Emerging Energy Issues and North Carolina Trends April 3, 2019 Ta - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

emerging energy issues and north carolina trends
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Emerging Energy Issues and North Carolina Trends April 3, 2019 Ta - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Emerging Energy Issues and North Carolina Trends April 3, 2019 Ta Table of Contents Methodology Voter Intensity Overview NC Trends Ideological Overview Clean Energy Alternative Issue Set Voter Sentiment Demographic


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Emerging Energy Issues and North Carolina Trends

April 3, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Ta Table of Contents

  • Methodology
  • Voter Intensity Overview
  • NC Trends
  • Ideological Overview
  • Clean Energy Alternative Issue Set
  • Voter Sentiment
  • Demographic Overview
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Me Metho thodo dology

This poll of 600 registered voters living in North Carolina was conducted via telephone by professional interviewers over the course of two nights, March 17 & 18, 2019. Interview selection was random within predetermined election units. These units were structured to correlate with actual voter participation from past midterm/Presidential General Election cycles. The poll of 600 likely general election voters has an accuracy of +/- 4.00% at a 95% confidence interval. Paul Shumaker served as project manager and Hays Shumaker as research coordinator.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Vo Voter Intensity

80.2% 10.3% 9.5% A L W A YS A L M O ST A L W A YS MO ST O F THE TIME

N=600

80.3% 80.7% 79.2% 9.2% 9.9% 12.5% 10.5% 9.5% 8.3% R EP U BL I C A N D EMO C RA T U N A F F I L I A ED

Always Almost Always Most of the time

84.6% 75.3% 82.5% 79.8% 84.3% 9.4% 12.1% 8.9% 11.0% 7.9% 6.0% 12.6% 8.5% 9.2% 7.9% L I BER A L MO D ERA TE C O NSER V A T IV E V O T E D EM O C R A T V O T E R EP U BL I C A N

Always Almost Always Most of the time

slide-5
SLIDE 5

NC NC Voter er Regi egistr trati tion Tren ends

47.52% 45.93% 45.79% 44.73% 43.28% 41.92% 41.21% 40.51% 39.70% 39.15% 38.17% 38.10% 37.6% 34.53% 34.70% 31.98% 31.63% 30.97% 30.49% 30.59% 30.63% 30.30% 30.38% 30.04% 29.90% 30.3% 17.96% 19.37% 22.23% 23.64% 25.75% 27.59% 28.19% 28.86% 30.00% 29.97% 31.07% 32.00% 32.1%

May 2004 May 2006 November 2008 November 2010 November 2012 November 2014 November 2015 April 2016 November 2016 April 2017 May 2018 November 2018 March 2019

Democrats Republicans Unaffiliated

slide-6
SLIDE 6

NC NC Id Ideo eologi gical Tren ends

44.0% 33.7% 29.5% 42.0% 28.8% 32.0% 22.7% 24.0% 16.4% 23.1% 19.7% 21.5% 23.0% 14.5% 11.4% 23.0% 3.5% 3.0%

  • 18.7%
  • 12.2%
  • 24.0%
  • 19.2%
  • 19.5%
  • 16.5%

74.0% 62.9% 59.2% 75.0% 63.8% 75.0% 75.6% 79.1% 70.4% 74.8% 74.1% 76.3% 29.0% 16.2% 15.2% 29.0% 33.7% 26.0% 24.8% 14.4% 16.4% 20.0% 17.6% 22.0%

September 1996 October 1998 October 2000 September 2004 September 2008 August 2010 October 2012 October 2014 August 2015 April 2016 September 2018 March 2019

North Carolina Democrats Republicans Unaffilated

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Pa Partisan Ideological Breaks

3.5% 34.6% 14.9% 19.5% 12.7% 43.2% 39.3% 33.0% 79.8% 18.1% 36.9% 41.0% 76.3%

  • 16.5%

22.0% 21.5%

  • 40.0%
  • 20.0%

0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Republican Democrat Unaffiliated NC Net Dif. Conservative Moderate Liberal

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Id Ideo eologi gical In Inten ensity y Profile

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Lived in NC <5 Years Lived in NC 6-10 Years Lived in NC 11-20 Years Lived in NC>20 Years Lived in NC Entire Life Very Lib. Somewhat Lib. Moderate Somewhat Cons. Very Cons. DK/Refused 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Always Democrat Usually Democrat Splits Ticket Usually Republican Always Republican Very Lib. Somewhat Lib. Moderate Somewhat Cons. Very Cons. DK/Refused 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Republican Democrat Unaffiliated NC

N=600

Very Lib. Somewhat Lib. Moderate Somewhat Cons. Very Cons. DK/Refused

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Wo Would you be more likely to support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate who su supports s polici cies that encourage the development of more fossil fuel energy such ch as as coal al an and oil? il?

49.3% 52.3% 47.2% 44.8% 42.5% 43.2% 5.8% 5.2% 9.7% N=600 2017 N=600 2018 N=600 2019

Support Oppose DK/Refused

3 Year Trend Data

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Wo Would you be more likely to support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate who supports polici cies that encourage the development of more fossil fuel energy such ch as coal and oil?

47.2% 43.2% 9.7% SU P P O R T O P P O SE D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Support Oppose DK/Refused Republican 173 74.0% 15.6% 10.4% Democrat 243 30.0% 63.4% 6.6% Unaffiliated 168 45.8% 41.1% 13.1% Vote Democratic 282 23.8% 70.2% 6.0% Vote Republican 242 77.3% 11.6% 11.2% Vote Undecided 76 38.2% 43.4% 18.4% Urban 92 33.7% 57.6% 8.7% Suburban 241 42.7% 48.1% 9.1% Rural 247 55.5% 34.4% 10.1% N= Support Oppose DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 41.7% 41.7% 16.6% NC 6-10 Years 38 23.7% 65.8% 10.5% NC 11-20 Years 94 34.0% 57.4% 8.5% NC>20 Years 217 48.4% 42.9% 8.8% NC Entire Life 211 55.9% 34.1% 10.0% Male 282 53.9% 37.9% 8.2% Female 318 41.2% 47.8% 11.0% Suburban White Female 93 38.7% 52.7% 8.6%

2019 Data Set

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Wo Would you be more likely to support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate who supports polici cies that encourage renewable energy options such ch as wind, solar, and waste to energy tech chnologies?

86.8% 86.5% 83.2% 85.2% 84.8% 10.3% 10.6% 11.8% 9.2% 10.5% 3.0% 2.9% 5.0% 5.7% 4.7%

N=800 2015 N=800 2016 N=600 2017 N=600 2018 N=600 2019

Support Oppose DK/Refused

5 Year Trend Data

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Wo Would you be more likely to support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate who supports polici cies that encourage renewable energy options such ch as wind, solar, and waste to energy tech chnologies?

84.8% 10.5% 4.7% SU P P O R T O P P O SE D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Support Oppose DK/Refused Republican 173 75.7% 16.8% 7.5% Democrat 243 93.4% 4.9% 1.6% Unaffiliated 168 81.0% 12.5% 6.5% Vote Democratic 282 94.7% 3.2% 2.1% Vote Republican 242 71.9% 19.8% 8.3% Vote Undecided 76 89.5% 7.9% 2.6% Urban 92 92.4% 4.3% 3.3% Suburban 241 83.4% 11.6% 5.0% Rural 247 84.6% 11.3% 4.0% N= Support Oppose DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% NC 6-10 Years 38 89.5% 10.5% 0.0% NC 11-20 Years 94 87.2% 6.4% 6.4% NC>20 Years 217 83.4% 11.5% 5.1% Male 282 82.6% 13.1% 4.3% Female 318 86.8% 8.2% 5.0% Suburban White Female 93 86.0% 8.6% 5.4%

2019 Data Set

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Wo Would you be more likely to support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate wh who su supports s legisl slation that would provide additional ways s for home or business owners to finance ce energy effici ciency cy upgrades such ch as improved in insulat latio ion, lig lightin ing, or win indows?

87.6% 84.9% 88.8% 87.3% 88.5% 8.9% 10.8% 5.7% 9.5% 6.3% 3.5% 3.5% 5.5% 3.2% 5.2%

N=800 2015 N=800 2016 N=600 2017 N=600 2018 N=600 2019

Support Oppose DK/Refused

5 Year Trend Data

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Wo Would you be more likely to support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate wh who su supports s legisl slation that would provide additional ways s for home or business owners to finance ce energy effici ciency cy upgrades such ch as improved in insulat latio ion, lig lightin ing, or win indows?

88.5% 6.3% 5.2% SU P P O R T O P P O SE D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Support Oppose DK/Refused Republican 173 80.3% 9.2% 10.4% Democrat 243 96.7% 2.5% 0.8% Unaffiliated 168 85.7% 7.7% 6.5% Vote Democratic 282 96.1% 2.5% 1.4% Vote Republican 242 78.9% 11.6% 9.5% Vote Undecided 76 90.8% 3.9% 5.3% Urban 92 94.6% 1.1% 4.3% Suburban 241 86.7% 6.6% 6.6% Rural 247 87.4% 8.5% 4.0% N= Support Oppose DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 95.8% 0.0% 4.2% NC 6-10 Years 38 92.1% 7.9% 0.0% NC 11-20 Years 94 93.6% 3.2% 3.2% NC>20 Years 217 83.9% 7.8% 8.3% NC Entire Life 211 89.1% 7.1% 3.8% Male 282 89.0% 6.0% 5.0% Female 318 88.2% 6.6% 5.3% Suburban White Female 93 89.2% 5.4% 5.4%

2019 Data Set

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Wo Would you be more likely to support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate wh who supports incr creasing acce ccess to natural gas resource ces by placi cing a priority on pipeline development and new pipeline co construct ction?

