estradiol resistant mutants
play

Estradiol-resistant mutants Cre-EBD78 itself Genes involved in - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Estradiol-resistant mutants Cre-EBD78 itself Genes involved in localization of the EBD Multidrug resistance Logarithmically growing haploid cells produced resistant mutations at a rate of 1.4*10 -6 per cell division In Diploids


  1. Estradiol-resistant mutants • Cre-EBD78 itself • Genes involved in localization of the EBD • Multidrug resistance • Logarithmically growing haploid cells produced resistant mutations at a rate of 1.4*10 -6 per cell division • In Diploids , 1.4*10 -8 mutations per cell division. 1

  2. In a rapidly growing culture of yeast, ages of individual cells will distribute geometrically, with : 1/2 of the population virgins, 1/4 one-division old mothers , 1/8 two-division-old mothers , 1/16 original mother 2 M. Kaeberlein et al. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008

  3. 3

  4. In search of ageing regulating genes in Baker's yeast Dr. Haim Cohens’ lab. Thesis presentation October 2011 Shaylee Bar 4

  5. What is ageing ? • For many years, ageing research was not popular among molecular biologists • ageing was believed to be a passive , entropic process of deterioration that occurred in a haphazard way. • We know now, however, that the ageing process, like many other biological processes, is subject to regulation by classical signaling pathways and transcription factors . 5

  6. What is ageing ? molecular cellular organ damage 6

  7. Why do we age? Kirkwood et al. Nature 2000 7

  8. Why do we age? Ageing theories • The Mutation Accumulation Theory Suggested by Medawar 8 Kirkwood et al. Nature 2000

  9. Why do we age? Ageing theories • The Theory Antagonistic Pleiotropy Suggested by Williams Kirkwood et al. Nature 2000 9

  10. Why do we age? Ageing theories • The Disposable Soma Theory Suggested by Kirkwood and Holliday Kirkwood et al. Nature 2000 10

  11. Ageing & Environment 11

  12. Ageing & Environment – DR (Dietary Restriction) Dr. Clive McCay 12

  13. Ageing & DR 13 Fontana et al. Science 2010

  14. Ageing & DR Forkheads Forkheads Forkheads Forkheads 14 Kenyon et al. Nature 2010

  15. Sirtuins & Ageing Sir2 - protein deacetylase SIR2 sir2 Δ sir2 Δ + OE SIR2 WT OE M. Kaeberlein et al. Cell Dev. Biol.2008 M. Kaeberlein et al. Genes Dev. 1999 Guarente L Genes Dev.2000 15

  16. Insulin/IGF-1 signaling 16 Kenyon et al. Nature 2010 S. Broughton et al. Biochem.2009

  17. Meet the Forkheads FOX proteins (Forkhead box proteins) first discovered more than 10 • years ago in Drosophila and are characterized by a shared 100 amino acid DNA- binding motif, termed “forkhead” domain The forkhead transcription factors have been shown to play diverse • roles in development, metabolism, immunology, cancer, and cell-cycle control Forkhead gene number: 39 in Homo • 20 in Drosophila 15 in Caenorhabditis 4 in Saccharomyces 17 Carlsson et al. Developmental Biology 2002

  18. Forkheads in yeast • S.cerevisiae has 4 Forkhead proteins: 1. FHL1 - Pre-rRNA processing 2. HCM1 - S phase transition 3. FKH1 - G2-M transition 4. FKH2 - • Role in mediating Replicative Life Span in yeasts: Unknown 18

  19. Ageing yeasts 19

  20. Research goals Checking whether S.cerevisiae‟s forkhead proteins have a role in mediating RLS. 20

  21. Results 21

  22. RLS for forkheads‟ KO strains – old protocol 22

  23. RLS for fkh1 KO - updated protocol 23

  24. RLS for fkh2 KO - updated protocol 24

  25. RLS for hcm1 KO - updated protocol 25

  26. RLS for all 3 KO Strain WT fkh1 Δ fkh2 Δ hcm1 Δ Median lifespan 28 26 24 17 26

  27. RLS of forkhead KO strains old vs. updated Updated protocol Old protocol OLD protocol UPDATED protocol strain WT fkh1 Δ fkh2 Δ hcm1 Δ WT fkh1 Δ fkh2 Δ hcm1 Δ 20.5 26 26.5 15.5 Median 28 26 24 17 37% 0% -6% 9% Change 27

  28. Viability test -28 % 28

  29. OLD vs. UPDATED - RLS protocol graveyard 1cm 4cm 29

  30. RLS for forkheads‟ O/E strains • Synthesis of O/E strains of the proteins below : • FKH1 OE • FKH2 OE • HCM1 OE • FHL1 OE 30

  31. Experimental procedure pGEM-T Vector Pac1 Asc1 HCM1 Restriction with Asc1+Pac1 M4366 Restriction with Not1 hisG hisG URA3 HCM1 HO-L HO-R Transformation To 31 BY4741=MATa his3 Δ 1 leu2 Δ 0 met15 Δ 0 ura3 Δ 0 Yeast To the HO locus

