Emergency Disconnect Procedures: Industry Approaches to DP Drift-Off - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

emergency disconnect procedures industry approaches to dp
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Emergency Disconnect Procedures: Industry Approaches to DP Drift-Off - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Emergency Disconnect Procedures: Industry Approaches to DP Drift-Off Analysis James N. Brekke, P.E. Account Manager, Offshore Energy Project Development American Bureau of Shipping BSEE Standards Workshop May 8, 2015


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Emergency Disconnect Procedures: Industry Approaches to DP Drift-Off Analysis

James N. Brekke, P.E.

Account Manager, Offshore Energy Project Development American Bureau of Shipping BSEE Standards Workshop – May 8, 2015

slide-2
SLIDE 2

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Preview

 Background on DP Drillship Operations  DP Watch Circles – Emergency Disconnect  Drift-off Analysis Techniques  Operations  Conclusions

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Drillship Operations

Drilling Riser Blow Out Preventer Casing DP Thrusters Derrick Heave Compensator Rig Floor Riser Tensioners

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Drilling Riser Management

 Objective:

 Protect the vessel, riser and well  Establish limits on operations

 Scope:

 Riser deployment  Riser tensioning  Emergency disconnect  Riser recoil  Storm hang-off

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Emergency Disconnect

 What is emergency disconnect?  How often does it happen?  Allowable limits:

 Conductor pipe – bending stress  Wellhead – bending moment  Riser bottom flex joint – limiting angle  Riser top flex joint – limiting angle, moonpool contact  Riser slip joint – stroke limits  Riser tensioners – stroke limits

 How are these managed? Watch Circles and Drift-Off Analysis.

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

,

.....

Drift off analysis results

\.

,J

n

EDS 90 sec

,

.....

Time

r

"

r

" Yellow POD

>

Red Alert

>

Alert

I

Offset

I

Offset

"-

.,J

"-

~

\.

~

I

~1 ~1

Tpod = t (sec) T

RED= t- EDS Time (sec)

T

YELLOW = t- EDS Time (sec) - 90 sec

Watch Circles: Concept

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Watch Circles

 Thresholds that are color-coded yellow and red  Established using drift-off analysis  Based on scenarios of drift-off under total loss of power, drive-off,

degraded thrusters, or other events

 Offset definitions:

 Point of disconnect (POD) – offset at which any allowable limit is

first exceeded

 Red – offset at which the emergency disconnect sequence (EDS)

must be activated. Drillpipe would be sheared during EDS.

 Yellow – offset at which preparations begin prior to EDS

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

320 310 300

Watch Circles: Compass View

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

600 500

§ 400

'ui

...

:::::l (.)

X

w

Drift Off Analysis - Vessel Excursion From Well Centre

  • Vessel Excursion - 10 ppg Mud Weight & 1455 k/p Top Tension

POINT OF DISCONNECT

469 - -

  • a> 300

RED ALERT OFFSET ~

281 -

  • ~

2

C

2 200

·;::

I

100

70sec

I

1•

I

187

0 L--~==--+-----+---+----+--+----+-- 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240

Time (sec) 257

260 280 300

Drift-Off Analysis Results

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Drift-Off Analysis Techniques

 Fully coupled analysis (state-of-the-art)

 Riser analysis fully coupled with vessel analysis  Includes riser restoring force, riser dynamics

– Ref: O’Sullivan, Soles, Dib, “Fully Coupled EDS/Drift-off Analysis for a Harsh Environment Deepwater Site” OMAE 2004 – 51631

 Uncoupled techniques

 Vessel drift-off analysis without riser, static riser analysis  Vessel drift-off analysis without riser, dynamic riser analysis

 Fixed offset

 Constant watch circle sizes, typically based on % water depth

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Operations

 Dynamic Watch Circles (updates on the rig every 6 hours)

 Prevailing or forecast weather  Changes in riser top tension or drilling mud weight  Can use coupled or uncoupled drift-off analysis

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

_,.

I\.)

w

~

I I I I I

1430 3/27 1230 3/28 1200 3/29 2200 3/30 2200 3/30 2100 4/1 2100 4/2 2200 4/3 2130 4/4 0300 4/6 0300 4/7 0900 4/8 1500 4/9 1500 4/10 0900 4/12 0900 4/13

I

~ I I

::0

"&' ,, ,,

CD

C C

Q.

'< '< r

:;E

() ()

3

r

r-t-

3

C C

,,

"O "O ><

r-t- CD CD CD

,,

Q. Q. Q. ><

::0

"&'

CD CD

Q. Q.

r

:;E

3

r

r-t

3

;::;:

Fixed vs. Dynamic (Fully Coupled)

Courtesy of Wood Group Kenny

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

zyxwvutsrqponmlkjihgfedcbaZYXWVUTSRQPONMLKJIHGFEDCBA Conclusions

 Use of fully-coupled drift-off analysis makes a difference;

providing a more realistic solution

 Regular updates of watch circles also make a difference,

accounting for:

 Prevailing weather  “What-if” forecast weather  Changes in top tension and mud weight

 Fully-coupled drift-off analysis is referenced as part of marine

drilling riser assessments in ISO 13624-1 and ISO 13624-2.

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

www.eagle.org