55.8% 55.8% 62.5% 34.5% 34.5% 29.3% 9.7% 9.7% 8.7% N=600 2017 N=600 2018 N=600 2019

Support Oppose DK/Refused

3 Year Trend Data

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Wo Would you be more likely to support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate wh who supports incr creasing acce ccess to natural gas resource ces by placi cing a priority

  • n pipeline development and new pipeline co

construct ction?

62.5% 29.3% 8.7% SU P P O R T O P P O SE D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Support Oppose DK/Refused Republican 173 81.5% 10.4% 8.1% Democrat 243 48.6% 42.8% 8.6% Unaffiliated 168 63.7% 31.0% 5.4% Vote Democratic 282 43.3% 46.5% 10.3% Vote Republican 242 87.6% 7.4% 5.0% Vote Undecided 76 53.9% 35.5% 10.5% Urban 92 46.7% 43.5% 9.8% Suburban 241 61.4% 29.9% 8.7% Rural 247 68.0% 24.7% 7.3% N= Support Oppose DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 50.0% 50.0% 0.0% NC 6-10 Years 38 57.9% 34.2% 7.9% NC 11-20 Years 94 51.1% 35.1% 13.8% NC>20 Years 217 61.8% 30.9% 7.4% NC Entire Life 211 68.2% 23.7% 8.1% Male 282 72.0% 19.9% 8.2% Female 318 54.1% 37.7% 8.2% Suburban White Female 93 50.5% 41.9% 7.5%

2019 Data Set

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Wo Would you be more likely to support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate who wants to ch change North Carolina's energy regulatory polici cies to allow for more co competition and co consumer ch choice ce?

81.3% 9.0% 9.7% SU P P O R T O P P O SE D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Support Oppose DK/Refused Republican 173 82.7% 7.5% 9.8% Democrat 243 76.1% 13.2% 10.7% Unaffiliated 168 86.3% 5.4% 8.3% Vote Democratic 282 79.8% 9.2% 11.0% Vote Republican 242 85.1% 6.2% 8.7% Vote Undecided 76 75.0% 17.1% 7.9% Urban 92 82.6% 12.0% 5.4% Suburban 241 80.9% 7.5% 11.6% Rural 247 84.2% 7.3% 8.5% N= Support Oppose DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 75.0% 12.5% 12.5% NC 6-10 Years 38 84.2% 5.3% 10.5% NC 11-20 Years 94 86.2% 6.4% 7.4% NC>20 Years 217 82.5% 7.8% 9.7% NC Entire Life 211 80.6% 11.4% 8.1% Male 282 86.9% 6.4% 6.7% Female 318 76.4% 11.3% 12.3% Suburban White Female 93 74.2% 7.5% 18.3%

2019 Data Set

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Wo Would you be more likely to support or oppose a lawmaker or candidate wh who su supports s off-shore drilling exploration for natural gas off the co coast of No North Carolina?

46.8% 45.0% 8.2% SU P P O R T O P P O SE D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Support Oppose DK/Refused Republican 173 71.7% 20.2% 8.1% Democrat 243 30.5% 62.1% 7.4% Unaffiliated 168 45.2% 45.8% 8.9% Vote Democrat 282 27.0% 67.0% 6.0% Vote Republican 242 73.6% 17.8% 8.7% Vote Undecided 76 35.5% 50.0% 14.5% Urban 92 34.8% 57.6% 7.6% Suburban 241 43.2% 49.4% 7.5% Rural 247 53.8% 38.1% 8.1% N= Support Oppose DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 50.0% 45.8% 4.2% NC 6-10 Years 38 28.9% 63.2% 7.9% NC 11-20 Years 94 37.2% 57.4% 5.3% NC>20 Years 217 46.1% 43.3% 10.6% NC Entire Life 211 54.5% 39.3% 6.2% Male 282 57.1% 37.2% 5.7% Female 318 37.7% 51.9% 10.4% Suburban White Female 93 29.0% 62.4% 8.6%

2019 Data Set

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Which ch one of the following do you think is the number one ca cause for elect ctrici city rates to incr crease in North Carolina?

2019 N= CO's/High er Profits Lack of Comp. Supply & Demand Renewable Mandates Cost Generate / Incrs. DK/Refus ed Republican 173 24.9% 38.2% 7.5% 9.2% 6.4% 13.9% Democrat 243 47.7% 23.9% 10.7% 5.8% 4.1% 7.8% Unaffiliated 168 28.6% 33.9% 7.7% 11.3% 8.3% 10.1% Vote Democratic 282 48.2% 24.1% 11.0% 4.3% 5.3% 7.1% Vote Republican 242 22.3% 35.1% 6.2% 15.3% 7.4% 13.6% Vote Undecided 76 31.6% 42.1% 7.9% 2.6% 3.9% 11.8% Urban 92 48.9% 29.3% 6.5% 4.3% 2.2% 8.7% Suburban 241 31.5% 34.9% 11.6% 5.8% 7.1% 9.1% Rural 247 35.2% 28.7% 6.1% 13.4% 6.9% 9.7% 2019 N= CO's/Hig her Profits Lack of Comp. Supply & Demand Renewable Mandates Cost Generate/ Incrs. DK/Refus ed NC <5 Years 24 37.5% 16.7% 16.7% 20.8% 4.2% 4.2% NC 6-10 Years 38 44.7% 34.2% 5.3% 0.0% 5.3% 10.5% NC 11-20 Years 94 30.9% 44.7% 6.4% 5.3% 2.1% 10.6% NC>20 Years 217 38.2% 28.1% 9.2% 9.2% 7.8% 7.4% NC Entire Life 211 34.6% 29.4% 9.0% 10.0% 5.7% 11.4% Male 282 30.9% 35.1% 8.2% 10.3% 7.8% 7.8% Female 318 39.9% 27.0% 9.1% 6.9% 4.4% 12.6% Suburban White Female 93 40.9% 29.0% 9.7% 2.2% 4.3% 14.0%

33.3% 38.9% 38.3% 40.3% 35.7% 28.1% 24.0% 24.7% 24.3% 30.8% 12.8% 9.9% 10.3% 10.2% 8.7% 7.1% 8.5% 10.3% 9.3% 8.5% 8.0% 8.6% 7.2% 6.8% 6.0% 10.8% 10.1% 9.2% 9.0% 10.3% N=800 2015 N=800 2016 N=600 2017 N=600 2018 N=600 2019

CO's/Higher Profits Lack of Comp. Supply & Demand Renewable Mandates Cost Generate/ Incrs. DK/Refused

5 Year Data Trend

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Which ch of the following do you think is the most important to you and you think should be the top priority for lawmakers to co consider?

2019 N= Invest Clean Energy More Comp. Oil/Gas Explor. Low Cost/- less Env. Cont. Coal DK/Refus ed Republican 173 28.3% 32.9% 19.1% 7.5% 7.5% 4.6% Democrat 243 67.1% 14.4% 3.3% 6.2% 3.3% 5.8% Unaffiliated 168 45.2% 29.8% 11.3% 5.4% 4.2% 4.2% Vote Democratic 282 72.0% 14.2% 2.5% 5.0% 1.8% 4.6% Vote Republican 242 23.1% 32.6% 21.1% 9.1% 9.1% 5.0% Vote Undecided 76 51.3% 32.9% 3.9% 3.9% 2.6% 5.3% Urban 92 65.2% 16.3% 7.6% 6.5% 3.3% 1.1% Suburban 241 49.4% 25.7% 11.6% 6.2% 2.9% 4.1% Rural 247 45.3% 25.9% 9.7% 7.3% 6.5% 5.3% 2019 N= Invest Clean Energy More Comp. Oil/Gas Explor. Low Cost/-less Env.

  • Cont. Coal DK/Refused

NC <5 Years 24 62.5% 20.8% 4.2% 8.3% 0.0% 4.2% NC 6-10 Years 38 55.3% 21.1% 7.9% 10.5% 5.3% 0.0% NC 11-20 Years 94 56.4% 24.5% 9.6% 5.3% 2.1% 2.1% NC>20 Years 217 49.8% 23.5% 13.4% 6.5% 4.1% 2.8% NC Entire Life 211 45.0% 25.6% 8.1% 6.6% 6.2% 8.5% Male 282 41.1% 27.3% 15.6% 5.0% 6.0% 5.0% Female 318 57.2% 21.1% 5.3% 7.9% 3.8% 4.7% Suburban White Female 93 64.5% 19.4% 5.4% 4.3% 2.2% 4.3%

47.5% 53.6% 49.2% 49.7% 49.7% 20.5% 18.6% 21.3% 21.3% 24.0% 15.1% 10.9% 13.3% 11.0% 10.2% 5.9% 5.8% 6.7% 6.8% 6.5% 6.4% 5.9% 5.2% 6.7% 4.8% 4.6% 5.3% 4.3% 4.5% 4.8% N=800 2015 N=800 2016 N=600 2017 N=600 2018 N=600 2019

Invest Clean Energy More Comp. Oil/Gas Explor. Low Cost/ -less Env.

  • Cont. Coal

DK/Refused

5 Year Trend Data

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Do you believe cl climate ch change is real and we are seeing the effect cts with dramatic c shifts in our weather or that cl climate ch change is not real and air pollution from man has had very little impact ct in our weather patterns?

66.2% 25.0% 8.8% R EA L NO T REA L D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Real Not Real DK/Refused Republican 173 42.8% 45.1% 12.1% Democrat 243 88.1% 7.8% 4.1% Unaffiliated 168 58.3% 29.2% 12.5% Vote Democratic 282 92.6% 5.0% 2.5% Vote Republican 242 33.9% 50.8% 15.3% Vote Undecided 76 71.1% 17.1% 11.8% Urban 92 84.8% 12.0% 3.3% Suburban 241 65.1% 23.2% 11.6% Rural 247 61.1% 30.4% 8.5% N= Real Not Real DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 83.3% 12.5% 4.2% NC 6-10 Years 38 71.1% 13.2% 15.8% NC 11-20 Years 94 71.3% 19.1% 9.6% NC>20 Years 217 65.0% 25.3% 9.7% NC Entire Life 211 63.0% 29.9% 7.1% Male 282 57.1% 31.9% 11.0% Female 318 74.2% 18.9% 6.9% Suburban White Female 93 74.2% 21.5% 4.3%

2019 Data Set

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Renewables are Not About the Environment, They’re About Economics

Message Test Climate Change Real (N=397) Not Real (N=150)

A lawmaker or candidate who supports policies that encourage the development of more fossil fuel energy such as

  • il and coal?

32.7 % Support 84.7% Support A lawmaker or candidate who supports policies that encourage renewable energy options such as wind, solar and waste to energy technologies? 95.0% Support 64.0% Support A lawmaker or candidate who supports legislation that would provide additional ways for home or business owners to finance energy efficiency upgrades such as improved insulation, lighting or windows? 93.7% Support 78.0% Support A lawmaker or candidate who supports increasing access to Natural Gas resources by placing a priority on pipeline development and new pipeline construction? 50.6% Support 86.0% Support A lawmaker or candidate who wants to change North Carolina’s energy regulatory policies to allow for more competition and consumer choice? 79.1% Support 87.3% Support A lawmaker or candidate who supports Off-shore-drilling exploration for natural gas off the coast of North Carolina? 32.5% Support 78.0% Support Our current system of a public utility where access to electricity is controlled by one source has served us well and will continue to do so in the future? 11.1% Agree 20.7% Agree Solar and Wind bring very little benefit to our energy supply and are just feel good programs promoted by politicians. 4.8% Agree 40.0% Agree Do you think lawmakers should change this law to allow individuals and businessowners the ability to sell their excess power and provide consumers more choice, or do you think things should stay the same? 73.3% Change the Law 70.0% Change the Law We need of modernize the current system by relying more on micro-grids and renewable energy sources such as wind and solar 81.4% Agree 70.0% Agree

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Do Do you th think our contr trolled syste tem of a public uti tility ty, with th one source contr trolling electr tricity ty ac access, has has served d us us well ll and and will ill cont ntinue inue to do do so? Or that hat techno hnolo logy is is mak aking ing this his mo mode del out utda dated d and nd legislators sho houl uld d ena nact laws tha hat pr promo mote inno nnovation n and nd compe mpetition n to to meet t our energy needs?

14.5% 77.5% 8.0% O NE SO U R C E INNOV./ C OMP . D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= One Source Innov./ Comp. DK/Refused Republican 173 17.3% 75.7% 6.9% Democrat 243 11.5% 79.0% 9.5% Unaffiliated 168 16.7% 76.8% 6.5% Vote Democratic 282 10.3% 82.3% 7.4% Vote Republican 242 19.8% 71.1% 9.1% Vote Undecided 76 13.2% 80.3% 6.6% Urban 92 14.1% 76.1% 9.8% Suburban 241 14.5% 76.8% 8.7% Rural 247 13.4% 81.0% 5.7% N= One Source Innov./ Comp. DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 8.3% 87.5% 4.2% NC 6-10 Years 38 10.5% 84.2% 5.3% NC 11-20 Years 94 12.8% 78.7% 8.5% NC>20 Years 217 13.4% 78.3% 8.3% NC Entire Life 211 17.5% 74.4% 8.1% Male 282 16.7% 74.8% 8.5% Female 318 12.6% 79.9% 7.5% Suburban White Female 93 10.8% 83.9% 5.4%

2019 Data Set

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Do Do y you t think s solar a and w wind en ener ergy gy b bring v g ver ery l little b e ben enefit t to o

  • ur en

ener ergy gy s supply a and are just feel good programs promoted by politici cians? Or that solar and wind energy represent new tech chnological advance ces in energy product ction and should be expanded ed to hel elp mee eet our future e en ener ergy gy need eeds?

15.7% 76.7% 7.7% L I T T L E BEN EF I T P R O D U C TIV E/EXP A ND D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Little Benefit Productive/Expand DK/Refused Republican 173 28.3% 65.9% 5.8% Democrat 243 5.3% 88.1% 6.6% Unaffiliated 168 17.9% 71.4% 10.7% Vote Democratic 282 2.8% 91.5% 5.7% Vote Republican 242 31.4% 57.4% 11.2% Vote Undecided 76 13.2% 82.9% 3.9% Urban 92 6.5% 88.0% 5.4% Suburban 241 17.4% 74.7% 7.9% Rural 247 16.6% 76.1% 7.3% N= Little Benefit Productive/Expand DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 8.3% 91.7% 0.0% NC 6-10 Years 38 13.2% 84.2% 2.6% NC 11-20 Years 94 12.8% 83.0% 4.3% NC>20 Years 217 15.7% 72.4% 12.0% NC Entire Life 211 17.1% 77.7% 5.2% Male 282 21.3% 70.9% 7.8% Female 318 10.7% 81.8% 7.5% Suburban White Female 93 12.9% 83.9% 3.2%

2019 Data Set

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Do you think our cu current system is the best way to ensure our a stable supply of elect ctrici city to meet all of our state’s energy needs? Or that we need to modernize

  • ur cu

current system by relying more on micr crogrids and renewable source ces such ch as wind and so solar?

16.8% 74.7% 8.5% C U R R ENT FINE NEED MO D ERNIZE D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Current Fine Need Modernize DK/Refused Republican 173 25.4% 61.8% 12.7% Democrat 243 10.7% 84.4% 4.9% Unaffiliated 168 17.9% 73.2% 8.9% Vote Democratic 282 7.4% 88.7% 3.9% Vote Republican 242 29.8% 56.6% 13.6% Vote Undecided 76 10.5% 80.3% 9.2% Urban 92 7.6% 85.9% 6.5% Suburban 241 17.4% 73.4% 9.1% Rural 247 19.8% 71.7% 8.5% N= Current Fine Need Modernize DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 12.5% 87.5% 0.0% NC 6-10 Years 38 18.4% 76.3% 5.3% NC 11-20 Years 94 10.6% 84.0% 5.3% NC>20 Years 217 16.1% 73.3% 10.6% NC Entire Life 211 19.4% 71.6% 9.0% Male 282 20.2% 69.9% 9.9% Female 318 13.8% 78.9% 7.2% Suburban White Female 93 10.8% 79.6% 9.7%

2019 Data Set

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Cu Currently y NC C law w allows s a homeown wner or busi siness ss to generate and store their own wn energy, but are pr prohi hibi bited d to se sell the heir excess ss po power to ano nothe her busi busine ness, ss, even n one ne located d in n the he sa same busi busine ness ss compl plex. Do Do you

  • u think legislator
  • rs shou
  • uld change this law and allow the sale of
  • f excess power and provide con
  • nsumers

mo more e choic ice? e?

71.8% 19.8% 8.3% C HA NG E L A W ST A Y T HE SA ME D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Change Law Stay the Same DK/Refused Republican 173 71.7% 22.5% 5.8% Democrat 243 67.9% 21.4% 10.7% Unaffiliated 168 77.4% 14.9% 7.7% Vote Democratic 282 73.0% 18.8% 8.2% Vote Republican 242 70.7% 22.3% 7.0% Vote Undecided 76 71.1% 15.8% 13.2% Urban 92 73.9% 15.2% 10.9% Suburban 241 75.1% 16.6% 8.3% Rural 247 70.4% 22.7% 6.9% N= Change Law Stay the Same DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 54.1% 41.7% 4.2% NC 6-10 Years 38 73.7% 15.8% 10.5% NC 11-20 Years 94 81.9% 12.8% 5.3% NC>20 Years 217 77.9% 14.3% 7.8% NC Entire Life 211 64.9% 25.6% 9.5% Male 282 77.7% 17.0% 5.3% Female 318 66.7% 22.3% 11.0% Suburban White Female 93 77.4% 14.0% 8.6%

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Ju Just rec ecen ently, Gov

  • ver

ernor

  • r Coop

Cooper er annou

  • unced

ed a 300 300 thou

  • usand-do

dollar llar plan plan to study udy br bring inging ing wi wind-tu turbine components ts manufactu turing to to North th Carolina to to support t off-sh shore re wind farm rm de develo lopme pment

  • nt. Do you

u ag agree or dis disag agree wit ith h the he Governo nor that hat No North h Car arolina lina sho hould uld be be lo looking ing for way ays to enhanc nhance wind ind tur urbine bine compo pone nent nts manuf anufac actur uring ing?