  32. FKH1 Over-expression 32

  33. FKH2 Over-expression 33

  34. HCM1 Over-expression 34

  35. FHL1 Over-expression • 3700bp • No luck with cloning 35

  36. RLS for FKH1 over-expression 36

  37. RLS for FKH2 over-expression 37

  38. RLS for HCM1 over-expression 38

  39. RLS for all 3 O/E Strain WT FKH1 OE FKH2 OE HCM1 OE Median lifespan 30 29 25 27 39

  40. Discussion • Why didn‟t fkh 1 Δ , fkh2 Δ & hcm1 Δ have the same lifespan increase like WT in the updated protocol? • Hcm1 Δ viability test + 35% decreased in life span tetO7-HCM1 = stress resistance 40

  41. Sum-up • Unlike their roles in developed organisms (flies, nematodes, mice), the yeast forkheads transcription factors do not effects yeasts BUT replicative life span • 2X expression (mRNA level) is enough to induce potential benefits ? • 2 X in mRNA level doesn‟t always means 2X protein levels? • What about Fhl1? • End of part 1 Questions? 41

  42. RLS measuring by “MEP” assay The Mother Enrichment Program 42

  43. Measuring RLS • The current „„gold standard‟‟ for isolating aged mother cells is by micromanipulation • 40 yeasts + 3 strains on each plate + Every 90 min. = 3-4 strains in 3 weeks 43

  44. And then came Gottschling.. • Using a faster method to analyze RLS of tens of strains without using the micromanipulation method. • Novel genetic method that creates selection against daughter cell replication, while allowing mother cells to achieve a normal RLS. 44

  45. A Cre-lox mediated selection against daughter cells • MEP strain was created using the following way: 1. Loxing of UBC9 and CDC20: Both are required for the degradation of mitotic cyclins and other targets vital to cell cycle progression 45

  46. A Cre-lox mediated selection against daughter cells 2. Expression of the Cre recombinase restricted by a daughter- specific promoter derived from SCW11 Daughter specific promoter: Conditional ability: controlled by Ace2 TF, which is Cre is fused to an EBD domain (estradiol- asymmetrically distributed to binding domain). EBD sequesters the fusion daughter cell nuclei prior to protein in the cytoplasm until estradiol is cytokinesis. introduced . 46

  47. A Cre-lox mediated selection against daughter cells 3. Illustration of the expected localization of Cre-EBD78 (shading) in response to estradiol. PSCW11-cre-EBD78 expression is restricted to daughter cells. • In the absence of estradiol the fusion protein is sequestered in the cytoplasm. • Upon ligand binding, the fusion protein is translocated into the nucleus where it • can act on loxP target sites. 47

  48. Research goals Perform a genetic screen for genes that effect RLS by using the MEP assay 48

  49. MEP assay - protocol MEP 30 for strain 2 x 10 3 cells/ml 3 hr 30 O/N 25 ml recovering Estradiol ..… 0 hrs 5 hrs 10 hrs 30 hrs 120 hrs 49

  50. MEP assay - protocol 50% of cells are daughters, thus immediately arrested Normal RLS aging behavior Daughters constituted approximately half of the initial inoculum. These daughter cells are immediately arrested by estradiol, leaving only a cohort of mother cells in the viable population. 50

  51. Results (2) 51

  52. Assay Calibration – Estradiol effects Diploid , Haploid and Control strains grown for 16 hours in YPD with or without estradiol to verify the effect of estradiol on life span 52

  53. CR & MEP 53

  54. CR & MEP- take 2 54

  55. Discussion Micromanipulation MEP RLS protocol • Why didn‟t I get life span extension by caloric restriction? Why didn‟t Gottschlings‟ lab check the effects of CR on lifespan? • All the genes of interest must be manipulated on the MEP diploid strain • RLS as a function of time - “As long as the cell division rates remains constant within a cohort of mother cells, viability in liquid culture will be directly proportional to RLS..” (Gottschling et al. Genetics.2009) • It is not possible to do the assay on more than tens strains at a time. 55

  56. Discussion • MEP as a method to purify aged population As an alternative to micromanipulation, methods were developed to • isolate aged cells from liquid cultures. due to the exponential growth of progeny cells, these populations are technically limited to 7 – 12 generations before nutrient depletion interferes with replicative aging 56

  57. Sum-up • A good method to measure RLS and replace the micromanipulation is yet to be found • Possible potential to the MEP as a method to purify aged population 57

  58. Dr. Haim Cohen‟s lab Dr. Batia Lerrer Dr. Yariv Kanfi Dr. Gilad Gibor Dr. Yahav Dikstein Moran Finkel Noam Maoz Orshay Gabay Maya Greenbloom Sivan Elchanati Liat Nachum Asaf Gertler Shaul Bert Reuven Gil Shoshana Naiman Shai Lubel Daniel Marton Yael Buchnik 58

  59. 59

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend