discussion

  • Why didn‟t I get life span extension by caloric

restriction? Why didn‟t Gottschlings‟ lab check the effects of CR on lifespan?

  • All the genes of interest must be manipulated on

the MEP diploid strain

  • RLS as a function of time -

“As long as the cell division rates remains constant within a cohort of mother cells, viability in liquid culture will be directly proportional to RLS..”

(Gottschling et al. Genetics.2009)

  • It is not possible to do the assay on more than

tens strains at a time.

Micromanipulation

MEP RLS protocol

55

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Discussion

  • MEP as a method to purify aged population
  • As an alternative to micromanipulation, methods were developed to

isolate aged cells from liquid cultures. due to the exponential growth of progeny cells, these populations are technically limited to 7–12 generations before nutrient depletion interferes with replicative aging

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Sum-up

  • A good method to measure RLS and replace

the micromanipulation is yet to be found

  • Possible potential to the MEP as a method to

purify aged population

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58
  • Dr. Haim

Cohen‟s lab

  • Dr. Batia Lerrer
  • Dr. Yariv Kanfi
  • Dr. Gilad Gibor
  • Dr. Yahav Dikstein

Moran Finkel

Noam Maoz

Orshay Gabay Maya Greenbloom Sivan Elchanati Liat Nachum Asaf Gertler Shaul Bert Reuven Gil Shoshana Naiman Shai Lubel Daniel Marton Yael Buchnik

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

59