72.3% 20.7% 7.0% A G R EE D ISA G REE D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Agree Disagree DK/Refused Republican 173 53.8% 36.4% 9.8% Democrat 243 86.0% 9.1% 4.9% Unaffiliated 168 71.4% 21.4% 7.1% Vote Democratic 282 90.0% 5.0% 5.0% Vote Republican 242 52.1% 39.7% 8.3% Vote Undecided 76 71.1% 18.4% 10.5% Urban 92 79.3% 17.4% 3.3% Suburban 241 74.3% 19.1% 6.6% Rural 247 69.2% 23.5% 7.3% N= Agree Disagree DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 75.0% 25.0% 0.0% NC 6-10 Years 38 73.7% 23.7% 2.6% NC 11-20 Years 94 80.9% 14.9% 4.3% NC>20 Years 217 70.0% 22.6% 7.4% NC Entire Life 211 70.1% 21.3% 8.5% Male 282 69.9% 24.1% 6.0% Female 318 74.5% 17.6%

  • 7. 9%

Suburban White Female 93 82.8% 11.8% 5.4%

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Ad Advancem emen ents in batter ery capacity now make e it affor

  • rdable

e for

  • r ren

enewable e prod

  • ducer

ers to

  • stor
  • re

e el elect ectrici city, improving rel eliability and lower ering costs. Utility companies es see ee this as co competition and want to stop this practice. Do you think renewable energy co companies sh should be allowed to store their r energy to better r compete against local utilities? s?

83.5% 10.2% 6.3% A L L O W D O N'T A LLO W D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Allow Don't Allow DK/Refused Republican 173 85.0% 8.1% 6.9% Democrat 243 79.4% 12.8% 7.8% Unaffiliated 168 88.1% 8.9% 3.0% Vote Democratic 282 85.1% 9.2% 5.7% Vote Republican 242 82.2% 11.6% 6.2% Vote Undecided 76 81.6% 9.2% 9.2% Urban 92 81.5% 10.9% 7.6% Suburban 241 87.6% 7.5% 5.0% Rural 247 84.6% 10.5% 4.9% N= Allow Don't Allow DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 70.8% 20.8% 8.3% NC 6-10 Years 38 94.7% 5.3% 0.0% NC 11-20 Years 94 94.7% 1.1% 4.3% NC>20 Years 217 87.1% 7.4% 5.5% NC Entire Life 211 78.2% 13.7% 8.1% Male 282 86.9% 9.2% 3.9% Female 318 80.5% 11.0% 8.5% Suburban White Female 93 90.3% 3.2% 6.5%

slide-29
SLIDE 29

All things being equal, if elect ctions were held today, are you more likely to vote for a Democr cratic c ca candidate or Republica can ca candidate for the North Carolina State Legi Legislature? e?

47.0% 40.3% 12.7% D EMO C RA TIC R EP U BL I C A N D K/REFUSED

N=600

N= Democratic Republican DK/Refused Republican 173 6.9% 82.1% 11.0% Democrat 243 81.9% 7.8% 10.3% Unaffiliated 168 36.9% 46.4% 16.7% Vote Democratic 282 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% Vote Republican 242 0.0% 100.0% 0.0% Vote Undecided 76 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% Urban 92 62.0% 22.8% 15.2% Suburban 241 48.5% 39.0% 12.4% Rural 247 36.7% 49.4% 10.9% N= Democratic Republican DK/Refused NC <5 Years 24 58.3% 25.0% 16.7% NC 6-10 Years 38 47.4% 36.8% 15.8% NC 11-20 Years 94 58.5% 30.9% 10.6% NC>20 Years 217 45.6% 44.2% 10.1% NC Entire Life 211 41.7% 43.1% 15.2% Male 282 36.2% 48.9% 14.9% Female 318 56.6% 32.7% 10.7% Suburban White Female 93 54.8% 32.3% 12.9%

2019 Data Set

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Tr Trump vs. Bid iden

N= Trump Biden Undecided Republican 173 80.9% 11.0% 8.1% Democrat 243 9.5% 83.1% 7.4% Unaffiliated 168 47.0% 44.6% 8.3% Urban 92 23.9% 65.2% 10.9% Suburban 241 37.8% 53.1% 9.1% Rural 247 51.4% 43.7% 4.9% Suburban White Female 93 32.3% 61.3% 6.5% N= Trump Biden Undecided NC <5 Years 24 20.8% 62.5% 16.7% NC 6-10 Years 38 34.2% 55.3% 10.5% NC 11-20 Years 94 30.9% 61.7% 7.4% NC>20 Years 217 44.7% 47.9% 7.4% NC Entire Life 211 45.5% 46.9% 7.6% Male 282 50.4% 38.7% 11.0% Female 318 32.4% 61.6% 6.0%

40.8% 36.2% 50.8% 41.3% 8.3% T RU MP D EF. TRUMP BID EN D EF. BID EN U N D EC I D ED

N=600

1.8% 90.9% 0.4% 83.5% 94.0% 5.4% 81.9% 1.7% 4.3% 3.7% V O T E D EM O C R A T V O T E R EP U BL I C A N

Trump

  • Def. Trump

Biden

  • Def. Biden

Undecided

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Tr Trump vs. San anders

N= Trump Sanders Undecided Republican 173 83.2% 8.7% 8.1% Democrat 243 12.3% 74.9% 12.8% Unaffiliated 168 50.6% 38.1% 11.3% Urban 92 26.1% 54.3% 19.6% Suburban 241 42.3% 48.1% 9.5% Rural 247 52.6% 37.7% 970.0% Suburban White Female 93 35.5% 54.8% 9.7% N= Trump Sanders Undecided NC <5 Years 24 20.8% 58.3% 20.8% NC 6-10 Years 38 31.6% 52.6% 15.8% NC 11-20 Years 94 30.9% 57.4% 11.7% NC>20 Years 217 47.5% 42.4% 10.1% NC Entire Life 211 51.2% 37.9% 10.9% Male 282 54.3% 34.0% 11.7% Female 318 34.3% 54.1% 11.6%

43.7% 38.2% 44.7% 34.7% 11.7% T RU MP D EF. TRUMP SA ND ER S D EF. SA ND ERS U N D EC I D ED

N=600

2.5% 94.6% 0.7% 86.4% 87.2% 2.9% 69.1% 1.2% 10.3% 2.5% V OT E DE MOC R AT V OT E R E PUBL IC AN

Trump

  • Def. Trump

Sanders

  • Def. Sanders

Undecided

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Ke Key Findings

  • For the first time, more Unaffiliated voters described themselves as

moderate instead of conservative. GOP candidates will have to work harder to build a winning coalition, especially in the suburbs.

  • Democrats are not without their problems. Registration numbers

continue to erode and the Party’s drift to the left will only benefit Republicans.

  • Five-year trend data on all clean energy issues show overwhelming

support for wind, solar and waste to energy technologies. The issue strength is based in technology and modernization.

  • Over half of the voters who favor a GOP candidate for the state legislature

agree with Governor Cooper’s effort to bring wind-turbine manufacturing to North Carolina.

  • Support for natural gas pipeline construction has increased overall to

62%. Republicans are the strongest supporters (81.5%), followed by Unaffiliated voters (62.5%). Democrats are split on the issue.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Ke Key Findings

  • North Carolina voters clearly want more competition and more

consumer choices for purchasing their electricity. Keeping the status quo is supported by only 14.5% of all voters.

  • North Carolina voters understand that technology is changing the

world and they see clean energy alternatives as new technology.

  • While some support renewables because they are seen as beneficial

to the environment, support is driven by economics and free-market choices.

  • Renewable clean energy technology is a blue-sky issue for

conservatives, they just don’t need to be flying a Boeing 737-max.

  • However, it can be a slippery slope for Democrats if they chose to

drive on the environmental front instead of the economic issue set. Governor Cooper’s efforts on wind development is a good example of the right way for a Democrat.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Demographic Ove verview of Surve vey (N=600)

15.3% Urban 40.2% Suburban 41.2% Rural 25.0% Cell Phone 75.0% Landline 47.0% Male 53.0% Female 7.5% Under $20,000 11.0% $20,000-$40,000 13.0% $40,000-$60,000 17.5% $60,000-$100,000 11.8% $100,000-$150,000 10.3% More Than $150,00

31.3% RDU 27.0% Charlotte 17.7% Triad 5.3% Wilmington 10.2% East 8.5% West

35.2% Entire Life 36.2% + 20 Years 15.7% 11-20 Years 6.3% 6-10 Years 4.0% < 5 Years 22.0 % Post Graduate 34.0% College Degree 24.3% Some College 13.3%High School Degree 1.7% Some High School 71.2% White 19.3% Black 1.3% Hispanic 0.5% Asian 4.0% Other 29.0% 65+ 24.8% - 55-64 Yrs. Old 20.5% - 41-54 Yrs. Old 18.0% - 26-40 Yrs. Old 3.8% 18-25 Yrs. Old 28.8% Republican 40.5% Democratic 28.0% Unaffiliated