eric nicholls spiral uk ken martin cornwall manufacturers
play

Eric Nicholls Spiral UK Ken Martin Cornwall Manufacturers Group - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Eric Nicholls Spiral UK Ken Martin Cornwall Manufacturers Group 1300 companies (>90% fewer than 10 emps) 19,000 employed 25% self employed 9.5% of Cornwall employment 732m GVA (10% of total) Multiplier 1.51


  1. Eric Nicholls – Spiral UK Ken Martin – Cornwall Manufacturers Group

  2.  1300 companies (>90% fewer than 10 emps)  19,000 employed – 25% self employed  9.5% of Cornwall employment  £732m GVA (10% of total)  Multiplier 1.51  Higher than average pay

  3.  35 companies  3350 employees (20% total)  £130m p.a. into Cornish economy  £500m turnover  94% exported out of Cornwall  42% exported out of UK  GVA £260m (36% of manufacturing GVA)

  4.  Bid by Cornwall Development Company (CDC) and CMG with private sector lead (Eric)  Needed organisation acceptable to SFA for admin – West of England Aerospace Forum (WEAF)  CMG – Project Management  Steering Group chaired by Eric  Quarterly meetings with SFA  Monthly claims

  5.  No risk to SFA  Only claimed when training complete and evidenced  Minimum paperwork for companies – state aid etc  Late start  Monthly claims  3 reprofiles

  6. Origin inal al New EooS 313,000 247,000 Company 549,000 454,000 Total 862,000 701,000 % 36% 35%

  7.  Four strands  Apprenticeships – Cornwall College  Continuous Improvement – South West Manufacturing Advisory Service (SWMAS)  Digital Sales and Marketing – Chartered Institute of Marketing (CIM)  CAD – Falmouth University

  8. Strand nd Old New Actual ual Apprenticeships 20 9 9 Continuous 50 65 75* Improvement CAD 20 22 24* Digital Sales & 20 14 16 Marketing *Possible because cost per participant is lower than originally planned.

  9.  4 strands – 1 company  3 strands – 2 companies  2 strands – 8 companies  1 strand – 9 companies  20 companies in total  18 SMEs

  10.  Power in hands of employers (development money and bespoke courses especially Apprenticeship strand)  Empowered companies – showed benefit of working together  Increased voice  Strengthened relationships  Raised awareness of other training funds and areas of co-operation

  11. Value Added  Problem Solving in companies as non- accredited  Job creation: 2 companies now have 5 apprentices in new posts  Progression: EooS – LRF. Top up to full apprenticeships. Plus 1-3 extra days training at higher level.  KTP – University of Falmouth  Wide eligibility criteria  University continues to be used post training

  12.  Bureaucracy/keeping it simple!!  Herding SMEs  Timescale  Changing circumstances of the companies involved – importance of re-profiling.

  13.  Flexible re-profiling  3 rd party broker for SMEs  Must be simple to administer  Awareness of true cost to company - benefit must outweigh direct and indirect costs  Ability to problem solve within the training  In kind match funding to be taken into account  Non accredited meant companies could get what they wanted and needed  Project Management and Admin costs - linked to project size - differentiation for SME projects

  14.  The project delivered what it said it was going to do  We would like another one just like it that is tailored to companies’ needs.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend