Emotion and Cancer: Treatment and Survivorship Lynne Padgett, PhD 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

emotion and cancer treatment and survivorship
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Emotion and Cancer: Treatment and Survivorship Lynne Padgett, PhD 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Emotion and Cancer: Treatment and Survivorship Lynne Padgett, PhD 1 Erin Kent, PhD 1 Nonniekaye Shelburne, MS, CRNP, AOCN 2 Ashley Wilder Smith, PhD, MPH 3 June Peters, MS, CGC, MFT 4 Lindsey Hoskins, M, MS, LGMFT, PhD 4 (1) Office of Cancer


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Emotion and Cancer: Treatment and Survivorship

Lynne Padgett, PhD1 Erin Kent, PhD1 Nonniekaye Shelburne, MS, CRNP, AOCN2 Ashley Wilder Smith, PhD, MPH3 June Peters, MS, CGC, MFT4 Lindsey Hoskins, M, MS, LGMFT, PhD4

(1) Office of Cancer Survivorship, DCCPS; (2) Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Branch, Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, DCCPS; (3) Outcomes Research Branch, Applied Research Program, DCCPS; (4) Clinical Genetics Branch, DCEG

slide-2
SLIDE 2
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Outline

  • Definitions and meaning of cancer survivor/ survivorship
  • The cancer control continuum
  • The survivorship tracks:

(1) typical (2) poor-functioning

  • Lifecourse perspective
  • Caregiving context
  • Socio-cultural factors
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Risk assessment/ Prevention Screening and Detection Diagnosis Treatment Survivorship End of life/ Palliative care Adapted from Rowland and Bellizzi, 2008, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am

Cancer Control Continuum“Revisited”

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Cancer treatment and survivorship

  • “Survivor”:

– An individual from time of diagnosis

  • nward through the balance of his or

her life. – Friends, family members, and caregivers

  • Survivorship research: focus on the physical, emotional,

social, and financial outcomes among pediatric and adult survivors and their friends, families, and caregivers.

  • Survivor identities (Park et al., 2009, J Gen Intern Med):

– “Patient,” “survivor,” “person with cancer,” and “victim”

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Two tracks…

  • 1. Typical: many survivors, who have

healthy levels of pre-cancer emotional functioning)

  • 2. Poor-functioning: those who either

have preexisiting psychological comorbidities or come from stressful contexts)

slide-7
SLIDE 7
  • Distress definition:

a multi-determined unpleasant emotional experience of a psychological, social and/or spiritual nature that may interfere with the ability to cope effectively with cancer, its symptoms and treatment.

  • National Comprehensive Cancer

Network, 2002

One Dominant Emotion: Distress

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Tracks

Responses to Distress

Blunted High Time since diagnosis Distress

Diagnosis Treatment End of Treatment No Evidence

  • f

Disease Recurrence

  • r

progression Advanced Cancer or Treatment Failure End of Life

Typical

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Consider the Lifecourse

  • Emotional response may differ for survivors and caregivers,

depending on the age/developmental stage of survivor

– Children (age 0-14) – Adolescents, Young Adults (AYA) (age 15-39) – Middle aged adults (age 40-59) – Older Adults (age 60+)

  • Impact on family differs by age/life

stage

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Family Caregivers

Risk Factors Caregiver age Caregiver gender Education level Spirituality Disease status Treatment intensity Relationship Responsibilities Coping methods Income concerns

  • Physical Outcomes

Lack of sleep Unhealthy & irregular eating Fatigue Decreased physical activity Chronic disease management Accelerated aging

  • Emotional Outcomes

Emotional distress Anxiety Depression Posttraumatic stress symptoms Anger Loss of Role Stress Guilt

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Multiple levels of socio-cultural factors

Policy

  • ex. Survivorship care planning,

standard s of care

Community/Culture

  • ex. work, school, neighborhood,

heritage

Healthcare Team

Healthcare providers, patient navigators

Family/Caregivers Survivor

Adapted from Stokols, 1996, American Journal of Health Promotion

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Socio-cultural perspectives

  • n cancer survivorship
  • Cancer survivorship, in terms of emotional health,

entails meaning-making

– Differs across individuals and across socio-cultural scales

  • Survivorship interventions should be tested in any

new population and then tailored to be relevant, sensitive, and meaningful for specific groups.

  • Big need for qualitative research to understand how

experiences in treatment and survivorship unfold for different cultural groups and quantitative research to expand inclusion of understudied groups

slide-13
SLIDE 13

End of Life and Palliative Care

  • Time of heightened emotion for survivors and

their family

  • Decisions to accept or decline treatment
  • Elevated levels of emotion for

– Decision to stop treatment – End of life care – Death

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Summary

  • Definitions and meaning of cancer survivor/ survivorship
  • The cancer control continuum
  • The survivorship tracks:

(1) typical (2) poor-functioning

  • Lifecourse perspective
  • Caregiving context
  • Socio-cultural factors
slide-15
SLIDE 15

References

1.Alfano CM, Rowland JH (2006) Recovery issues in cancer survivorship: a new challenge for supportive care. Cancer J 12: 432- 443 2.Park CL, Zlateva I, Blank TO (2009) Self-identity after cancer: "survivor", "victim", "patient", and "person with cancer." J Gen Intern Med 24 Suppl 2: S430-435

  • 3. Stokols D (1996) Translating social ecological theory into guidelines

for community health promotion. Am J Health Promot 10: 282-298

  • 4. Rowland JH, Bellizzi KM (2008) Cancer survivors and survivorship

research: a reflection on today's successes and tomorrow's

  • challenges. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 22: 181-200, v
  • 5. Stein KD, Syrjala KL, Andrykowski MA (2008) Physical and

psychological long-term and late effects of cancer. Cancer 112: 2577-2592

slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Extra slides for handouts

slide-18
SLIDE 18

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011 2016

Number in millions Year

Estimated Number Cancer Survivors in the US 1971 - 2006

Projections including and excluding in situ 2007-2020 U.S. Estimated Prevalence counts (excluding in situ) Projections including in situ Projections excluding in situ

Warren et al., Current and Future Utilization of Services From Medical Oncologists, JCO, 2008

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Glass & McAtee, 2006, Social Science & Medicine