Energy Trust Overview and Measure Development BESF Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Energy Trust Overview and Measure Development BESF Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Energy Trust Overview and Measure Development BESF Presentation 6/15/11 Energy Trust Funding & Incentives Funding for incentives is provided by ratepayers of PGE, Pacific Power, NW Natural and Cascade Natural Gas through a
Energy Trust Funding & Incentives
- Funding for incentives is provided
by ratepayers of PGE, Pacific Power, NW Natural and Cascade Natural Gas through a percentage charge on customer utility bills.
- The Oregon Public Utility
Commission is responsible for
- verseeing Energy Trust
administration of ratepayer funds.
- In 2010, paid more than $71.3
million in incentives for efficiency and renewable energy projects.
Savings that are predicted by your energy model can result in real dollar savings to the owner.
Why are Savings important to you?
Other non-energy benefits (NEB’s) that are realized through energy conservation:
- Marketability (public image)
- Better tenant retention/occupancy rates
- Increased occupant comfort
- Environmental benefits (ex. CO reduction)
Why are Savings important to you?
- Environmental benefits (ex. CO2 reduction)
Why are Savings important to ETO?
- Savings credited to utilities’ IRP
- Used for load forecasting
Energy Efficiency is viewed as a resource equivalent to generation - “The less you consume, the less you have to generate in the first place.”
Why are Savings important to ETO?
Since 2002, cumulative savings total of:
- 254 average megawatts of electricity
- 17.8 million annual therms of natural gas
- Saved participating customers almost $800
million in bills
Effect of Savings to Date – Overall
2009-2010 Savings – New Buildings
“Other” Building types include:
- Assembly
- Auto Services
- Church
- Grocery
- Gym/Athletic Club
- Infrastructure
- Laundry/Dry Cleaners
- Laundry/Dry Cleaners
- Manufacturing
- Parking structure/Garage
- Religious/Spiritual
- Retirement/Assisted Facilities
2009-2010 Savings – Existing Buildings
New Buildings Existing Buildings # projects completed 530 2,500 kWh saved 58,900,000 88,000,000 Therms saved 1,900,000 1,400,000
2009-2011 Commercial Programs
Therms saved 1,900,000 1,400,000 Total incentives paid ($) $10,350,000 $17,000,000
Details on Cost-effectiveness
Societal (Total Resource Cost) B/C
Benefits =All benefits to participant or utility system Costs= All costs borne by consumer or ratepayer
Utility System B/C
Fundamentals - Benefit/Cost Tests
Benefits = All benefits to utility system Costs = All cost to utility system (ET fully allocated cost Both ratios must be 1.0 or better for ETO to invest
Cost-Effectiveness Calculator
Measure # Energy Efficiency Measure Name Measure Lifetime (Maximum 70 yrs) Annual Electricity Savings (kWh) Annual Natural Gas Savings (therms) Total Incremental Cost of Measure Total Potential Incentive If Measure is Cost- effective Combined Utility System BCR Combined Societal BCR Simple Customer Payback w/ Incentive (years) 1 Awesome Energy Efficient Measure 5 100,000 4,000 $20,000 $7,000 6.7 2.3 1.2 Efficient Measure 2 Less Awesome Energy Efficient Measure 5 100,000 4,000 $75,000 $0
- 0.6
7.0 3 Less Awesome Energy Efficient Measure (but with longer lasting flavor) 45 100,000 4,000 $75,000 $18,200 13.9 3.4 5.3
Cost-effectiveness trends
- Cool Roofs/Eco Roofs
Measures that typically have not been cost-effective for ETO
- Insulation (pipe and envelope) beyond
code levels
- Low-e paint
Measures that typically have not been cost-effective for ETO
- Windows (PST shows some cases where
it might be cost-effective)
- Window Films
Measures that typically have not been cost-effective for ETO
- Heat Recovery (incl. drain waste)
Measures that typically have not been cost-effective for ETO
- Motors (now under new fed specs)
- Ice Storage (Peak reduction)
- Behavioral Measures
- Water Heaters in non-restaurants
Measures that typically have not been cost-effective for ETO
- Water Heaters in non-restaurants
- Others?
- Almost everything related to lighting and
lighting controls.
- LED’s are the exception as they are
still an emerging technology
Measures that typically have been cost-effective for ETO
still an emerging technology
- Daylighting as well
- Demand Control Ventilation
- HVAC Controls
Measures that typically have been cost-effective for ETO
- Water heating savings measures
(showerheads, aerators, etc.)
Measures that typically have been cost-effective for ETO
- Refrigeration measures
Measures that typically have been cost-effective for ETO
New Buildings Program Measure Trends
Existing Buildings Program Measure Trends
Measure Analysis and Development
Why
- Increase demand for product
- Drive down product cost over less
efficient alternative How
- Request from PMC
New Measure Analysis
- Request from PMC
- Request from market (A/E firms)
- Regional support - Opportune time for
a coordinated effort
- Pilot effort - ex. Emerging tech.
