SLIDE 1
October 16, 2017 Presentation to the Tompkins County Health Planning Council Lee Shurtleff Director Department of Emergency Response
EMS S in in T Tom
- mpk
pkin ins Cou
- unty
EMS S in in T Tom ompk pkin ins Cou ounty nty October 16, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EMS S in in T Tom ompk pkin ins Cou ounty nty October 16, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EMS S in in T Tom ompk pkin ins Cou ounty nty October 16, 2017 Presentation to the Tompkins County Health Planning Council Lee Shurtleff Director Department of Emergency Response ALL CALLS LS DI DISPATCHED CHED 2006 2016 49,537
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
CALLS LLS DI DISP SPATCHED CHED PER ER DI DISCIPLINE CIPLINE
LAW
34,315 45,149
FIRE
4,436 5,017
EMS
10,786 16,060
SLIDE 4
SLIDE 5
SLIDE 6
Fi Fire P e Protec ecti tion
- n Cos
- sts b
ts by T y Town wnsh ship ip
SLIDE 7
Amb mbulance lance – Total tal Responses sponses Dispa patch tched ed
SLIDE 8
Resc escue ue Squa uad d – Fi First R st Resp espon
- nse
se
SLIDE 9
FI FIRE RE RE RESPONSE PONSE TREND RENDS
Fire 1976 2016 Alarms Adjusted Brooktondale 45 67 7 60 Cayuga Heights 112 194 102 92 Etna 45 60 11 49 Danby 55 75 11 64 Dryden 114 320 187 133 Enfield 57 82 8 74 Freeville 36 129 76 53 Groton 101 109 25 84 Ithaca 990 2,410 1,366 1,044 Lansing 172 358 161 197 McLean 39 46 4 42 Newfield 71 102 8 94 Slaterville 39 32 3 29 Speedsville 5 10 1 9 Trumansburg 130 277 89 188 Varna 58 95 18 77 Ithaca 990 2,410 1,366 1,044 All Others 1,078 1,956 711 1,245 Fire 2,068 4,366 2,077 2,289 Rescue 436 4,739 Total 2,068 9,105 Mutual Aid 221 774
SLIDE 10
EM EMS DI DISPATCH CHED ED IN IN COU OUNT NTY
SLIDE 11
PO POPU PULA LATION TION IN INCREASE REASE
SLIDE 12
AGE GE DEM DEMOG OGRAPH RAPHICS ICS
10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000 80,000 90,000 1980 2000 2015 Est. Under 18 Under 60 60+
SLIDE 13
EM EMD D DE DETERMINA ERMINANTS NTS
9886 – Ambulance calls dispatched in County and preliminarily coded 7564 – processed by Dispatch as full PRO-QA 1173 – “send” 1149 – taken by 3rd party, assist, fire, standby
SLIDE 14
CAL ALLS LS BY PR PROTOCOL OCOL
SLIDE 15
FAL ALLS LS in in 20 2016 6 – 1,2 ,228 28
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 TOTAL Teens 30s 50s 70s 90s Female Male Of note: 399 or 32.5% of all calls occurred in a “congregate” living site … and almost half of that number occurred in one site
SLIDE 16
PROTOCOL OCOL 31: UNCO CONSCIOUS NSCIOUS PER ERSON ON
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 <9/>99 Teens 20-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 90-99 Unknown
SLIDE 17
20 2016 6 – EC ECHO HO CAL ALLS LS
SLIDE 18
Sco copes pes of
- f Pr
Prac acti tice ce
SLIDE 19
Amb mbulance ulance Str trength ength – Total tal Cer erti tified ied
SLIDE 20
First st Response sponse EM EMS Certif tification ication Levels els
SLIDE 21
Cer erti tified ed EM EMT/ T/EMS EMS Str tren ength th: Res escue ue Squa uads ds
SLIDE 22
Inc ncre rease se in E n EMS MS – 911 Di Disp spat atched ched Num umber er of
- f Pr
Provi vide ders
SLIDE 23
Con
- nce
cerns rns:
SLIDE 24
Con
- nce
cerns rns:
SLIDE 25
Con
- nce
cerns rns:
SLIDE 26
Con
- nce
cerns rns:
SLIDE 27
Is Is th ther ere a e a me mean ans t s to re
- redu
duce ce ca call l vol
- lumes:
umes:
Falls/elderly Substance abuse Mental Health Leverage health care initiatives
(readmissions - DSRIP)
Community Paramedicine (mobile
integrated health care)
SLIDE 28
EXP XPECT ECTATION TIONS: S:
Have we defined them? Are we meeting them? Can we sustain the EMS system
“as is”?
SLIDE 29
Di Disc scus ussi sion
- n: