Energy Efficiency, Water Conservation, Chemical Optimization Kerry - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

energy efficiency water conservation
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Energy Efficiency, Water Conservation, Chemical Optimization Kerry - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Energy Efficiency, Water Conservation, Chemical Optimization Kerry Ingredients By: Denzel Bibbs MnTAP Advisor: Matt Domski Kerry Supervisor: Brian Morgan Company Background: Kerry Food, ingredients, and flavours Sales in over 140


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Energy Efficiency, Water Conservation, Chemical Optimization Kerry Ingredients

By: Denzel Bibbs MnTAP Advisor: Matt Domski Kerry Supervisor: Brian Morgan

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Company Background: Kerry

  • Food, ingredients, and flavours
  • Sales in over 140 countries
  • Global HQ: Ireland
  • Americas HQ: Beloit, Wisconsin
  • Rochester Manufacturing Site
  • Opened in 1970, acquired in 2004
  • Functional Ingredients & Actives
  • UpGrade™
  • Accel™
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Motivations for Change

Car arbo bon n Emis issio ions ns Wat ater er U Use Was aste

  • 13%
  • 7%
  • 12%

2016 Performance

B A S ELIN E YEA R 2 0 13

  • 2.5%
  • 2.7%
  • 10%

Targets

B A S ELIN E YEA R 2 0 13

KERRY 2015-2020 ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Reasons for MnTAP Assistance

  • Assess energy and chemical usage
  • Reduce environmental impact
  • Electric & natural gas
  • City and well water use
  • Cleaners/chemicals
  • Evaluate savings for proposed ideas
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Supporting Agencies

  • Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5
  • Pollution prevention in food processing industry
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Approach

  • Understand plant utilities
  • Steam usage, water treatment and usage
  • City and well water
  • Contact chemical vendors for chemical

inventory and usage

  • Prioritized investigation
  • Opportunities for improvement
  • Importance to manufacturing process
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Steam System

Softeners Boiler #1 DA Tank Boiler #3 Boiler #4 Process Steam Demand City water Legend Water Steam Condensate Asset Proposed Reverse Osmosis To drain

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Recommendation: Reverse Osmosis (RO)

Recommendation Waste Reduction, per year Savings, per year Payback Period Status Install RO Skid 2.1 million gal water, 68,100 therms $38,600 2.5 years Recommended/ Implementing

  • Improve water chemistry
  • Reduce boiler blowdown
  • Reduce treatment chemical use
  • Cleaner heat transfer surfaces
  • Increase equipment longevity
  • Environment
  • 361 metric tons of CO2

Water Softening for Boiler Water

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Current Sewer

Caustic (basic pH) Lift Pit Plant 60000 gal sewer pit Sulfuric acid To Rochester Wastewater Treatment Plant Legend Wastewater Caustic Base Sulfuric Acid Asset

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Recommendation: Equalization Tank

Prescreen Equalization Tank Transfer Tank Plant Legend Wastewater Caustic Base Sulfuric Acid Asset Sulfuric acid Caustic (basic pH) To Rochester Wastewater Treatment Plant

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Recommendation: Equalization Tank

Recommendation Waste Reduction, per year Savings, per year Payback Period Status Equalization Tank 16,600 lb caustic, 9,400 lb sulfuric acid $8,000 >10 years Recommended/ Implementing

  • Chemical optimization
  • Agitation and dosing within tank
  • Improve acid/base effectiveness
  • 50% caustic reduction & sulfuric acid reduction
  • Prescreen equipment
  • Large debris
slide-12
SLIDE 12

Current Single-Pass Cooling

Well Pump Plant Cooling Load To Stream Legend Water Asset

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Recommendation: Closed Loop Cooling

Water Storage Plant Cooling Load

Heat Exchanger

Glycol Supply City Water Legend Water Asset

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Recommendation: Closed Loop Cooling

  • Significantly reduce well water

consumption

  • Reduce electricity consumption
  • No need to constantly run well pump

Recommendation Waste Reduction, per year Savings, per year Payback Period Status Closed Loop Cooling 200 million gal water $27,000 Needs further review Recommended Glycol Chiller

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Recommendation: Improve Steam Traps

Recommendation Waste Reduction, per year Savings, per year Payback Period Status Improve Pasteurizer HX Steam Traps 270,000 gal water 4,110 therms $2,500 3.5 Needs further review

  • Begin improvement with pasteurizer
  • Reduce new make-up water
  • Natural gas and water savings
  • Improve equipment operation and

maintenance

  • Steam line longevity

Orifice Steam Trap

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Summary

Recommendation Waste Reduction, per year Savings, per year Payback Period Status Install RO Skid 2.1 million gal water, 68,100 therms $38,600 2.5 years Recommended/ Implementing Equalization Tank 16,600 lb caustic, 9,400 lb sulfuric acid $8,000 >10 years Recommended/ Implementing Closed Loop Cooling 200 million gal water $27,000 Needs further review Recommended Improve Pasteurizer HX Steam Traps 270,000 gal water 4110 therms $2,500 3.5 Needs further review

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Additional Ideas

  • LED lighting throughout plant
  • 32W florescent to 18W LED
  • Save 89 kWh/yr-bulb, $8.48/yr-bulb
  • 138 pounds CO2/yr-bulb
  • Dry cleaning process
  • Reduce biological oxygen demand
  • Install additional condensate

pumps and steam traps

600 BHP Boiler

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Personal Takeaways

  • First engineering internship
  • Industry experience and

engagement

  • Problem solving
  • Technical knowledge
slide-19
SLIDE 19

Questions?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Caustic Dosing

1 2 3 50 100 150 200 250 300 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

Number of low pH Violations Caustic (lb) Calendar Day

Caustic Dosing June 2017

Violations Caustic

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Current pH Neutralization

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Additional Ideas: BOD Loading

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000

BOD (lb) Calendar Day

June '17 BOD

BOD Limit

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Additional Ideas: Sewer Charges

BOD TSS TP Ammonia Volume

SEWER CHARGES

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Additional Ideas

  • BOD/TSS removal
  • Dissolved air flotation (Primary)
  • TSS, insoluble BOD
  • 15 year payback period
  • Biological treatment (Secondary)
  • Soluble BOD

Treatment Type BOD reduction (%) TSS reduction (%) BOD cost reduction ($) TSS Cost Reduction ($) Total Cost Savings ($) Primary 25 95 63,000 46,000 109,000 Primary + Secondary 85 95 214,000 46,000 260,000