EMILIO MORDINI, M.D. DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRE FOR SCIENCE, SOCIETY AND - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
HONG KONG HONG KONG 4.5 JANUARY 2010 JANUARY EMILIO MORDINI, M.D. DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRE FOR SCIENCE, SOCIETY AND CITIZENSHIP ROME (IT) ROME (IT) RISING PAN EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL AWARENESS OF AWARENESS OF BIOMETRICS AND SECURITY ETHICS
HONG KONG JANUARY HONG KONG 4.5 JANUARY 2010
EMILIO MORDINI, M.D. DIRECTOR OF THE CENTRE FOR SCIENCE, SOCIETY AND CITIZENSHIP‐ ROME (IT) ROME (IT)
RISING PAN‐EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL AWARENESS OF AWARENESS OF BIOMETRICS AND SECURITY ETHICS www.riseproject.eu
M h 8 F b 1 March 2009 ‐ 28 Feb 2012
A RESEARCH PROJECT FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION ETHICS AND GOVERNANCE UNIT IN THE SCOPE COMMISSION ETHICS AND GOVERNANCE UNIT IN THE SCOPE OF THE FP7
1.
Centre for Science, Society and Citizenship (Italy)
2.
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Greece) y
3.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Biometric Research Center (China) C f P li E i T h l i (U i d
4.
Centre for Policy on Emerging Technologies (United States)
5
Lancaster University (United Kingdom)
5.
Lancaster University (United Kingdom)
6.
European Biometric Forum (Ireland)
7.
Global Security Intelligence LLC (United States) y g
8.
Data Security Council of India (India)
9.
University of Tartu (Estonia)
12/March/2009 RISE ‐ KOM 12‐13 march 2009, Rome 4
http://www.riseproject.eu
BITE 2004‐2007 HIDE 2008‐2011 RISE 2009‐2012 BITE 2004 2007 HIDE 2008 2011 9
From 01/10/2004 to February 2007
B l 6 D
Brussels 15‐16 Dec 2005 Convened by DG Research Art 29 WP chair Art.29 WP chair Director and delegates from
US DHS Privacy Office US DHS Privacy Office
50 experts mainly from EU,
USA
Convened by DHS and
US Visit Program
EU delegates from DG
R h BEPA Research, BEPA, Art.29 WP
80 partipants from 9 80 partipants from 9
different countries
November, 28 – 29 2006 Washington DC g
Jerusalem 2‐4 September
2006: IDENTITY SECURITY 2006: IDENTITY. SECURITY AND DEMOCRACY f 30 participants from 14 countries, Israel, France, Belg ium, Italy, Slovenia, Bulgaria, ium, Italy, Slovenia, Bulgaria, Netherlands, Denmark, USA, Latvia, UK, Germany, Poland, P l ti i A th iti Palestinian Authorities.
HOMELAND SECURITY,
BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION & IDENTIFICATION & PERSONAL DETECTION ETHICS ETHICS www.hideproject.eu
F b 8 J 1 Feb 2008 ‐ 31 Jan 2011
HIDE + Technology BITE Oriented
PERMANENT INTERNATIONAL INITIATIVE ON
EXPLORATORY
RISE
INITIATIVE ON ETHICS AND POLICY OF
RISE + Policy O i t d
BIOMETRICS
Oriented
1.
ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI (GREECE)
2.
CENTRE FOR POLICY ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES (UNITED STATES)
1.
IBMG UNIVERSITY OF ROTTERDAM (NETHERLANDS)
2.
INTERNATIONAL BIOMETRICS GROUP (USA) ( )
3.
CENTRE FOR SCIENCE, SOCIETY AND CITZENSHIP (ITALY) – COORDINATOR
4.
UNIVERSITY OF ROME LA SAPIENZA (ITALY)
5
DATA SECURITY COUNCIL OF INDIA ( )
3.
INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION OF MIGRATION (UNITED NATIONS)
4.
LANCASTER UNIVERSITY (UNITED KINGDOM)
5
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE
5.
DATA SECURITY COUNCIL OF INDIA (INDIA)
6.
ESA COMMUNICATION (ITALY)
7.
EUROPEAN BIOMETRIC FORUM (IRELAND)
8
EUTELIS (ITALY)
5.
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE (SINGAPORE)
6.
OPTEL (POLAND)
7.
SAGEM SECURITE’ (FRANCE)
8.
THE HASTING CENTER (USA) THE HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC
8.
EUTELIS (ITALY)
9.
FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE (GERMANY)
10.
GLOBAL SECURITY INTELLIGENCE LLC (UNITED STATES)
11.
HUMANSCAN (SWITZERLAND‐
9.
THE HONG KONG POLYTECHNIC UNIVERSITY (CHINA)
10.
UNIVERSITY OF LIJBLJANA (SLOVENIA)
11.
UNIVERSITY OF TARTU (ESTONIA)
12.
ZUYD UNIVERSITY(THE NETHERLANDS) GERMANY)
Spain Switzerland Turkey Ukraine N Z l d Portugal Singapore Slovenia p Italy Latvia Malta New Zealand Series1 European Commission France Greece Ireland A i Brazil Canada Czech Republic p
16
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Argentina Austria
17
l b l l b l bili bili
Mass of People in transit too huge to be
1) Global 1) Global Human Human Mobility Mobility
Mass of People in transit too huge to be handled in traditional ways
) U li bl Id i D 2) Unreliable Identity Documents
Too many people without reliable documents. Too Too many people without reliable documents. Too many unreliable States
3) Global Identity Management 3) y g
Digital Identities, dispersed and globalised g p g
Advances in transport and communications are determining factors in the Advances in transport and communications are determining factors in the globalization process, and wider access to these technologies has increased the mobility of people, goods and services
Source: Population Action International 1994 20
Current Current Mobility Mobility ……. …….
Source: Population Action International 1994 21
Estimated Global Mobile Populations > 800 million
21st Century’s Migration……. 21st Century’s Migration…….
Source: Population Action International 1994 23
I ld t h l ll St t i d l i t i In a world system where nearly all States in developing countries are not able to provide their citizens with reliable identity documents, biometrics is likely to be the sole hope for most third documents, biometrics is likely to be the sole hope for most third world inhabitants to have trustworthy identity documents
29
Around 51 million children born in 2006 have not had their births registered. Forty‐four per cent of these children live in South Asia. One in three developing countries has birth registration rates of less than 50 per cent. Two out of three African children under age five are not registered.
UNREGISTERED CHILDREN
b f l l An increasing number of online applications require a reliable means of identification of users, the whole b h l b d web architecture is increasingly based on certain digital identities
Internet banking, online trading, remote management
access to personal information require certain digital identities.
The conventional means of identification (e g passwords personal (e.g.passwords, personal identification numbers) can be easily compromised, observed
e.mordini@bioethics.it
Identity management is going to become a more critical factor in grid and cloud computing in grid and cloud computing given the need to manage interactions between hubs and i h li Bi i periphery clients. Biometrics – including voice recognition, human‐machine g , interactions, touch user‐ interfaces with the Internet – will be more prevalent in order be
to create trusted digital identities
If one focuses only on privacy risks, it is unlikely that he finds sol tions solutions. Enlarged conversation should foster both respect for privacy foster both respect for privacy and technology innovation. The concept of privacy aware technology can be misleading: all technology must become privacy aware.
The idea that privacy is only an issue of western countries is i l di d h ld b misleading and should be abandoned. In a globalized, borderless world India and China are not world, India and China are not “fast‐moving, unregulated competitors” but are policy actors competitors but are policy actors which can offer interesting solutions to governance g problems in this area.
The development and deployment
technologies systems and technologies, systems, and applications show that privacy and biometrics policies are inextricably p y
Privacy involve politics and public li h it d l d policy as much as it does law and technology. By involving different stakeholders By involving different stakeholders and perspectives it is possible to
l win‐win solutions.
Aeschylus “Prometheus Bound”
And thank to the Polytechnic of HK Prof Polytechnic of HK, Prof Zhang, and all his staff for the great efforts ! for the great efforts !