Measure Development List
Measures Under Analysis Program Sector Measure Name Description Status Building Sector Priority Responsible BE VFD (Variable Frequency Drive) Develop prescriptive VFD measure for BE similar to NBE program Waiting for LMC to initiate blessing memo Office, Retail, School 1 LMC BE Under counter commercial dishwashers Re-do dishwasher analysis to align with upcoming EnergyStar changes. Re-run cost effectiveness test to align with new EnergyStar levels. Foodservice 1 ETO NBM Boiler Pipe insulation Revise old R-8 insulation measures to be more like BE measure. ETO working savings numbers around to keep incentive levels equal. Multi-family 1 ETO BE/NBE Commercial windows Replacement of windows with various U-factor and SHGC combinations for new and existing buildings ICF finalizing PST for both programs Office, Retail, School 2 ICF BE Window Films Tinted window film to lower cooling requirements of commercial buildings Enerlogic has made a product that appears cost-effective for large office
- buildings. Will probably be able to be used
in windows PST, and could find market niche in historic buildings Hospitality/Lodging, schools, grocery, retail, office, hospital 2 LMC niche in historic buildings NBE Controls for EC motors in walk-ins Measure to add a controller or program the EC motor so that fan speed is varied based on refrigerant flow. For a single compressor system, the fan will go to a low speed when compressor stops running. In a multi- plex, a liquid line solenoid valve must be installed so that refrigerant flow can be stopped to the evaporator coil so that refrigerant doesn't go unevaporated through the coil when the fan speed ramps down. PECI is completing a workpaper for the
- Northwest. Is there a demand for this
measure? Grocery 2 PECI BE Case Doors Efficient refrigeration case doors for cases that do not have anti-sweat heaters or controls. PECI looking into grocersmart program for
- savings. Initial findings show .03% of
program, so may not be worth digging further. Grocery 3 LMC BE/NBE Door gaskets for refrg cases Prescriptive measure to replace worn door gaskets for refrigeration cases RTF approved savings. ETO will check to see if cost-effective in our program Grocery 4 ETO BE/NBE LED Parking Lot lighting LED replacement/new lamps for parking lots RTF investigating cost-effectiveness for this measure in their custom program. May adopt similar practices for regional
- consistency. LMC expressed interest.
Retail 5 RTF
Prioritizing Measures
- Quantifiable and repeatable energy
savings across a broad spectrum of building sectors, climates, etc.
- Generally preferred by participants and
program staff
Measure Types - Prescriptive
program staff
- “You get x dollars per piece of
equipment”
- May demonstrate repeatable savings, but
varies across installations & building types
- Not always widget based
- Climate dependant
Measure Types - Custom
- Climate dependant
- Hours of use/occupancy dependant
Example #1-Predictive Savings Tool
Example #2-NB Lighting Tool
New Buildings Program – Typical Project Measure Distribution
- 50% of all projects < 25,000 SF
- 77% of projects pursue
Standard measures
- 70% of project savings come
from projects that pursue some form of energy modeling
2008-2010 Savings – Existing Buildings
Existing Buildings Custom Project Count by Year
When should projects model?
Modeled projects by building size New Buildings (2009 – 2011)
LEED Projects Area (sq.ft) # 0-30,000 14 30-50,000 7 Custom (Modeled) Projects Area (sq.ft) # 0-30,000 1 30-50,000 7 50-70,000 11 > 70,000 35 Total 67 30-50,000 2 50-70,000 7 > 70,000 22 Total 32
When should New Buildings projects model?
- Projects pursuing LEED certification
- Projects > 70,000 SF
- Energy intensity of project type (e.g.
Grocery vs. grade school)
- Pursuing aggressive energy efficiency
strategies (e.g. natural ventilation and radiant floors)
When should Existing Buildings projects model?
- Modeling is recommended when:
- Implementing pneumatic to DDC conversions
(SP reset, ST reset, etc.)
- Estimating savings with heat recovery chillers
- Estimating savings with heat recovery chillers
- Implementing demand-controlled ventilation
(DCV)
- Capturing interactions between two or more
measures
Pilots
Pilot Programs – New Buildings Path to Net Zero
What’s being piloted?
Higher incentives for design process activities (e.g. CFD modeling) Emerging technologies, innovative passive designs, and behavioral measures Monitoring and Reporting feedback loop
Pilot Programs – New Buildings Small Commercial Efficiency Pilot (SCEP)
What’s being piloted?
Design assistance and process checks for smaller, design-build type projects Comprehensive package of Comprehensive package of measures and guide for small commercial buildings; incentives per square foot Green Certification – Earth Advantage Commercial Functional testing requirements
Pilot Programs – Existing Buildings
Building Performance Tracking & Control Systems (BPTaC Systems) What’s being piloted?
Incentives for systems that promote behavioral changes Incentives for low cost control systems Incentives for optimization software that requires no human interface Energy consultant provides feedback of performance and makes recommendations Energy consultant provides feedback of performance and makes recommendations Motivation for increased participation with Existing Building incentives
Results
Final outcome of all this analysis?
Evaluation of projects is used to inform us of predicted vs. actual savings
- NB Realization Rates – 92% gas, 90% elec.
- EB Realization Rates – 97% gas, 98% elec.